Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 142

Thread: Oh, How Much Better Can This Get?

  1. #21
    Originally Posted by Spock View Post
    OK, I did. And got this:

    Name:  
Views: 
Size:
    But you got nothing in the drop down box.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  2. #22
    Originally Posted by Spock View Post
    I mostly use Firefox, so I checked Chrome and Edge and both were identical to what I posted above.

    Now there could be a political bias algorithm that tends to add or hide certain searches. (I'm not saying there IS, just that it's probably possible. As I recall Facebook DOES do this).

    But if that was the case it would probably stick to a browser. It's very rare for me to use Edge, and rather infrequent that I use Chrome, yet the information stayed the same.
    What you are getting is nothing but the softball stuff on her email scandal. Here are some hardball facts:

    When she became Secretary of State, like all government officials, she was assigned a government server. She was required to sign off on documents swearing she would conduct all government business on her government server and that all her email communications were the property of the U.S. Government. And she signed off on those documents.

    BUT SHE NEVER USED THAT GOVERNMENT SERVER. NOT EVEN ONCE.

    She set up her own private server. Why would she do that? She intended that no one, in government or without, would see her emails. News organizations would not be able to obtain any of her emails thru the Freedom of Information Act. You know, the transparency of the Obama Administration. But then Benghazi happened. In the resulting investigation Congress demanded to see her emails over the affair. The first thing they noticed was she didn't have a .gov address. When Obama told the press that the first he learned of her private server address was thru the news he was lying thru his teeth. How do you trade hundreds probably thousands of emails with someone and not notice that they don't have a .gov address?

    Hillary's intent to hide her emails from everyone including the U.S. Government was a blatant violation of the Criminal Code. But she got away with it because of our two-tiered justice system.

    The Russians that hacked her highly benefitted from her stupid criminal acts. Throw in Uranium One and Russian money in the Clinton Foundation , and I've still to this day never bought the narrative that the Russians wanted Trump to win the Presidency.

    Google is wide open manipulating what you get to see on the internet about Dems as opposed to the Republicans. They intend to sway as many as 30 million votes in the 2020 elections. And all the stupid people think it's the Russians that are swaying the elections. Morons.

    Google is ANTI-TRUST and should be broken up.
    Last edited by mickeycrimm; 08-02-2019 at 02:11 AM.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  3. #23
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Spock View Post
    I mostly use Firefox, so I checked Chrome and Edge and both were identical to what I posted above.

    Now there could be a political bias algorithm that tends to add or hide certain searches. (I'm not saying there IS, just that it's probably possible. As I recall Facebook DOES do this).

    But if that was the case it would probably stick to a browser. It's very rare for me to use Edge, and rather infrequent that I use Chrome, yet the information stayed the same.
    What you are getting is nothing but the softball stuff on her email scandal. Here are some hardball facts:

    When she became Secretary of State, like all government officials, she was assigned a government server. She was required to sign off on documents swearing she would conduct all government business on her government server and that all her email communications were the property of the U.S. Government. And she signed off on those documents.

    BUT SHE NEVER USED THAT GOVERNMENT SERVER. NOT EVEN ONCE.

    She set up her own private server. Why would she do that? She intended that no one, in government or without, would see her emails. News organizations would not be able to obtain any of her emails thru the Freedom of Information Act. You know, the transparency of the Obama Administration. But then Benghazi happened. In the resulting investigation Congress demanded to see her emails over the affair. The first thing they noticed was she didn't have a .gov address. When Obama told the press that the first he learned of her private server address was thru the news he was lying thru his teeth. How do you trade hundreds probably thousands of emails with someone and not notice that they don't have a .gov address?

    Hillary's intent to hide her emails from everyone including the U.S. Government was a blatant violation of the Criminal Code. But she got away with it because of our two-tiered justice system.

    The Russians that hacked her highly benefitted from her stupid criminal acts. Throw in Uranium One and Russian money in the Clinton Foundation , and I've still to this day never bought the narrative that the Russians wanted Trump to win the Presidency.

    Google is wide open manipulating what you get to see on the internet about Dems as opposed to the Republicans. They intend to sway as many as 30 million votes in the 2020 elections. And all the stupid people think it's the Russians that are swaying the elections. Morons.

    Google is ANTI-TRUST and should be broken up.
    Mickey, a couple things:

    I did not know that Hillary NEVER used the govt. server. NOT EVEN ONCE. That is crazy blatant!!!

    I never bought the line that Russia wanted Trump to be president either. Trump ran on bolstering our military and he has. He also ran on unleashing our capabilities as an oil & gas producer and we are now the global leader. Can't imagine Putin wanted either of those things to come to fruition especially with their economy so dependent on oil & gas.

    There can't be anyone out there, even among the most ardent leftists, that do not realize that the leaders of Google, Facebook, and the mainstream media are all on the side of Democrats. Can there?

  4. #24
    mickeycrimm, I would just like to say it is a real privilege reading your spot on political opinions as well as your AP knowledge.

  5. #25
    Originally Posted by BoSox View Post
    mickeycrimm, I would just like to say it is a real privilege reading your spot on political opinions as well as your AP knowledge.
    I agree.

  6. #26
    Good job Mickey. I also agree.

  7. #27
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Spock View Post
    I mostly use Firefox, so I checked Chrome and Edge and both were identical to what I posted above.

    Now there could be a political bias algorithm that tends to add or hide certain searches. (I'm not saying there IS, just that it's probably possible. As I recall Facebook DOES do this).

    But if that was the case it would probably stick to a browser. It's very rare for me to use Edge, and rather infrequent that I use Chrome, yet the information stayed the same.
    What you are getting is nothing but the softball stuff on her email scandal. Here are some hardball facts:

    When she became Secretary of State, like all government officials, she was assigned a government server. She was required to sign off on documents swearing she would conduct all government business on her government server and that all her email communications were the property of the U.S. Government. And she signed off on those documents.

    BUT SHE NEVER USED THAT GOVERNMENT SERVER. NOT EVEN ONCE.

    She set up her own private server. Why would she do that? She intended that no one, in government or without, would see her emails. News organizations would not be able to obtain any of her emails thru the Freedom of Information Act. You know, the transparency of the Obama Administration. But then Benghazi happened. In the resulting investigation Congress demanded to see her emails over the affair. The first thing they noticed was she didn't have a .gov address. When Obama told the press that the first he learned of her private server address was thru the news he was lying thru his teeth. How do you trade hundreds probably thousands of emails with someone and not notice that they don't have a .gov address?

    Hillary's intent to hide her emails from everyone including the U.S. Government was a blatant violation of the Criminal Code. But she got away with it because of our two-tiered justice system.

    The Russians that hacked her highly benefitted from her stupid criminal acts. Throw in Uranium One and Russian money in the Clinton Foundation , and I've still to this day never bought the narrative that the Russians wanted Trump to win the Presidency.

    Google is wide open manipulating what you get to see on the internet about Dems as opposed to the Republicans. They intend to sway as many as 30 million votes in the 2020 elections. And all the stupid people think it's the Russians that are swaying the elections. Morons.

    Google is ANTI-TRUST and should be broken up.
    So you consider yourself a moderate yet you buy into all these crazy rightwing conspiracies that seem to be little more than propaganda.

    Are you aware of this ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_W...il_controversy ? Read the whole link. Then put it into perspective with what Hillary did. The only difference is the type of brain that makes somewhat lean to the left, tends to not make them as susceptible to silly conspiracies. Otherwise we'd be hearing about Bush and his emails. Liberals seem to get taken in by a different variety of bullshit.

    Google intends to sway as many as 30 million voters. Where do you get this ? For such a numbers guy in the slot world, you seem to be a bit loose with the numbers elsewhere.

  8. #28
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Spock View Post
    I mostly use Firefox, so I checked Chrome and Edge and both were identical to what I posted above.

    Now there could be a political bias algorithm that tends to add or hide certain searches. (I'm not saying there IS, just that it's probably possible. As I recall Facebook DOES do this).

    But if that was the case it would probably stick to a browser. It's very rare for me to use Edge, and rather infrequent that I use Chrome, yet the information stayed the same.
    What you are getting is nothing but the softball stuff on her email scandal. Here are some hardball facts:

    When she became Secretary of State, like all government officials, she was assigned a government server. She was required to sign off on documents swearing she would conduct all government business on her government server and that all her email communications were the property of the U.S. Government. And she signed off on those documents.

    BUT SHE NEVER USED THAT GOVERNMENT SERVER. NOT EVEN ONCE.

    She set up her own private server. Why would she do that? She intended that no one, in government or without, would see her emails. News organizations would not be able to obtain any of her emails thru the Freedom of Information Act. You know, the transparency of the Obama Administration. But then Benghazi happened. In the resulting investigation Congress demanded to see her emails over the affair. The first thing they noticed was she didn't have a .gov address. When Obama told the press that the first he learned of her private server address was thru the news he was lying thru his teeth. How do you trade hundreds probably thousands of emails with someone and not notice that they don't have a .gov address?

    Hillary's intent to hide her emails from everyone including the U.S. Government was a blatant violation of the Criminal Code. But she got away with it because of our two-tiered justice system.

    The Russians that hacked her highly benefitted from her stupid criminal acts. Throw in Uranium One and Russian money in the Clinton Foundation , and I've still to this day never bought the narrative that the Russians wanted Trump to win the Presidency.

    Google is wide open manipulating what you get to see on the internet about Dems as opposed to the Republicans. They intend to sway as many as 30 million votes in the 2020 elections. And all the stupid people think it's the Russians that are swaying the elections. Morons.

    Google is ANTI-TRUST and should be broken up.
    So you consider yourself a moderate yet you buy into all these crazy rightwing conspiracies that seem to be little more than propaganda.

    Are you aware of this ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_W...il_controversy ? Read the whole link. Then put it into perspective with what Hillary did. The only difference is the type of brain that makes somewhat lean to the left, tends to not make them as susceptible to silly conspiracies. Otherwise we'd be hearing about Bush and his emails. Liberals seem to get taken in by a different variety of bullshit.

    Google intends to sway as many as 30 million voters. Where do you get this ? For such a numbers guy in the slot world, you seem to be a bit loose with the numbers elsewhere.
    I don't consider myself a moderate. I know I'm a moderate. But you, brainsinquestion, think that anyone that doesn't hold the same hard left positions as you is an ultra conservative.

    So you think two wrongs make a right? Prosecute the Bush Administration. Prosecute Hillary Clinton. They all broke the law. The only reason for a private server is ultra secrecy. Secrecy from you own country.

    Google swayed up to 10 million votes in 2016 and still lost. This time around they are going all out.

    As a moderate I see the hard left for what it is, the most serious risk to the future of this country. Lie, cheat, steal is all fair game. Only the outcome matters. Socialism has done nothing but fail wherever it has been instituted. You know the old saying about the definition of insanity.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  9. #29
    Sorry Mickey. But the only time you come across as a moderate is when you post your road trips. The rest of the time you come across as an extremist.

  10. #30
    Originally Posted by seemoreroyals View Post
    Sorry Mickey. But the only time you come across as a moderate is when you post your road trips. The rest of the time you come across as an extremist.
    Sorry, dude but you lefties see anyone that is even just a little to the right of you as a right wing extremist.

    "The hard left poses the most serious threat to the future of the United States" Alan Dershowitz.

    Dershowitz is a moderate democrat that supported and voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016. But you probably now see him as an extremist.

    The hard left now considers Joe Biden to be a right wing extremist. In their eyes if you are not for the advancement of socialism you are a right wing extremist.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  11. #31
    Sorry dude but you being a moderate is about as ridiculous a statement as Trump saying he is a stable genius. I am not buying what you are selling. Sorry but I do like your road trip casino picture taking.

  12. #32
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post

    What you are getting is nothing but the softball stuff on her email scandal. Here are some hardball facts:

    When she became Secretary of State, like all government officials, she was assigned a government server. She was required to sign off on documents swearing she would conduct all government business on her government server and that all her email communications were the property of the U.S. Government. And she signed off on those documents.

    BUT SHE NEVER USED THAT GOVERNMENT SERVER. NOT EVEN ONCE.

    She set up her own private server. Why would she do that? She intended that no one, in government or without, would see her emails. News organizations would not be able to obtain any of her emails thru the Freedom of Information Act. You know, the transparency of the Obama Administration. But then Benghazi happened. In the resulting investigation Congress demanded to see her emails over the affair. The first thing they noticed was she didn't have a .gov address. When Obama told the press that the first he learned of her private server address was thru the news he was lying thru his teeth. How do you trade hundreds probably thousands of emails with someone and not notice that they don't have a .gov address?

    Hillary's intent to hide her emails from everyone including the U.S. Government was a blatant violation of the Criminal Code. But she got away with it because of our two-tiered justice system.

    The Russians that hacked her highly benefitted from her stupid criminal acts. Throw in Uranium One and Russian money in the Clinton Foundation , and I've still to this day never bought the narrative that the Russians wanted Trump to win the Presidency.

    Google is wide open manipulating what you get to see on the internet about Dems as opposed to the Republicans. They intend to sway as many as 30 million votes in the 2020 elections. And all the stupid people think it's the Russians that are swaying the elections. Morons.

    Google is ANTI-TRUST and should be broken up.
    So you consider yourself a moderate yet you buy into all these crazy rightwing conspiracies that seem to be little more than propaganda.

    Are you aware of this ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_W...il_controversy ? Read the whole link. Then put it into perspective with what Hillary did. The only difference is the type of brain that makes somewhat lean to the left, tends to not make them as susceptible to silly conspiracies. Otherwise we'd be hearing about Bush and his emails. Liberals seem to get taken in by a different variety of bullshit.

    Google intends to sway as many as 30 million voters. Where do you get this ? For such a numbers guy in the slot world, you seem to be a bit loose with the numbers elsewhere.
    I don't consider myself a moderate. I know I'm a moderate. But you, brainsinquestion, think that anyone that doesn't hold the same hard left positions as you is an ultra conservative.

    So you think two wrongs make a right? Prosecute the Bush Administration. Prosecute Hillary Clinton. They all broke the law. The only reason for a private server is ultra secrecy. Secrecy from you own country.

    Google swayed up to 10 million votes in 2016 and still lost. This time around they are going all out.

    As a moderate I see the hard left for what it is, the most serious risk to the future of this country. Lie, cheat, steal is all fair game. Only the outcome matters. Socialism has done nothing but fail wherever it has been instituted. You know the old saying about the definition of insanity.
    So you never complain about what Bush did, when he was an actual President. Yet Clinton.. what was her position? Why do you bring up her in multi-paragraph rants, then completely ignore the fact that Bush did the same thing?

    That isn't what a moderate would do. You're 100% biased and come across as a bit of a puppet. At least be honest with yourself about that.

  13. #33
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    The hard left now considers Joe Biden to be a right wing extremist.

    Dude, really?

    Like.. there might be a handful of people who actually would agree with this statement and that one could consider far left. Your view of the political spectrum is all fucked up though and a bit nonsensical.

    Sure, many on the left might think he is "too rightwing", but they'd call him a rightwing extremist?

    Thats like saying they'd call you a moderate.

  14. #34
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    The only difference is the type of brain that makes somewhat lean to the left, tends to not make them as susceptible to silly conspiracies.
    LOL What??

    You mean stuff like.....

    - Kavanaugh "raped" some dumb bimbo who doesn't remember jack shit 30+ years ago? Mhmmm. #BelieveAllWomen #SomethingSomethingRapeCulture #AccusationsEqualGuilt
    - Jesse Smollet (this really shouldn't need any explanation), but the whole thing was completely retarded from the get go. Yeah, it's like -10 degrees outside and everyone's bundled up to the hilt and somehow anyone, let alone white people, are going to recognize this guy that no white person has ever heard of?
    - I forget the kid's name, but remember when that fake vietnam veteran indian was being a dick to a bunch of kids on a field trip (in DC I think)?
    - Or when Michael Brown attacked a police officer and ended up getting shot and the left went absolute berserk because they think black people = perfect.
    - Let's not forget the glorious presidential election of 2016 where they were absolutely confident HRC was gonna win. There were some predictions nearing 99% for HRC. And of course, they lost (go figure, people don't want HRC as commander in chief, big surprise!). Then you had people rioting in the streets crying (literally -- people were crying), shouting "not MY president!" and other dumb shit.
    #FreeTyde

  15. #35
    Originally Posted by seemoreroyals View Post
    Sorry dude but you being a moderate is about as ridiculous a statement as Trump saying he is a stable genius. I am not buying what you are selling. Sorry but I do like your road trip casino picture taking.
    That's how jaded your commie pinko ass is. Only a left wing extremist would think I'm a right wing extremist.

    This is how right wing extremist I am. I'm not for cuts in government spending. I'm for limiting government growth to the size of population growth. I support abortion in the first trimester. No cuts or change of Social Security retirement accounts. I support reparations to a degree. This is based on my knowledge of my ancestors, some of whom owned slaves. I'm not for cutting federal income taxes or raising them. I support legal immigration.

    This is just some of my views. I'm in the middle in this country. I think things are about right as they are now. No shifting further to the left. That's my problem with the left. It's reached the point where no more ground can be given to them. Every little thing you concede to them will not be enough. They will want more and more and more. They have an insatiable thirst for socialism. The vast majority of people in the world that have lived under socialism hate it.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  16. #36
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post

    So you consider yourself a moderate yet you buy into all these crazy rightwing conspiracies that seem to be little more than propaganda.

    Are you aware of this ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_W...il_controversy ? Read the whole link. Then put it into perspective with what Hillary did. The only difference is the type of brain that makes somewhat lean to the left, tends to not make them as susceptible to silly conspiracies. Otherwise we'd be hearing about Bush and his emails. Liberals seem to get taken in by a different variety of bullshit.

    Google intends to sway as many as 30 million voters. Where do you get this ? For such a numbers guy in the slot world, you seem to be a bit loose with the numbers elsewhere.
    I don't consider myself a moderate. I know I'm a moderate. But you, brainsinquestion, think that anyone that doesn't hold the same hard left positions as you is an ultra conservative.

    So you think two wrongs make a right? Prosecute the Bush Administration. Prosecute Hillary Clinton. They all broke the law. The only reason for a private server is ultra secrecy. Secrecy from you own country.

    Google swayed up to 10 million votes in 2016 and still lost. This time around they are going all out.

    As a moderate I see the hard left for what it is, the most serious risk to the future of this country. Lie, cheat, steal is all fair game. Only the outcome matters. Socialism has done nothing but fail wherever it has been instituted. You know the old saying about the definition of insanity.
    So you never complain about what Bush did, when he was an actual President. Yet Clinton.. what was her position? Why do you bring up her in multi-paragraph rants, then completely ignore the fact that Bush did the same thing?

    That isn't what a moderate would do. You're 100% biased and come across as a bit of a puppet. At least be honest with yourself about that.
    Dude, I did not support Bush in 2000. I supported Gore. In 2004 I held my nose and supported Bush because Kerry was to far to the left for me. That was the tipping point. I had supported Democrats for President until then. But I didn't change. The Democrat party changed. Went to far left. The Democrat party of today is not my father's democrat party.

    Whats the difference to me between the Bush and Clinton email controversies? Classified information. Hillary made it easy for the Russians, Chinese and god knows who else to hack her. And they wound up with all that classified information. Wise up.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  17. #37
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    The hard left now considers Joe Biden to be a right wing extremist.

    Dude, really?

    Like.. there might be a handful of people who actually would agree with this statement and that one could consider far left. Your view of the political spectrum is all fucked up though and a bit nonsensical.

    Sure, many on the left might think he is "too rightwing", but they'd call him a rightwing extremist?

    Thats like saying they'd call you a moderate.
    Haven't you heard? According to the far left Biden is a racist. Of course, the word racist has taken on new meanings in today's world. It used to mean "prejudiced or antagonistic toward people of a different race." But the new meanings are:

    One who believes in lower taxes and less government.
    One who believes in the rule of law.
    One who believes abortion is immoral.
    One who believes in legal immigration but is against illegal immigration.
    One who believes in the right to bear arms.

    And the big one:

    Those that have different political views than ones own.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  18. #38
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by seemoreroyals View Post
    Sorry dude but you being a moderate is about as ridiculous a statement as Trump saying he is a stable genius. I am not buying what you are selling. Sorry but I do like your road trip casino picture taking.
    That's how jaded your commie pinko ass is. Only a left wing extremist would think I'm a right wing extremist.

    This is how right wing extremist I am. I'm not for cuts in government spending. I'm for limiting government growth to the size of population growth. I support abortion in the first trimester. No cuts or change of Social Security retirement accounts. I support reparations to a degree. This is based on my knowledge of my ancestors, some of whom owned slaves. I'm not for cutting federal income taxes or raising them. I support legal immigration.

    This is just some of my views. I'm in the middle in this country. I think things are about right as they are now. No shifting further to the left. That's my problem with the left. It's reached the point where no more ground can be given to them. Every little thing you concede to them will not be enough. They will want more and more and more. They have an insatiable thirst for socialism. The vast majority of people in the world that have lived under socialism hate it.
    But why all the name calling and hate in the tone and context of your posts? It makes you come across as an unreasonable and miserable idiot.

  19. #39
    Originally Posted by seemoreroyals View Post
    But why all the name calling and hate in the tone and context of your posts? It makes you come across as an unreasonable and miserable idiot.
    People with my political views get called racists, fascists, nazis everyday by the left and it's blasted all over the main stream media. Every fucking day!!!! Have you ever questioned that? Others may remain silent but not me. I'm returning the favor you walking pile of pig shit. The only good socialist is a dead socialist. Fuck off and die, bitch.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  20. #40
    This will all come to its peaceful and righteous conclusion next Nov. when Trump wins again. The lefties have no choice but to make their nutjob accusations because they're simply trying to counter the president's devastatingly exceptional policies for the whole of the American public.

    Today CNN is becoming unraveled once again over a Trump retweet. The president thought it would be a nice touch (and I completely agree) to suggest the Clintons might be behind Epstein's death. Why not---Bill's just as much a pervert as Epstein and has just as much to lose if Jeffrey started to sing.

    CNN laughably complained about Trump "spreading another baseless conspiracy theory"....this after them pushing the baseless Russian conspiracy theory for 2+ years.

    Can't wait for the 2020 Trump steamroll victory. The collection of misguided foreigners, minorities, queers, elites etc. in California and New York who hate Trump because it's fashionable, are but a blimp on the screens of those across the middle of the country who've got more jobs, more money, and far better lives today than when we finally got rid of that white and jew-hating big-mouthed Negro with the Muslim name.

    And THAT'S the name of the game people. Liberals lose and cry in their beer again!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •