Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 28 of 28

Thread: General George Armstrong Singer, Lieut. A. Mendelson and the Indians.

  1. #21
    Pahrump pete is not Rob Singer.
    I was talking about and did read "The Undeniable Truth about Video Poker recently.

    The book is written for the beginning player and is very mellow and tame. There are no outrageous claims made by Singer about winning.

    Rob says his approach may not be for everyone and he will not promise positive results as others have.

    Singer says you have to rely on knowing when to quit and goals can vary. Consistently profitable playing is attained by Luck, discipline and common sense.

    Singer doesn't explain his systems in this book. Perhaps they would have too overwhelming for a new player to take on.

    From the little I know of his strategies, I don't have the bankroll for them. However the short time I have been determined to keep more of my winnings instead of giving it back in the same session has made for a much more enjoyable casino experience.

    That's all folks.

  2. #22
    First, it’s obvious how Kewlj is obsessed with this place, one of the only places he could still post at. Other than Alan, who else swears to leave this place only to return within two weeks at least 10 times so far? That should tell you out of the gate a few of his wires are crossed. AP’s are all over Alan for this move, but never say a peep about Kewlj doing it.

    Now he starts complaining about new sign ups who don’t agree with his math standards or their handles, with suggestions their sock puppets. He also exposes how the click pm each other making sure they join each other’s attack on something that might strengthen their argument of bullshit. We’ve seen this more than once already with Reditz. Not a single word when new sign ups came here praising him. I brought up Bob21 as a sock puppet for Kewlj simply because I couldn’t believe anyone could pop-in and just start praising his past endless bullshit, along with sounding like he was all-in on sucking this queer’s cock.

    Then Kewlj wants to give Dan a lesson and a wake up call on how to run his forum. Why? Simply because new posters are not for a better phrase, in his camp.

    He asks others for honest results. For the record shithead, this is a 99.9% anonymous forum. You or anyone else posting what is being claimed as honest results are meaningless for everyone including you without actual confirmed facts. Yet, you want others to share their alleged honest experiences with you because you’re interested. You’re not interested in hearing anything but what you believe. That has been proven a thousand times here already with you. What you really want is nothing but another one of your one way because you say so arguments.

    This forum would eventually grow without you always creating arguments with anyone who doubts your bullshit from the endless fairytales you print here.

    Why don’t you tie all your cash in a rag, then connect it to a wooden pole, grab a big cardboard box and get back under the tunnel.

  3. #23
    [QUOTE=kewlJ;85226]Slingshot, "If only I had stopped when I was ahead" is a statement heard in every casino hundreds of times a day. Every losing player says that.

    But anyway, I want to clarify what you are saying. I understand you play lower limits, but you are saying that proportionally, you win the same as Singer claims. That if you were playing higher limits you would have made buckets of money? I need to clarify this before anything else.[/QUOTbill,
    I don't speculate. But did you get what I said? Almost EVERY trip it wasn't unusual to be ahead over $100. These last few weeks have been unusually good, as my $165 Chrysler battery $100 replacement rear window brake light to pass inspection. $80 sticker and inspection fee were paid for by winnings. And that doesn't include the $300 anniversary celebration with my wife. Yeah- the money's gone now, but the IMPORTANT things in life are OK. And FORMER losers are the ones who learn from the past and fight to quit when it's time. Just one other memory came to mind. I once saved enough for one session to advance to dollars. As I was on my 3rd $100 bill, I noticed how uncomfortable I felt knowing this session was gonna be the last. Well, long story short-I hit quads on ddbp for a relieving $80 win. At first I was happy, but then I thought hey- I could a done this on quarters without all the stress. I won't do it again unless I have the proper bankroll.

  4. #24
    Here' a Singer mini system:

    5 cent
    10 cent
    25 cent
    50 cent
    $1
    $5

    Bankroll for the play would be $20 + $40 + $100 + $200 + $400 + $2000 = $2760

    Win goal would be $120 which is directly proportional to Singer's win goal.

    According to Singer he rarely if ever needed the last bet level, $100. So you shouldn't need the last bet level, $5, on this progression. That means you could put this play down with just $760.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  5. #25
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Here' a Singer mini system:

    5 cent
    10 cent
    25 cent
    50 cent
    $1
    $5

    Bankroll for the play would be $20 + $40 + $100 + $200 + $400 + $2000 = $2760

    Win goal would be $120 which is directly proportional to Singer's win goal.

    According to Singer he rarely if ever needed the last bet level, $100. So you shouldn't need the last bet level, $5, on this progression. That means you could put this play down with just $760.
    Correct- and I've stopped at dimes with $85 win. Why? This is the single play strategy and I'd been there over an hour and had to leave. This would be a great strategy for keybangers as it is very time consuming. My favorite is artt strategy for both free play and regular play. Of course, on free play, the bonus poker part of the strategy is key.
    Oh, one last thought. There IS a $2 session after the $1 session. Some machines have 10 credits at $1-or 20 credits at 50¢.
    Last edited by slingshot; 03-19-2019 at 07:52 AM.

  6. #26
    Thank you Mickey & Sling for that info. Definitely interested in a small test. Great.

  7. #27
    Originally Posted by slingshot View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Here' a Singer mini system:

    5 cent
    10 cent
    25 cent
    50 cent
    $1
    $5

    Bankroll for the play would be $20 + $40 + $100 + $200 + $400 + $2000 = $2760

    Win goal would be $120 which is directly proportional to Singer's win goal.

    According to Singer he rarely if ever needed the last bet level, $100. So you shouldn't need the last bet level, $5, on this progression. That means you could put this play down with just $760.
    Correct- and I've stopped at dimes with $85 win. Why? This is the single play strategy and I'd been there over an hour and had to leave. This would be a great strategy for keybangers as it is very time consuming. My favorite is artt strategy for both free play and regular play. Of course, on free play, the bonus poker part of the strategy is key.
    Oh, one last thought. There IS a $2 session after the $1 session. Some machines have 10 credits at $1-or 20 credits at 50¢.
    I was thinking of five-coin machines. The Singer progression looks like this:

    1,2,5,10,25,100

    The mini progression I put up looks like this:

    1,2,5,10,20,100

    The only minor difference is the Singer 25 level and the Mini 20 level. If you go from $1 denom to $2 denom it would only be 40X on the last level.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  8. #28
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by slingshot View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Here' a Singer mini system:

    5 cent
    10 cent
    25 cent
    50 cent
    $1
    $5

    Bankroll for the play would be $20 + $40 + $100 + $200 + $400 + $2000 = $2760

    Win goal would be $120 which is directly proportional to Singer's win goal.

    According to Singer he rarely if ever needed the last bet level, $100. So you shouldn't need the last bet level, $5, on this progression. That means you could put this play down with just $760.
    Correct- and I've stopped at dimes with $85 win. Why? This is the single play strategy and I'd been there over an hour and had to leave. This would be a great strategy for keybangers as it is very time consuming. My favorite is artt strategy for both free play and regular play. Of course, on free play, the bonus poker part of the strategy is key.
    Oh, one last thought. There IS a $2 session after the $1 session. Some machines have 10 credits at $1-or 20 credits at 50¢.
    I was thinking of five-coin machines. The Singer progression looks like this:

    1,2,5,10,25,100

    The mini progression I put up looks like this:

    1,2,5,10,20,100

    The only minor difference is the Singer 25 level and the Mini 20 level. If you go from $1 denom to $2 denom it would only be 40X on the last level.
    Thanks. The only machines left here are 5-25-50¢ with 5-25 credits. So $2.50 would be my max. Then there's the $1 machines and $5 machines on high limit floor.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Trump Salutes N. Korean General
    By Half Smoke in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 07-05-2018, 07:58 AM
  2. Caesars Palace releases George Burns chips
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 08-22-2017, 08:26 PM
  3. Is Rob Singer Really George Costanza?
    By redietz in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-17-2013, 07:38 AM
  4. Answers About Dice Control; general and personal
    By FrankScoblete in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-09-2013, 06:18 PM
  5. Mendelson Math
    By redietz in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 11-10-2012, 07:45 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •