Page 169 of 198 FirstFirst ... 69119159165166167168169170171172173179 ... LastLast
Results 3,361 to 3,380 of 3956

Thread: The Adventures of MDawg (in progress)

  1. #3361
    MrV keeps his "cattle" under his hat. Shit for brains.
    Every one /everyone knows it all; yet, no thing /nothing is truly known by any one /anyone. Similarly, the suckers think that they win, but, the house always wins, unless to hand out an even worse beating.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xsa6ojQcYXQ

    Garnabby + OppsIdidItAgain + ThomasClines (or TomasHClines) + The Grim Reaper + LMR + OneHitWonder (or 1HitWonder, 1Hit1der) + Bill Yung ---> GOTTLOB1, or GOTTLOB = Praise to God!

    Blog at https://garnabby.blogspot.com/

  2. #3362
    OMG! Someone got suspended for the following quote:

    "I hope to one day find a girl who looks at me the way MDawg looks at himself!"

    Is that even an insult? Shackleford has lost his mind. Wizzy is completely complicit in this now, protecting Mdawg to this degree, while completely turning a blind eye to not 1, but 2 Mdawg sock puppets that do nothing but kiss Mdawgs ass and bump thread for him. Add Shackleford to the mix and there is a lot of jockeying to kiss that nasty hairy, old ass.
    Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".

  3. #3363
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    OMG! Someone got suspended for the following quote:

    "I hope to one day find a girl who looks at me the way MDawg looks at himself!"

    Is that even an insult? Shackleford has lost his mind. Wizzy is completely complicit in this now, protecting Mdawg to this degree, while completely turning a blind eye to not 1, but 2 Mdawg sock puppets that do nothing but kiss Mdawgs ass and bump thread for him. Add Shackleford to the mix and there is a lot of jockeying to kiss that nasty hairy, old ass.
    To be honestly fair, Mwalz was skating on VERY thin ice even before that quote. He was throwing out a LOT of insults. I can see why that "Innocent," quote got him suspended. It was a backhanded compliment implying that Mdawg is a narcissistic. It was a passive aggressive insult to Mdawg disguised as a compliment, something like what happened when a Dad insulted a Mom who was helping her child pick up eggs on an Easter egg hunt, in this particular Easter Egg Hunt, Parents were definitely NOT supposed to be helping their children pick up eggs. He said something sarcastically like,"Wow, Mommy is sure good at Easter egg Hunting". She smiled at him at first, thinking it was a compliment at FIRST, and then it dawned on her that he was actually INSULTING her and she ended up slapping him(After he followed her around filming her without her permission). So I can see why he got Suspended for passively aggressively insulting Mdawg. It's only a week Suspension. Watch Me Win got punished much longer for something more innocent than what Mwalz did. Watch Me Win got a two month Suspension for calling someone naive.....
    https://photos.app.goo.gl/Zk2WAFzDcrJ7pjNB7

    Take comfort in the fact that no one is actually backing up his wishes to have you permanantly banned.


    Smart is knowing a Tomato is a fruit.

    Wise is knowing a Tomato doesn't belong in a fruit salad.



    I am glad to get my full posting rights back! Thank you Dan!

  4. #3364
    Originally Posted by MDawg
    Even if I had no advantage to my Baccarat play, which I do, even if I were playing a straight coin toss with no house edge, still being undercapitalized would make a difference, simply due to variance.
    and this post

    Originally posted by Mdawg.

    And you don't even know how many hands I played, what games I played (I played both Baccarat and BJ), how I played them, what exactly the house edge was on each game and whether what form of what you wannabees call "advantage" play I was utilizing changed the house edge.
    MDawg stated that he plays with an advantage. "

    Both of these posts are over a year old..
    https://photos.app.goo.gl/Zk2WAFzDcrJ7pjNB7

    Take comfort in the fact that no one is actually backing up his wishes to have you permanantly banned.


    Smart is knowing a Tomato is a fruit.

    Wise is knowing a Tomato doesn't belong in a fruit salad.



    I am glad to get my full posting rights back! Thank you Dan!

  5. #3365
    yo yeeall, and to md! finally got round to giving this site a look in. let's see how long i last! . hey md, you mentioned a certain 'dawg house' in a recent casino opening. is that in reference to you?

  6. #3366
    Originally Posted by wellbush View Post
    yo yeeall, and to md! finally got round to giving this site a look in. let's see how long i last! . hey md, you mentioned a certain 'dawg house' in a recent casino opening. is that in reference to you?


    Larry Fine enters the room.

    Can Moe and Curly be far behind?

    'Nyuk 'nyuk 'nyuk.
    What, Me Worry?

  7. #3367
    Up early (vegas time) so caught up a bit on the Mdawggy chronicles. Several interesting things.

    Wizard finally hides the voodoo/betting systems scam Mdawg thread and Mdawg responds by linking to the hidden thread in another thread, directing people to it. Talk about thumbing your nose at Wizard? I have felt for a while that is what Mdawggy is really up to anyway....making a mockery of Wizard and WoV.

    Mdawg writes that he has shown Wizard a second batch of casino checks now totalling $500,000 in winnings in his 3 months in Vegas. Of course we all know he is leaving out the losing days. But it just cracks me up that this clown wants us to beleive he has won 500k over 3 months, while the casinos comp him high end suites and high end perks and repeatedly tell him he is the best they have ever seen. Yeah....THAT is just how Las vegas casinos work. (insert laughing so hard....heart attack emoji).

    Mdawg returns from a month layoff and Wizard welcomes him back and says "he can't wait to read about his results over the last month". Shackleford continues to not only enable, but encourage this fraud and misleading of players. Exact contradiction to what he said his forum was about. That is just a shame. That is all you can say.

    Oh one other thing. Recent suspensions: Mdawg 3 days. Axelwolf 3 days. Kewlj 30 days. Kind of funny, the guy calling out this bullshit gets 30 days....again.
    Last edited by kewlJ; 07-05-2021 at 07:37 AM.
    Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".

  8. #3368
    MDawg has done absolutely everything to prove himself. Kerlj (like many others) has done everything to prove he can only criticise!

    MDawg wins shitloads over and over again at the casinos. Criticizers jealously criticise over and over again whilst watching him on the sidelines as he wins!

    What kerlj and all the others don't realise is that MDawg is probably using a +EV method! The idiots on the sidelines don't have a clue about gambling winners like MDawg. They think variations of progressive betting systems cannot have a +EV! Their ignorance is astounding!!! And that's being flattering!
    Last edited by wellbush; 07-06-2021 at 02:14 AM.

  9. #3369
    Originally Posted by wellbush View Post
    MDawg has done absolutely everything to prove himself. Kerlj (like many others) has done everything to prove he can only criticise!

    MDawg wins shitloads over and over again at the casinos. Criticizers jealously criticise over and over again whilst watching him on the sidelines as he wins!

    What kerlj and all the others don't realise is that MDawg is probably using a +EV method! The idiots on the sidelines don't have a clue about gambling winners like MDawg. They think variations of progressive betting systems cannot have a +EV! Their ignorance is astounding!!! And that's being flattering!
    Been hitting the sauce dawg?

    People here don't play that WoV bullshit.

  10. #3370
    Kerlj, and all the others, ever heard of a Grand Martingale? It has a +EV! Jeez, and you've been wrong about EV all this time!!! Maybe you've been trusting the Wiz way too much, eh???

  11. #3371
    Another (MaxPen) who thinks I'm a puppet of MD! Another who thinks all progressive strategies must have a -EV! Another who believes everything coming from the Wiz! Fools following a fool. It's hilarious

  12. #3372
    Originally Posted by wellbush View Post
    Kerlj, and all the others, ever heard of a Grand Martingale? It has a +EV! Jeez, and you've been wrong about EV all this time!!! Maybe you've been trusting the Wiz way too much, eh???
    I can verify everything wellbush says, since I hail from Tennessee.

    Wink Martindale, born in Jackson, is worth well over $20 million.

    And Mr. Martindale was never in the Wiz. That was Nipsey Russell, although they have similar voices.


    (Garnabby, did I do that right?)


    P.S. The most interesting aspect of this is whether coach belly will step in to help wellbush out. These wellbush posts may be a stretch even for the coach. But let's give coach some time to rally his thoughts on this.
    Last edited by redietz; 07-06-2021 at 04:04 AM.

  13. #3373
    MDawg's proof: countless verified wins at the casinos

    wellbush's proof: math

    detractor's proof: the wiz says so, or math they don't understand!

    hm...

  14. #3374
    Originally Posted by wellbush View Post
    MDawg's proof: countless verified wins at the casinos

    wellbush's proof: math

    detractor's proof: the wiz says so, or math they don't understand!

    hm...

    English Note: The proper word would be "detractors," which is plural. So the proper spelling would be detractors' with the apostrophe after the plural.

    Math Note: I'm always up for learning new math. Each year, I review "Probability Made Clear" from the Great Courses, featuring Michael Starbird of the University of Texas at Austin. I have no expertise in math, so I try to muddle through relying on courses like these and some of my friends, who have taught probability in college. If wellbush is up for it, he could lay out his math explanations here, perhaps in an entire section of threads devoted to the same. I, for one, would certainly enjoy learning new math concepts.

    Additional math and English Note: "Countless" is one of those words best NOT used in discussing math. As in "countless verified wins at the casinos" suggests that the reader cannot count very high or that the MDawg is immortal and has racked up so many wins that mortals cannot count them. While MDawg has made many claims, I do not think that immortality is among them. Although one can make the case that the Crusades were a precursor to MDawg and his followers battling futilely to their deaths in support of the unprovable, I do not believe that MDawg, although a crusader of sorts, was a Crusader with a capital "C." If any 12th century paintings turn out to feature the Dawg, I stand corrected.
    Last edited by redietz; 07-06-2021 at 05:45 AM.

  15. #3375
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post

    English Note: The proper word would be "detractors," which is plural. So the proper spelling would be detractors' with the apostrophe after the plural.

    Math Note: I'm always up for learning new math. Each year, I review "Probability Made Clear" from the Great Courses, featuring Michael Starbird of the University of Texas at Austin. I have no expertise in math, so I try to muddle through relying on courses like these and some of my friends, who have taught probability in college. If wellbush is up for it, he could lay out his math explanations here, perhaps in an entire section of threads devoted to the same. I, for one, would certainly enjoy learning new math concepts.

    Additional math and English Note: "Countless" is one of those words best NOT used in discussing math. As in "countless verified wins at the casinos" suggests that the reader cannot count very high or that the MDawg is immortal and has racked up so many wins that mortals cannot count them. While MDawg has made many claims, I do not think that immortality is among them. Although one can make the case that the Crusades were a precursor to MDawg and his followers battling futilely to their deaths in support of the unprovable, I do not believe that MDawg, although a crusader of sorts, was a Crusader with a capital "C." If any 12th century paintings turn out to feature the Dawg, I stand corrected.
    You're correct re detractors'. You're not necessarily correct re "countless" coz ("coz" is another english error, but who's being pedantic?) I was using the term in the sense of 'numerous.' I'll get back to you re EV.
    Last edited by wellbush; 07-06-2021 at 06:28 AM.

  16. #3376
    Originally Posted by wellbush View Post
    You're correct re detractors'. You're not necessarily correct re "countless" coz ("coz" is another english error, but who's being pedantic?) I was using the term in the sense of 'numerous.' I'll get back to you re EV.
    Fuck off you trolling cunt.

  17. #3377
    Originally Posted by wellbush View Post
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post

    English Note: The proper word would be "detractors," which is plural. So the proper spelling would be detractors' with the apostrophe after the plural.

    Math Note: I'm always up for learning new math. Each year, I review "Probability Made Clear" from the Great Courses, featuring Michael Starbird of the University of Texas at Austin. I have no expertise in math, so I try to muddle through relying on courses like these and some of my friends, who have taught probability in college. If wellbush is up for it, he could lay out his math explanations here, perhaps in an entire section of threads devoted to the same. I, for one, would certainly enjoy learning new math concepts.

    Additional math and English Note: "Countless" is one of those words best NOT used in discussing math. As in "countless verified wins at the casinos" suggests that the reader cannot count very high or that the MDawg is immortal and has racked up so many wins that mortals cannot count them. While MDawg has made many claims, I do not think that immortality is among them. Although one can make the case that the Crusades were a precursor to MDawg and his followers battling futilely to their deaths in support of the unprovable, I do not believe that MDawg, although a crusader of sorts, was a Crusader with a capital "C." If any 12th century paintings turn out to feature the Dawg, I stand corrected.
    You're correct re detractors'. You're not necessarily correct re "countless" coz ("coz" is another english error, but who's being pedantic?) I was using the term in the sense of 'numerous.' I'll get back to you re EV.
    As long as we are correcting his paper, it is criticize, not criticise. Now jdaewoo’s paper needs no correction.

  18. #3378
    Originally Posted by regnis View Post
    As long as we are correcting his paper, it is criticize, not criticise. Now jdaewoo’s paper needs no correction.
    if you back jd, i'm not responding to you either

  19. #3379
    1. I have no idea who jdaewoo is or with whom he is aligned.
    2. If you had done your research (you know--that button on the machine that says "google"), you would see that you would not often be responding to me anyway as I post only a couple times every month, if even that often. I only try to inject a little humor now and then and I do like to correct improper use of English and grammar, even while intentionally butchering it here from time to time. I am not here to look for a fight.

    If you look beyond whatever your issues may be with jdaewoo, you would see that my statement was an attempt at humor. His statement was clear and concise and he didn't use 20 words to say what he clearly could say in only 5 words.

  20. #3380
    Do you believe this guy, Wellbush. Lets assume is isn't Madawg for just a moment....just for fun.

    Wellbush writes "what kerlj and all the others don't realise is that MDawg is probably using a +EV method!" Mdawg was asked this multiple times a year ago by me and others and each time he replied "no". So he or you on his behalf can't come back now and change the story. That doesn't fly. And if this who thing was built on a lie, that that doesn't fly either.

    Now "Grand Martingale". Give me a second, I laughed so hard I still have milk coming out my nose. Note to self: Don't read this funny website while eating my Frosted Flakes.

    Yes in theory the Grand Martingale works. That would be a player with unlimited bankroll and a casino that has no betting limits. Neither of which occurs in the real world. In the absense of these two conditions, Grand Margindale changes nothing except total amounts being bet on negative expectation (-EV) outcome, which still equals a negative expectation outcome. This isn't anything new. It has been proven over and over again, for hundreds of years. Just people like you come along and think you are re-inventing the wheel.

    For an easy explanation just look to a simple $10 wager martingaled. After 10 losses, the player is betting over $10,000. Betting $10,000 to win $10 for the series. And after the player loses that $10,000 wager it will take 1000 series of winning $10 just to get back to EVEN. And for you people that don't actually gamble and are just talking on an internet forum, those 10, 11, or more losses in a row, do happen and more than you realize.

    That you even would type the words "grand Martingale" and think it is a serious discussion, eliminates you from being taken seriously any further.

    And not to insult you but you have posted that you can't even get together a $2000 bankroll. We are supposed to beleive that a guy who can't put together a measley $2000 bankroll has all the answers. Everything overlooked by expert mathematicians for centuries. This is fantasy stuff.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 23 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 23 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. MDawg here. Greetings!
    By MDawg in forum Whatever's On Your Mind
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-29-2020, 04:30 AM
  2. Thoughts about the X Train's progress.
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-14-2013, 05:24 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 08-28-2012, 08:35 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •