Page 2 of 9 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 168

Thread: The Complete Sequence

  1. #21
    Again kew, you have no evidence that I've been untruthful on anything. You keep saying that, yet you're equating my stated results from a strategy you do not understand with it supposedly not being true because its results don't meet mathematical theory. If you knew anything about how the math works then you'd never be claiming such nonsense.

    I've been invited to meet with Mike, likely because some people understand the magnitude of this story and would like to get some expert opinion on what I've done. I'm not knocking doors down. IGT contacted ME about it but they're being very unclear about what they want. I released the story to axel, mickey and here because this is where I happened to be at this point in time. And you will not understand this either: when the play ended in 2009 and I retired, what was important to me was that I fade away from the play and keep a close eye on if Kane and Nestor would be prosecuted. Somehow proving anything about my take from the play 10 and more years down the road had absolutely no meaning to me. I imposed a 10-year period of silence mostly because I wanted to tell family members and a few close friends about what I did, and how. They all understand and believe me by the way, because unlike you who knows nothing about me, they have experienced my lifelong truthfulness and abilities.

    Finally.....you want me to be living in an old RV in someone's driveway stealing electricity. I'm not. You want me to be a fatty. I'm not. You don't want me to be in good shape. I am. You don't want me to have won $375k from playing my strategy. I did. You probably don't want it to be that I've been very happily married for 41 years because your mind can't figure how a fabricated fat old broke guy who lies and has no home could have such a wife along with children and grandchildren. I have been. Oops....that must mean you're full of it.

    I could go on and on but I'll cut you a break. If wizard interviews me you'll just have to live with it. From what I hear he couldn't care less about what you think or say anyway.

  2. #22
    Rob, seriously....what IS wrong with you?

    If your family and friends believe you because they know you as a truthful person, power to them and you. Unfortunately, you have not been a truthful person on this forum or any of your other stops in the gambling/AP community, so none of us have that to go by. If you had been somewhat truthful over the years, instead of lie after lie and usually getting caught in them, perhaps we wouldn't even be in this situation.

    We are all aware of my relationship with Mike Shackleford. He doesn't like me and while I don't dislike him (double negative), I have lost respect for him as a person. Why on earth would you even bring that up? has nothing to do with your situation. Are you hoping that if Shackleford somehow says he believes you, that is some reflection on me? That you have a leg up or something? For the record while Mike doesn't like me personally and the way I have behaved since he banned me and some of the things I have said, he has never said he had any questions about my claims as a card counter/AP. As a matter of fact, I could pull up some quotes of just the opposite.

    BUT he has already voiced his opinion that your claim regarding your progressive wagering and special plays is BS (I believe his term). So we will see what he opines about this claim. Either way, it has nothing to do with me, so not sure why you are bringing me into it. This is your deal and if people find you not credible it is your doing. No one else.

    I'll tell you Rob it would be a freaking shame if your story/claim about the double up is true, and because you lied and lied and lied about everything under the sun, people can't and don't believe you. That would be a real life modern day 'Boy who cried wolf'. When the wolf came no one believed him. But if that is what occurs (and I don't think it is), YOU did that Rob, so stop blaming everyone else.

  3. #23
    Rob, I am going to stop this back and forth. It is rehashing and going nowhere. Let's see how this plays out and go from there. I wish you luck Rob. If your story is true, I hope you can prove it to Mike's satisfaction, so you can get the attention you crave.

  4. #24
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Again kew, you have no evidence that I've been untruthful on anything.
    Sorry, I know I said I was done for the moment, but I skimmed over this and guess I missed it. I can NOT let this go with out responding.

    You said my partner/spouse died of aids, when he died from an aneurism.

    You said my partner was my "sugardaddy" when I was the one who paid the bills.

    You implied I had sex with both my Brother and Mother.

    You said I live with my mother and she pays the bills.

    I could be here all night listing your freaking lies about things big and small. What a ridiculous statement that I have no evidence of your untruthfulness.

  5. #25
    As I expected, you could not identify anything I've said here that's untrue. In other words, you are happiest when you lie about others (which you've been caught doing all the time here BTW), you thrive amongst chaos, and you live for daily conflict. Why do you think you have so few people who believe, support or even like you? What I believe is you can't even see half of this. You never admit being wrong, I
    nobody but you is right, and you can't handle criticism. Is this how pathetic and unlikable all gay people are? You and redietz deserve each other.

    I'll leave this go and give you another chance to do what you said you would do: have enough self-confidence and self-control to ignore me. But you can't, can you. You're too disgustingly weak a person, and you react only out of shame. What you're missing is if you lie about something like this all the time, why would anybody believe a thing you make up about yourself....which you so desperately seem to need.

    Get over me. I can't help it that you have no family, no life, and have a few screws loose.

  6. #26
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Again kew, you have no evidence that I've been untruthful on anything.
    Sorry, I know I said I was done for the moment, but I skimmed over this and guess I missed it. I can NOT let this go with out responding.

    You said my partner/spouse died of aids, when he died from an aneurism.

    You said my partner was my "sugardaddy" when I was the one who paid the bills.

    You implied I had sex with both my Brother and Mother.

    You said I live with my mother and she pays the bills.

    I could be here all night listing your freaking lies about things big and small. What a ridiculous statement that I have no evidence of your untruthfulness.
    Can you prove to us that ANY of what I said is untrue? Then by your own standards, YOU'RE LYING!

    Caught in your own trap again. What a surprise!
    Gotta love it
    Last edited by Rob.Singer; 09-16-2019 at 07:45 PM.

  7. #27
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Rob, seriously....what IS wrong with you?

    If your family and friends believe you because they know you as a truthful person, power to them and you. Unfortunately, you have not been a truthful person on this forum or any of your other stops in the gambling/AP community, so none of us have that to go by. If you had been somewhat truthful over the years, instead of lie after lie and usually getting caught in them, perhaps we wouldn't even be in this situation.

    We are all aware of my relationship with Mike Shackleford. He doesn't like me and while I don't dislike him (double negative), I have lost respect for him as a person. Why on earth would you even bring that up? has nothing to do with your situation. Are you hoping that if Shackleford somehow says he believes you, that is some reflection on me? That you have a leg up or something? For the record while Mike doesn't like me personally and the way I have behaved since he banned me and some of the things I have said, he has never said he had any questions about my claims as a card counter/AP. As a matter of fact, I could pull up some quotes of just the opposite.

    BUT he has already voiced his opinion that your claim regarding your progressive wagering and special plays is BS (I believe his term). So we will see what he opines about this claim. Either way, it has nothing to do with me, so not sure why you are bringing me into it. This is your deal and if people find you not credible it is your doing. No one else.

    I'll tell you Rob it would be a freaking shame if your story/claim about the double up is true, and because you lied and lied and lied about everything under the sun, people can't and don't believe you. That would be a real life modern day 'Boy who cried wolf'. When the wolf came no one believed him. But if that is what occurs (and I don't think it is), YOU did that Rob, so stop blaming everyone else.
    Not everyone believes his story is untrue. But you damn sure do.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  8. #28
    The coming scrutiny of Rob's claims is going to be very interesting. Shack's findings are certainly to be debated on Wizard of Vegas. Besides the AP's there are some pretty heavy hitters from the dark side too, like Drich, Mathextremist, Crystalmath.

    My opinion is still that it is highly likely Rob put this play down for 5.5 years. He's definitely the type of person that has the smarts to pull it off, not get greedy and overwork the play, spread the action around, a one a done approach to jackpots in each casino.

    His technical knowledge of the play is highly superior to anyone else's, probably even IGT. When it had not been published anywhere online Rob told us the sequence in the Wired article was incorrect. KJ went to the author of the Wired article, obviously looking for evidence to discredit Rob. But the author verified Rob's claim, they purposely put the wrong sequence in the article. In KJ's zeal to "unmask" Rob he actually bolstered Rob's argument.

    Now, Rob retiring in 2009, the same year Kane and Nestor got busted? Rob didn't tell us that to bolster his claim. I remembered it and brought it up here. Was it a coincidence? Well, was the cut on OJ's finger a coincidence?

    I still have my 1K reward out there and no one has tried to claim it. Will someone come out of the woodwork and say with sincerity they taught Rob the play? I wouldn't hold my breath on that one.

    Another thing in Rob's favor, he's not shying away from the coming scrutiny. There are going to be a lot of sharpsters trying to tear his argument apart. He doesn't look like he is backing down to me. Shack's investigation will lead to more publicity....and more scrutiny as we go forward.

    I look forward to following the story as events unfold.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  9. #29
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    The coming scrutiny of Rob's claims is going to be very interesting. Shack's findings are certainly to be debated on Wizard of Vegas. Besides the AP's there are some pretty heavy hitters from the dark side too, like Drich, Mathextremist, Crystalmath.

    My opinion is still that it is highly likely Rob put this play down for 5.5 years. He's definitely the type of person that has the smarts to pull it off, not get greedy and overwork the play, spread the action around, a one a done approach to jackpots in each casino.

    His technical knowledge of the play is highly superior to anyone else's, probably even IGT. When it had not been published anywhere online Rob told us the sequence in the Wired article was incorrect. KJ went to the author of the Wired article, obviously looking for evidence to discredit Rob. But the author verified Rob's claim, they purposely put the wrong sequence in the article. In KJ's zeal to "unmask" Rob he actually bolstered Rob's argument.

    Now, Rob retiring in 2009, the same year Kane and Nestor got busted? Rob didn't tell us that to bolster his claim. I remembered it and brought it up here. Was it a coincidence? Well, was the cut on OJ's finger a coincidence?

    I still have my 1K reward out there and no one has tried to claim it. Will someone come out of the woodwork and say with sincerity they taught Rob the play? I wouldn't hold my breath on that one.

    Another thing in Rob's favor, he's not shying away from the coming scrutiny. There are going to be a lot of sharpsters trying to tear his argument apart. He doesn't look like he is backing down to me. Shack's investigation will lead to more publicity....and more scrutiny as we go forward.

    I look forward to following the story as events unfold.
    As all can see, Mickey is finally very much in love ❤️....congratulations

  10. #30
    I get why some people don't want to believe anything about me that's decent or in this case, exceptional, because they don't like me from all my years of forum nastiness. But as I've said, it had its purpose, as it was the choice I made to help me through a long and tough period of keeping my mouth shut. Diversion personified. Each AP I talk to sees me for who I really am. Shack and I got along great. I chatted with axel about a lot more than vp for nearly 2 hours. And mickey would be a lifelong friend had we met 40 years ago.

    Kew and his biases have only hurt him. If he's really interested in gaming stories and history then what I've done should entice him to look at everything surrounding THIS situation stand alone in order to see what makes sense and what doesn't--kinda like mickey has--instead of muddling it up what he doesn't like about my SPS and all the untruths he's created in his head about it and me.

    People like RS__ who claim I'm not worth their time yet continuously go out of their way to denigrate my age & appearance (6'2" 200 lbs. at 70 and I'm fat!) because as everyone knows, when you get over-frustrated with someone and/or their success then you attack their appearance....I really believe he was personally hurt by a thread being brought up about me on WoV, and he's afraid of what might come of it.

    Whatever happens with Wizard down the road, I can tell you that he WILL be re-focused on the magnitude of the entire double up bug background. I think everybody is looking at this as if history was already known at the time I came across the glitch. Not so of course, and I was alone and nervous as hell the entire time. People say now that they'd have beat the play for far more than I did, but I believe they'd have been caught soon. Go back and do it on an island and under the lights like I did, and the tune will change. You know nothing about anything but the play, you have no idea which machines work and which don't, and the worst pressure of all is the burning desire to tell someone about such a thing.

    It's over now, I made my money from it, and the residual win is that I always feel like a king in every Nevada casino I go into, always remembering what I was able to do during those 5-1/2 years. I never planned on "announcing" this because it's not something even remotely important and to be clear, in 2004-2009 I didn't know whether I'd still be talking about vp on a forum in 2019 or even be alive for that matter, and until Kane I had no idea how or if my play would end. I wish I had the foresight to have taken a video of me operating the play at the time, but now that I think about it I wouldn't have done it because I wanted no evidence existing.

    It is what it is. Life goes on.

  11. #31
    RobSinger wrote:

    I never planned on "announcing" this because it's not something even remotely important and to be clear, in 2004-2009 I didn't know whether I'd still be talking about vp on a forum in 2019 or even be alive for that matter, and until Kane I had no idea how or if my play would end.


    Biggest bullshit quote in the history of gaming forums. Not to mention you are talking through both sides of your mouth. On one hand you say:

    "I never planned on "announcing" this because it's not something even remotely important"

    BUT, in the same post you are masterbating all over yourself with these lines:


    I get why some people don't want to believe anything about me that's decent or in this case, exceptional, because they don't like me from all my years of forum nastiness.


    It's over now, I made my money from it, and the residual win is that I always feel like a king in every Nevada casino I go into, always remembering what I was able to do during those 5-1/2 years.


    Which is it Rob? A play you used that as you say wasen't even remotely important? OR, something exceptional that made you think you were king of Vegas anytime you walked into any casino right up there with the likes of Elvis, and Sinatra?
    Last edited by BoSox; 09-19-2019 at 09:42 AM.

  12. #32
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Another thing in Rob's favor, he's not shying away from the coming scrutiny. There are going to be a lot of sharpsters trying to tear his argument apart. He doesn't look like he is backing down to me. Shack's investigation will lead to more publicity....and more scrutiny as we go forward.

    I look forward to following the story as events unfold.
    Of course Rob isn't shying away from the coming scrutiny. Rob is a narcissist to the 10th degree. He loves the attention and scrutiny. More than loves he needs the attention and scrutiny.

    Mickey has repeatedly made the point that one of the things that he finds credible about Rob's story is that Rob announced his retirement in 2009. Mickey says "he remembers Rob announced his retirement in 2009". I have no idea if that is true. Can someone show me where he posted that? And if it is true, proves absolutely nothing. 2009 would be the year Rob turned 60. Perhaps that was a point in his life he decided to stop throwing so much money away at the casinos.

    What I will concede is that at some point this story 'peeked' Rob's interest. And when that occurs the person wants to find out all they can about the story that they find so intriguing. And I suspect that is what happened here. Everyone is focusing on the Wired story, because that pops up with any kind of search, but there are or were a number of different articles out there about the double up bug. I know because I have read at least one other article, maybe two, in the past. So who knows where Rob got some information from that he is trying to parlay into credibility.

    I also think it is possible that after the story broke and peaked Rob's intertest, that he was able to locate a few machines that had not yet been "fixed" with a software upgrade. This likely would be at some sort of smaller out of the way casino, just the kind of place Rob seems to like to hit. So he could have found it that way and even played it some, for a profit, just no where near the time or numbers of his claim. There are just a number of possibilities as to how Rob could have come into some information.....AFTER THE FACT.

    Of course there is also the possibility that Rob's claim is exactly as he says. Not likely based on the fact that Rob has a long history of lying and untruthfulness on these forums and throughout the gambling community and that history of lying dates back before this claim, so the lying is not a diversion cover-up as Rob claims.

    Like mickey, I too am looking forward to Mr. Shackleford weighing in with his opinion. I see 3 ways that could go. Shack could say he believes Rob played this play for 5.5 years earning 3 million dollars. I think this unlikely but he could opine that. Of course there would be no argument from Rob. There would be discussion as there would be arguments from some other members of WoV as mickey said. And Rob would love that He would claim victory from Shack's opinion and revel in the attention of discussion.

    2nd possibility is that Shack says he doesn't believe Rob played the play and 3rd possible is that he doesn't offer an opinion, saying he has seen nothing that would prove Rob played the play, but that he could have. In Both cases, I suspect we will see the old Singer playbook in that Rob will attack Shack's credibility, saying things like he just doesn't have the knowledge understand the play or that he went into it with a bias. Almost anything to undermine the credibility. Seen it a hundred times. BUT, there would still be quite a bit of discussion, maybe even more in this instance, and that is really what a narcissist like Rob is after. So it is all a win/win for Rob. A 70 year old ultra narcissist, completely irrelevant in the gambling community, back in the spotlight that he seeks. And isn't that what it is all about Rob?

  13. #33
    This is actually almost a re-run for me and a handful of the blackjack guys that participated at Norm's forum 6-7 years ago.

    The guy T3 that I challenged that lead to my 2 bannings at BJTF and WoV was almost an identical situation. T3 was a small time card counter. He posted that for years, maybe decades. Then all of the sudden he announced that he was going to be known as one of the blackjack greats. What followed was several years of escalating ridiculous claims. Claims that the math said are impossible.

    Now I don't know if Rob actually "announced" that he was going to be known as one of the great VP players, as that was before my time on any forum dealing with Rob. Weather he announced it like T3 or not, it is crystal clear Rob's goal was to elevate himself above what were considered the top VP players. Hell he even took a handle mocking Bob Dancer. That tells you what Rob's whole agenda has been about.

    Real AP's, real and successful AP's don't do what Rob and T3 did, they have no need to inform and prove to the world that they are the greatest. I'll give a couple examples.

    Mickeycrimm: Mickey has detailed some of his plays. A lot of low limit stuff. Stuff a lot of other AP's wouldn't find worthwhile. THAT is a real AP! Mickey doesn't toot his horn as one of the greats, although for my money, he just may be.

    Axelwolf: Not one of my favorite people in the community, but I have great respect for him as an AP. I used to think Axel was solely a machine specialist. And while he is that, I have come to realize, he has played plenty of table games including blackjack. He will go after anything +EV that he deems worth his while. Once in a while he blows his horn a little bit (among other things), like when he attempts to put others down by telling us all how he is self taught.....(as if there is some sort of shame from learning from books and other players), but generally you don't see Axel doing a lot of self promoting.

    RS__, MaxPen, BoSox and some others I am leaving out...most AP's aren't running around telling you how great they are. They do their thing, whether professionally (full-time, making a living) or Part-time recreationally/supplemental. But you just don't hear real AP, telling you how great they are.

    Now I am a lowly card counter. You know salamander stuff. Lowest ring on the AP ladder. Many other AP's look down on me. And that is all fine. I am not out to be the best card counter ever. I do my thing and that is all I care about. I do share my experiences and that is often mistaken as braggadocios, but I mean really a guy at the lowest level, looked down on by most....that person isn't bragging. Even some things that I do that I though might be kind of special like tracking multiple table, turns out most successful card counters eventually incorporate into their game. So no seeking or claims of being the greatest here. Just some sharing or experiences. Sharing the journey.

    Again that's how you can tell who is real and who is just some narcissist living in a fantasy world claiming to be something he isn't. Rob is classic...absolutely text book!

  14. #34
    Here come the haters. KJ, have you tried your hand in conspiracy theories? You would be good at it. Hucksterism is your long suit. All you are really saying is you hate Rob. Very destructive emotion.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  15. #35
    I've already won their arguments mickey, and they know it. It's why they can't rest. And can you just IMAGINE the amount of frustration, humiliation, and envy kew is suffering right now--and forevermore if I talk to Shack--since he's rejected and can't get the time of day from WoV? That's gotta hurt REAL bad....... In fact, it's enough for me to feast on for the next 10 years! (assuming his faulty ticker makes it that long).

  16. #36
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    I've already won their arguments mickey, and they know it. It's why they can't rest. And can you just IMAGINE the amount of frustration, humiliation, and envy kew is suffering right now--and forevermore if I talk to Shack--since he's rejected and can't get the time of day from WoV? That's gotta hurt REAL bad....... In fact, it's enough for me to feast on for the next 10 years! (assuming his faulty ticker makes it that long).
    Only a true narcissist would think and say things like this. Thank you for proving my point Rob.

  17. #37
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    I've already won their arguments mickey, and they know it. It's why they can't rest. And can you just IMAGINE the amount of frustration, humiliation, and envy kew is suffering right now--and forevermore if I talk to Shack--since he's rejected and can't get the time of day from WoV? That's gotta hurt REAL bad....... In fact, it's enough for me to feast on for the next 10 years! (assuming his faulty ticker makes it that long).
    Only a true narcissist would think and say things like this. Thank you for proving my point Rob.
    And I'll take that as meaning I made another direct hit.

    Bingo, Dingo!

  18. #38
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    I've already won their arguments mickey, and they know it. It's why they can't rest. And can you just IMAGINE the amount of frustration, humiliation, and envy kew is suffering right now--and forevermore if I talk to Shack--since he's rejected and can't get the time of day from WoV? That's gotta hurt REAL bad....... In fact, it's enough for me to feast on for the next 10 years! (assuming his faulty ticker makes it that long).
    Only a true narcissist would think and say things like this. Thank you for proving my point Rob.
    And I'll take that as meaning I made another direct hit.

    Bingo, Dingo!
    Rob, give your grandkids money to spend time with you or something like a normal old, irrelevant man and stop obsessing over me. It's pathetic.

    And creepy!
    Last edited by kewlJ; 09-19-2019 at 05:16 PM.

  19. #39

  20. #40
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Another thing in Rob's favor, he's not shying away from the coming scrutiny. There are going to be a lot of sharpsters trying to tear his argument apart. He doesn't look like he is backing down to me. Shack's investigation will lead to more publicity....and more scrutiny as we go forward.

    I look forward to following the story as events unfold.
    Of course Rob isn't shying away from the coming scrutiny. Rob is a narcissist to the 10th degree. He loves the attention and scrutiny. More than loves he needs the attention and scrutiny.

    Mickey has repeatedly made the point that one of the things that he finds credible about Rob's story is that Rob announced his retirement in 2009. Mickey says "he remembers Rob announced his retirement in 2009". I have no idea if that is true. Can someone show me where he posted that? And if it is true, proves absolutely nothing. 2009 would be the year Rob turned 60. Perhaps that was a point in his life he decided to stop throwing so much money away at the casinos.

    What I will concede is that at some point this story 'peeked' Rob's interest. And when that occurs the person wants to find out all they can about the story that they find so intriguing. And I suspect that is what happened here. Everyone is focusing on the Wired story, because that pops up with any kind of search, but there are or were a number of different articles out there about the double up bug. I know because I have read at least one other article, maybe two, in the past. So who knows where Rob got some information from that he is trying to parlay into credibility.

    I also think it is possible that after the story broke and peaked Rob's intertest, that he was able to locate a few machines that had not yet been "fixed" with a software upgrade. This likely would be at some sort of smaller out of the way casino, just the kind of place Rob seems to like to hit. So he could have found it that way and even played it some, for a profit, just no where near the time or numbers of his claim. There are just a number of possibilities as to how Rob could have come into some information.....AFTER THE FACT.

    Of course there is also the possibility that Rob's claim is exactly as he says. Not likely based on the fact that Rob has a long history of lying and untruthfulness on these forums and throughout the gambling community and that history of lying dates back before this claim, so the lying is not a diversion cover-up as Rob claims.

    Like mickey, I too am looking forward to Mr. Shackleford weighing in with his opinion. I see 3 ways that could go. Shack could say he believes Rob played this play for 5.5 years earning 3 million dollars. I think this unlikely but he could opine that. Of course there would be no argument from Rob. There would be discussion as there would be arguments from some other members of WoV as mickey said. And Rob would love that He would claim victory from Shack's opinion and revel in the attention of discussion.

    2nd possibility is that Shack says he doesn't believe Rob played the play and 3rd possible is that he doesn't offer an opinion, saying he has seen nothing that would prove Rob played the play, but that he could have. In Both cases, I suspect we will see the old Singer playbook in that Rob will attack Shack's credibility, saying things like he just doesn't have the knowledge understand the play or that he went into it with a bias. Almost anything to undermine the credibility. Seen it a hundred times. BUT, there would still be quite a bit of discussion, maybe even more in this instance, and that is really what a narcissist like Rob is after. So it is all a win/win for Rob. A 70 year old ultra narcissist, completely irrelevant in the gambling community, back in the spotlight that he seeks. And isn't that what it is all about Rob?
    It's common knowledge that Rob announced his retirement in 2009. And everyone should remember the Singer/Arci challenge over producing tax returns. It was for the years 2000 thru 2009, the last year Rob said he filed schedule C as a professional gambler. Rob refused to produce the returns. Was it because they would have showed him making a hell of a lot more from gambling that the 100K per year he claimed at the time?

    The rest of your speculation here is pretty far fetched. You don't know what is in Rob's mind but you don't mind claiming that you do. Easy to speculate what is in someone's mind then tear them down from there.

    Could you give us your take on why the moon landing was a hoax that never occurred? If you put as much effort into it as you do trying to discredit Singer and the double up bug I'm sure you can come up with something.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 90
    Last Post: 04-03-2020, 10:45 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •