https://www.corbettreport.com/lies-d...SzJ2WEF5In0%3D
Lengthy report on the lies and exaggeration about covid 19. Great stuff, liberal nightmare.
https://www.corbettreport.com/lies-d...SzJ2WEF5In0%3D
Lengthy report on the lies and exaggeration about covid 19. Great stuff, liberal nightmare.
Last edited by House of Orange; 04-21-2020 at 09:09 AM. Reason: add on
Dude better watch it or he is going to have his Youtube account yanked for telling the truth.Originally Posted by House of Orange
Congratulations to Montana Governor Bullock for opening up Bars, Restaurants and Casinos in the near future. Along with Churches this week. Mickey can certainly talk more about Montana’s unique casino structure, but this is a positive move for Small Business owners and workers.
Note that Bullock is a Democrat but is running to unseat the current GOP Senator Daines. He obviously knows his constituents want the state open. But he is a liberal at heart and recently fundraised with Camel Toe Harris.
https://www.usnews.com/news/best-sta...pening-montana
The bar/casinos will be opening back up on May 4. Some will have to shut machines down to maintain the social distancing. But others will have no problem at all as their machines are already several feet apart. They are multi-game machines and the slowest action is always in the mornings. I can't check a machine if someone is playing it so the mornings are the best time to look for plays. By late afternoon most of the machines can be taken so it's a waste of time to stop and check the machines for plays. But these days I'm through by noon anyway.Originally Posted by The Boz
So I'll be in them when it's slow and not in them when it's busy. Thats some pretty good social distancing. Wearing a mask, washing my hands quite a big, and packing hand sanitizer around.
Last edited by mickeycrimm; 04-22-2020 at 06:42 PM.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
There are 1700 liquor licenses in the state. The bars/casinos represent a lot of jobs as do the restaurants. Plus the owners. When you look at the number of families involved its a lot of people. I read the figure 67,000 people layed off....in a state of 909,000 people.Originally Posted by The Boz
No matter that economic terrorists like Anderson Cooper exist in this country and lobby to keep the shutdown going it is just not right to impoverish that many people.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Shrewd politician. That would suck if he unseats Daines. He may be a moderate democrat but when the chips are down he’ll go with what Schumer wants.Originally Posted by The Boz
I remember an ad Joe Manchin made when he first ran for senate in 2010 after Obamacare was the law of the land. It showed him out somewhere with rifle in hand taking aim at and shooting at the bill, all 2000+ pages, promising he’d repeal.
When he got his chance in 2017 he voted no. He did break ranks for the Kavanaugh confirmation but that could have been as much to do with political expediency as there was no way he was going win senate re-election a month later after voting no on Brett K.
Mickey, in a very, very casual way I know an AP in my neck of the woods, which is far away from you. He speaks very highly of you and said you've helped him a lot by getting him more into slot plays, and teaching him the ins and outs of how to win. He's not on forums, so I doubt if he's reading this. But it gave me a better appreciation for what you do, and how you try to help others, even though there is nothing in it for you.Originally Posted by mickeycrimmThere are 1700 liquor licenses in the state. The bars/casinos represent a lot of jobs as do the restaurants. Plus the owners. When you look at the number of families involved its a lot of people. I read the figure 67,000 people layed off....in a state of 909,000 people.Originally Posted by The Boz
No matter that economic terrorists like Anderson Cooper exist in this country and lobby to keep the shutdown going it is just not right to impoverish that many people.
I'm never going to get into slot plays, since that isn't my cup of tea, or why I go to casinos. I mostly go for entertainment and to relax from work, but I also want to play a winning game. But I have learned somethings about slot plays, which is what you've taught him. It's all good! I'm sure you've helped a lot of people like this, meaning people you've only met on-line. He said he's never met you in person. As I'm sure you know, you've got a lot of fans out there.
I listened to about 35 minutes of it.Originally Posted by tableplayDude better watch it or he is going to have his Youtube account yanked for telling the truth.Originally Posted by House of Orange
It started to get a little redundant but I agree with the analysis.
Next thing Redietz, LMR, Midwest Player and others will have us believe is that...
Marina Abramovic is an Artist and she has nothing to do with Satanism.
They probably believe, like Microsoft, that she is the most legendary artist working now.
I don't really want to post her pictures but here is a recent NYT Article.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/21/a...cy-theory.html
Thanks, Bob. I love to teach the stuff which has gotten me some heat from some machine pros who don't like me giving up the information. Tell your friend I said hi.Originally Posted by Bob21Mickey, in a very, very casual way I know an AP in my neck of the woods, which is far away from you. He speaks very highly of you and said you've helped him a lot by getting him more into slot plays, and teaching him the ins and outs of how to win. He's not on forums, so I doubt if he's reading this. But it gave me a better appreciation for what you do, and how you try to help others, even though there is nothing in it for you.Originally Posted by mickeycrimmThere are 1700 liquor licenses in the state. The bars/casinos represent a lot of jobs as do the restaurants. Plus the owners. When you look at the number of families involved its a lot of people. I read the figure 67,000 people layed off....in a state of 909,000 people.Originally Posted by The Boz
No matter that economic terrorists like Anderson Cooper exist in this country and lobby to keep the shutdown going it is just not right to impoverish that many people.
I'm never going to get into slot plays, since that isn't my cup of tea, or why I go to casinos. I mostly go for entertainment and to relax from work, but I also want to play a winning game. But I have learned somethings about slot plays, which is what you've taught him. It's all good! I'm sure you've helped a lot of people like this, meaning people you've only met on-line. He said he's never met you in person. As I'm sure you know, you've got a lot of fans out there.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
South Dakota joining the common sense states in putting people back to work with restrictions.
https://rapidcityjournal.com/busines...035ca56b2.html
“Under the plan, restaurants and bars would be able to reopen with a minimum of six feet between tables, chairs and barstools, and would put capacity limits on those restaurants, bars and casinos.”
The barstools are the only part I am not sure about. Assuming a couple can sit next to each other. That seems to make sense but who knows? Seems there will be a lot of trial and error.
My thought of the day while getting ready to enjoy it.
“I wonder how many of those so scared of dying from Coronavirus never even lived?”
The Governor of South Dakota did not shut the state down. The bar/casino and restaurant shutdowns were voluntary. SD was the only place in the country you could play a machine if you could find an SD bar that was open. Rapid City probably did it's own shutdown.Originally Posted by The Boz
The South Dakota Video Lottery is in the Bars/Restaurants. It's actually Class III gaming. A license can have up to 10 machines.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
It will be quite the uphill battle for them to convince us that she is not a satanist, and also that she is not much much worse (as you know) . . .Originally Posted by monet
Bump. On March 10 redietz predicted 10 million infected and he put the over/under on hospitalizations for those infected at 20%. And he was "worried" about our health care system being overwhelmed by that 20% in the span of the "next couple of months." Since he wrote the post on March 10 then May 10 would be the end of the "next couple of months."Originally Posted by redietz
The context of his post is that 10 million would be infected by May 10, that number has turned out to be about 4.5 million. And he was well off on the 20% hospitalization rate too.
But I guarantee you redietz has more routes than Greyhound Bus Lines so will have ample excuses for his very bad math. But he will probably go with a flat out denial that he was wrong.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
I don’t think we will see much of RED over here anymore other than maybe a hit and run post.Originally Posted by mickeycrimmBump. On March 10 redietz predicted 10 million infected and he put the over/under on hospitalizations for those infected at 20%. And he was "worried" about our health care system being overwhelmed by that 20% in the span of the "next couple of months." Since he wrote the post on March 10 then May 10 would be the end of the "next couple of months."Originally Posted by redietz
The context of his post is that 10 million would be infected by May 10, that number has turned out to be about 4.5 million. And he was well off on the 20% hospitalization rate too.
But I guarantee you redietz has more routes than Greyhound Bus Lines so will have ample excuses for his very bad math. But he will probably go with a flat out denial that he was wrong.
Alt Right posters must not be the target audience for his Sports Handicapping Services. Not sure he will have much better luck at WoV but all it takes is 1.
But I hear he has 40 different tickets for this Sunday’s NASCAR race purchased so he can say he had the winner Monday morning. And PROVE it.
Mickey, you were always good with numbers, but you butchered these.Originally Posted by mickeycrimmBump. On March 10 redietz predicted 10 million infected and he put the over/under on hospitalizations for those infected at 20%. And he was "worried" about our health care system being overwhelmed by that 20% in the span of the "next couple of months." Since he wrote the post on March 10 then May 10 would be the end of the "next couple of months."Originally Posted by redietz
The context of his post is that 10 million would be infected by May 10, that number has turned out to be about 4.5 million. And he was well off on the 20% hospitalization rate too.
But I guarantee you redietz has more routes than Greyhound Bus Lines so will have ample excuses for his very bad math. But he will probably go with a flat out denial that he was wrong.
First of all, there are just 1.4 million confirmed cases in the U.S. right now (May 14). The world total is about 4.5 million, which is the number you quoted. The confirmed number is so low because testing has been low per capita compared to other countries. Now "confirmed cases," of course is not the same as "people in U.S. who have had the virus." I figure that's pretty obvious, but you seem to have messed that up. Let me repeat that. In the post you quote, I said "infected," not "confirmed cases." Two very different things, which leads to:
Second, as to how many people actually have had the disease in the U.S., the estimate based on testing thus far (at the low end) is 5%. At the high end, it's 15%. Five percent of U.S. population would yield about 15 million, so my 10 million was low.
Third, it's mitigation and social distancing, which were instituted AFTER that March 10 post, that flattened the curve. The trick was going to be to prevent overwhelming hospitalizations, and the trick did the job. It also slowed the spread, which resulted in a more staggered incursion of the virus state-to-state. Now you'll see the red southern states begin to have issues.
Fourth, I framed much of this in hypotheticals, as in "if 20% require hospitalization." You seem to skip the meaning of these, as you do with responses to kewlJ, and you frame them in declaratives. For example, the title "Coronavirus is a scam" is a declarative. Not sure how you posted that and have the cajones to keep posting on the subject, but to each his own.
Finally, Boz, any time you want to put me through a polygraph, you let me know. Did you manage to contact that company president who partnered with me on the futures deal back in 2000? I sent you his name and the business name. I actually do not know if he is still alive; I haven't spoken to him in more than a decade. He retired and has got to be 20 years older than me. I'd give the company of which he was president a call. I see they are still open for business during the pandemic.
Good luck, fellas. As I said, I post here mainly to correct egregious errors. Mickey's were egregious.
We understand.Originally Posted by redietz
You got noodles to slurp down!
Redietz, when you find you are in a hole you need to quit digging. Your claims are not getting more acccurate they are getting more outrageous. And the smoke & mirrors you threw up on your previous numbers is not working.Originally Posted by redietzMickey, you were always good with numbers, but you butchered these.Originally Posted by mickeycrimmBump. On March 10 redietz predicted 10 million infected and he put the over/under on hospitalizations for those infected at 20%. And he was "worried" about our health care system being overwhelmed by that 20% in the span of the "next couple of months." Since he wrote the post on March 10 then May 10 would be the end of the "next couple of months."Originally Posted by redietz
The context of his post is that 10 million would be infected by May 10, that number has turned out to be about 4.5 million. And he was well off on the 20% hospitalization rate too.
But I guarantee you redietz has more routes than Greyhound Bus Lines so will have ample excuses for his very bad math. But he will probably go with a flat out denial that he was wrong.
First of all, there are just 1.4 million confirmed cases in the U.S. right now (May 14). The world total is about 4.5 million, which is the number you quoted. The confirmed number is so low because testing has been low per capita compared to other countries. Now "confirmed cases," of course is not the same as "people in U.S. who have had the virus." I figure that's pretty obvious, but you seem to have messed that up. Let me repeat that. In the post you quote, I said "infected," not "confirmed cases." Two very different things, which leads to:
Second, as to how many people actually have had the disease in the U.S., the estimate based on testing thus far (at the low end) is 5%. At the high end, it's 15%. Five percent of U.S. population would yield about 15 million, so my 10 million was low.
Third, it's mitigation and social distancing, which were instituted AFTER that March 10 post, that flattened the curve. The trick was going to be to prevent overwhelming hospitalizations, and the trick did the job. It also slowed the spread, which resulted in a more staggered incursion of the virus state-to-state. Now you'll see the red southern states begin to have issues.
Fourth, I framed much of this in hypotheticals, as in "if 20% require hospitalization." You seem to skip the meaning of these, as you do with responses to kewlJ, and you frame them in declaratives. For example, the title "Coronavirus is a scam" is a declarative. Not sure how you posted that and have the cajones to keep posting on the subject, but to each his own.
Finally, Boz, any time you want to put me through a polygraph, you let me know. Did you manage to contact that company president who partnered with me on the futures deal back in 2000? I sent you his name and the business name. I actually do not know if he is still alive; I haven't spoken to him in more than a decade. He retired and has got to be 20 years older than me. I'd give the company of which he was president a call. I see they are still open for business during the pandemic.
Good luck, fellas. As I said, I post here mainly to correct egregious errors. Mickey's were egregious.
So you believe 15 million americans were infected with the virus or about 5%s. Well, I guess us Montanans are special people with magical qualities to fight coronavirus because we don't have anything near that infection rate.
Worldometers updates the stats everyday. We've had 462 people test positive out of 24,549 tests. That's about 1.88% or 1 in every 53 people. But if you go back over a month ago it was 1 out of every 23 people testing positive. The number has been dropping dramatically ever since. The number of administered tests jumps up at least a few hundred every day. And for weeks they might find one new case maybe for every 250 tests. However many tests they did in the last day there was not 1 positive. I'll post the new count up tomorrow and we'll look at the daily numbers but your 5% infection rate is exponentially off the mark.
Your strategy of trying to paint your critics as crackpots is not working.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Redietz, your post over at Wizard of Vegas on how your life was here at VCT, until conservatives showed up was kind of touching. I actually had a tear in my eye by the time I ended up reading it.Originally Posted by redietzMickey, you were always good with numbers, but you butchered these.Originally Posted by mickeycrimmBump. On March 10 redietz predicted 10 million infected and he put the over/under on hospitalizations for those infected at 20%. And he was "worried" about our health care system being overwhelmed by that 20% in the span of the "next couple of months." Since he wrote the post on March 10 then May 10 would be the end of the "next couple of months."Originally Posted by redietz
The context of his post is that 10 million would be infected by May 10, that number has turned out to be about 4.5 million. And he was well off on the 20% hospitalization rate too.
But I guarantee you redietz has more routes than Greyhound Bus Lines so will have ample excuses for his very bad math. But he will probably go with a flat out denial that he was wrong.
First of all, there are just 1.4 million confirmed cases in the U.S. right now (May 14). The world total is about 4.5 million, which is the number you quoted. The confirmed number is so low because testing has been low per capita compared to other countries. Now "confirmed cases," of course is not the same as "people in U.S. who have had the virus." I figure that's pretty obvious, but you seem to have messed that up. Let me repeat that. In the post you quote, I said "infected," not "confirmed cases." Two very different things, which leads to:
Second, as to how many people actually have had the disease in the U.S., the estimate based on testing thus far (at the low end) is 5%. At the high end, it's 15%. Five percent of U.S. population would yield about 15 million, so my 10 million was low.
Third, it's mitigation and social distancing, which were instituted AFTER that March 10 post, that flattened the curve. The trick was going to be to prevent overwhelming hospitalizations, and the trick did the job. It also slowed the spread, which resulted in a more staggered incursion of the virus state-to-state. Now you'll see the red southern states begin to have issues.
Fourth, I framed much of this in hypotheticals, as in "if 20% require hospitalization." You seem to skip the meaning of these, as you do with responses to kewlJ, and you frame them in declaratives. For example, the title "Coronavirus is a scam" is a declarative. Not sure how you posted that and have the cajones to keep posting on the subject, but to each his own.
Finally, Boz, any time you want to put me through a polygraph, you let me know. Did you manage to contact that company president who partnered with me on the futures deal back in 2000? I sent you his name and the business name. I actually do not know if he is still alive; I haven't spoken to him in more than a decade. He retired and has got to be 20 years older than me. I'd give the company of which he was president a call. I see they are still open for business during the pandemic.
Good luck, fellas. As I said, I post here mainly to correct egregious errors. Mickey's were egregious.
It sounds like in the good 'ol days on VCT there were mainly four posters, Mendelson, Singer, some guy i don't know, and you. It sounded like during those days, you pretty much ruled the roost and set people straight. You made 5,000 posts during your heyday at VCT; now that is impressive!
And then in your view VCT changed, and apparently checked 6 out of 7 boxes that you consider bad. I guess the good news is VCT was at least checking some boxes.
I thought your "boxes" were interesting. It looks like you've drank the left-wing kool-aide and believe pretty much anything the left tells you. For the record, you've checked all my boxes too. You're to the left of Kj, accountinquestion and even bomb thrower MWP. You're about as hard-core left-wing liberal as I've ever seen on one of these forums.
Btw, your story sounded similar to how liberals view Walmart, and how they believe Walmart destroyed small towns, since their shops couldn't compete against Walmart. Liberals believe Walmart was being evil by bringing products to consumers in small towns at a lower price.
Liberals have a hard time moving forward in life and accepting change. But guess what, that is part of life. Hope you can take this as a life lesson, and realize things change.
I dunno what happened.Originally Posted by Bob21
Redietz went from bashing Alan to loving Gay Rights.
He just pissed off AndrewG over at WoV and Alan demands an apology!!
Not sure how he went from grieving husband to slurping noodles with his slant eyed girlfriend so fast.
If my slant eyed wife dies I am pretty much done with relationships.
Too old to start over with some new chick-a-dee again.
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote