Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
Originally Posted by MaxPen View Post
Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post

Maybe a good way of staying under the radar just dealing with accumulated credits but I don't know about 3 mil in a year. That would be a lot of play.
My understanding is you are not limited to one collection. Get a 4oak on quarter BPD. Switch to $1 and collect a few times and move on to another place. I could do 10k+ a day and still wonder what to do with all my spare time. With .25-$1 I would never even hit a taxable. I'd much prefer .50-$2 though.
,

After giving it some thought, if I wanted to avoid W2-G's, I would play 9/6 Jacks on a machine that had a denom spread from $1 to $10. At $1 denom the straight pays $20, flush $30, full house $45. I would activate the bug on these three hands making them pay, $200, $300, $450. All three of these hands have a frequency of about 90. So it would take just a short period of time to rack up a reasonable amount of money with no W2-G's. Percentagewise you would be at 364%. I wouldn't activate the double up bug on 4 of a Kind or the Straight Flush and the only W2-G I would get would be for a royal. Would I activate the double up bug on that royal? That would sure as hell be tempting.
Who cares about the payback of the game your playing. I will play 3/2/1/1/1/1 Jacks with this glitch. That aside, my initial response was to Rob when he claimed playing a 4:1 ratio on this play was something one would not do. Why not? Admittedly I would prefer .25 - $2 BPD. You could make $3million+ per year without even trying and hardly draw any attention with the huge rotation of casinos that had the game available. This along with Rob never residing in Vegas at the time would be my argument for why he never played it.