View Poll Results: Who has the higher IQ?

Voters
15. You may not vote on this poll
  • Rob Singer

    3 20.00%
  • Tasha

    12 80.00%
Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 114

Thread: Singer or Tasha, whose the smartest?

  1. #21
    Originally Posted by RS__ View Post
    Rob's IQ is at best 85.
    Accountinquestion's age and IQ are about the same.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  2. #22
    Sling, I had a strategic reason for acting the way I have on forums. Nuff said.

    History is written for me and what I did. No one was able to know about it until the time I chose, and it was solely for my and my family's protection. I chose to release it axel even though we've had many unpleasant words in the past, because underneath all my acting and antics, I knew he would have as much knowledge as anyone on the play, and he would understand what I've been going thru over the years and why. I know I can't 100% prove anything to anybody at this point, but the overall preponderance of the evidence and my clear 100% knowledge of the technical aspects of it are the best I can offer today. I hope I can locate at least one more machine when I'm able to get active again, so I can inform axel and maybe some others.

    That said, it's pretty clear kew is dying for axel to say something that will make him sleep well at night. All I say to that is....I feel like a king whenever I go into Nv. casinos since late 2009. And those apples taste pretty good.

  3. #23
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Sling, I had a strategic reason for acting the way I have on forums. Nuff said.

    History is written for me and what I did. No one was able to know about it until the time I chose, and it was solely for my and my family's protection. I chose to release it axel even though we've had many unpleasant words in the past, because underneath all my acting and antics,
    This is Bullshit Rob. The way you have acted for decades hasn't been an act...it is who you are...an angry bitter person. I know this because you have continued to act this way since revealing your....revelation. You continue to troll, attack name-call everyone, me, Dan Druff recently, RS_. The only one's you no longer do is Mickey and Axel because you have made peace or called a truce or whatever with them. And low and behold you wanted something from them. You needed something from them. Everyone else, it is the same old, bitter angry Rob.

    And while I don't like this poll. I don't think it is right. It is pretty revealing. I mean, I don't think all these people that voted really believe Tasha is smarter than Rob. I don't think that. But it is a reflection of how people feel about Rob, including his credibility.

    I mean think about this. Rob made this revelation about the double up bug. And if true, would be and should be a huge story in the AP community. I mean huge. And yet no one will give Rob a platform to even discuss this and allow people to decide for themselves. Not GWAE, Not Shackleford. No one. And that is because no one finds Rob credible, except one, maybe two members of the entire AP community. I say maybe two because Axelwolf isn't being clear.

    Now Rob will say it is because these people don't like him. I am not aware of any feud between Munchkin and Rob. Munchkin isn't really that kind of person. And if there was bad blood between him and Rob, Munchkin would put that aside if he really found this story credible. And the same with Shackleford. Despite any bad blood, Mike would interview Rob, either on his podcast thingy or in writing as he has done before, if he really believed Rob's claim and even found him a little credible. He wouldn't let him back on WoV, but he would interview him.

    So it is just nonsense Rob. People, except a very few just don't find anything you say or claim credible, including this big claim/revelation . And you demonize everyone who doesn't find you credible with attacks and name calling. That is your defense. Your way of making them the bad guy in your mind.
    Last edited by kewlJ; 08-26-2019 at 10:10 PM.

  4. #24
    Your life is that of a simpleton kew. Your experiences are few....your fantasies, many.

  5. #25
    Rob is a proven liar and he personally admitted he just posts on forums to irk and troll people. There's really no reason to engage him. Remember, even after all this fantasy "Rob played the DU bug" stuff came out, Rob is STILL pretending that his bunk system works.

    The most likely scenario is that Rob felt like his BS "legacy" of working some shit system and living off govt. handouts & bankruptcy wasn't good enough for him, so he concocted some new story so that his legacy would be "the greatest AP to ever live". This isn't the first time we've heard some exorbitant story from Rob trying to stay in the spotlight, and it damn sure isn't going to be the last.

    Just wait till he claims he's DB Cooper.
    #FreeTyde

  6. #26
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Does anyone know who brainfart brainsinquestion is a sock puppet of?
    I would say Bob21. The difference in political views is designed to throw off suspicion between the two.

  7. #27
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Does anyone know who brainfart brainsinquestion is a sock puppet of?
    I'm a sock puppet of ... <drumroll> myself.

    I only posted on RTP and under a different name. While I do use different names across different forums due to stalkers and weirdos and general privacy concerns, I do not have another account on this forum.

    Dan Druff knows me personally and can attest to that if you're really concerned.

    I'm just a dude who runs a business, plays poker, and is a wanna-be weekend warrior AP. I used to drink a lot.

    You wouldn't know my other accounts Mick. If you're seriously trying to figure something like that out, total waste of brainpower. I have no ulterior motives, thus no need for sock puppets.

    Cheers.
    You use different usernames across forums because you are a coward.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  8. #28
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Sling, I had a strategic reason for acting the way I have on forums. Nuff said.

    History is written for me and what I did. No one was able to know about it until the time I chose, and it was solely for my and my family's protection. I chose to release it axel even though we've had many unpleasant words in the past, because underneath all my acting and antics,
    This is Bullshit Rob. The way you have acted for decades hasn't been an act...it is who you are...an angry bitter person. I know this because you have continued to act this way since revealing your....revelation. You continue to troll, attack name-call everyone, me, Dan Druff recently, RS_. The only one's you no longer do is Mickey and Axel because you have made peace or called a truce or whatever with them. And low and behold you wanted something from them. You needed something from them. Everyone else, it is the same old, bitter angry Rob.

    And while I don't like this poll. I don't think it is right. It is pretty revealing. I mean, I don't think all these people that voted really believe Tasha is smarter than Rob. I don't think that. But it is a reflection of how people feel about Rob, including his credibility.

    I mean think about this. Rob made this revelation about the double up bug. And if true, would be and should be a huge story in the AP community. I mean huge. And yet no one will give Rob a platform to even discuss this and allow people to decide for themselves. Not GWAE, Not Shackleford. No one. And that is because no one finds Rob credible, except one, maybe two members of the entire AP community. I say maybe two because Axelwolf isn't being clear.

    Now Rob will say it is because these people don't like him. I am not aware of any feud between Munchkin and Rob. Munchkin isn't really that kind of person. And if there was bad blood between him and Rob, Munchkin would put that aside if he really found this story credible. And the same with Shackleford. Despite any bad blood, Mike would interview Rob, either on his podcast thingy or in writing as he has done before, if he really believed Rob's claim and even found him a little credible. He wouldn't let him back on WoV, but he would interview him.

    So it is just nonsense Rob. People, except a very few just don't find anything you say or claim credible, including this big claim/revelation . And you demonize everyone who doesn't find you credible with attacks and name calling. That is your defense. Your way of making them the bad guy in your mind.
    Dancer definitely calls the shots over Munchkin, and sure, he won't do anything to promote Rob, but combine that with he won't do anything that might diminish his own place in video poker history. Rob is banned from WoV so ask yourself from your own experience, KJ, how much does Shack promote those that have been banned? He doesn't and won't. Did Shack try to interview you over those blackjack shufflers?

    I personally like the position of not having to troll back and forth with Rob. You could have been in the same position. When Rob asked for a ceasefire you could have been part of it but you chose not to. Not only did you not stop the trolling you poured the coal on it. What did you expect Rob to do? Sit by and let you fire away at him without responding?

    You are hung up on the credibility thing. Politicians do the same thing. Attack someone's credibility. Like it doesn't matter if one's assertions are true. It's how much credibility they have. It's just to damn easy to attack someone's credibility. But what about the assertions? Do they hold any weight?

    It's been quite awhile since Rob revealed his play on the double up bug. I put out a 1K reward for information from anyone that they taught Rob anything about the play. The gambling world is a small world and no one has responded.

    If a debate were held, to bad the prominants like Dancer, Munchkin and Shack won't participate, on the double up bug, I think we would all be witnesses to the fact that Rob holds more knowledge on the double up bug than any other human being. I think he can rip anyone to shreds over technical knowledge of the play. Not even IGT knows as much about it as he does.

    And it's just sad, KJ, that you and some others can't let old animosities go by the wayside and move on in life.
    Last edited by mickeycrimm; 08-27-2019 at 02:39 AM.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  9. #29
    My best guesses are that acccountinquestion, a notorious coward, is:

    1) Jerry Logan
    2) girlfriday
    3) Alan Mendelson's son straightening out karma
    4) redietz on a pre-season bender, but with a better sense of humor (the poll was a funny idea).


    I especially suspect the latter, as his stated self-banning here except to defend others from "Singer" seems to match up with the arrival of accountinquestion. Then again, redietz self banned from WoV just to make a point, which appears to be rare these days. So maybe not.

  10. #30
    I don't really know who or what Munchkin is and never heard of him until he hooked up with Dancer on GWAE--and like I've said, I don't blame Dancer for not wanting to talk to me, regardless of the huge boost it would give his show. But I'm not 100% sure it's the same with Shack yet.

    At any rate, when we see hacks like RS__ repeatedly posting how and why he won't "engage" when he just can't help himself from continually "engaging", it's very clear what his approach and agenda is when it comes to me. Not my fault he's a coward though.

  11. #31
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    I don't really know who or what Munchkin is and never heard of him until he hooked up with Dancer on GWAE--and like I've said, I don't blame Dancer for not wanting to talk to me, regardless of the huge boost it would give his show. But I'm not 100% sure it's the same with Shack yet.

    At any rate, when we see hacks like RS__ repeatedly posting how and why he won't "engage" when he just can't help himself from continually "engaging", it's very clear what his approach and agenda is when it comes to me. Not my fault he's a coward though.
    Hey, RS is a GOOD GUY! He is as Good As Gold! He's nice, sweet, understanding, patient, smart, tolerant!

  12. #32
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Rob is banned from WoV so ask yourself from your own experience, KJ, how much does Shack promote those that have been banned? He doesn't and won't. Did Shack try to interview you over those blackjack shufflers?
    It wasn't necessary for Shackleford or anyone interested in checking out my shuffle machine accusation to interview me. I posted where they where right down to the exact tables. Shackleford did show an interest in looking into it, but was a bit slow. I think he might have been out of town (judging from his lack of posts at the time) and by the time he posted that he was going to head to the casino in question to take a look, the machines had been removed.

    That situation unfolded pretty quickly after I made my posts and they were picked up by a second and third forum. It was less than two weeks from the time I stated what these machines were doing, and what I had done to prove it (tracking hundreds of shuffles), before the two machines in questions were removed. I think if there would have been some benefit to interview me, and I had requested it, Mike would have done so.

    Things like this as well as Rob's claim are bigger than any feud or personal bad feelings. In the interview and article that Mike did do with Rob, Mike looked at all Rob's claims at the time, listed them and concluded that he didn't find Rob's claim (regarding his progressive wagering system) credible, but would look into it again, if anything new came up. Well, this was something new. Mike would have revisited it I believe.

    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    I personally like the position of not having to troll back and forth with Rob. You could have been in the same position. When Rob asked for a ceasefire you could have been part of it but you chose not to. Not only did you not stop the trolling you poured the coal on it. What did you expect Rob to do? Sit by and let you fire away at him without responding?
    First I was never offered a ceasefire from Rob. But had I been nothing would have changed. I already try not to attack Rob on a personal level. Occasionally I retaliate to his bullying and say something personal, but I really try not to....and it is hard, because he is a bully and troll. He wants people to respond. He wants THAT kind of attention.

    My comments about Rob are specific to his claims, and for the last few months specific to his progressive wagering system claim which remains near impossible. I have let the double up thing go because there is no sense in discussing that anymore. Rob made the claim, but has offered no proof or anything collaborating to back it up. So it is just his word and everyone is free to decide for themselves. I do find it very strange and convenient that Rob says he knew no one would believe him, but offered no supporting documentation.

    So if I had been offered a ceasefire, I wouldn't have done a 180 about everything. impossible claims are still impossible claims, whether I am feuding with the person or not. Because some bully offers to stop attacking me as he has done for years isn't going to make me say, Hell yeah, the grass is purple and the earth flat.

    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    And it's just sad, KJ, that you and some others can't let old animosities go by the wayside and move on in life.
    Mickey it is not that I don't find Rob credible and you all of the sudden do (after your ceasefire). It is that 95% of people in the AP community don't find him credible and you do. And that is your right but don't try to make it about me not liking Rob. If I find someone credible I find them credible whether I like them or not and the same the other way.

    Case in point, I don't like you all that much anymore, based on your behavior on this forum. Seems all you do is cuss at people who don't agree with you and try to turn discussions of about gambling into politics. Discussion that have zero to do with politics. As soon as someone has a different opinion than you, you attack them with homophobic remarks and call them a liberal. You are doing just what Rob had done for years....demonizing people that disagree with you or have a different opinion.

    But despite this sudden change that I don't like, I still find your AP related claims very credible. You have proven yourself to be credible in that regard. Do you see the difference? Rob's claims aren't credible whether a person likes him or not or whether there is some cease fire agreement in place or not.
    Last edited by kewlJ; 08-27-2019 at 08:17 AM. Reason: formatting

  13. #33
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Does anyone know who brainfart brainsinquestion is a sock puppet of?
    I'm a sock puppet of ... <drumroll> myself.

    I only posted on RTP and under a different name. While I do use different names across different forums due to stalkers and weirdos and general privacy concerns, I do not have another account on this forum.

    Dan Druff knows me personally and can attest to that if you're really concerned.

    I'm just a dude who runs a business, plays poker, and is a wanna-be weekend warrior AP. I used to drink a lot.

    You wouldn't know my other accounts Mick. If you're seriously trying to figure something like that out, total waste of brainpower. I have no ulterior motives, thus no need for sock puppets.

    Cheers.
    You use different usernames across forums because you are a coward.
    Let me straighten this out. I only use different names because I don't want people being able to search up my whole history across various forums. I have no desire for glory or anything like you. I'm not on twitter (well I have an inactive account) I have no desire to be doxed or anything else like that. Dan Druff knows who I am. I've known the guy for over a decade. Not claiming friendship but a level of mutual respect. I'm here to trade thoughts/ideas. I'm not here to grow any sort of fame or make friends.

    Trust me, this isn't the first forum I had a weirdo startup a thread on me. (Where do ya'll think I learned !)

    Now I'd like to go see this Bob21 character, whoever that is.

    A Warning - From here on out I will just fuck with anyone who wants to think I am a "sock-puppet". I'll let you guys sit around and play Sherlock Holmes on a made-up mystery that doesn't exist and I'll lol from the shadows with my sock-puppet self.

    Actually, you guys just call me Master of Puppets...

    Master of puppets, I'm pulling your strings
    Twisting your mind and smashing your dreams
    Blinded by me, you can't see a thing
    Just call my name 'cause I'll hear you scream
    Master, master!
    Just call my name 'cause I'll hear you scream
    Master, master!

  14. #34
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    It wasn't necessary for Shackleford or anyone interested in checking out my shuffle machine accusation to interview me. I posted where they where right down to the exact tables. Shackleford did show an interest in looking into it, but was a bit slow. I think he might have been out of town (judging from his lack of posts at the time) and by the time he posted that he was going to head to the casino in question to take a look, the machines had been removed.

    That situation unfolded pretty quickly after I made my posts and they were picked up by a second and third forum. It was less than two weeks from the time I stated what these machines were doing, and what I had done to prove it (tracking hundreds of shuffles), before the two machines in questions were removed. I think if there would have been some benefit to interview me, and I had requested it, Mike would have done so.

    Things like this as well as Rob's claim are bigger than any feud or personal bad feelings. In the interview and article that Mike did do with Rob, Mike looked at all Rob's claims at the time, listed them and concluded that he didn't find Rob's claim (regarding his progressive wagering system) credible, but would look into it again, if anything new came up. Well, this was something new. Mike would have revisited it I believe.


    First I was never offered a ceasefire from Rob. But had I been nothing would have changed. I already try not to attack Rob on a personal level. Occasionally I retaliate to his bullying and say something personal, but I really try not to....and it is hard, because he is a bully and troll. He wants people to respond. He wants THAT kind of attention.

    My comments about Rob are specific to his claims, and for the last few months specific to his progressive wagering system claim which remains near impossible. I have let the double up thing go because there is no sense in discussing that anymore. Rob made the claim, but has offered no proof or anything collaborating to back it up. So it is just his word and everyone is free to decide for themselves. I do find it very strange and convenient that Rob says he knew no one would believe him, but offered no supporting documentation.

    So if I had been offered a ceasefire, I wouldn't have done a 180 about everything. impossible claims are still impossible claims, whether I am feuding with the person or not. Because some bully offers to stop attacking me as he has done for years isn't going to make me say, Hell yeah, the grass is purple and the earth flat.

    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    And it's just sad, KJ, that you and some others can't let old animosities go by the wayside and move on in life.
    Mickey it is not that I don't find Rob credible and you all of the sudden do (after your ceasefire). It is that 95% of people in the AP community don't find him credible and you do. And that is your right but don't try to make it about me not liking Rob. If I find someone credible I find them credible whether I like them or not and the same the other way.

    Case in point, I don't like you all that much anymore, based on your behavior on this forum. Seems all you do is cuss at people who don't agree with you and try to turn discussions of about gambling into politics. Discussion that have zero to do with politics. As soon as someone has a different opinion than you, you attack them with homophobic remarks and call them a liberal. You are doing just what Rob had done for years....demonizing people that disagree with you or have a different opinion.

    But despite this sudden change that I don't like, I still find your AP related claims very credible. You have proven yourself to be credible in that regard. Do you see the difference? Rob's claims aren't credible whether a person likes him or not or whether there is some cease fire agreement in place or not.
    You just keep coming up with excuses to carry on your troll feud with Rob. And you quit liking me? Fuck off, bitch. I quit liking you when you attacked me for giving my fair and balanced opinion on Rob and the double up bug. That told me a lot about you and some others on here. You're just nasty dirty little trolls yourselves. Your hatred is so strong you will give up friends over it. Thats a liberal trait. Rob's ceasefire request wasn't to just axel and me. It was to everyone. You got worse after that, not better. Robs posts took a different tone but you didn't acknowledge it and kept firing away. What did you expect Rob to do? You goaded him into going back to trolling your ass so live with the consequences and quit blaming others.

    And your bullshit line "who knows what they are talking about and who's just talking." You damn sure didn't apply that to all the technical information Rob gave up on the double up bug. I looked at all that information to come to an opinion. You looked at who was giving the information to come to your opinion. I asked myself if the information given was credible. You on the other hand didn't consider anything but your dislike of Rob and based you bullshit assertions on it. You are totally biased on the issue, hence, your opinion is worth about as much as an empty pack of cigarettes.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  15. #35
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post

    I'm a sock puppet of ... <drumroll> myself.

    I only posted on RTP and under a different name. While I do use different names across different forums due to stalkers and weirdos and general privacy concerns, I do not have another account on this forum.

    Dan Druff knows me personally and can attest to that if you're really concerned.

    I'm just a dude who runs a business, plays poker, and is a wanna-be weekend warrior AP. I used to drink a lot.

    You wouldn't know my other accounts Mick. If you're seriously trying to figure something like that out, total waste of brainpower. I have no ulterior motives, thus no need for sock puppets.

    Cheers.
    You use different usernames across forums because you are a coward.
    Let me straighten this out. I only use different names because I don't want people being able to search up my whole history across various forums. I have no desire for glory or anything like you. I'm not on twitter (well I have an inactive account) I have no desire to be doxed or anything else like that. Dan Druff knows who I am. I've known the guy for over a decade. Not claiming friendship but a level of mutual respect. I'm here to trade thoughts/ideas. I'm not here to grow any sort of fame or make friends.

    Trust me, this isn't the first forum I had a weirdo startup a thread on me. (Where do ya'll think I learned !)

    Now I'd like to go see this Bob21 character, whoever that is.

    A Warning - From here on out I will just fuck with anyone who wants to think I am a "sock-puppet". I'll let you guys sit around and play Sherlock Holmes on a made-up mystery that doesn't exist and I'll lol from the shadows with my sock-puppet self.

    Actually, you guys just call me Master of Puppets...

    Master of puppets, I'm pulling your strings
    Twisting your mind and smashing your dreams
    Blinded by me, you can't see a thing
    Just call my name 'cause I'll hear you scream
    Master, master!
    Just call my name 'cause I'll hear you scream
    Master, master!
    You're a scumbag coward for using all those usernames. No one with any standing in the gambling world does that. But I understand why you do it. You don't want all those you trolled to come exposing you on new sites. Just a run of the mill coward. Now run on off to some other new site with another phony username. That is, after you go pee in the women's room.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  16. #36
    Originally Posted by RS__ View Post
    Rob is a proven liar and he personally admitted he just posts on forums to irk and troll people. There's really no reason to engage him. Remember, even after all this fantasy "Rob played the DU bug" stuff came out, Rob is STILL pretending that his bunk system works.

    The most likely scenario is that Rob felt like his BS "legacy" of working some shit system and living off govt. handouts & bankruptcy wasn't good enough for him, so he concocted some new story so that his legacy would be "the greatest AP to ever live". This isn't the first time we've heard some exorbitant story from Rob trying to stay in the spotlight, and it damn sure isn't going to be the last.

    Just wait till he claims he's DB Cooper.
    Haven't posted in some time, but what you said here RS__ is 100% spot on.

    After reading through some of the posts concerning the double up bug, I'd be surprised if anyone took anything Rob has to say seriously ever again. (As if anyone ever did.)

    For decades he's done nothing but disparage and insult APs like AxelWolf and mickeycrimm.

    He sees mickeycrimm get interviewed on GWAE and the respect AxelWolf receives from many of the folks posting on this site that have come over from the Wizard's site. I imagine that must have stung.

    Then, he literally crawls out from under his rock on his belly, hat in hand, begging to initiate private conversations with both AxelWolf and mickeycrimm to try and get them to vouch for his concocted story. Using their reputations and good name in an attempt to shine a light on himself.

    What an absolute pathetic joke of a human being.

  17. #37
    Originally Posted by a2a3dseddie View Post
    Originally Posted by RS__ View Post
    Rob is a proven liar and he personally admitted he just posts on forums to irk and troll people. There's really no reason to engage him. Remember, even after all this fantasy "Rob played the DU bug" stuff came out, Rob is STILL pretending that his bunk system works.

    The most likely scenario is that Rob felt like his BS "legacy" of working some shit system and living off govt. handouts & bankruptcy wasn't good enough for him, so he concocted some new story so that his legacy would be "the greatest AP to ever live". This isn't the first time we've heard some exorbitant story from Rob trying to stay in the spotlight, and it damn sure isn't going to be the last.

    Just wait till he claims he's DB Cooper.
    Haven't posted in some time, but what you said here RS__ is 100% spot on.

    After reading through some of the posts concerning the double up bug, I'd be surprised if anyone took anything Rob has to say seriously ever again. (As if anyone ever did.)

    For decades he's done nothing but disparage and insult APs like AxelWolf and mickeycrimm.

    He sees mickeycrimm get interviewed on GWAE and the respect AxelWolf receives from many of the folks posting on this site that have come over from the Wizard's site. I imagine that must have stung.

    Then, he literally crawls out from under his rock on his belly, hat in hand, begging to initiate private conversations with both AxelWolf and mickeycrimm to try and get them to vouch for his concocted story. Using their reputations and good name in an attempt to shine a light on himself.

    What an absolute pathetic joke of a human being.
    Yeah right eddie. Always a follower. And I suppose you aren't smart enough to realize all your rant accomplished this time around is identifying how you believe both mickey and axel are sooo stupid and unaware that they were, and never have been able, to make their own choices and know how to approach people or things and then comment on it--unless approved by losers like you.

    Wise up.

  18. #38
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    It wasn't necessary for Shackleford or anyone interested in checking out my shuffle machine accusation to interview me. I posted where they where right down to the exact tables. Shackleford did show an interest in looking into it, but was a bit slow. I think he might have been out of town (judging from his lack of posts at the time) and by the time he posted that he was going to head to the casino in question to take a look, the machines had been removed.

    That situation unfolded pretty quickly after I made my posts and they were picked up by a second and third forum. It was less than two weeks from the time I stated what these machines were doing, and what I had done to prove it (tracking hundreds of shuffles), before the two machines in questions were removed. I think if there would have been some benefit to interview me, and I had requested it, Mike would have done so.

    Things like this as well as Rob's claim are bigger than any feud or personal bad feelings. In the interview and article that Mike did do with Rob, Mike looked at all Rob's claims at the time, listed them and concluded that he didn't find Rob's claim (regarding his progressive wagering system) credible, but would look into it again, if anything new came up. Well, this was something new. Mike would have revisited it I believe.


    First I was never offered a ceasefire from Rob. But had I been nothing would have changed. I already try not to attack Rob on a personal level. Occasionally I retaliate to his bullying and say something personal, but I really try not to....and it is hard, because he is a bully and troll. He wants people to respond. He wants THAT kind of attention.

    My comments about Rob are specific to his claims, and for the last few months specific to his progressive wagering system claim which remains near impossible. I have let the double up thing go because there is no sense in discussing that anymore. Rob made the claim, but has offered no proof or anything collaborating to back it up. So it is just his word and everyone is free to decide for themselves. I do find it very strange and convenient that Rob says he knew no one would believe him, but offered no supporting documentation.

    So if I had been offered a ceasefire, I wouldn't have done a 180 about everything. impossible claims are still impossible claims, whether I am feuding with the person or not. Because some bully offers to stop attacking me as he has done for years isn't going to make me say, Hell yeah, the grass is purple and the earth flat.

    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    And it's just sad, KJ, that you and some others can't let old animosities go by the wayside and move on in life.
    Mickey it is not that I don't find Rob credible and you all of the sudden do (after your ceasefire). It is that 95% of people in the AP community don't find him credible and you do. And that is your right but don't try to make it about me not liking Rob. If I find someone credible I find them credible whether I like them or not and the same the other way.

    Case in point, I don't like you all that much anymore, based on your behavior on this forum. Seems all you do is cuss at people who don't agree with you and try to turn discussions of about gambling into politics. Discussion that have zero to do with politics. As soon as someone has a different opinion than you, you attack them with homophobic remarks and call them a liberal. You are doing just what Rob had done for years....demonizing people that disagree with you or have a different opinion.

    But despite this sudden change that I don't like, I still find your AP related claims very credible. You have proven yourself to be credible in that regard. Do you see the difference? Rob's claims aren't credible whether a person likes him or not or whether there is some cease fire agreement in place or not.
    You just keep coming up with excuses to carry on your troll feud with Rob. And you quit liking me? Fuck off, bitch. I quit liking you when you attacked me for giving my fair and balanced opinion on Rob and the double up bug. That told me a lot about you and some others on here. You're just nasty dirty little trolls yourselves. Your hatred is so strong you will give up friends over it. Thats a liberal trait. Rob's ceasefire request wasn't to just axel and me. It was to everyone. You got worse after that, not better. Robs posts took a different tone but you didn't acknowledge it and kept firing away. What did you expect Rob to do? You goaded him into going back to trolling your ass so live with the consequences and quit blaming others.

    And your bullshit line "who knows what they are talking about and who's just talking." You damn sure didn't apply that to all the technical information Rob gave up on the double up bug. I looked at all that information to come to an opinion. You looked at who was giving the information to come to your opinion. I asked myself if the information given was credible. You on the other hand didn't consider anything but your dislike of Rob and based you bullshit assertions on it. You are totally biased on the issue, hence, your opinion is worth about as much as an empty pack of cigarettes.

    So let's get this straight. "Singer" disparages APs for 10 to 20 years (depending on the AP), but then he offers an olive branch, and people should accept it? And they should accept it why exactly? That's the problem I'm having trying to figure out this line of thought. What's the motivation for accepting the olive branch? Singing Kumbaya?

    It seems to me that the appropriate response if, say, "Singer" was denigrating a late family member for 10 years, would be to wait until one of "Singer's" family members died, then denigrate them for 10 years, then offer him a similar olive branch. That would seem to make things even-steven.

    I just can't fathom what the motivation would be for letting 10 to 20 years of over-the-top nastiness ride. To put oneself in mickeycrimm's good graces? I mean, c'mon, seriously, what's the purported reasons for making nice with "Singer?" So one could meet Jerry Logan? Or get a real estate deal from girlfriday?

  19. #39
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post

    You're a scumbag coward for using all those usernames. No one with any standing in the gambling world does that. But I understand why you do it. You don't want all those you trolled to come exposing you on new sites. Just a run of the mill coward. Now run on off to some other new site with another phony username. That is, after you go pee in the women's room.
    No, I actually have a professional career and the internet is full of mentally ill freaks. I don't want them trolling/stalking me.

    We've never even posted on the same forum until now. I was aware of you though from my browsing of other forums where I never bothered to sign up. I'm not sure what this has to do with anything but show your mental illness. I'm a scumbag because I have an actual professional career and would rather not be all over google and the likes. You on the other hand are basically a professional mooch. A nifty mooch, but it isn't like you contribute anything. Yet, so quick to look down on others. A guy with nothing to lose.

    What would it even matter if you knew my other usernames on other forums? Lol. So nuts. So you could go stalk me? I don't put myself out there like you. I seek no attention or glory.

    I haven't trolled anyone on this site outside of Rob nor am I hiding from anyone on this site. Your logic sucks and so do your skills outside of slot machines. Like I said before, stick with the machines as they have treated you well.

    I never said I had any "standing in the gambling world". I referred to myself as a wanna-be weekend warrior AP. Are you this fucking dumb outside of machines? I know a few people, nothing more.

    Sorry you got so worked up over my exposing how Trump owns you mentally. You and your "moderate" views. That is literally what this is all about.

    Man you are nasty. No wonder you couldn't hold down a job. Christ.

  20. #40
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    It wasn't necessary for Shackleford or anyone interested in checking out my shuffle machine accusation to interview me. I posted where they where right down to the exact tables. Shackleford did show an interest in looking into it, but was a bit slow. I think he might have been out of town (judging from his lack of posts at the time) and by the time he posted that he was going to head to the casino in question to take a look, the machines had been removed.

    That situation unfolded pretty quickly after I made my posts and they were picked up by a second and third forum. It was less than two weeks from the time I stated what these machines were doing, and what I had done to prove it (tracking hundreds of shuffles), before the two machines in questions were removed. I think if there would have been some benefit to interview me, and I had requested it, Mike would have done so.

    Things like this as well as Rob's claim are bigger than any feud or personal bad feelings. In the interview and article that Mike did do with Rob, Mike looked at all Rob's claims at the time, listed them and concluded that he didn't find Rob's claim (regarding his progressive wagering system) credible, but would look into it again, if anything new came up. Well, this was something new. Mike would have revisited it I believe.


    First I was never offered a ceasefire from Rob. But had I been nothing would have changed. I already try not to attack Rob on a personal level. Occasionally I retaliate to his bullying and say something personal, but I really try not to....and it is hard, because he is a bully and troll. He wants people to respond. He wants THAT kind of attention.

    My comments about Rob are specific to his claims, and for the last few months specific to his progressive wagering system claim which remains near impossible. I have let the double up thing go because there is no sense in discussing that anymore. Rob made the claim, but has offered no proof or anything collaborating to back it up. So it is just his word and everyone is free to decide for themselves. I do find it very strange and convenient that Rob says he knew no one would believe him, but offered no supporting documentation.

    So if I had been offered a ceasefire, I wouldn't have done a 180 about everything. impossible claims are still impossible claims, whether I am feuding with the person or not. Because some bully offers to stop attacking me as he has done for years isn't going to make me say, Hell yeah, the grass is purple and the earth flat.



    Mickey it is not that I don't find Rob credible and you all of the sudden do (after your ceasefire). It is that 95% of people in the AP community don't find him credible and you do. And that is your right but don't try to make it about me not liking Rob. If I find someone credible I find them credible whether I like them or not and the same the other way.

    Case in point, I don't like you all that much anymore, based on your behavior on this forum. Seems all you do is cuss at people who don't agree with you and try to turn discussions of about gambling into politics. Discussion that have zero to do with politics. As soon as someone has a different opinion than you, you attack them with homophobic remarks and call them a liberal. You are doing just what Rob had done for years....demonizing people that disagree with you or have a different opinion.

    But despite this sudden change that I don't like, I still find your AP related claims very credible. You have proven yourself to be credible in that regard. Do you see the difference? Rob's claims aren't credible whether a person likes him or not or whether there is some cease fire agreement in place or not.
    You just keep coming up with excuses to carry on your troll feud with Rob. And you quit liking me? Fuck off, bitch. I quit liking you when you attacked me for giving my fair and balanced opinion on Rob and the double up bug. That told me a lot about you and some others on here. You're just nasty dirty little trolls yourselves. Your hatred is so strong you will give up friends over it. Thats a liberal trait. Rob's ceasefire request wasn't to just axel and me. It was to everyone. You got worse after that, not better. Robs posts took a different tone but you didn't acknowledge it and kept firing away. What did you expect Rob to do? You goaded him into going back to trolling your ass so live with the consequences and quit blaming others.

    And your bullshit line "who knows what they are talking about and who's just talking." You damn sure didn't apply that to all the technical information Rob gave up on the double up bug. I looked at all that information to come to an opinion. You looked at who was giving the information to come to your opinion. I asked myself if the information given was credible. You on the other hand didn't consider anything but your dislike of Rob and based you bullshit assertions on it. You are totally biased on the issue, hence, your opinion is worth about as much as an empty pack of cigarettes.

    So let's get this straight. "Singer" disparages APs for 10 to 20 years (depending on the AP), but then he offers an olive branch, and people should accept it? And they should accept it why exactly? That's the problem I'm having trying to figure out this line of thought. What's the motivation for accepting the olive branch? Singing Kumbaya?

    It seems to me that the appropriate response if, say, "Singer" was denigrating a late family member for 10 years, would be to wait until one of "Singer's" family members died, then denigrate them for 10 years, then offer him a similar olive branch. That would seem to make things even-steven.

    I just can't fathom what the motivation would be for letting 10 to 20 years of over-the-top nastiness ride. To put oneself in mickeycrimm's good graces? I mean, c'mon, seriously, what's the purported reasons for making nice with "Singer?" So one could meet Jerry Logan? Or get a real estate deal from girlfriday?
    Weird. Just plain weird.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Natha/Kentry/Tasha/Karen/andrew
    By Robsingerwho in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 08-09-2018, 05:28 AM
  2. Hi! I'm Tasha!
    By Tasha in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 84
    Last Post: 06-18-2018, 02:08 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •