Stop implying that AndrewG is Alan Mendelson!

[Rob.Singer]

Jesus Fucking Christ. Of all the things Rob or any of us are concerned about is how you feel about us.

And certainly no one gives a fuck if you “Honestly feel sad for you”. Like you are some person to be concerned about. The same goes with me or most posters on forums. NOBODY should care or lose sleep over how someone else feels about them unless you know that person in life. And actually DO care about that person.

I doubt you and Rob have that kind of relationship.

You know Boz, you have really changed.

Last evening with nothing else to do, I was reading through some of the WoV achieves. I started out trying to read up on "Jerry Logan" because I just am not that familiar with that "episode", as I think it was before my time at WoV. I just wanted to see for myself if that was Singer. Anyway, because I didn't really have that much interest, I quickly got side-tracked and read all sorts of different achieves of different discussion. Unlike today at WoV, many, many good and useful discussion concerning gambling and advantage play. And sadly, as you read through some of those discussion, you notice that half of the people involved in those discussion, are now in red or brown, meaning they are gone from the forum. And most of those names are people that knew what they were talking about. What a shame from what that forum was to what it is today.

Anyway, I got side-tracked slightly above. So back to my point. I stumbled on a discussion about, my buddy King James. That would be James Grosjean and the "Bible" of advantage play that he published. Discussion moved to whether the book was worth the price that even today it frequently sells for if you can find a copy available. I mentioned that an AP had emailed me a pirated copy of the book years before and although I have to be honest, I glanced through it, but fairly quickly deleted it. I mean that is the kind of material that you keep forever and reference over and over and over. I couldn't in good conscience do that, as it was stolen, without the authors permission.

After I posted that, the very next post was from you. I am going to paraphrase here, because I have no idea where to find your quote again and don't want to spend half a day looking. You said something to the effect "This is why everyone on several different forums admires and respects you so much". I don't remember if I thanked you for that remark, so I will now. Thank you Boz.

But I am just wondering how does one go from that to what you just posted? I'll close where I began. It is YOU that has really changed Boz.

btw, maybe coach belly can dig up that Boz quote. He seems good at finding these things from years ago...well at least when it suits him.

Don't Cry For Me, Argentino

waaa...waaa...waaa...

[Keystone]

Singer identified Alan's daughter and posted where she worked.

He didn't need any inside info, the daughter is identified by googling Alan.

100% correct and welcome back Coach! Hasn’t been the same here without you. Even if we seldom or ever agree.

I miss Mr. Blackhole`s insights myself

[kewlJ]

So I just visited Alan's facebook page. Alan you are a really stupid motherfucker! Hard to defend you when you do some of the really stupid things you do!

First, facebook is so yesterday. It isn't even yesterday, it is yesterday's yesterday.

BUT, I guess I am not the least bit surprised that Alan is on facebook AND posting multiple times a day about his every move.

Strange Days indeed. --- John Lennon


I wonder if Tasha is on facebook and if so how many accounts she has? Dozens?

[monet]

So I just visited Alan's facebook page. Alan you are a really stupid motherfucker! Hard to defend you when you do some of the really stupid things you do!

First, facebook is so yesterday. It isn't even yesterday, it is yesterday's yesterday.

BUT, I guess I am not the least bit surprised that Alan is on facebook AND posting multiple times a day about his every move.

Strange Days indeed. --- John Lennon


I wonder if Tasha is on facebook and if so how many accounts she has? Dozens?

Alan Mendleson does not read or post at this site anymore.
He asked Dan to ban him which Dan complied.
Alan does seem to post at WoV, Twitter, Youtube and Facebook.
I am sure he post many other places but he does not read or post at this site anymore as he has found the cure.

I went through some of his Facebook.
Good News!
Jason Mendleson has a page and let's the world know all about him.
Pictures of him and his son and everything.
What was his name over here... Funk Something???
People really post their whole lives with pictures and everything and make it public.
No wonder the CIA couldn't believe that Americans would actually do this!

[Rob.Singer]

Since there's a bit of time on most people's hands and kew loves the drama, lets kick it up a notch.

Alan comes on here and gripes about him being labeled a gambling addict....again. Yes, I know everyone already agrees with that easy peasy assessment. But why have I joined in on this?

First, how many times have I said to him over the forum years that if he does everything the casinos want him to do--ie, cash checks at the cage, use casino ATM's, play suckass with the hosts, and obtain casino credit (and being in charge of his own business, he could have easily manipulated the applications into assigning him a much higher credit limit than he qualified for--if indeed he really did qualify for one with all his self-stated personal problems) he'd be asking for trouble. Only losers do that stuff.

Why would a son knowingly come onto a forum where his father posted regularly just to announce how his father would not pay him the tens of thousands he owed him because he kept losing it all in casinos in LV and Rincon, if he was not extremely desperate and was truly being stiffed by an addicted gambler? Alan thought that episode was just flying by me but it wasn't. In fact, he went out of his way several times to blame Jason. It made no sense to me, but I listened.

I'm not gonna get into all the divorces and the LV GF who had him thrown out for being a degenerate gambler. All that stuff clearly speaks for itself.

I always wondered why, after expressing so much interest in my play strategy, he never wanted to be taught how to play it. I tried to get thru--many times. And I had my suspicions. But it all came together the day I watched him play and count remaining money like a nervous addict who had a loan shark with muscle waiting for him to arrive home at his LA apt. He was simply only interested in hurrying up and getting big winners. He had zero use for money management, discipline, or strategy. That stuff was for all the other players. He just wanted and NEEDED to win NOW!

There's a reason he's continually kept me aware of his jackpot hits since self-banning here. He obviously knows I'm not the dummy others are. He tried his best to assure me that all his troubles from bad gambling were in the past---that his occasional jackpots were confirmation that all is fine in Denmark. But of course I know better. I know he's in LV on his last leg. I know his addiction is eventually gonna take him to lower than rock bottom. And I know he should work very hard at not getting involved with any other women until the day comes where he gets the help needed to stay away from the poker machines (and ok, the craps tables).

Alan, please call Gamblers Anonymous.

And no kew, there is no "twisting of the knife" here. It's not even what you think. No one "twists the knife"--they stick it in and force it to cut in other directions while jiggling it in order to reach and cause maximum damage to organs and arteries, if they're lucky. I know--I've done it.

[mickeycrimm]

Deleted wrong thread

[redietz]

Since there's a bit of time on most people's hands and kew loves the drama, lets kick it up a notch.

Alan comes on here and gripes about him being labeled a gambling addict....again. Yes, I know everyone already agrees with that easy peasy assessment. But why have I joined in on this?

First, how many times have I said to him over the forum years that if he does everything the casinos want him to do--ie, cash checks at the cage, use casino ATM's, play suckass with the hosts, and obtain casino credit (and being in charge of his own business, he could have easily manipulated the applications into assigning him a much higher credit limit than he qualified for--if indeed he really did qualify for one with all his self-stated personal problems) he'd be asking for trouble. Only losers do that stuff.

Why would a son knowingly come onto a forum where his father posted regularly just to announce how his father would not pay him the tens of thousands he owed him because he kept losing it all in casinos in LV and Rincon, if he was not extremely desperate and was truly being stiffed by an addicted gambler? Alan thought that episode was just flying by me but it wasn't. In fact, he went out of his way several times to blame Jason. It made no sense to me, but I listened.

I'm not gonna get into all the divorces and the LV GF who had him thrown out for being a degenerate gambler. All that stuff clearly speaks for itself.

I always wondered why, after expressing so much interest in my play strategy, he never wanted to be taught how to play it. I tried to get thru--many times. And I had my suspicions. But it all came together the day I watched him play and count remaining money like a nervous addict who had a loan shark with muscle waiting for him to arrive home at his LA apt. He was simply only interested in hurrying up and getting big winners. He had zero use for money management, discipline, or strategy. That stuff was for all the other players. He just wanted and NEEDED to win NOW!

There's a reason he's continually kept me aware of his jackpot hits since self-banning here. He obviously knows I'm not the dummy others are. He tried his best to assure me that all his troubles from bad gambling were in the past---that his occasional jackpots were confirmation that all is fine in Denmark. But of course I know better. I know he's in LV on his last leg. I know his addiction is eventually gonna take him to lower than rock bottom. And I know he should work very hard at not getting involved with any other women until the day comes where he gets the help needed to stay away from the poker machines (and ok, the craps tables).

Alan, please call Gamblers Anonymous.

And no kew, there is no "twisting of the knife" here. It's not even what you think. No one "twists the knife"--they stick it in and force it to cut in other directions while jiggling it in order to reach and cause maximum damage to organs and arteries, if they're lucky. I know--I've done it.

So the lesson from this post isn't that "Singer" fooled Mendelson with lies about a big bucks video poker strategy. The lesson isn't that Mendelson might have attempted to use Singer's strategies and busted out when doing so.

The lesson instead is, because "Singer's" nonsensical play strategies have to be taught specifically by "Singer" and cannot be learned by reading all of his stuff, that "Singer" lying about his wins and lying about his strategy HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH MENDELSON LOSING.

So, the conclusion we are supposed to come to is that "Singer" did Mendelson no harm by promoting flimflam systems and lying to him. Instead, Mendelson was his own worst enemy because of "THE DAY SINGER SAW HIM PLAY."

Let us get this straight: Mendelson is a crash-and-burn addict, but out of the times "Singer" met with him, he saw Mendelson play ONCE. JUST ONCE. Let that seep in for a moment. Um, why would an addict play just once?

What we are supposed to walk away from this with: "Singer" (seeing Mendelson play ONCE in his lifetime) established via "Singer's" keen eye and trained mind, that Mendelson is an addict. And "Singer" knows beyond any doubt that the "Singer systems" did not contribute to Mendelson losing because only those personally trained by "Singer" know how to play any of the systems.

These are brilliant insights and well worthy of the greatest video poker player ever. LOL.

I mean, really, this is the kind of junk fifth graders try to pull off. As in "two years ago, I saw Sharon kissing Mike once. She's a real whore. You know how I know? I tried to teach her to kiss, and she didn't want to. Nobody knows how to kiss like I do."

This "Singer" junk is so low brow and stupid, it makes me want to suck down a Tide Pod.

[Rob.Singer]

Since there's a bit of time on most people's hands and kew loves the drama, lets kick it up a notch.

Alan comes on here and gripes about him being labeled a gambling addict....again. Yes, I know everyone already agrees with that easy peasy assessment. But why have I joined in on this?

First, how many times have I said to him over the forum years that if he does everything the casinos want him to do--ie, cash checks at the cage, use casino ATM's, play suckass with the hosts, and obtain casino credit (and being in charge of his own business, he could have easily manipulated the applications into assigning him a much higher credit limit than he qualified for--if indeed he really did qualify for one with all his self-stated personal problems) he'd be asking for trouble. Only losers do that stuff.

Why would a son knowingly come onto a forum where his father posted regularly just to announce how his father would not pay him the tens of thousands he owed him because he kept losing it all in casinos in LV and Rincon, if he was not extremely desperate and was truly being stiffed by an addicted gambler? Alan thought that episode was just flying by me but it wasn't. In fact, he went out of his way several times to blame Jason. It made no sense to me, but I listened.

I'm not gonna get into all the divorces and the LV GF who had him thrown out for being a degenerate gambler. All that stuff clearly speaks for itself.

I always wondered why, after expressing so much interest in my play strategy, he never wanted to be taught how to play it. I tried to get thru--many times. And I had my suspicions. But it all came together the day I watched him play and count remaining money like a nervous addict who had a loan shark with muscle waiting for him to arrive home at his LA apt. He was simply only interested in hurrying up and getting big winners. He had zero use for money management, discipline, or strategy. That stuff was for all the other players. He just wanted and NEEDED to win NOW!

There's a reason he's continually kept me aware of his jackpot hits since self-banning here. He obviously knows I'm not the dummy others are. He tried his best to assure me that all his troubles from bad gambling were in the past---that his occasional jackpots were confirmation that all is fine in Denmark. But of course I know better. I know he's in LV on his last leg. I know his addiction is eventually gonna take him to lower than rock bottom. And I know he should work very hard at not getting involved with any other women until the day comes where he gets the help needed to stay away from the poker machines (and ok, the craps tables).

Alan, please call Gamblers Anonymous.

And no kew, there is no "twisting of the knife" here. It's not even what you think. No one "twists the knife"--they stick it in and force it to cut in other directions while jiggling it in order to reach and cause maximum damage to organs and arteries, if they're lucky. I know--I've done it.

So the lesson from this post isn't that "Singer" fooled Mendelson with lies about a big bucks strategy video poker. The lesson isn't that Mendelson might have attempted to use Singer's strategies and busted out when doing so.

The lesson instead is, because "Singer's" nonsensical play strategies have to be taught specifically by "Singer" and cannot be learned by reading all of his stuff, that "Singer" lying about his wins and lying about his strategy HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH MENDELSON LOSING.

So, the conclusion we are supposed to come to is that "Singer" did Mendelson no harm by promoting flimflam systems and lying to him. Instead, Mendelson was his own worst enemy because of "THE DAY SINGER SAW HIM PLAY."

Let us get this straight: Mendelson is a crash-and-burn addict, but out of the times "Singer" met with him, he saw Mendelson play ONCE. JUST ONCE. Let that seep in for a moment. Um, why would an addict play just once?

What we are supposed to walk away from this with is that "Singer" (seeing Mendelson play ONCE in his lifetime) established via "Singer's" keen eye and trained mind, that Mendelson is an addict. And "Singer" knows beyond any doubt that the "Singer systems" did not contribute to Mendelson losing because only those personally trained by "Singer" know how to play any of the systems.

These are brilliant insights and well worthy of the greatest video poker player ever. LOL.

I mean, really, this is the kind of junk fifth graders try to pull off. As in "two years ago, I saw Sharon kissing Mike once. She's a real whore. You know how I know? I tried to teach her to kiss, and she didn't want to. Nobody knows how to kiss like I do."

This "Singer" junk is so low brow and stupid, it makes me want to suck down a Tide Pod.

Weird. Just plain weird.

[redietz]

Since there's a bit of time on most people's hands and kew loves the drama, lets kick it up a notch.

Alan comes on here and gripes about him being labeled a gambling addict....again. Yes, I know everyone already agrees with that easy peasy assessment. But why have I joined in on this?

First, how many times have I said to him over the forum years that if he does everything the casinos want him to do--ie, cash checks at the cage, use casino ATM's, play suckass with the hosts, and obtain casino credit (and being in charge of his own business, he could have easily manipulated the applications into assigning him a much higher credit limit than he qualified for--if indeed he really did qualify for one with all his self-stated personal problems) he'd be asking for trouble. Only losers do that stuff.

Why would a son knowingly come onto a forum where his father posted regularly just to announce how his father would not pay him the tens of thousands he owed him because he kept losing it all in casinos in LV and Rincon, if he was not extremely desperate and was truly being stiffed by an addicted gambler? Alan thought that episode was just flying by me but it wasn't. In fact, he went out of his way several times to blame Jason. It made no sense to me, but I listened.

I'm not gonna get into all the divorces and the LV GF who had him thrown out for being a degenerate gambler. All that stuff clearly speaks for itself.

I always wondered why, after expressing so much interest in my play strategy, he never wanted to be taught how to play it. I tried to get thru--many times. And I had my suspicions. But it all came together the day I watched him play and count remaining money like a nervous addict who had a loan shark with muscle waiting for him to arrive home at his LA apt. He was simply only interested in hurrying up and getting big winners. He had zero use for money management, discipline, or strategy. That stuff was for all the other players. He just wanted and NEEDED to win NOW!

There's a reason he's continually kept me aware of his jackpot hits since self-banning here. He obviously knows I'm not the dummy others are. He tried his best to assure me that all his troubles from bad gambling were in the past---that his occasional jackpots were confirmation that all is fine in Denmark. But of course I know better. I know he's in LV on his last leg. I know his addiction is eventually gonna take him to lower than rock bottom. And I know he should work very hard at not getting involved with any other women until the day comes where he gets the help needed to stay away from the poker machines (and ok, the craps tables).

Alan, please call Gamblers Anonymous.

And no kew, there is no "twisting of the knife" here. It's not even what you think. No one "twists the knife"--they stick it in and force it to cut in other directions while jiggling it in order to reach and cause maximum damage to organs and arteries, if they're lucky. I know--I've done it.

So the lesson from this post isn't that "Singer" fooled Mendelson with lies about a big bucks strategy video poker. The lesson isn't that Mendelson might have attempted to use Singer's strategies and busted out when doing so.

The lesson instead is, because "Singer's" nonsensical play strategies have to be taught specifically by "Singer" and cannot be learned by reading all of his stuff, that "Singer" lying about his wins and lying about his strategy HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH MENDELSON LOSING.

So, the conclusion we are supposed to come to is that "Singer" did Mendelson no harm by promoting flimflam systems and lying to him. Instead, Mendelson was his own worst enemy because of "THE DAY SINGER SAW HIM PLAY."

Let us get this straight: Mendelson is a crash-and-burn addict, but out of the times "Singer" met with him, he saw Mendelson play ONCE. JUST ONCE. Let that seep in for a moment. Um, why would an addict play just once?

What we are supposed to walk away from this with is that "Singer" (seeing Mendelson play ONCE in his lifetime) established via "Singer's" keen eye and trained mind, that Mendelson is an addict. And "Singer" knows beyond any doubt that the "Singer systems" did not contribute to Mendelson losing because only those personally trained by "Singer" know how to play any of the systems.

These are brilliant insights and well worthy of the greatest video poker player ever. LOL.

I mean, really, this is the kind of junk fifth graders try to pull off. As in "two years ago, I saw Sharon kissing Mike once. She's a real whore. You know how I know? I tried to teach her to kiss, and she didn't want to. Nobody knows how to kiss like I do."

This "Singer" junk is so low brow and stupid, it makes me want to suck down a Tide Pod.

Weird. Just plain weird.

Tell us again about all of the times you saw Mendelson play video poker. You know, over all of the years you've known him. How many times was it?

[The Boz]

Shouldn’t you be out protesting Tennessee starting to open up Red? And warning people we will have 18 more months of this coming? And that enjoying a Hamburger shouldn’t be the death of them?


https://fox17.com/news/local/many-te...aurant-waiting

And on topic, tell us any legitimate reason why you are taking a losing side trying to defend someone who won’t even admit who is. And lies to you and everyone daily?

You come off as what many of accusing Coach of, taking a position just for arguments sake.

[redietz]

Shouldn’t you be out protesting Tennessee starting to open up Red? And warning people we will have 18 more months of this coming? And that enjoying a Hamburger shouldn’t be the death of them?


https://fox17.com/news/local/many-te...aurant-waiting

And on topic, tell us any legitimate reason why you are taking a losing side trying to defend someone who won’t even admit who is. And lies to you and everyone daily?

You come off as what many of accusing Coach of, taking a position just for arguments sake.

We'll be lucky if we have just 18 more months of this coming. But you don't have to worry. The president explained on April 20 that the total deaths from the pandemic will be 60,000. So by Friday, all the dying should stop cold.

Meanwhile, it speaks to the juvenile nature of this site that I have to point out the utter stupidity of making an argument that someone is an addict based on seeing them play video poker once in, what, 10 years? Mendelson could be the worst addict on the planet, but watching him play video poker once in a decade actually is evidence that he's not.

[Rob.Singer]

He's taking this position because he's eternally upset with me for releasing that he and his crew solicited me for selling his picks to.

I saw Alan play several times. But it only takes once.

[Rob.Singer]

Shouldn’t you be out protesting Tennessee starting to open up Red? And warning people we will have 18 more months of this coming? And that enjoying a Hamburger shouldn’t be the death of them?


https://fox17.com/news/local/many-te...aurant-waiting

And on topic, tell us any legitimate reason why you are taking a losing side trying to defend someone who won’t even admit who is. And lies to you and everyone daily?

You come off as what many of accusing Coach of, taking a position just for arguments sake.

We'll be lucky if we have just 18 more months of this coming. But you don't have to worry. The president explained on April 20 that the total deaths from the pandemic will be 60,000. So by Friday, all the dying should stop cold.

Meanwhile, it speaks to the juvenile nature of this site that I have to point out the utter stupidity of making an argument that someone is an addict based on seeing them play video poker once in, what, 10 years? Mendelson could be the worst addict on the planet, but watching him play video poker once in a decade actually is evidence that he's not.

You're like Anderson Cooper--afraid to talk about the facts.

When a son talks about what he did on a forum and the way he said it, you don't go into denial. When a person is so addicted to casino action enough so that he gets married to an umpteenth wife at a craps table, you don't just write it off as funny. When a vp player is witnessed feverishly playing and feeding bills just to hopefully experience that next hit of intermittent satisfaction, you don't just shrug it off. And when a player constantly claims he's a loser overall and is watched nervously counting what remains with a worried and sweat-dripping face, you expect there's something very wrong. Add it all up, and what do YOU get?

[Dan Druff]

This is becoming a mess again. Some ex-girlfriend of Alan's e-mailed me today on behalf of him, asking me to stop the stuff about his daughter out here. I find it odd because his daughter intentionally made her issue with the TV station very public, and it very much appeared to me that she wanted the world to know, as she felt she had been wronged.

However, since his daughter has never been a member of this forum to my knowledge, I will ask that people stop talking about her, and I'm going to go back and delete the references to her.

I will say that I am even more convinced today that AndrewG is Alan, though.

[redietz]

Shouldn’t you be out protesting Tennessee starting to open up Red? And warning people we will have 18 more months of this coming? And that enjoying a Hamburger shouldn’t be the death of them?


https://fox17.com/news/local/many-te...aurant-waiting

And on topic, tell us any legitimate reason why you are taking a losing side trying to defend someone who won’t even admit who is. And lies to you and everyone daily?

You come off as what many of accusing Coach of, taking a position just for arguments sake.

We'll be lucky if we have just 18 more months of this coming. But you don't have to worry. The president explained on April 20 that the total deaths from the pandemic will be 60,000. So by Friday, all the dying should stop cold.

Meanwhile, it speaks to the juvenile nature of this site that I have to point out the utter stupidity of making an argument that someone is an addict based on seeing them play video poker once in, what, 10 years? Mendelson could be the worst addict on the planet, but watching him play video poker once in a decade actually is evidence that he's not.

You're like Anderson Cooper--afraid to talk about the facts.

When a son talks about what he did on a forum and the way he said it, you don't go into denial. When a person is so addicted to casino action enough so that he gets married to an umpteenth wife at a craps table, you don't just write it off as funny. When a vp player is witnessed feverishly playing and feeding bills just to hopefully experience that next hit of intermittent satisfaction, you don't just shrug it off. And when a player constantly claims he's a loser overall and is watched nervously counting what remains with a worried and sweat-dripping face, you expect there's something very wrong. Add it all up, and what do YOU get?

I get someone who watched someone else play video poker once in 10 years and used that as a basis to label them an addict. Good luck with that in court.

You don't see it, do you? The fact you two were together on and off, and you were the one pushing to play video poker a bunch of times suggests the opposite -- that YOU were the addict. He played once, and you wanted to play a bunch of times. Who appeared to be the addict?

Jesus, do I have to point this stuff out to you?

You may be right about Mendelson. But you made a moronic argument and couldn't see the flip side. To most people who saw you and Mendelson together, YOU looked like the addict.

Man, I don't know what's wrong with your brain, but you should get somebody else to vet your logic before you post it.

[Rob.Singer]

This is becoming a mess again. Some ex-girlfriend of Alan's e-mailed me today on behalf of him, asking me to stop the stuff about his daughter out here. I find it odd because his daughter intentionally made her issue with the TV station very public, and it very much appeared to me that she wanted the world to know, as she felt she had been wronged.

However, since his daughter has never been a member of this forum to my knowledge, I will ask that people stop talking about her, and I'm going to go back and delete the references to her.

I will say that I am even more convinced today that AndrewG is Alan, though.

Dan I have no issue with and actually support you removing references about the lady. I brought her into the discussion for one reason only: to pressure Alan into making more mistakes and stop using Andrew, whereby he could discuss any problems he has with me openly instead of bothering axel on another forum. I believe it worked, not for me because I already know Andrew = Alan.

[The Boz]

This is becoming a mess again. Some ex-girlfriend of Alan's e-mailed me today on behalf of him, asking me to stop the stuff about his daughter out here. I find it odd because his daughter intentionally made her issue with the TV station very public, and it very much appeared to me that she wanted the world to know, as she felt she had been wronged.

However, since his daughter has never been a member of this forum to my knowledge, I will ask that people stop talking about her, and I'm going to go back and delete the references to her.

I will say that I am even more convinced today that AndrewG is Alan, though.

How fucking pathetic is this?

Not the daughter part as I agree she is not a member here. But how little and weak this degenerate gambler Alan is that he has someone else email you. For something HE is responsible for. How much Family drama has come from this one family, including his Son, who is/was a member here. You should have congratulated the lady for getting away from him with anything she has left.

The little man is becoming more and more deserving of everything he gets on here. He leaves the forum, denounces it and Dan, yet must be visiting to read it daily.

As I said before, the Man has a kick me sign on his back and he put it there himself. And I believe he enjoys the spotlight of being kicked in the ass. Without casinos to do it to him, he needs us to take their place.

[Rob.Singer]

We'll be lucky if we have just 18 more months of this coming. But you don't have to worry. The president explained on April 20 that the total deaths from the pandemic will be 60,000. So by Friday, all the dying should stop cold.

Meanwhile, it speaks to the juvenile nature of this site that I have to point out the utter stupidity of making an argument that someone is an addict based on seeing them play video poker once in, what, 10 years? Mendelson could be the worst addict on the planet, but watching him play video poker once in a decade actually is evidence that he's not.

You're like Anderson Cooper--afraid to talk about the facts.

When a son talks about what he did on a forum and the way he said it, you don't go into denial. When a person is so addicted to casino action enough so that he gets married to an umpteenth wife at a craps table, you don't just write it off as funny. When a vp player is witnessed feverishly playing and feeding bills just to hopefully experience that next hit of intermittent satisfaction, you don't just shrug it off. And when a player constantly claims he's a loser overall and is watched nervously counting what remains with a worried and sweat-dripping face, you expect there's something very wrong. Add it all up, and what do YOU get?

I get someone who watched someone else play video poker once in 10 years and used that as a basis to label them an addict. Good luck with that in court.

You don't see it, do you? The fact you two were together on and off, and you were the one pushing to play video poker a bunch of times suggests the opposite -- that YOU were the addict. He played once, and you wanted to play a bunch of times. Who appeared to be the addict?

Jesus, do I have to point this stuff out to you?

You may be right about Mendelson. But you made a moronic argument and couldn't see the flip side. To most people who saw you and Mendelson together, YOU looked like the addict.

Man, I don't know what's wrong with your brain, but you should get somebody else to vet your logic before you post it.

One problem red, other than $10 free play on quarters at Red Rock, I've never played with Alan there.

And WHO needs their logic to be vetted?

And just for fun, if kew were to put up one of his famous poll questions that asked if the evidence Alan himself as well as Jason posted here on this forum suggests Alan is a bona fide degenerate gambler or not, what do you think the results would look like?

[redietz]

You're like Anderson Cooper--afraid to talk about the facts.

When a son talks about what he did on a forum and the way he said it, you don't go into denial. When a person is so addicted to casino action enough so that he gets married to an umpteenth wife at a craps table, you don't just write it off as funny. When a vp player is witnessed feverishly playing and feeding bills just to hopefully experience that next hit of intermittent satisfaction, you don't just shrug it off. And when a player constantly claims he's a loser overall and is watched nervously counting what remains with a worried and sweat-dripping face, you expect there's something very wrong. Add it all up, and what do YOU get?

I get someone who watched someone else play video poker once in 10 years and used that as a basis to label them an addict. Good luck with that in court.

You don't see it, do you? The fact you two were together on and off, and you were the one pushing to play video poker a bunch of times suggests the opposite -- that YOU were the addict. He played once, and you wanted to play a bunch of times. Who appeared to be the addict?

Jesus, do I have to point this stuff out to you?

You may be right about Mendelson. But you made a moronic argument and couldn't see the flip side. To most people who saw you and Mendelson together, YOU looked like the addict.

Man, I don't know what's wrong with your brain, but you should get somebody else to vet your logic before you post it.

One problem red, other than $10 free play on quarters at Red Rock, I've never played with Alan there.

And WHO needs their logic to be vetted?

You said yourself you kept offering to "teach" him how to play, but he continually turned you down. So who looks like the addict?

Man, you need to think through your arguments. Person "A" plays once in 10 years with Person "B". Person "B" plays once in 10 years with Person "A," but asks Person "A" to play half a dozen or a dozen other times. Person "A" says no each time. Who looks like the addict?

[Rob.Singer]

I get someone who watched someone else play video poker once in 10 years and used that as a basis to label them an addict. Good luck with that in court.

You don't see it, do you? The fact you two were together on and off, and you were the one pushing to play video poker a bunch of times suggests the opposite -- that YOU were the addict. He played once, and you wanted to play a bunch of times. Who appeared to be the addict?

Jesus, do I have to point this stuff out to you?

You may be right about Mendelson. But you made a moronic argument and couldn't see the flip side. To most people who saw you and Mendelson together, YOU looked like the addict.

Man, I don't know what's wrong with your brain, but you should get somebody else to vet your logic before you post it.

One problem red, other than $10 free play on quarters at Red Rock, I've never played with Alan there.

And WHO needs their logic to be vetted?

You said yourself you kept offering to "teach" him how to play, but he continually turned you down. So who looks like the addict?

Man, you need to think through your arguments. Person "A" plays once in 10 years with Person "B". Person "B" plays once in 10 years with Person "A," but asks Person "A" to play half a dozen or a dozen other times. Person "A" says no each time. Who looks like the addict?

I can teach YOU how to play if you want. What's that--no? Well, I'll ask you again next week.

You see anybody sitting at machines during that exchange?

Such an idiot....