Originally Posted by
MDawg
which would include:
-stacks of cash
-stacks of chips
-millions of dollars in paid off markers
-casino checks issued for wins
-pictures and videos of high end timepieces
-pictures of winning Baccarat shoes
-pictures of large Vegas high roller suites
-pictures of gourmets meal eaten at casino resort restaurants
-pictures of the television screen inside the suites, and paper folios, that prove full RFB comps.
-actual video of WIN statements while logged in live to player card accounts to substantiate all alleged wins
Only one of these 10 items has any value at all as far as proving anything. I will address each separately in a moment. But before I do a couple other things. Yes here I am posting about this shit. Call me a gluten for punishment or whatever names you want to substitute. What I really am is a gluten or more accurately passionate about not allowing this bullshit.
Second thing, thinking he had dispatched me, because I have grown weary of this battle and foolishness, Mdawg immediately turned his sights and attacks toward Axelwolf, saying anything and everything he can come up with to try to discredit Axelwolf, just as he did me before. This guy's (mdawgs) bullshit story can gain no tractions, zero, unless he can discredit every real player, professional or recreational, that knows his story in it's entirety is bullshit because it is not how Las Vegas, or the gambling industry works.
He must discredit, or try to, every single person that speaks up. Hense, the list of more than a dozen individual members that he attempted to discredit a the forum he promotes at the bottom of his page.
Third thing and this is just too funny to not direct people to. Post #3500, just a few posts back (bottom of last page). It is 2 pictures. I won't even describe it. Just take a look. That is Narcissism at it's epitome. Nothing else need be said.
Now these 10 items that I feel the need to address:
1. -stacks of cash
This proves NOTHING, except that the person has access to some cash. Doesn't even have to be their cash, just that they have access to some cash. Or you could pull a Rob Singer and buy some movie prop money if you don't have the real cash. In the case of Mdawg, no one is disputing that he has access to some real cash and in pretty high quanities. Posting pictures of cash proves nothing in regards to wins or losses.
2. -stacks of chips
Same as above. Pictures of chips proves the poster has access to some cash and purchased or bought in for chips. Proves nothing about wins or losses. Even posting a picture of say $45,00 in chips. What does that mean? Person could have bought in for $75,000 and lost $30,000 and be posting $45.000. Just proves NOTHING.
3. -millions of dollars in paid off markers
This also proves nothing about wins or losses. 2 examples. Player takes out a marker. Plays, is fortunate enough to win (all players win some time....it is called variance) and pays off the marker. All that proved is he won a session just like all players +EV or even the worse -EV degenerate gambler sometimes do. Example 2, player takes about a marker and losses. He then withdraws more money from his accounts to pay off marker. He can now prove he paid off the marker. Again, proves nothing. In this case he actually lost and still paid off marker.
4. -casino checks issued for wins
Axelwolf and a few others already proved that a player can get casino checks for more than just the winning portion of play. But lets just go with the idea that Mdawg wanted to convey that having a casino issued check means the player won. FOR THAT SESSION! Again, player takes out marker every day. On days he wins (variance) he re-pays marker and requests check for winnings. On days he losses, he pays of marker from his bank account or other funds. At the end of 20 days he could have 5 or 6 casino checks and have a total loss of hundreds of thousands. Proves nothing, but this was a slick one of Mdawgs attempts, I will give him that.
5. -pictures and videos of high end timepieces
This has what to do with gambling winnings? I will just say more narcissism and need to impress and leave it at that.
6. -pictures of winning Baccarat shoes
Don't even know what exactly this means or where he showed this.
7. -pictures of large Vegas high roller suites
Big Losing players are the players most often comped high roller suites. Proves nothing about wins or losses though. Proves that player put a lot of action in. Not sure where anyone questioned that he plays a lot and puts a lot of money in action. Also see $5. An element of narcissism to this.
8. pictures of gourmets meal eaten at casino resort restaurants
This one is gross in that he has often posted pictures of half eaten food. Other than that, again, shows an element of narcissism, but proves NOTHING about wins or losses.
9. -pictures of the television screen inside the suites, and paper folios, that prove full RFB comps.
If real, like all comps this proves a player put in a certain amount of action, which no one is disputing. Proves NOTHING about winning or losing.
10. -actual video of WIN statements while logged in live to player card accounts to substantiate all alleged wins
And finally #10. This has some value if real. But because so many things can be doctored or fake (just take a look at Rob Singers postings), to have any real value this would need to be confirmed by someone to prove that it was legit. Without that it is no different than a picture of a guy behind the steering wheel of an RV at the RV showroom.
Conclusion:
These things prove nothing. NOTHING at all, except maybe the player gambles at higher stakes which no one is disputing. Well actually most of us aren't disputing that. There is someone I won't mention (he can if he wants) that has the theory that Mdawg is just has access to someone eles's situation, a friend or family member or employer who is actually the high roller. That seems a stretch to me, but shows the possibilities. These things just don't prove anything. And stacking multiple things that don't prove anything on top of one another, doesn't change that. Just the same as playing multiple losing strategies (-EV) does not make for a winning strategy.
But a real winning strategy or play is not what this has ever been about. This has always been about Mdawg overwhelming with enough bullshit that it almost seems believable. And he would have succeeded if there weren't people like me and Axelwolf and those dozen other real players that he started individual threads attempting to discredit, and even the people that just chime in once in a while.
Now lets hear the response like "OMG, he posted when he said he wouldn't" and that crap, instead of focusing on the reality of this.