Originally Posted by
mickeycrimm
]
You aren't giving it any weight at all. It has to be a coincidence to you because that is what supports your pre-drawn narrative.
This is wrong Mickey. YOU are the one with a pre-drawn narrative. You have your reasons for believing Singer based on things he said, I presume. Unless he revealed something to you privately that he and you haven't revealed to the rest of us, I don't see anything that backs up his claim. Or maybe one or two small co-incidenses such as he announced his retirement in 2009?
BUT you have ignored inconsistencies that have raised questions for not just myself but many, even since this claim, sticking with that pre-drawn narrative even in the face of new questions.
I am not going to post quotes from your PM's but I would encourage you to go back and re-read your very first Pm and several other early PM after I joined the site, where you were explaining to me what a liar and manipulator Rob Singer (who I was not familiar with) is and how he never shows proof while demanding from others, never backs down from his lies. and is never to be trusted.
Seems like Rob deciding to make nice with you, has made you forget who you thought Rob is/was. Rob is a great manipulator. And that buttering up act that he did publicly with both you and Axel just prior to this claim going public was the ultimate Singer manipulation play. Rob needs supporters, enablers, for his claims to have any traction. Alan played that role for a long time.
I am not going to keep going back and forth. You are free to believe whatever you like. At the risk of seeing you fly off the handle, I think you are being played Mickey and someday you will look back and acknowledge that. If Singer had this greatest of claims, greatest of AP plays that he had been sitting on, and he KNEW there would be skeptics, as he claims, he would have preserved and provided some supporting documentation. BUT he didn't, just as the 'old mickey' told me privately from day one. He provided no proof and as a matter of fact he claims he destroyed or got rid of the proof. How odd? Do you not find that odd Mick?