Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
In my research since the IGT fix, I've found two very low limit machines at Az. Indian casinos that had the flaw, and when I saw they worked I left without cashing out.
Thank you for this statement Rob. This is Exactly one of the possibilities that I have raised. After the fact, that you located a machine or machines that had the capability and were then able to learn the ins and out and acquire the information that is so impressing mickeycrimm. Just one of numerous possibilities.

It is just a fact that Rob having this information NOW, does not prove Rob knew and/or played this play for years to the tune of 3 million dollars and he has offered nothing that does prove that. So why is mickey getting so bent out of shape about people deciding for themselves at to Rob's credibility.
How dumb. I've looked for this play every time I've gone to casinos since it got stopped by Kane.
Dumb? I simply raised the possibility of one way you could have come into this information without knowing and playing the play beforehand. One of numerous ways. And you seemingly confirmed it.

I am not going to get into all this back and forth again. Here is the simple fact. You claim you made this play for years to the tune of 3 million plus. But you have offered no supporting evidence of this. If you have some, please, please offer it and end this for good. In the absence of that and since there is other possible ways you could know this information, why should each of us not all be free to decide for ourselves how credible we find you?

I mean this is basically the Singer system argument all over again. You offer no mathematical way of how you turn a -EV game to a long-term winning game. I have begged you time and time again, to offer something anything that makes this possible and you have given nothing. Just name-calling and attacks.

In the absence of proof, we are all free to decide how credible we find you.