Really, I am just Blackjackpro who just joined yesterday here! I am no one else! I am telling the truth! Please believe me! My name is Jordan Smith and I play Blackjack professionally!
Really, I am just Blackjackpro who just joined yesterday here! I am no one else! I am telling the truth! Please believe me! My name is Jordan Smith and I play Blackjack professionally!
Last edited by Blackjackpro; 07-12-2019 at 12:17 PM.
Sounds legit. What`s the quickest way I can send you a blank check so you can teach me everything I need to know about being a pro?!
Don't get too excited.Originally Posted by SplitFaceDisaster
The only thing you'd likely learn is how to use this;
Rule number one. Do not get to cockyOriginally Posted by SplitFaceDisaster
Rule number 2 do not pull your chips back after betting them. Rule number 3. Have a nice attitude. Rule 4. Do not gamble money that you need. Actually this should be number one, but rule 4 it is at. Rule 5, tip your dealers. Rule 6. Stop playing when you are up. Nothing worse than being up and then ending up down.
This right here is pretty much enough evidence to say you are a fraud.Originally Posted by BlackjackproRule number one. Do not get to cockyOriginally Posted by SplitFaceDisaster
Rule number 2 do not pull your chips back after betting them. Rule number 3. Have a nice attitude. Rule 4. Do not gamble money that you need. Actually this should be number one, but rule 4 it is at. Rule 5, tip your dealers. Rule 6. Stop playing when you are up. Nothing worse than being up and then ending up down.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
If you take the standard blackjack game, let's say 6 decks, with about a .5% house advantage (or .5% -EV) and apply your rules 1 through 4 & 6, you end up exactly the same place, -.5% expected value or expected loss. These rules change nothing. Still -EV. Still losing.Originally Posted by Blackjackpro
Add in your rule #5 and you have changed things. it now becomes an even greater -EV game. (bigger disadvantage to over come).
So Mr blackjack pro, same question I asked Mr. Singer for years concerning his VP system: Can you give us anything....anything at all that tells us how you change the negative expectation play to positive expectation play, which is what you would need to be a "blackjack pro".
Always split 10sOriginally Posted by kewlJIf you take the standard blackjack game, let's say 6 decks, with about a .5% house advantage (or .5% -EV) and apply your rules 1 through 4 & 6, you end up exactly the same place, -.5% expected value or expected loss. These rules change nothing. Still -EV. Still losing.Originally Posted by Blackjackpro
Add in your rule #5 and you have changed things. it now becomes an even greater -EV game. (bigger disadvantage to over come).
So Mr blackjack pro, same question I asked Mr. Singer for years concerning his VP system: Can you give us anything....anything at all that tells us how you change the negative expectation play to positive expectation play, which is what you would need to be a "blackjack pro".
Take off that stupid mask you big baby.
Just for fun, I would like to hear you expand on this one. Stop limits.Originally Posted by BlackjackproAre you stopping for that session? for the day? for the next week? forever?
3 of those 4 answers changes nothing as to what will occur next round played. Only stopping forever preserves anything.
Stop playing for the whole DAY that you are there when you are up.Originally Posted by kewlJJust for fun, I would like to hear you expand on this one. Stop limits.Originally Posted by Blackjackpro
3 of those 4 answers changes nothing as to what will occur next round played. Only stopping forever preserves anything.
What areas of the country do you find to have the most opportunities, blackjack pro ?Originally Posted by BlackjackproStop playing for the whole DAY that you are there when you are up.Originally Posted by kewlJJust for fun, I would like to hear you expand on this one. Stop limits.Originally Posted by Blackjackpro
3 of those 4 answers changes nothing as to what will occur next round played. Only stopping forever preserves anything.
Are you a counter?Originally Posted by BlackjackproStop playing for the whole DAY that you are there when you are up.Originally Posted by kewlJJust for fun, I would like to hear you expand on this one. Stop limits.Originally Posted by Blackjackpro
3 of those 4 answers changes nothing as to what will occur next round played. Only stopping forever preserves anything.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Anthony Curtis looked good in the 80's
This is exactly the kind of thread Nathan would start and say.Originally Posted by Blackjackpro
how is it that once you got suspended from WOV you found this site so quick?
I love it. BlackjackPro catches multiple fish on the the same cast line.
NOT! we all know. It will be fun to see if 'she' can come up with any answers.Originally Posted by MaxPenI love it. BlackjackPro catches multiple fish on the the same cast line.
It is weird. Blackjackpro seemed like the run of the mill baiting troll. They say the most stupid things. If someone wanted to pretend to be a card counter, you'd really come up with better examples almost guaranteed. His complaint about his 20 getting beat. haha. Who would fall for this? If this person is really trying to fool anyone coming off as a counter, they are simple. Yet all the APs seem to think this person is legitimately trying to convince others. No clue.
Oops, I got distracted and forgot to ban blackjackpro.
Let me go do that now...
Check out my poker forum, and weekly internet radio show at http://pokerfraudalert.com
I vote for another chance too. We can't let Nathan get away with convincing everyone she is Blackjackpro.
For those that care, (which is probably few of you), "Nathan", (AKA Tasha), revealed today that all of these were sock puppets of hers:
Alexander
BlackjackPro
Kentry
Luscious Sweet
Dean
Nelvin
Nathan
Knathan
Kind of interesting that she was supposed to give ALL alias she has or are using, yet Tasha wasn't on the list. Hmmmm
And exactly where was this revealed at?
It's probably hard to keep track and remember all the names you ever used, I can see how she would forget one. After reading her other posts on the other thread I almost have to believe someone else was using her account. The post just didn't jive with her consistent personality that she's shown over multiple usernames and multiple forums over a significant amount of time. Either that or she's absolutely been trolling us the entire time. Don't get me wrong, I think she puts on an act sometimes, however, I really do believe it's not all an act And she's just messed up.
I highly suggest Dan druff ban her accounts on here until that's figured out, but that's just my opinion.
Last edited by AxelWolf; 07-26-2019 at 12:35 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote