Okay now you're saying a lot of different things. Which is good! and fine.

All I was saying was that if you are undercapitalized in a casino, then at best you'll be able to flat bet - won't have the money to vary your bet. And we know that flat betting is a sure loser no matter what you are doing, counting cards at BJ, or whatever. And the same applies, in a way, at the stock market, with trading. If you are undercapitalized, you'll be able to buy only one "chunk" (lot) of shares, versus being able to average in, and your chances of winning will be lowered. This could be somewhat compared to flat betting (one bite - one bet at the stock only, versus multiple).

Which is why I am agreeing with you in disagreeing with that guy who said that a small bankroll is better than a big bankroll at the tables. I am more concurring though, in that I am agreeing for different reasons. I am saying that undercapitalization is bad.