Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 118

Thread: Reminder regaring doxxing and link spamming

  1. #41
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    How does that work for you.
    I encourage that.

    MDawg has always encouraged monitors, and he's never proposed or accepted any bet in this regard.
    How is it that YOU always become the biggest supporter and spokesman for every one of these math defiers...these guys that come along and claim to win with their "special plays" and magic potions, and lucky rabbits feet, defying the mathematics? What exactly draws you to that?

    I apologize in advance if this comes off as a putdown, but maybe I am wrong about you, when I say I truly believe you are smarter than to believe this voodoo crap. And that's exactly what it is... voodoo crap. It is the voodoo stuff that losing degenerative gamblers believe and that the large casinos I can see out my window are built on. The casino has the edge, the advantage. In order to win, over an extended period of time, anything more than a day or couple days, a player has to do something to flip that advantage in his favor. THAT is what advantage play is! Progression wagering doesn't do it and MDawg and others have never explained what it is that they are doing that can allow them to win.

    The casinos are just loving...and missing you guys.
    Last edited by kewlJ; 04-12-2020 at 09:13 PM.

  2. #42
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Please show me where I have mercifully attacked others since MDawg joined.
    You mean mercilessly, which I was referring to the attacks on Alan.

    There have been many more attacks, and I'll post one of yours.

    This may take a few minutes, so don't accuse me of running away...you've done that before.
    I am not going to be up for long as I am growing very tired and fatigued. If you are going back to find something I said about Alan, I'll see it in the morning. I regret some things I said to Alan, But let me remind you Alan, is no innocent person in all of this.

  3. #43
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    How is it that YOU always become the biggest supporter and spokesman for every one of these math defiers...these guys that come along and claim to win with their "special plays" and magic potions, and lucky rabbits feet, defying the mathematics? :
    I love just because the AP’s say the math says something about unknown gambling statistics it’s going to become a fact sooner or later. The math does not turn into a crystal ball and actually know for fact when sooner or later will happen or if it ever will happen for any individual before they make money, break even, or go broke trying.

    Who is giving the false hopes about all this to young unsuspecting newbies especially in today’s casino climate? Because the math says Kewlj is going to make 200K this year playing BJ he is? The math says you should win 10k playing this slot machine just keep pounding away sooner or later you’ll win.

    I’m not saying AP’s aren’t making money, but because the math says you should there aren’t any guarantees you’ll be one of them that do. In fact, you have as much of a chance of going broke.

    With all the AP claims of great success on these forums who in fact are the ones sending newbies to the poor house.

    MDawg comes around bragging about winning sessions betting serious money and proves it. If a newbie could afford those stakes not sure why he would be concerned one way or the other if he wins or loses.

    On the other hand, he could follow the AP math of sooner or later with absolutely no proof that sooner or later ever came for any of the AP’s posting on here.

    So who’s bullshitting who?

  4. #44
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    I am not going to be up for long as I am growing very tired and fatigued. I regret some things I said to Alan
    I added a recent interaction in the previous post.

    It's not about Alan, but my point about Alan is that it was a group attack...and that group is contained within the list of NO voters in your MDawg poll.

    Don't you see the connection?

  5. #45
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    I am not going to be up for long as I am growing very tired and fatigued. I regret some things I said to Alan
    I added a recent interaction in the previous post.

    It's not about Alan, but my point about Alan is that it was a group attack...and that group is contained within the list of NO voters in your MDawg poll.

    Don't you see the connection?
    No I don't see the connection. There you go using "group" again. You desperately want to continue to divide among "teams". I am not on any "team". If you need proof of that look no further than fairly recent disagreements with Mickeycrimm and Axelwolf and even my current falling out with BoSox, of which I am not even entirely sure what is about. I am about the math and I say so. And I say what claims are defying the math. That is my team. I am on team math. (and surely the weakest link on team math)

  6. #46
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    How is it that YOU always become the biggest supporter and spokesman for every one of these math defiers
    When another member is called a liar, then I want to know why they are calling him a liar.

    I ask many questions in an effort to find out why, and I am invariably insulted for making that effort.

    I don't care so much about who wins or loses, if anything I'm happy to hear that others have won regardless of whether they played with an advantage or not.

    But there is a group of members here who become very agitated by other's reports of winning.

  7. #47
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    No I don't see the connection. There you go using "group" again. You desperately want to continue to divide among "teams".
    This discussion that you started is about forum conduct, not math.

    There is a group of members who routinely engage in unprovoked insults, and that group is contained within the list of NO voters in your MDawg poll.

    Look at the list of members who voted NO, and you'll recognize them for that kind of conduct. Mickey's not the only one in the cock and balls crowd, there's a bunch of them.

    I didn't divide the forum members into groups, they did it themselves by their conduct, and their vote in the MDawg poll.

  8. #48
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post

    Who is giving the false hopes about all this to young unsuspecting newbies especially in today’s casino climate? Because the math says Kewlj is going to make 200K this year playing BJ he is? The math says you should win 10k playing this slot machine just keep pounding away sooner or later you’ll win.
    I have to question why people exaggerate their numbers to try to make their points. I have never made $200k a year playing blackjack. I have never made $150k a year playing blackjack. I have made $120k a year playing blackjack exactly once and over $100k playing blackjack only twice. Without looking I average probably just over $80k a year playing blackjack. Now I have had years that I have had additional money doing other AP things. My best combined year wasn't even $150k, and that included winning a couple significant drawings, including a truck and a $10k cash drawing.

    I am trying to get away from posting results as I just did, but I did so for a reason. That reason is that you are wrong that the math doesn't say that I am going to win. It most certainly does. I call it accumulated EV, although I don't know anyone else that uses that term. But all AP's use it. They know what the math says they should win for a session, (maybe in the case of machine players "a play"), or a day or a week or a month or a year. I actually have it down to each round I play. I know what every hand played is worth.

    Now that doesn't mean I win that accumulated EV every session, or day, or week, or even month. But the longer term you get, like into months and certainly into years, actual results come very close to accumulated EV. The math guarantees it. I have had exactly 2 outlier years, that would be an entire year that is significantly lower or higher than the math says. 2 years!....1 in each direction. One fairly significantly above and one very significantly below. And they were back to back which means for the two year period....yep, almost right where the math says I should have been. The math just doesn't lie.

    And that is the difference between me and you, between you and any AP. We believe in the math....and yes it is proven. It has been proven over and over for centuries, where as you guys seem to believe in...."well it could happen", "it's possible". And that's what the casinos are counting on. That is what the huge (currently vacant) buildings out my window are built on....people believing what you guys believe and NOT in the math.

  9. #49
    That these alleged "AP'ers" are "concerned" that someone might come along and try to be like MDawg, is nonsense. Not one of them is worried about that. Why they post their negative remarks about someone who not only posted about winning big money, and proved it, but even discussed to some extent how he did it - has already been explained to death and need not be reiterated. Compare the level of detail with which I have posted, backed up and proven what has happened, versus these "AP'ers" who never talk about anything of note.

    Given that these "AP'ers" tell us NOTHING about what they are doing, and offer ZERO proof that they are making much of anything, if anything, at all, I'd think that there is far greater danger that some newbie would come along and decide that he wants to "be like them" but have no clue as to how to even do it, and end up in the hole trying to do something that no one wants to talk about or teach him.

    Just consider the ZenKing posts - when he posts about losing while counting I'm the one who comes in and says that there is no guarantee that you are going to win, no matter what the count, and it is the "AP'ers," apparently desperate to establish that whatever they are doing MUST be profitable, who come in to say that "ZenKing must be counting wrong." EVIDENTLY trying to dissuade someone from having unrealistic hopes is VERY far from their minds.

    In any case, anyone who wants to follow in my footsteps would need to first establish at least mid five figure lines at multiple casinos across town, and anyone who is able to do that, must have had some measure of success in his life, and unless he simply inherited it (and even then I'd assume some level of education and family grooming), should be smart enough to know what to do with his money. I see little "danger" (absurd) of a successful businessperson's reading the MDawg Adventures and upending his whole life to follow. I am sure that anyone reading the MDawg Adventures knows that there would need to be some pieces to the puzzle in place before even attempting to casino gamble or trade stocks like that, at that level.

    That's one of the most ridiculous arguments of all to explain all the naysayer posts - that "I'm here to make sure no one tries to be like MDawg."
    Last edited by MDawg; 04-12-2020 at 10:17 PM.
    I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.

    MDawg Adventures carry on at: https://www.truepassage.com/forums/f.../46-IPlayVegas

  10. #50
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    No I don't see the connection. There you go using "group" again. You desperately want to continue to divide among "teams".
    This discussion that you started is about forum conduct, not math.

    There is a group of members who routinely engage in unprovoked insults, and that group is contained within the list of NO voters in your MDawg poll.

    Look at the list of members who voted NO, and you'll recognize them for that kind of conduct. Mickey's not the only one in the cock and balls crowd, there's a bunch of them.

    I didn't divide the forum members into groups, they did it themselves by their conduct, and their vote in the MDawg poll.
    First I don't see it. I guess I have missed all this cock and balls talk. Perhaps you should list who you think is always talking "cock and balls". Other than mickey, I can't think of anyone, who does so routinely. I am sure you can and will go back and find some quote where Axel or MaxPen or I don't know who else might have said something out of frustration, but you seem to be obsessed with this.

    I don't know what you want from me? I can't tell anyone what to say or not to say. Just imagine what mickey would say to me if I told him to stop saying "cock and balls".

    But the point that I think you are trying to make that all the name calling comes from one side is just ridiculous. You, blackhole, Singer, are just as much to blame. If you are going to deny that, that there is no sense in going on....we are in some sort of twilight zone alternative reality.

    But whatever I am going to bed. Be safe. Stay healthy. And good night.

  11. #51
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    No I don't see the connection. There you go using "group" again. You desperately want to continue to divide among "teams".
    This discussion that you started is about forum conduct, not math.

    There is a group of members who routinely engage in unprovoked insults, and that group is contained within the list of NO voters in your MDawg poll.

    Look at the list of members who voted NO, and you'll recognize them for that kind of conduct. Mickey's not the only one in the cock and balls crowd, there's a bunch of them.

    I didn't divide the forum members into groups, they did it themselves by their conduct, and their vote in the MDawg poll.

    I just re-read the poll question. It does NOT ask if MDawg has won, or is a liar. It does NOT ask if MDawg, to this point in time, has been a baccarat winner. It DOES ask if the voters think MDawg's baccarat play is a long term winning strategy. Well, there are no long term winning baccarat strategies, so the answers should be self-evident. But maybe they are not. The poll could specify one of two things -- are MDawg's baccarat strategies a long term winning strategy for MDawg, would be one question. Since, if MDawg is ahead lifetime according to what he's written, then he can choose to quit at any point in time while he's still ahead lifetime, and technically it can be said that MDawg's baccarat strategy is a long-term winner FOR HIM. I mean, who knows. Here's another example. Technically, anything is possible with angle shooting. For example, MDawg could be ultra wealthy and maybe he likes to look like a winner to people loitering around the high limit rooms. Maybe he gets off on it. He could contract to pay a casino a million a year to play baccarat solo in the high limit area and get paid more on winning hands than normal, just to look good on a solo table in public. Playing at different odds could be arranged. Then MDawg would win the bet about him being a long term winner at baccarat because a casino gives him different odds. The million he's paying them annually is a personal services fee to acquire the better odds. Not impossible in the world of angle shooting.

    Getting on with more likely arguments, however, if the question is whether MDawg's baccarat strategy is a long term winner "for other players" or "in general," then the answer has to be "no" since the math of the game is solved and there are no long-term winning strategies.

    Of course, technically, one could argue that if MDawg is paying a place to give him non-normal odds so he wins while sitting at the solo table, that he has a "long term winning strategy" for baccarat that others could copy. That is a tortured use of semantics, but technically it might hold up in court as to whether he was a "long term winner" since specific odds are not necessarily attached to the definition, legal or otherwise, of "baccarat."

    You have to be careful with betting and angle shooting.

    Similarly, if MDawg arranged to get rebates for losing sessions, then he might have constructed a "long term winning baccarat strategy" in technical and legal, if not mathematical, terms. There are other permutations of this, of course.

    Has MDawg established a way to beat a solved negative expectation game in the long term that is played at normal odds without including value from comps or sales of such and without rebates? That's a mouthful, but necessary to tease out the full meaning.
    Last edited by redietz; 04-12-2020 at 10:25 PM.

  12. #52
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Of course, technically, one could argue that if MDawg is paying a place to give him non-normal odds so he wins while sitting at the solo table, that he has a "long term winning strategy" for baccarat that others could copy. That is a tortured use of semantics, but technically it might hold up in court as to whether he was a "long term winner" since specific odds are not necessarily attached to the definition, legal or otherwise, of "baccarat."
    THIS is a very good point and one of the possibilities I was driving at when I repeatedly asked MDawg what he was doing that allowed him to win longterm. And if this is something he has declined to share, that would be pretty dishonest of him. But his premise seems to be that he has a lot of money and bets big so he can win. This would explain that and it's not that far fetched. Don Johnson used this, special odds that allowed him to win millions and somehow be recognized as a great blackjack player and be in the BJHoF.

    Now lets take the "suppose game" just a little further. Why would a casino do this? Why would a casino give a player better odds, even to the point of making their play +EV? The answer of course is they are getting it back somewhere else. Since MDawg spends relatively little time playing baccarat on his trip, lets just suppose either he or his female companion is playing slot machines at 3, or 5 or 10 times the disadvantage they are giving him with his special deal at baccarat. Suppose....

    I'm off for real. I'll catch up tomorrow since we all have another wasted day staring at us.

  13. #53
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    I mean seriously, one has to wonder if the leading poster of this forum (by volume, not quality) is capable of even making a single post that doesn't contain derogatory language towards race, sexual preference or religion.
    You wouldn't have objected if I called them pussies. Wouldn't that be offensive to heterosexuals? Or would it?

    Here's a conversation you'll never hear "Hey, that's not fair" said one prize fighter to the other "You hit to hard."

    But here's a conversation you will hear on VCT "Hey, thats not fair" said one troll to the other "You troll harder than I do."

    My offensive language is meant to be....offensive. My "cock and balls" talk has nothing to do with gays. If you want to piss off a heterosexual man then call him gay or make reference that he is gay. My intent was to inflict as much insult as I could at BH and Belly. As you can see it worked because both of them are now squealing about it. No matter how hard they troll me my response will be to troll them harder. Those two have no chance to be as mean a troll as I can be.

    But no one in these forums has ever seen me attack anyone that was not offensive to me. I have never thrown the first salvo. Has anyone ever seen me attack Tasha? No. She is quite annoying to some here but you've never seen me attack her. That's because she has never attacked me. I don't put any stock in her opinions but I don't attack her for them.

    Belly and BH have a cottage industry going with their attacks on me.

    HINT: IF YOU DON'T WANT TO BE ATTACKED BY ME THEN DON'T ATTACK ME!!!!

    And don't complain about it when I attack you harder than you attacked me.
    Last edited by mickeycrimm; 04-13-2020 at 03:47 AM.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  14. #54
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    Mickeycrimm is a disgusting fool endlessly accusing in almost every post he makes of members sucking cock, licking balls, sticking cocks in other members asses, now he’s getting into derogatory comments about my dead mother and incest insinuations like here a few minutes ago.

    "One thing for sure, brokeassblackhole. Your momma damn sure knew your daddy. He was her brother."

    Just scan over his last 20 posts.

    He’s the biggest troll on this site yet I’m sure since you like him, he’ll get a pass like he did before. Remember, it was okay for him to wish me dead when I was suffering with medical issues, but you took down all my posts and banned me from the thread when I did the same to him when he was suffering.

    It’s your site and you don’t need me to tell you you’re going to do what you want with it. But if you’re going to be fair all of a sudden it certainly remains to be seen.
    Dude, you cast the first stones. Now you are squealing about getting a big dose of your own medicine. What's that saying? You can dish it out but you can't take it? Yeah, that's it. Fits you to a tee.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  15. #55
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    I just read the sticky. I'll try to follow the rules you put up. The problem is with those that won't follow the rules. They will continue to troll but anyone trying to stick to the rules will have to tolerate being called all kinds of derogatory stuff without response. Thats the problem. The known trolls of the forum will continue to troll whether others do or not. Its not right that they get away with it.
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post

    Dude, you cast the first stones. Now you are squealing about getting a big dose of your own medicine. What's that saying? You can dish it out but you can't take it? Yeah, that's it. Fits you to a tee.
    First of all who jumped in this thread first squealing like a pig?

    Here's a couple of just very recent posts by Mickeycrimm. I'd like to add that almost all of these posts he wasn't even in the conversation or was being spoke to. All you had to do was be against his personal math believes or voted for Mdawg.

    You don't like talk about cock and balls? Then all you have to do is quit trolling me. Just go cold turkey. Quit trolling me or I will continue to tell how you like balls in your mouth and cock in your ass

    Just like you, brokeassblackhole. Where do you two meet up and do it at? Atlantic City? C'mon, BH, tell us the truth. You and smelly are trannies, right?

    Hey, brokeassblckhole. How's life with MDawg's cock up you ass? Then he sticks it in your mouth. Every time I read one of your posts its got cock and balls in it. Damn, you must really like it.

    Coach, you can suck MDawg cock you want to. And you can let him butt-fuck you all you want. But, please. Leave me out of it.

    Now get back to chasing the boys around the locker room.



    His attacks could be found in every thread he posts in and that would cover the entire forum. Then he cries he's being trolled. He's the king of trolls and keeps repeating he's being trolled knowing his pal Dan will read this sooner or later.
    Last edited by blackhole; 04-13-2020 at 04:56 AM.

  16. #56
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    I just read the sticky. I'll try to follow the rules you put up. The problem is with those that won't follow the rules. They will continue to troll but anyone trying to stick to the rules will have to tolerate being called all kinds of derogatory stuff without response. Thats the problem. The known trolls of the forum will continue to troll whether others do or not. Its not right that they get away with it.
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post

    Dude, you cast the first stones. Now you are squealing about getting a big dose of your own medicine. What's that saying? You can dish it out but you can't take it? Yeah, that's it. Fits you to a tee.
    First of all who jumped in this thread first squealing like a pig?

    Here's a couple of just very recent posts by Mickeycrimm. I'd like to add that almost all of these posts he wasn't even in the conversation or was being spoke to. All you had to do was be against his personal math believes or voted for Mdawg.

    You don't like talk about cock and balls? Then all you have to do is quit trolling me. Just go cold turkey. Quit trolling me or I will continue to tell how you like balls in your mouth and cock in your ass

    Just like you, brokeassblackhole. Where do you two meet up and do it at? Atlantic City? C'mon, BH, tell us the truth. You and smelly are trannies, right?

    Hey, brokeassblckhole. How's life with MDawg's cock up you ass? Then he sticks it in your mouth. Every time I read one of your posts its got cock and balls in it. Damn, you must really like it.

    Coach, you can suck MDawg cock you want to. And you can let him butt-fuck you all you want. But, please. Leave me out of it.

    Now get back to chasing the boys around the locker room.



    His attacks could be found in every thread he posts in and that would cover the entire forum. Then he cries he's being trolled. He's the king of trolls and keeps repeating he's being trolled knowing his pal Dan will read this sooner or later.
    All you've done is prove my point. You think you are a bad ass troller but you are actually a candy ass troller. I've told you a million times. It goes back a long ways. Hit me and I will hit you harder. For all your talk about not liking it you keep quoting it. You must actually like it.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  17. #57
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post

    Who is giving the false hopes about all this to young unsuspecting newbies especially in today’s casino climate? Because the math says Kewlj is going to make 200K this year playing BJ he is? The math says you should win 10k playing this slot machine just keep pounding away sooner or later you’ll win.
    I have to question why people exaggerate their numbers to try to make their points. I have never made $200k a year playing blackjack. I have never made $150k a year playing blackjack. I have made $120k a year playing blackjack exactly once and over $100k playing blackjack only twice
    Okay, let me rephrase my comment above. Just because the math says Kewlj should make 25K this year playing blackjack, the math crystal ball can't confirm he will with any confirmed facts upfront. He could end up winning 50K, or losing 50K. The math can't confirm what any results might be at the end of any given year he did the math for involving gambling.

  18. #58
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post

    Who is giving the false hopes about all this to young unsuspecting newbies especially in today’s casino climate? Because the math says Kewlj is going to make 200K this year playing BJ he is? The math says you should win 10k playing this slot machine just keep pounding away sooner or later you’ll win.
    I have to question why people exaggerate their numbers to try to make their points. I have never made $200k a year playing blackjack. I have never made $150k a year playing blackjack. I have made $120k a year playing blackjack exactly once and over $100k playing blackjack only twice
    Okay, let me rephrase my comment above. Just because the math says Kewlj should make 25K this year playing blackjack, the math crystal ball can't confirm he will with any confirmed facts upfront. He could end up winning 50K, or losing 50K. The math can't confirm what any results might be at the end of any given year he did the math for involving gambling.
    If you don't like KJ's math you won't like mine. I'm pissed if I break even for the day. I'm used to booking a mid 3 figure win everyday. But what I do is much different than what KJ does. I never have cared for the thin edge stuff like blackjack. I like the big edges. If you do it like I do it then its payday everyday. There are just no real downswings.

    I'd put my average edge at around 15%. That sounds like a lot and it would be if I could run say 10K a day in wager. But that's not how it works. In order to keep the edge up I have to be very picky about the plays I put down. That means I might get in a 2K to 4K wager a day. And even then I don't win on every play. But when I put down 15 to 30 plays a day the minority of plays I lose on are well covered by the majority of plays that are winners.

    And actually this is all in the past because I'm pretty much retired now. Not by choice but by health. But that's how it was when I was doing it.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  19. #59
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    I have to question why people exaggerate their numbers to try to make their points. I have never made $200k a year playing blackjack. I have never made $150k a year playing blackjack. I have made $120k a year playing blackjack exactly once and over $100k playing blackjack only twice
    Okay, let me rephrase my comment above. Just because the math says Kewlj should make 25K this year playing blackjack, the math crystal ball can't confirm he will with any confirmed facts upfront. He could end up winning 50K, or losing 50K. The math can't confirm what any results might be at the end of any given year he did the math for involving gambling.
    If you don't like KJ's math you won't like mine. I'm pissed if I break even for the day. I'm used to booking a mid 3 figure win everyday. But what I do is much different than what KJ does. I never have cared for the thin edge stuff like blackjack. I like the big edges. If you do it like I do it then its payday everyday. There are just no real downswings.

    I'd put my average edge at around 15%. That sounds like a lot and it would be if I could run say 10K a day in wager. But that's not how it works. In order to keep the edge up I have to be very picky about the plays I put down. That means I might get in a 2K to 4K wager a day. And even then I don't win on every play. But when I put down 15 to 30 plays a day the minority of plays I lose on are well covered by the majority of plays that are winners.

    And actually this is all in the past because I'm pretty much retired now. Not by choice but by health. But that's how it was when I was doing it.
    The real trick is finding those big edge plays. I know how to find them. Most people don't. But there are some, not all, here on VCT that know how to find them.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  20. #60
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    it can be said that MDawg's baccarat strategy is a long-term winner FOR HIM.
    I agree, and that's exactly what I said here...

    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    MDawg's baccarat play is a longterm winning strategy for him.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. DOXXING THREATS
    By blackhole in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 04-10-2020, 12:57 PM
  2. Doxxing threat
    By DoxingAlert in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 123
    Last Post: 03-04-2020, 07:47 PM
  3. Here's a reminder for Redietz and everyone else
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 09-11-2018, 03:58 PM
  4. A necessary reminder to Dan Druff
    By MisterV in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 75
    Last Post: 08-14-2018, 06:43 AM
  5. Seven Stars Benefit Reminder
    By FABismonte in forum Total Rewards and MLife
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-04-2016, 02:46 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •