movie reco

[tableplay]

My problem with the movie is that it was basically a movie to check all the boxes.
They put women, blacks, homos, Asians, witchcraft, pedophilia... etc. etc. inside of the story.

Great point. The gap widens between what Hollywood wants to show us and what we want to see.

[monet]

Mother Fuckers are bringing back Krull.
I know you liked the new version of DUNE, many people do, I hated it.
(I also paid 30 dollars to own a digital copy cause I'm stoopid like that)
Now this?
They are gonna Fuck it Up bad.
No way it's as good as the original.

"We’ve exclusively learned Warner Bros. is rebooting the 1983 cult classic Krull with J.J. Abrams attached to direct."

Remember now... this is the same director who Fucked Up Star Trek!

[tableplay]

Mother Fuckers are bringing back Krull.
I know you liked the new version of DUNE, many people do, I hated it.
(I also paid 30 dollars to own a digital copy cause I'm stoopid like that)
Now this?
They are gonna Fuck it Up bad.
No way it's as good as the original.

"We’ve exclusively learned Warner Bros. is rebooting the 1983 cult classic Krull with J.J. Abrams attached to direct."

Remember now... this is the same director who Fucked Up Star Trek!

Well the original Dune with Sting was a masterpiece, but yes I did find the new version was pretty good. Well you're spot on with Krull - it was a great movie. It upset me when Roger Ebert and Gene Siskel dissed this movie (please go to 12:33 of the video below) and I'm glad I ignored the review and went to go see it. I would be surprised if the Krull remake is any good for the reason you state - I predict it will be a woke trashfest.
Gottlieb even came out with a Krull pinball machine, but they only made a few of them. I remember they put the pinball machine at some of the theaters' debut of Krull and I had a lot of fun seeing the movie along with playing the Krull pinball machine (https://www.ipdb.org/machine.cgi?id=1397) a little before and more extensively after the movie.

[Keystone]

[QUOTE=tableplay;163466]

Mother Fuckers are bringing back Krull.
I know you liked the new version of DUNE, many people do, I hated it.
(I also paid 30 dollars to own a digital copy cause I'm stoopid like that)
Now this?
They are gonna Fuck it Up bad.
No way it's as good as the original.

"We’ve exclusively learned Warner Bros. is rebooting the 1983 cult classic Krull with J.J. Abrams attached to direct."

Remember now... this is the same director who Fucked Up Star Trek!

Well the original Dune with Sting was a masterpiece, but yes I did find the new version was pretty good. Well you're spot on with Krull - it was a great movie. It upset me when Roger Ebert and Gene Siskel dissed this movie (please go to 12:33 of the video below) and I'm glad I ignored the review and went to go see it. I would be surprised if the Krull remake is any good for the reason you state - I predict it will be a woke trashfest.
Gottlieb even came out with a Krull pinball machine, but they only made a few of them. I remember they put the pinball machine at some of the theaters' debut of Krull and I had a lot of fun seeing the movie along with playing the Krull pinball machine (https://www.ipdb.org/machine.cgi?id=1397) a little before and more extensively after the movie.
[/QUOTE
On this weeks episode of Movie Nights Gone Bad, Mrs Monet returns home early from work and catches her beloved and Tableplay watching queer porn and giving eachother simultaneous hand jobs

[tableplay]

On this weeks episode of Movie Nights Gone Bad, Mrs Monet returns home early from work and catches her beloved and Tableplay watching queer porn and giving eachother simultaneous hand jobs

Kuntstone, your homosexual fantasies, as well as the fact that something as innocuous as movie discussions are enough to cause you to waste some of your life posting your garbage demonstrate what an evil fuck you are. I notice it's always a 3rd person reply since of course you're too much of a pussy to post a direct reply.

[monet]

Alright... I got a bit of a movie recco here for you.
It's called INSIDE (2023)
Willem Dafoe so he makes it good enough to watch.
I wouldn't mind discussing it if you view it.
I don't want to spoil any of it.
I thought it was better than the IMDB and Tomato Reviews suggested.

[tableplay]

Alright... I got a bit of a movie recco here for you.
It's called INSIDE (2023)
Willem Dafoe so he makes it good enough to watch.
I wouldn't mind discussing it if you view it.
I don't want to spoil any of it.
I thought it was better than the IMDB and Tomato Reviews suggested.

Sounds good Monet. This one is already in HD for free, so I will queue it up straight away.
Thanks for the reco.

[tableplay]

Alright... I got a bit of a movie recco here for you.
It's called INSIDE (2023)
Willem Dafoe so he makes it good enough to watch.
I wouldn't mind discussing it if you view it.
I don't want to spoil any of it.
I thought it was better than the IMDB and Tomato Reviews suggested.

I enjoyed the movie. Willem lived up to his stellar acting reputation IMHO. Willem's character Nemo sees himself in the art work of one of the apartment paintings with a long lizard's tongue darting out to the cleaning lady's lizard's tongue (she also was in the artwork). My take on it was that he wasn't hallucinating and that he wasn't hallucinating during some of the other impossible events like when the apartment owner shoved Nemo's head into the sink and caused him to get knocked out for awhile, when he sees the owner's daughter and owner's dog outside the window when it was snowing, when the cleaning lady looks up into the camera to let Nemo know she knows she is being observed by him and can see him through occult means, or when he communicates with the apartment owner during one of his dreams.

Of course the big message here is that most extremely wealthy people are heavily tied to satanism and the makers of the film want to make sure that those people viewing the film that are not part of the Eyes Wide Shut crowd understand this.
I finally got to see what the inside of a 20 million dollar spread looks like thanks to this film.

Thanks again for bringing this movie to my attention.

[monet]

Alright... I got a bit of a movie recco here for you.
It's called INSIDE (2023)
Willem Dafoe so he makes it good enough to watch.
I wouldn't mind discussing it if you view it.
I don't want to spoil any of it.
I thought it was better than the IMDB and Tomato Reviews suggested.

I enjoyed the movie. Willem lived up to his stellar acting reputation IMHO. Willem's character Nemo sees himself in the art work of one of the apartment paintings with a long lizard's tongue darting out to the cleaning lady's lizard's tongue (she also was in the artwork). My take on it was that he wasn't hallucinating and that he wasn't hallucinating during some of the other impossible events like when the apartment owner shoved Nemo's head into the sink and caused him to get knocked out for awhile, when he sees the owner's daughter and owner's dog outside the window when it was snowing, when the cleaning lady looks up into the camera to let Nemo know she knows she is being observed by him and can see him through occult means, or when he communicates with the apartment owner during one of his dreams.

Of course the big message here is that most extremely wealthy people are heavily tied to satanism and the makers of the film want to make sure that those people viewing the film that are not part of the Eyes Wide Shut crowd understand this.
I finally got to see what the inside of a 20 million dollar spread looks like thanks to this film.

Thanks again for bringing this movie to my attention.

Yeah, I think the point of the movie was that the movie is like Art.
It's left up to the viewers interpretation.
I have a lot of different scenarios of what was going on.
I liked the movie.
It was enjoyable for an actual new movie.
Many people hated it but I thought it kept making me think and kept me entertained throughout.
I wonder if any of it was even real.
Could have all been inside his head.
I tend to think he offed himself.
Like he escaped but he escaped through death.
But was that natural death or ego death?
The movie is layered, and nobody's interpretation is right or wrong.
But all and all... entertaining enough for a free viewing.
I enjoyed it more than Mission Impossible 7 so there is that.

[tableplay]

Yeah, I think the point of the movie was that the movie is like Art.
It's left up to the viewers interpretation.
I have a lot of different scenarios of what was going on.
I liked the movie.
It was enjoyable for an actual new movie.
Many people hated it but I thought it kept making me think and kept me entertained throughout.
I wonder if any of it was even real.
Could have all been inside his head.
I tend to think he offed himself.
Like he escaped but he escaped through death.
But was that natural death or ego death?
The movie is layered, and nobody's interpretation is right or wrong.
But all and all... entertaining enough for a free viewing.
I enjoyed it more than Mission Impossible 7 so there is that.

Great take Monet.

Please disregard this if you have already watched the following movie: I watched the martial arts assassin movie King of Killers, but it was mediocre (one of these direct to video deals) so I cannot reco it. That being said, I will see the sequel for continuity purposes if one comes out which is likely. If you can watch it for free and you're bored, there's no reason not to watch it (except that it is very gory at times).