So, just found out I've been impersonated!

[Blackjackpro]

Some idiot on Gambling Forums impersonated me! The BlackjackPro on Gambling Forums is NOT ME. That BlackjackPro on Gambling Forums is a FAKE! FAKE! That loser even linked to a thread I started on Blackjack Forums as if they were me. This is the equivalent of identity theft of not outright identity theft.

[kewlJ]

Some idiot on Gambling Forums impersonated me! The BlackjackPro on Gambling Forums is NOT ME. That BJPro is a FAKE! FAKE!

Good grief is THAT place still alive?

[kewlJ]

Some idiot on Gambling Forums impersonated me! The BlackjackPro on Gambling Forums is NOT ME. That BJPro is a FAKE! FAKE!

Good grief is THAT place still alive?

So in taking a quick look....you have some credibility with this claim. Yea Nathan!

GamblingForums has from it's inceptions stolen threads and posts word for word from other forums in an attempt to generate traffic, discussion and credibility. Many of the early posters, known gambling people never really posted there, but just had posts copied there.

And it looks like there was a rash of this today as a number of threads and posts from Norm's BlackjacktheForum were "stolen" and copied there. It is highly unlikely that Freighman, Zeebabar, Soxfan all from Norm's site, signed up and posted exact threads and posts that were posted at Norms site. Yours appears to be just another that was stolen from Norm's site, where you did post it.

I have used the word "stolen" several times. I don't know how copyright works with posts and threads, but you can bet your ass that when Mr. Wattenberger, gets knowledge of this his blood pressure will fly through the roof. He is always babbling on about copyright infringement. So Norm, if you are reading, just relax. Nobody takes this dying gamblingforums seriously anyway.

edit: actually, all of these new threads/posts have a "source" link, linking Norm's forum as the original source, including yours blowjobpro. That is new for this site when stealing threads to start traffic. Perhaps Norm's threats have worked. I wonder if this will appease him.

[smurgerburger]

Some idiot on Gambling Forums impersonated me! The BlackjackPro on Gambling Forums is NOT ME. That BlackjackPro on Gambling Forums is a FAKE! FAKE! That loser even linked to a thread I started on Blackjack Forums as if they were me. This is the equivalent of identity theft of not outright identity theft.

Blackjackpro, I have a dark suspicion...what if Nathan is the one pretending to be you?

A lot of people seem to think you're Nathan because you have a similar manner of expression, but maybe that's just because Nathan is imitating you? After all Nathan has already admitted to having multiple identities.

I hope you keep your blackjack bankroll in a safe place so Nathan can't get to it!

[Blackjackpro]

Some idiot on Gambling Forums impersonated me! The BlackjackPro on Gambling Forums is NOT ME. That BlackjackPro on Gambling Forums is a FAKE! FAKE! That loser even linked to a thread I started on Blackjack Forums as if they were me. This is the equivalent of identity theft of not outright identity theft.

Blackjackpro, I have a dark suspicion...what if Nathan is the one pretending to be you?

A lot of people seem to think you're Nathan because you have a similar manner of expression, but maybe that's just because Nathan is imitating you? After all Nathan has already admitted to having multiple identities.

I hope you keep your blackjack bankroll in a safe place so Nathan can't get to it!

Nathan came off as a Deceiver, starting with pretending to be a GUY and letting Wizard Of Nothing go to a Casino to meet "Him," and then drop the truth and admit she was a WOMAN after he had already left without meeting her. She also pretended NOT to be Tasha until Dan called her out on it. But I don't remember her ever impersonating someone else.

[Dan Druff]

I'm banning you now.

I will continue banning you for as long as you continue to make these accounts with the TMobile phone in southern Florida.

Clearly using your phone only is a way you're using to attempt to hide your identity.

[MaxPen]

I'm banning you now.

I will continue banning you for as long as you continue to make these accounts with the TMobile phone in southern Florida.

Clearly using your phone only is a way you're using to attempt to hide your identity.

There goes my entertainment.

[Spock]

There goes my entertainment.

You can still get your entertainment here:

https://www.blackjacktheforum.com/me...3-BlackjackPro

I wouldn't wait too long though because I suspect she won't last long there.

Looks like she got the boot from DT too. She can't be a happy camper about now. (edited to add; "BlackJackPro" is banned, Nathan/Karen still has an account)

I'd also guess that we'll see her with at least a few more aliases in the near future.

[21forme]

I just signed up for an account here so nobody else uses my ID, but I have no intention to be active here.
P.S. Hi KJ.

[kewlJ]

I just signed up for an account here so nobody else uses my ID, but I have no intention to be active here.
P.S. Hi KJ.

Hysterical, 21forme. But someday when you are really bored and nothing is on TV.....

[PIGGY BANKER]

Why

[kewlJ]

I am a little surprised that blackjackpro (<-) has lasted this long at BlackjackTheForum. Especially starting that same thread she started everywhere about rookie mistakes as a player, where she posts "to her horror the dealer beat her 20 with a 21". Anyone who would post that, just doesn't play much if any blackjack as that is a common occurrence, not something that shocks a player.

But because someone "outed" her fairly early on, the lack of questioning her is probably just due to apathy from the membership.

[AxelWolf]

I am a little surprised that blackjackpro (<-) has lasted this long at BlackjackTheForum. Especially starting that same thread she started everywhere about rookie mistakes as a player, where she posts "to her horror the dealer beat her 20 with a 21". Anyone who would post that, just doesn't play much if any blackjack as that is a common occurrence, not something that shocks a player.

But because someone "outed" her fairly early on, the lack of questioning her is probably just due to apathy from the membership.

you're just mad she has a super Advanced Blackjack strategy you cant comprehend. Kind of like those guys that were boasting up to 3-5% on Norms site. It's all true you just haven't figured it out yet.

[kewlJ]

you're just mad she has a super Advanced Blackjack strategy you cant comprehend. Kind of like those guys that were boasting up to 3-5% on Norms site. It's all true you just haven't figured it out yet.

It was 5% advantage from card counting, which is impossible and it was one guy, since completely debunked by Mathematician Don Schlesinger, after which the fraud quit the forum and slinked away. You really want to get into it, or just being an Axeldick.

And the funny part is your buddy Mike Shackleford could have been that mathematician that looked into that claims and confirmed it was impossible. I asked Mike to do just that, and he promised to look into it, but that was just another promise broken.

And Don Schlesinger and Norm are also good friends, personal friends from what I understand. BUT that didn't stop Don from standing up and telling the truth, that the guy Norm was protecting was a fraud making impossible claims, just like I said. The math is the math! And you don't back away or look the other way because the math does not reveal what you "friend" wants it to.

[AxelWolf]

you're just mad she has a super Advanced Blackjack strategy you cant comprehend. Kind of like those guys that were boasting up to 3-5% on Norms site. It's all true you just haven't figured it out yet.

It was 5% advantage from card counting, which is impossible and it was one guy, since completely debunked by Mathematician Don Schlesinger, after which the fraud quit the forum and slinked away. You really want to get into it, or just being an Axeldick.

And the funny part is your buddy Mike Shackleford could have been that mathematician that looked into that claims and confirmed it was impossible. I asked Mike to do just that, and he promised to look into it, but that was just another promise broken.

And Don Schlesinger and Norm are also good friends, personal friends from what I understand. BUT that didn't stop Don from standing up and telling the truth, that the guy Norm was protecting was a fraud making impossible claims, just like I said. The math is the math! And you don't back away or look the other way because the math does not reveal what you "friend" wants it to.

If you really think I believe theres a card counting method that can add 5% then you haven't been paying attention.

[kewlJ]

If you really think I believe theres a card counting method that can add 5% then you haven't been paying attention.

No, I don't believe you think that. I know you were just being YOU! An instigator and troublemaker.

But I am just stating the facts. You know I don't like it when someone makes impossible claims for the sole purpose of misleading other players....players that get hurt by it. I believe real players and math experts have a responsibility to call that shit out.

[Rob.Singer]

Kew, are you a wannabee member of the SQUAD Trump rightfully makes fun of? Your post identifies a few failures, which you then say justifies your later claims of success, and you scoff at any and all who question it. Yet when I proclaim that I experienced failure in my early years as a vp AP and then claim success for 4 years using a strategy that partially incorporates AP play, you cry foul.

Your excuse? The mathematics crutch. "I'm right and I win and I don't have to prove it because I play with a mathematical edge!" But if you truly understood how math works, you'd get that it's mathematically possible to win just as it's mathematically possible to lose in gambling. The amount of luck--good or bad--is the key.

Who knows if your claims are true or not? Maybe so, but then for a person who harps about how playing with a theoretical edge means you automatically win, who in their right mind would bounce around for years from forum to forum to bloviate so much about it if it were really on the up & up? That's a credibility-reducer right there.

I think you're a real character who NEEDS forums to exist without ulcers and boils. When I get my legs back how about I take you out to a local shooting range, where you can release all of your inner frustrations and aggravations about what you read on these forums that riles you so. You'll discover where real power lies. I guarantee--it'll be a humbling experience.

[mickeycrimm]

Kew, are you a wannabee member of the SQUAD Trump rightfully makes fun of? Your post identifies a few failures, which you then say justifies your later claims of success, and you scoff at any and all who question it. Yet when I proclaim that I experienced failure in my early years as a vp AP and then claim success for 4 years using a strategy that partially incorporates AP play, you cry foul.

Your excuse? The mathematics crutch. "I'm right and I win and I don't have to prove it because I play with a mathematical edge!" But if you truly understood how math works, you'd get that it's mathematically possible to win just as it's mathematically possible to lose in gambling. The amount of luck--good or bad--is the key.

Who knows if your claims are true or not? Maybe so, but then for a person who harps about how playing with a theoretical edge means you automatically win, who in their right mind would bounce around for years from forum to forum to bloviate so much about it if it were really on the up & up? That's a credibility-reducer right there.

I think you're a real character who NEEDS forums to exist without ulcers and boils. When I get my legs back how about I take you out to a local shooting range, where you can release all of your inner frustrations and aggravations about what you read on these forums that riles you so. You'll discover where real power lies. I guarantee--it'll be a humbling experience.

Rob, don't be inviting strangers to shooting ranges. Remember what happened to Chris Kyle. Or at least keep a close eye on the stranger if you do.

PS: I'm loving the way you troll the celebrities on twitter.

[Keystone]

Kew, are you a wannabee member of the SQUAD Trump rightfully makes fun of? Your post identifies a few failures, which you then say justifies your later claims of success, and you scoff at any and all who question it. Yet when I proclaim that I experienced failure in my early years as a vp AP and then claim success for 4 years using a strategy that partially incorporates AP play, you cry foul.

Your excuse? The mathematics crutch. "I'm right and I win and I don't have to prove it because I play with a mathematical edge!" But if you truly understood how math works, you'd get that it's mathematically possible to win just as it's mathematically possible to lose in gambling. The amount of luck--good or bad--is the key.

Who knows if your claims are true or not? Maybe so, but then for a person who harps about how playing with a theoretical edge means you automatically win, who in their right mind would bounce around for years from forum to forum to bloviate so much about it if it were really on the up & up? That's a credibility-reducer right there.

I think you're a real character who NEEDS forums to exist without ulcers and boils. When I get my legs back how about I take you out to a local shooting range, where you can release all of your inner frustrations and aggravations about what you read on these forums that riles you so. You'll discover where real power lies. I guarantee--it'll be a humbling experience.

Rob, don't be inviting strangers to shooting ranges. Remember what happened to Chris Kyle. Or at least keep a close eye on the stranger if you do.

PS: I'm loving the way you troll the celebrities on twitter.

It’s nice to see Mickey finally in love ❤️

[mcap]

Kew, are you a wannabee member of the SQUAD Trump rightfully makes fun of? Your post identifies a few failures, which you then say justifies your later claims of success, and you scoff at any and all who question it. Yet when I proclaim that I experienced failure in my early years as a vp AP and then claim success for 4 years using a strategy that partially incorporates AP play, you cry foul.

Your excuse? The mathematics crutch. "I'm right and I win and I don't have to prove it because I play with a mathematical edge!" But if you truly understood how math works, you'd get that it's mathematically possible to win just as it's mathematically possible to lose in gambling. The amount of luck--good or bad--is the key.

Who knows if your claims are true or not? Maybe so, but then for a person who harps about how playing with a theoretical edge means you automatically win, who in their right mind would bounce around for years from forum to forum to bloviate so much about it if it were really on the up & up? That's a credibility-reducer right there.

I think you're a real character who NEEDS forums to exist without ulcers and boils. When I get my legs back how about I take you out to a local shooting range, where you can release all of your inner frustrations and aggravations about what you read on these forums that riles you so. You'll discover where real power lies. I guarantee--it'll be a humbling experience.

Rob, don't be inviting strangers to shooting ranges. Remember what happened to Chris Kyle. Or at least keep a close eye on the stranger if you do.

PS: I'm loving the way you troll the celebrities on twitter.

It’s nice to see Mickey finally in love ❤️

lol