The Adventures of MDawg (in progress)

[MDawg]

Is this why you're in on these private messages that were being handed around furiously. Didn't take long to find one person willing to cross the very thin blue line.

[Garnabby]

What is more likely, that you have developed a Theory of Everything or that Biden's "victory" is a result of wide-spread voting and ballot fraud ? I go with the latter.

A very juvenile argument. Because no one can begin to contemplate even the chance of a theory of everything existing, and, then, being found, however, without, first, knowing the theory of everything.

Regardless, of course, you certainly are as likely to go with "the latter" no matter what I write about it. The difference is that you speak of urinals, etc, instead of the slightest bit of any proof of anything. You go well out of your way to post up silly nonsense (albeit in the land of nonsense). But, life isn't a game, let alone a casino-game.

[tableplay]

What is more likely, that you have developed a Theory of Everything or that Biden's "victory" is a result of wide-spread voting and ballot fraud ? I go with the latter.

A very juvenile argument. Because no one can begin to contemplate even the chance of a theory of everything existing, and, then, being found, however, without, first, knowing the theory of everything.

Regardless, of course, you certainly are as likely to go with "the latter" no matter what I write about it. The difference is that you speak of urinals, etc, instead of the slightest bit of any proof of anything. You go well out of your way to post up silly nonsense (albeit in the land of nonsense). But, life isn't a game, let alone a casino-game.

Except that there are affidavits from the Fulton County poll observers at State Farm arena stating that they were ordered to leave the premises which is in violation of Georgia statute. Furthermore, when they were on the premises, they were roped off, along with the Fox News team at such a distance that there would be no way they could properly observe the vote counting that occurred which is also in violation (as clearly seen on the video). Below you will find many other violations of statutes along with constitutional violations. Whether these violations will be enforced in court is another matter, but violations occurred and the proof of this is presented below.

With regards to the Theory of Everything, at some point, perhaps at the time you were an infant, you were unaware of a Theory of Everything. By your own statement above then, it would be impossible for you to even contemplate it at some future time (including the present).


"https://youtu.be/tzE-Eow4L9Y?t=837"

[mickeycrimm]

MDawg, on page 8 of your thread on WoV you said you don't play on check out days because as they are the worst days to play because people are hunched over the table desperate to win as it gets closer and closer to departure time.

That implies you fly in and out on junkets with other people. Probably cheap junkets. And I don't know of any 30 day junkets.

[MDawg]

I think this just gets back to how many either misread or make assumptions. If you'd read my Adventures thread you know that we drive in because we have too much luggage, and generally come home with even more stuff than we arrived with, and don't even live all that far away. California isn't that far. I even answered some questions about what kind of car we have for the drive. I recall once part of the evidence that was used to establish that I wasn't that sock that came into WOV and pretended to be me, was that we were en route driving back from Vegas while that bozo was posting in my name.

Even so, everyone has a checkout day, whether it has a fixed hour or not. But when I referred to people hunched over desperate to win as it gets closer and closer to departure time - I was talking about the people who do that, not me.

If you read my threads carefully, you'd also know that back when I used to fly in, alone, I used to have the room comp'ed all the way until the next day so that I could leave whenever the day before, and not have a specific checkout time. And still, I advise against playing on checkout days.

Even when all we are doing is moving from one resort to another still in Vegas, I don't play on checkout days at the departing resort, and might not even play at the arriving new resort, because that merges into my other rule of not playing on check in days, because I might be tired. If we're arriving from out of town, I definitely will not play on check in days. I might bend the "don't play on check in days" rule if all we are doing is moving across Vegas one resort to another.

The point being that when we go to Vegas it's an open ended trip for the most part absent some business or other event for which I must be back in town on a certain date. Or until my wife gets sick of Vegas, which she gets tired of it well before I do. I almost never want to leave.
But still, the day comes inevitably where I have finished that day's session and it has been decided that we will leave the next day. And that next day, I will not play, we will simply leave.

[Garnabby]

With regards to the Theory of Everything, at some point, perhaps at the time you were an infant, you were unaware of a Theory of Everything. By your own statement above then, it would be impossible for you to even contemplate it at some future time (including the present).

Peripheral considerations about a theory of everything aren't a theory of everything. Anyway, you assume that a theory of everything can't, itself, involve paradox. It must. A simple example of this sort of paradox is the often cited, "There is no theory of everything, it can't be done." Well, were this the case, then this bit, itself, fleshed out, would be the theory of everything. Ie, a no-theory theory of everything, or a no-solution solution. There are lots of established theorems, or whatever about there not being a theory of everything, set of all sets, or however to put it. But, professional people are still looking to resolve also the paradoxical.

[Garnabby]

Except that there are affidavits from the Fulton County poll observers at State Farm arena stating that they were ordered to leave the premises which is in violation of Georgia statute. Furthermore, when they were on the premises, they were roped off, along with the Fox News team at such a distance that there would be no way they could properly observe the vote counting that occurred which is also in violation (as clearly seen on the video). Below you will find many other violations of statutes along with constitutional violations. Whether these violations will be enforced in court is another matter, but violations occurred and the proof of this is presented below.

With regards to the Theory of Everything, at some point, perhaps at the time you were an infant, you were unaware of a Theory of Everything. By your own statement above then, it would be impossible for you to even contemplate it at some future time (including the present).


"https://youtu.be/tzE-Eow4L9Y?t=837"

I listened to a couple minutes of it. Look, around the twenty-minute mark, the professor claimed that there doesn't have to be any fraud - none was found by Barr - but, just irregularities in the voting system, to then have the election results thrown out. First off, had Trump won the election, there would, almost surely, be a lot more people - the majority of them - finding themselves out on the street protesting the elections. Secondly, there will always be irregularities in every thing we do, some type and degree of. Is there a law that states that the general election results are to be thrown out given the slightest and least of voting and counting irregularities?

[BoSox]

Except that there are affidavits from the Fulton County poll observers at State Farm arena stating that they were ordered to leave the premises which is in violation of Georgia statute. Furthermore, when they were on the premises, they were roped off, along with the Fox News team at such a distance that there would be no way they could properly observe the vote counting that occurred which is also in violation (as clearly seen on the video). Below you will find many other violations of statutes along with constitutional violations. Whether these violations will be enforced in court is another matter, but violations occurred and the proof of this is presented below.

With regards to the Theory of Everything, at some point, perhaps at the time you were an infant, you were unaware of a Theory of Everything. By your own statement above then, it would be impossible for you to even contemplate it at some future time (including the present).


"https://youtu.be/tzE-Eow4L9Y?t=837"

I listened to a couple minutes of it. Look, around the twenty-minute mark, the professor claimed that there doesn't have to be any fraud - none was found by Barr - but, just irregularities in the voting system, to then have the election results thrown out. First off, had Trump won the election, there would, almost surely, be a lot more people - the majority of them - finding themselves out on the street protesting the elections. Secondly, there will always be irregularities in every thing we do, some type and degree of. Is there a law that states that the general election results are to be thrown out given the slightest and least of voting and counting irregularities?

Is there a law that says that 74 million people must accept the result of a Cou De Tau?

[Garnabby]

Is there a law that says that 74 million people must accept the result of a Cou De Tau?

A totally irrelevant statement. Incidentally,

Coup d’état, also called coup, the sudden, violent overthrow of an existing government by a small group. The chief prerequisite for a coup is control of all or part of the armed forces, the police, and other military elements. Unlike a revolution, which is usually achieved by large numbers of people working for basic social, economic, and political change, a coup is a change in power from the top that merely results in the abrupt replacement of leading government personnel. A coup rarely alters a nation’s fundamental social and economic policies, nor does it significantly redistribute power among competing political groups.

[mcap]

Fucking garnabby.

[tableplay]

Except that there are affidavits from the Fulton County poll observers at State Farm arena stating that they were ordered to leave the premises which is in violation of Georgia statute. Furthermore, when they were on the premises, they were roped off, along with the Fox News team at such a distance that there would be no way they could properly observe the vote counting that occurred which is also in violation (as clearly seen on the video). Below you will find many other violations of statutes along with constitutional violations. Whether these violations will be enforced in court is another matter, but violations occurred and the proof of this is presented below.

With regards to the Theory of Everything, at some point, perhaps at the time you were an infant, you were unaware of a Theory of Everything. By your own statement above then, it would be impossible for you to even contemplate it at some future time (including the present).


"https://youtu.be/tzE-Eow4L9Y?t=837"

I listened to a couple minutes of it. Look, around the twenty-minute mark, the professor claimed that there doesn't have to be any fraud - none was found by Barr - but, just irregularities in the voting system, to then have the election results thrown out. First off, had Trump won the election, there would, almost surely, be a lot more people - the majority of them - finding themselves out on the street protesting the elections. Secondly, there will always be irregularities in every thing we do, some type and degree of. Is there a law that states that the general election results are to be thrown out given the slightest and least of voting and counting irregularities?

Bill, Dr. Eastman's main point is that Georgia (which is now being sued by Texas and Louisiana for just exactly what Dr. Eastman pointed out in the video I linked to above) violated constitutional electoral statutes when Georgia bypassed its state legislature when enacting new voting laws (two-signature ballot verification was replaced with single-signature ballot verification on mail-in/absentee ballots for example). You are correct that ballot fraud doesn't even need to be present with regard to Dr. Eastman's point (even though I and many other people believe it is present as I have posted previously).

With regards to a theory of everything (one that works anyhow) if peripheral considerations about a theory of everything aren't a theory of everything then you should stop making such considerations.

[Garnabby]

With regards to a theory of everything (one that works anyhow) if peripheral considerations about a theory of everything aren't a theory of everything then you should stop making such considerations.

Many potential theories of everything could have the same underlying peripheral considerations, such as likelihood of being discovered. Hence, such can't be a theory of everything, but, can only follow a proved working theory of everything. The reason that election stuff, in terms of likelihood, can have nothing to do with a theory of everything.

[Garnabby]

To answer some more of the general election result stuff. This, neither, is a matter of likelihood. Texas, a Republican state, is suing Georgia for changing its election rules, before the election? Is Lousiana, too, now a Republican state?

"The politics of Louisiana are known for its entrenched corruption and populism. The State has toggled between Democratic and Republican control since the civil war, and has reliably supported populist candidates of all stripes, including Huey Long, Earl Long, David Duke, and George Wallace."

Trump will be long gone, for good, in about a month. Right? Surely you must realize this. The craziest nut to be elected, mainly, I guess, because no one had any idea what he was like. First he lost the House, then, the general election, and, maybe, if he keeps it up, the Senate, in about a month. Epic one-time Presidential fail. And, on the way to jail? The hilarious saga of Trump and family in the White House, and, his followers who thought they were going to do away with elections (as we know them) all together.

Anyway, if things are so corrupt, and faked, why bother with any of it? Give up on all the conspiracy stuff, and, then, focus on, and write about the stuff you are doing to improve your own life. (Something I have done, my entire life.)

[mcap]

To answer some more of the general election result stuff. This, neither, is a matter of likelihood. Texas, a Republican state, is suing Georgia for changing its election rules, before the election? Is Lousiana, too, now a Republican state?

"The politics of Louisiana are known for its entrenched corruption and populism. The State has toggled between Democratic and Republican control since the civil war, and has reliably supported populist candidates of all stripes, including Huey Long, Earl Long, David Duke, and George Wallace."

Trump will be long gone, for good, in about a month. Right? Surely you must realize this. The craziest nut to be elected, mainly, I guess, because no one had any idea what he was like. First he lost the House, then, the general election, and, maybe, if he keeps it up, the Senate, in about a month. Epic one-time Presidential fail. And, on the way to jail? The hilarious saga of Trump and family in the White House, and, his followers who thought they were going to do away with elections (as we know them) all together.

Anyway, if things are so corrupt, and faked, why bother with any of it? Give up on all the conspiracy stuff, and, then, focus on, and write about the stuff you are doing to improve your own life. (Something I have done, my entire life.)

[mickeycrimm]

I think this just gets back to how many either misread or make assumptions. If you'd read my Adventures thread you know that we drive in because we have too much luggage, and generally come home with even more stuff than we arrived with, and don't even live all that far away. California isn't that far. I even answered some questions about what kind of car we have for the drive. I recall once part of the evidence that was used to establish that I wasn't that sock that came into WOV and pretended to be me, was that we were en route driving back from Vegas while that bozo was posting in my name.

Even so, everyone has a checkout day, whether it has a fixed hour or not. But when I referred to people hunched over desperate to win as it gets closer and closer to departure time - I was talking about the people who do that, not me.

If you read my threads carefully, you'd also know that back when I used to fly in, alone, I used to have the room comp'ed all the way until the next day so that I could leave whenever the day before, and not have a specific checkout time. And still, I advise against playing on checkout days.

Even when all we are doing is moving from one resort to another still in Vegas, I don't play on checkout days at the departing resort, and might not even play at the arriving new resort, because that merges into my other rule of not playing on check in days, because I might be tired. If we're arriving from out of town, I definitely will not play on check in days. I might bend the "don't play on check in days" rule if all we are doing is moving across Vegas one resort to another.

The point being that when we go to Vegas it's an open ended trip for the most part absent some business or other event for which I must be back in town on a certain date. Or until my wife gets sick of Vegas, which she gets tired of it well before I do. I almost never want to leave.
But still, the day comes inevitably where I have finished that day's session and it has been decided that we will leave the next day. And that next day, I will not play, we will simply leave.

But you said you don't play on check out day because of people hunched over the table desperately trying to win as it gets closer and closer to departure time. That implies that you are all checking out on that day. Why would play be any different for you on that day than any other day?

[mickeycrimm]

MDawg, great job you are doing of giving Shack, Axel, and the rest of the gang on WoV, the runaround on meeting up. They still think it might happen. But you know damn well you will never meet up no matter what. Well played. I have to admit you are a master at the shuck and jive. You've got more routes than Greyhound Bus Lines.

[Darkoz]

I think this just gets back to how many either misread or make assumptions. If you'd read my Adventures thread you know that we drive in because we have too much luggage, and generally come home with even more stuff than we arrived with, and don't even live all that far away. California isn't that far. I even answered some questions about what kind of car we have for the drive. I recall once part of the evidence that was used to establish that I wasn't that sock that came into WOV and pretended to be me, was that we were en route driving back from Vegas while that bozo was posting in my name.

Even so, everyone has a checkout day, whether it has a fixed hour or not. But when I referred to people hunched over desperate to win as it gets closer and closer to departure time - I was talking about the people who do that, not me.

If you read my threads carefully, you'd also know that back when I used to fly in, alone, I used to have the room comp'ed all the way until the next day so that I could leave whenever the day before, and not have a specific checkout time. And still, I advise against playing on checkout days.

Even when all we are doing is moving from one resort to another still in Vegas, I don't play on checkout days at the departing resort, and might not even play at the arriving new resort, because that merges into my other rule of not playing on check in days, because I might be tired. If we're arriving from out of town, I definitely will not play on check in days. I might bend the "don't play on check in days" rule if all we are doing is moving across Vegas one resort to another.

The point being that when we go to Vegas it's an open ended trip for the most part absent some business or other event for which I must be back in town on a certain date. Or until my wife gets sick of Vegas, which she gets tired of it well before I do. I almost never want to leave.
But still, the day comes inevitably where I have finished that day's session and it has been decided that we will leave the next day. And that next day, I will not play, we will simply leave.

But you said you don't play on check out day because of people hunched over the table desperately trying to win as it gets closer and closer to departure time. That implies that you are all checking out on that day. Why would play be any different for you on that day than any other day?

I thought he plays$1,000 a hand Baccarat?

How many other players are going to be hunched over the high limit table.

[MDawg]

With MickeyCrimm, it's a reading comprehension issue. With DarkOz, it's that he's never been in a high limit salon in Vegas his whole life, such that he should be asking questions, not making statements.

[BoSox]

With MickeyCrimm, it's a reading comprehension issue. With DarkOz, it's that he's never been in a high limit salon in Vegas his whole life, such that he should be asking questions, not making statements.

Garnabby, if you are out there, MDawg, goes to a salon as referenced with his quote:

'I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people."

But you Garnabby must go to a saloon!

[mickeycrimm]

With MickeyCrimm, it's a reading comprehension issue. With DarkOz, it's that he's never been in a high limit salon in Vegas his whole life, such that he should be asking questions, not making statements.

You really lead the glamorous life. Where are all your glamorous friends? It seems that you would be spending time with them instead of the considerable time you spend with us "lowlifes" in the forums.

And yes, the game is played much differently in high limit. There the player must choose between banker and player. In the low limit area the player must choose between player and banker. Quite a difference indeed. Right, Hotdwawg?