Page 6 of 6 FirstFirst ... 23456
Results 101 to 118 of 118

Thread: Reminder regaring doxxing and link spamming

  1. #101
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post

    OK. Here's a question no one has ever chosen to answer.

    My history from playing about 200 sessions shows an average of 85% chance of winning "today's" session. This is also why people have chosen not to take me up on my various challenges. I believe they understand the huge chance I have of winning minimum $2500 betting up to 6 denominations with constant cashouts that are never risked again along with a $57,200 session bankroll. Make sense?

    So, if I have such a good chance today, why not tomorrow and the next session and the next session, etc.? The math doesn't change. The opportunity doesn't change. Why do you say I HAVE to lose it all eventually? Why ignore the giant winners that are hit? Why ignore that these winning sessions are almost always larger than the largest losing sessions? I don't lose $57,200 in a session, ever. I think my avg. loss in my losing sessions is four figures. All those smaller winning sessions (smaller being $2500-$10,000) add up.

    This IS a short term, single session strategy that has nothing to do with the long term. And even if you want to say 200 sessions IS long term, it has been an overall winner.
    People have answered and you don't like or accept the answer and you wont like or accept mine, but here it is: A bunch of short-term, small sample size does not equate to a long term larger sample size. The best example continues to be the example I frequently use for roulette. Is it reasonable that a person can walk into a casino bet black and win 3 out of 4 spins and leave. Absolutely! It is reasonable they can do that every single day for a year? Not a chance in hell! Why not? why can't they repeat that short term anomaly each and every day. That is basically what you are claiming.

    Look I appreciate you better tone, although I suspect it wont last, and it is not my intent to insult you here Rob, but what you are claiming is nothing new. I know you think it is this new ground breaking things....no one has ever done what you are doing. That simply isn't true. It is simply a variation of progression wagering system and it has been proven since your granddaddy was a toddler that progression betting systems cannot turn a negative expectation game into a winning game….not longterm.

    What progression systems do and have always done is change the groupings of wins and losses, but not the totality. What you always end up with is many small wins (thus your 85%) number and eventually a much, much larger loss that wipes away all those wins and then some. You can't change this. You just can't will it away.
    You've just shown how little you understood of what I wrote, yet again. Nobody has ever clearly addressed what I asked. To get it, you first have to clear the blindness within that says -EV always loses and +EV always wins. It doesn't, and the math proves it doesn't.

    Over time, there are some winners on -EV games and some losers on +EV games. That is a mathematical fact. Nothing is finite when it comes to GAMES of skill or chance. How can there be winners? Easy. And the same the other way around. I'm not gonna keep explaining how to you unless and until you open your "+=win and -=lose" mind. You simply take that easy way out, every single time you're cornered with sensible points.

    And you did it again. This isn't roulette, where you have no input other than a bet. Obviously you're right about what you said there. The biggest blockade I see for you is the continuous escaping the fact that the big jackpots are FAR bigger than the majority of the losing sessions. Instead of using a computer that tells you what formulas equal, use the far more useful computer attached to your neck and come out into the light.

    Critics feel good about continually claiming "the one or two big losses will wipe out all the small wins". Yet they for some reason ignore, even though they KNOW the strategy goes into some sky high denominations, that there are some HUGE hits. No critic will accept that, and my guess is by rejecting that, they can comfortably keep saying how the big losses wipe out all the winners and more.

    I've played about 200 sessions. There ARE huge hits. You've seen me post pictures even recently of hits that I've gotten WITHOUT playing my strategy, so you know these hits exist at the $10 and up levels. Even 6-figures. So where's the disconnect? You can't keep denying they happen.

    Then we have your insinuation that I see huge session losses. There's a few. My largest was about $33k. Next largest was $11k. And down from there---to as low as under $1000. That's 30 sessions of losses and 170 sessions of winners between $2540 and $96,000. (I'm rounding).

    Remember the holy grail of casino games: what has already occured has no bearing on past results or results yet to come. IE, if a strategy had an 85% chance of winning yesterday's session, it has an 85% chance of winning all future sessions. Where is it written that I must hit a big enough loser in a session to wipe all the winners out? And where is it written that HUGE jackpot winners just can't happen?

    Look, your world isn't gonna end if you admit you either don't understand how the strategy works so you're not yet qualified to form an educated opinion, or you might be getting closer to seeing how the strategy is better than grinding away at 4% +EV opportunities.

    Here's another question: the math cannot and does not dictate what will or should happen in a single session. Then how could it possibly predict a devastating loss "somewhere" within the structure of an 85% opportunity of winning? And why doesn't it also predict the huge jackpots?

    Answer: because this strategy, unlike AP play, completely and totally stops after every session is over. Remember, again, that no hand of vp has anything to do with hands that have come before or that are yet to come. The same with sessions.
    Last edited by Rob.Singer; 04-13-2020 at 06:36 PM.

  2. #102

  3. #103
    ......................................




    so Dan's going to lecture everybody about courtesy and good behavior?

    here's his thread from his other forum

    I'm waiting for him to tell everybody that he was just being cute - not offensive

    and, in case you're wondering - I'm a Christian




    Name:  iZL8c6F.jpg
Views: 304
Size:  59.1 KB




    yeah, I'm going to take advice from Dan about how to behave on a forum
    he's a role model for everybody




    Name:  giphy.gif
Views: 317
Size:  1.35 MB
    Last edited by Half Smoke; 04-14-2020 at 06:11 AM.
    Of course what I'm saying is true. I saw it ON THE INTERNET.

  4. #104
    Originally Posted by Half Smoke View Post
    ......................................




    so Dan's going to lecture everybody about courtesy and good behavior?

    here's his thread from his other forum

    I'm waiting for him to tell everybody that he was just being cute - not offensive

    and, in case you're wondering - I'm a Christian




    Name:  iZL8c6F.jpg
Views: 304
Size:  59.1 KB




    yeah, I'm going to take advice from Dan about how to behave on a forum
    he's a role model for everybody




    Name:  giphy.gif
Views: 317
Size:  1.35 MB
    Ahem...Dan is Jewish. You would be all over any white person using the n-word. You give black people a pass when they use the n-word. That is actually racist because you are treating someone differently because of their race. What is different about a Jew using a phrase like "Cheap Jew tip." It's the same as a black person using the n-word. You give the black folks a pass on it so you have to give Dan a pass on it.
    Last edited by mickeycrimm; 04-14-2020 at 06:19 AM.
    Stoogeboy maxpigpenn = professional nickel keno player and KJocchio's lover.

  5. #105
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post

    Ahem, Dan is Jewish.


    sorry, but that doesn't justify if
    Of course what I'm saying is true. I saw it ON THE INTERNET.

  6. #106
    Originally Posted by Half Smoke View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post

    Ahem, Dan is Jewish.


    sorry, but that doesn't justify if
    I'm sure you've been very vocal about black people using the n-word. Not!
    Stoogeboy maxpigpenn = professional nickel keno player and KJocchio's lover.

  7. #107
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Half Smoke View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post

    Ahem, Dan is Jewish.


    sorry, but that doesn't justify if
    I'm sure you've been very vocal about black people using the n-word. Not!


    for the record mickey, I have been vocal about black people using the N word - particularly in rap music that influences the young
    I've said this on many different forums
    I think it's disgusting - and the black leaders who refuse to address it are cowards - they're afraid of being considered irrelevant and not cool by the younger blacks
    they (leaders and politicians) deserve to be called out publicly for this for sure





    if Dan thinks laughing at stereotypes about Jews is so cute
    another stereotype about Jews is that they're very greedy
    maybe he'd like to change his profile picture to this:

    Name:  9Iy0KxY.jpg
Views: 326
Size:  216.7 KB
    Of course what I'm saying is true. I saw it ON THE INTERNET.

  8. #108
    Originally Posted by monet View Post
    My only gripe is that I don't know if I am AR-47 Monet or AK-47 Monet???
    Shit is confusing.
    At least both firearms use the same ammunition.
    I am also not sure why I have to be the TICKET-PUNCHER??

    Calling Tableplay a SPACE CADET has to be the most derogatory statement ever posted on the internet that I ever read.
    I am highly offended that this is allowed.
    I am not offended as much for DeMango which is odd.

    I confirmed with mcap that this thread has nothing to do with Las Vegas.
    Thanks Monet. I guess we shouldn't be surprised - LMR/Onehitwonder/Bill Yung is a retard.

  9. #109
    Originally Posted by monet View Post
    The best thing about this site is that it is loosely moderated.
    If you start bringing the hammer down none of us will survive very long.
    Now that traffic is up because of the stay at home shit, I guess Dan feels that he can bring in more rules. I suspect that If things start to dry up he will loosen things up again.

  10. #110
    Maybe, it's time to ban Singer, and Crimm, again. So Crimm can make up a few more "handles" to bash Singer. Lol. Those were the days.

  11. #111
    Originally Posted by LMR View Post
    Those were the days.
    "Those were the days"?? From someone who just signed up last month. Yep, I think we've got a sock puppet, but I know everybody already knows that. We don't even need Bosox forum detective on the case.

  12. #112
    Originally Posted by LMR View Post
    Maybe, it's time to ban Singer, and Crimm, again. So Crimm can make up a few more "handles" to bash Singer. Lol. Those were the days.
    What is it about researching HCQ that you don't like....other than it will make Trump will get credit if it works.

    Are you against testing other drugs or is it just HCQ?
    Stoogeboy maxpigpenn = professional nickel keno player and KJocchio's lover.

  13. #113
    [QUOTE=LMR;101772] Those were the days.[/QUOTE


  14. #114
    Originally Posted by BoSox View Post
    Originally Posted by LMR View Post
    Those were the days.
    I have every episode on DVD.
    I also have all of Sanford and Son to stay PC.
    TV is racist as Archie made it 9 seasons with spin offs.
    Fred only got 6 seasons but The Jeffersons actually made it 11 seasons... go figure!

  15. #115
    Originally Posted by monet View Post
    Originally Posted by BoSox View Post
    Originally Posted by LMR View Post
    Those were the days.
    I have every episode on DVD.
    I also have all of Sanford and Son to stay PC.
    TV is racist as Archie made it 9 seasons with spin offs.
    Fred only got 6 seasons but The Jeffersons actually made it 11 seasons... go figure!
    I wonder when people stopped telling polock jokes. Probably the eighties. I’m Italian and never minded the wop or dago slurs from Archie.

    I caught part of an All In the Family recently and meathead was going on about something to Archie, and he said, blacks makes up 1/8 of the US population.
    That got me thinking, fast forward 45-50 years. African-Americans make up about 1/8 (or 13%) of US population.

  16. #116
    Originally Posted by Bob21 View Post
    From someone who just signed up last month. Yep, I think we've got a sock puppet, but I know everybody already knows that. We don't even need Bosox forum detective on the case.
    I don't keep the same "handle" because I move on from the stuff. I mean, I couldn't have carried on with the OneHitWonder stuff because that was, for all intents and purposes, about the "two-dice problem". Fairly intense stuff. As well, not posting for stretches of time, you tend to move on to other things, and places in your life. Here's a quote from Yung about, if I recall, the only numbers I brought up, then. Coincidentally, these were the numbers that "fit" into the D'COVI stuff. I have to add, though, that I think that I'm a lot smarter than I was, then, with my theory of everything. What happened was, I think, the numbers started to work out a bit. It took me thirty years of wrestling with the basics of physics overall. Those observations, to get to this point.

    Look, you won't find anyone who works with a lot of numbers, a lot, who hasn't a lot "fun" stories about numbers. Check out the "crazy" stuff those guys do at https://math.stackexchange.com/ . Sprinkled among the more-serious stuff is the "crazy" stuff. I have a few posts up there, and met some of them, in the process.

    Incidentally, I did vote twice in the MDawg poll. Crimm caught me. Now I do feel a bit like Tasha. I guess that we can't trust anyone, at least not me, about anything. Maybe, not even ourselves. Sometimes, we get caught doing what seemed insignificant, or, with carrying on a bit too far with something we were already legitimately doing. On the other hand, that Crimm more or less just concluded this, I feel "justified" that I did it. The old saying, "If they blame you for it, you might as well do it."

    Originally Posted by Bill Yung View Post
    Today, I noticed that 411 = 3 X 137, and 137 = 4^2 + 11^2, a Pythagorean prime. The inverse of 137 is rather close to the fine-structure constant. The number that a famous physicist told his students to put up on their wall. It has a sort of "cult following" among theoretical physics, as well. Notice how the 4 and 11 make up the 137, and, versa, how the 137 makes up the 411. You would have to go to the other site to see the significance of the 411. (If we are the 42nd dimension, then the 41st, which in a way comes before and after us, is our "tracks". Then 41 + 1 ---> 411 comes from trying to add 1 to the 41, on the end, but after the end. Sort of a limit after the limit. How do we become our "tracks", which are beneath our matter and fields? Does the fine-structure constant remain constant between "different" universes? Is it actually somehow just, exactly 1 / 137?)
    Last edited by LMR; 04-14-2020 at 08:33 PM.

  17. #117
    Originally Posted by Half Smoke View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by Half Smoke View Post



    sorry, but that doesn't justify if
    I'm sure you've been very vocal about black people using the n-word. Not!


    for the record mickey, I have been vocal about black people using the N word - particularly in rap music that influences the young
    I've said this on many different forums
    I think it's disgusting - and the black leaders who refuse to address it are cowards - they're afraid of being considered irrelevant and not cool by the younger blacks
    they (leaders and politicians) deserve to be called out publicly for this for sure





    if Dan thinks laughing at stereotypes about Jews is so cute
    another stereotype about Jews is that they're very greedy
    maybe he'd like to change his profile picture to this:

    Name:  9Iy0KxY.jpg
Views: 326
Size:  216.7 KB
    Lilredrooster, this isn't WoV. And why did you feel the need to decieve us all with a phony username?
    Stoogeboy maxpigpenn = professional nickel keno player and KJocchio's lover.

  18. #118
    Originally Posted by LMR View Post

    I don't keep the same "handle" because I move on from the stuff. I mean, I couldn't have carried on with the OneHitWonder stuff because that was, for all intents and purposes, about the "two-dice problem". Fairly intense stuff. As well, not posting for stretches of time, you tend to move on to other things, and places in your life. Here's a quote from Yung about, if I recall, the only numbers I brought up, then. Coincidentally, these were the numbers that "fit" into the D'COVI stuff. I have to add, though, that I think that I'm a lot smarter than I was, then, with my theory of everything. What happened was, I think, the numbers started to work out a bit. It took me thirty years of wrestling with the basics of physics overall. Those observations, to get to this point.

    Look, you won't find anyone who works with a lot of numbers, a lot, who hasn't a lot "fun" stories about numbers. Check out the "crazy" stuff those guys do at https://math.stackexchange.com/ . Sprinkled among the more-serious stuff is the "crazy" stuff. I have a few posts up there, and met some of them, in the process.

    Incidentally, I did vote twice in the MDawg poll. Crimm caught me. Now I do feel a bit like Tasha. I guess that we can't trust anyone, at least not me, about anything. Maybe, not even ourselves. Sometimes, we get caught doing what seemed insignificant, or, with carrying on a bit too far with something we were already legitimately doing. On the other hand, that Crimm more or less just concluded this, I feel "justified" that I did it. The old saying, "If they blame you for it, you might as well do it."

    Originally Posted by Bill Yung View Post
    Today, I noticed that 411 = 3 X 137, and 137 = 4^2 + 11^2, a Pythagorean prime. The inverse of 137 is rather close to the fine-structure constant. The number that a famous physicist told his students to put up on their wall. It has a sort of "cult following" among theoretical physics, as well. Notice how the 4 and 11 make up the 137, and, versa, how the 137 makes up the 411. You would have to go to the other site to see the significance of the 411. (If we are the 42nd dimension, then the 41st, which in a way comes before and after us, is our "tracks". Then 41 + 1 ---> 411 comes from trying to add 1 to the 41, on the end, but after the end. Sort of a limit after the limit. How do we become our "tracks", which are beneath our matter and fields? Does the fine-structure constant remain constant between "different" universes? Is it actually somehow just, exactly 1 / 137?)
    Your use of sockpuppets demonstrates your dishonesty.

    You suck cock. Now, since you've been accused of it you may as well go ahead and do it.
    Stoogeboy maxpigpenn = professional nickel keno player and KJocchio's lover.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. DOXXING THREATS
    By blackhole in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 04-10-2020, 11:57 AM
  2. Doxxing threat
    By DoxingAlert in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 123
    Last Post: 03-04-2020, 06:47 PM
  3. Here's a reminder for Redietz and everyone else
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-11-2018, 02:58 PM
  4. A necessary reminder to Dan Druff
    By MisterV in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 75
    Last Post: 08-14-2018, 05:43 AM
  5. Seven Stars Benefit Reminder
    By FABismonte in forum Total Rewards and MLife
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-04-2016, 01:46 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •