View Poll Results: do you beleive MDawg's baccarat play is a longterm winning strategy

Voters
29. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes

    8 27.59%
  • No

    17 58.62%
  • unsure

    4 13.79%
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 96

Thread: MDawg Poll

  1. #21
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by slingshot View Post
    The truth is-as I've always said- is that no one here has the balls to try the strategy or the patience and understanding to keep up with their play. And no, everyone-i haven't made my millions playing it at my levels.
    I applaud your honesty. Let me take it a step further and ask have you made any money (longterm profit) playing this strategy?

    I believe I have asked this before and to your credit you said something like, "No, but you feel like you can play longer using this strategy" (something along those lines). And that is fine, but the problem is that is NOT what Singer's claim is.
    kew, if you've really been following what sling has always been saying instead of making it up as just another one of your lies, you'd have seen that he has never played SPS. He follows parts of my other recreational strategies.

    Do you ever get anything right?

    BTW....you gonna take down this dumb poll? Not going your way is it...and generally, irritated liberals try to silence things that don't go their way. How about putting up a poll that asks if homos have crossed wires upstairs that affects everything they do?
    Last edited by Rob.Singer; 04-06-2020 at 03:06 PM.

  2. #22
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by House of Orange View Post
    I'm the unsure guy, cause we really don't know triggers, there is no template to evaluate.
    I can appreciate this point of view. I too tried really hard to give him the benefit of doubt, thinking maybe he was doing something that allowed him to play with an advantage that he wasn't sharing. I asked about this probably a dozen times, begging him to tell us. He just keep going back to vague descriptions of progressing betting. And that is not going to result in the what he claims.
    And you've proven that even if he did share an explanation, the fact that you are just too stupid to comprehend it turns you into a nervous wreck with even more hate/typed word. It is the trait of a pure idiot.

  3. #23
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    He is convincing no one.
    You convinced me to vote.

    There's no question that MDawg's baccarat play is a longterm winning strategy for him.

    And, once the casinos open again, I will be employing both MDawg's baccarat strategy, and Rob Singer's VP strategies, as I understand them.

    You can all look forward to me posting many trip reports with documents, photos and videos to display my winnings.

    I'll even invite Axel to let me bankroll him and let him keep half the winnings.

    I only wish I was there to watch tickey's head explode.
    Wow you really are an idiot

  4. #24
    Originally Posted by slingshot View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Kew, you once again started another foolish thread predicated on another one of your lies. You've never seen me say "my vp strategy is a math-beating, long-term strategy". That's what internet hacks like you and redietz like to claim because you never read everything and red walks around with a hard-on for me.
    And do either of you think it's just "coincidence" that both your life partners were snatched from living after you go around perpetuating constant lies about yourselves and others? You think there are no consequences for such treachery?

    The truth about my strategy is that it is a rock solid, 85% of sessions played winner, and because of the occasional huge jackpot winners and how most losing sessions are relatively low four-figured losers, the strategy wins overall.

    This has proven too much for you to comprehend because all you know is how to repeat what you read on the internet....while red has his imaginary "university professors" that drive his life.

    Wise up.
    The truth is-as I've always said- is that no one here has the balls to try the strategy or the patience and understanding to keep up with their play. And no, everyone-i haven't made my millions playing it at my levels.
    Negative game players talk about "having balls to play." Like their bravery is some kind of positive. Like advantage players are chickenshit. It doesn't come down to having balls. It comes down to having smarts. Casinos are built on players "having the balls to play." In my opinion those ballers are not to bright. And you can get your ass that those that signed up to this forum today have voted in this poll.
    Last edited by mickeycrimm; 04-06-2020 at 04:16 PM.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  5. #25
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    He is convincing no one.
    You convinced me to vote.

    There's no question that MDawg's baccarat play is a longterm winning strategy for him.

    And, once the casinos open again, I will be employing both MDawg's baccarat strategy, and Rob Singer's VP strategies, as I understand them.

    You can all look forward to me posting many trip reports with documents, photos and videos to display my winnings.

    I'll even invite Axel to let me bankroll him and let him keep half the winnings.

    I only wish I was there to watch tickey's head explode.
    Yep, I knew you were stupid. But I didn't know you were this stupid. Gonna beat the bac, eh? To bad I can't travel. It would be loads of fun watching your head explode as it all comes crashing down around you. Go get 'em, Smelly. LOLOLOL!
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  6. #26
    Anonymous polls no good. To many socks on this site. Any poll taken here should publish the usernames of those who voted and how they voted. That is, after a period of time has passed. The usernames of those who voted have to be scrutinized. You can bet your ass there are socks right here in this current poll.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  7. #27
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Anonymous polls no good. To many socks on this site. Any poll taken here should publish the usernames of those who voted and how they voted. That is, after a period of time has passed. The usernames of those who voted have to be scrutinized. You can bet your ass there are socks right here in this current poll.
    You're a dope.

    How much do you want to bet?

  8. #28


    There is one pretty obvious sock. Who voted No.
    I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.

    MDawg Adventures carry on at: https://www.truepassage.com/forums/f.../46-IPlayVegas

  9. #29
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Anonymous polls no good. To many socks on this site. Any poll taken here should publish the usernames of those who voted and how they voted. That is, after a period of time has passed. The usernames of those who voted have to be scrutinized. You can bet your ass there are socks right here in this current poll.
    You're a dope.

    How much do you want to bet?
    And you've been sucking MDawg's cock to long. You are just one really stupid person. AP's in Atlantic City making an easy 10K a month but you are to stupid to do that. You would rather waste your time and money on negative games bullshit chasing a pipe dream. Do you know how stupid that is? Take stupid and multiply it by 29 to get stuuuuuuuppppppppiiiiiiiiiiidddddddd!!!!!!!! That's how dumb you are.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  10. #30
    Originally Posted by MDawg View Post


    There is one pretty obvious sock. Who voted No.
    Don't tell the drooling dummy how you know who voted and how they voted.

    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Any poll taken here should publish the usernames of those who voted and how they voted

  11. #31
    Originally Posted by MDawg View Post


    There is one pretty obvious sock. Who voted No.
    Go back to packing smelly up the ass.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  12. #32
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    You would rather waste your time and money on negative games
    Drool on, tickey...I'm gonna win $10K a day.

    And your head is gonna explode when I post the trip reports.

  13. #33
    Originally Posted by MDawg View Post


    There is one pretty obvious sock. Who voted No.
    MDawg, don’t worry so much about this stupid poll. I voted no but I like you and I’ve learn quite a bit from with regard to that stock market. You’ve given good solid advice there.

    You gotta be comfortable and secure in your own skin. Don’t let other people get under your skin so much.

    Look at me. I’ve got half smoke sending me a picture of Pluto and somehow thinking this proves something. I just find it funny and entertaining and go with it.

  14. #34
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by slingshot View Post
    The truth is-as I've always said- is that no one here has the balls to try the strategy or the patience and understanding to keep up with their play. And no, everyone-i haven't made my millions playing it at my levels.
    I applaud your honesty. Let me take it a step further and ask have you made any money (longterm profit) playing this strategy?

    I believe I have asked this before and to your credit you said something like, "No, but you feel like you can play longer using this strategy" (something along those lines). And that is fine, but the problem is that is NOT what Singer's claim is.
    kew, if you've really been following what sling has always been saying instead of making it up as just another one of your lies, you'd have seen that he has never played SPS. He follows parts of my other recreational strategies.

    Do you ever get anything right?

    BTW....you gonna take down this dumb poll? Not going your way is it...and generally, irritated liberals try to silence things that don't go their way. How about putting up a poll that asks if homos have crossed wires upstairs that affects everything they do?
    Actually, I tried once,starting at nickels. After over an hour I was +$80 when my wife called (shopping) and wanted to know if I had forgotten about picking her up! That's what I mean about keeping up with your play and the discipline to play the strategy right. An APer would otherwise find the strategy on some days enough to fill his time with his habit. The "entertainment" strategies still require concentration, but are less taxing.mentally. Yes, playing my favourite strategy of his DOES lengthen playing times and is a great way of playing free play. This has sometimes lengthened the session enough to get at least a tiny win or make a decision as whether to change machines or games. OK. That's all I have to add.
    Last edited by slingshot; 04-06-2020 at 05:08 PM.

  15. #35
    And just to be clear MDawg, I think you won the money you claim. I just don’t think you have a long-term winning strategy. That was the poll question, so I answered it no.

  16. #36
    There's absolutely zero chance 7 legitimate people voted yes, Nathan has like 7 sock puppets. If you're going to vote please announce your vote afterwards or it shouldn't even count whether it be a yay or nay. The Poll should have been... is he Legit or full of s***.

    I highly doubt there's even 20 people on The Forum nowadays

  17. #37
    I don't know what you are looking at but I see this:

    which gets riiiight, back to what I said here about the notion of "impossible" versus "improbable."
    https://vegascasinotalk.com/forum/sh...l=1#post100690
    And there you have it, what Axel claims has "zero chance" ("absolutely zero chance," no less ) is proven to have already happened.
    Last edited by MDawg; 04-06-2020 at 05:44 PM.
    I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.

    MDawg Adventures carry on at: https://www.truepassage.com/forums/f.../46-IPlayVegas

  18. #38
    Anyone smarter than a retard can see who voted and how they voted.

    You're the one who's full of shit.

    Originally Posted by AxelWolf View Post
    There's absolutely zero chance 7 legitimate people voted yes
    This statement right above proves that you will make up shit about things you can't understand, state it as fact, and then actually believe it yourself.

  19. #39
    In a way, all this reminds me of the stock market. You wake up one morning sure that everyone will vote no on a poll that you post, and what happens, it goes a different way. Just like when everyone thinks that the stock market is going to go in the toilet again today, next thing you know it roars up. You just can't always predict these things.
    Last edited by MDawg; 04-06-2020 at 06:23 PM.
    I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.

    MDawg Adventures carry on at: https://www.truepassage.com/forums/f.../46-IPlayVegas

  20. #40
    I said nobody legitimate, if you think Nathan and MDawg voting for himself is legit then ok.

    Surprised how Rob voted.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The Adventures of MDawg (in progress)
    By MDawg in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 3955
    Last Post: 02-27-2024, 02:27 PM
  2. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 03-26-2020, 09:49 AM
  3. MDawg here. Greetings!
    By MDawg in forum Whatever's On Your Mind
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-29-2020, 04:30 AM
  4. Poll: Should Trump Be Removed From Office
    By Midwest Player in forum Whatever's On Your Mind
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-21-2020, 10:38 AM
  5. Vote in the poll: do you tip in casinos?
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 12-28-2012, 10:34 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •