Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 45

Thread: A question for Mr Singer

  1. #21
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    I am not trying to be mean to Alan. Alan can be a good contributor, when he sets aside any biases that he may have and participates objectively. I also enjoy some of his gambling experiences that he shares, as I do with most people, AP or recreational gambler.

    But Alan also has a darker side and I am not referring to any kind of gambling problem. Once he decides to challenge or question someone, he throws all objectively (and honesty and integrity) out the window. He becomes extremely biased and will stoop to any level. I have witnessed and been victim to this several times. And once he gets into this mode, there is no turning back. He will hold a grudge and be out to "get" you for a very long time. It is Rob who is currently in Alan's sights and that is playing out now.
    The big difference kew is, I can handle it.

    You keep saying I've used some aliases here and I never have. Why does your agenda at times have to be based on lies? It's really a toss-up over who's more insecure, unless and until they can make believe they're convincing others of how they want things to be perceived--you or Alan?

    What I agree with you about is what Dan knows and how he's giving Alan a pass. His choice of course, although it does differ from what was said about socks. But if you don't count the place Alan's LV girlfriend threw him out of, he's only lived in one other place and posted as Alan from there. I don't believe he bothers with VPN's etc.

  2. #22
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    I am not trying to be mean to Alan. Alan can be a good contributor, when he sets aside any biases that he may have and participates objectively. I also enjoy some of his gambling experiences that he shares, as I do with most people, AP or recreational gambler.

    But Alan also has a darker side and I am not referring to any kind of gambling problem. Once he decides to challenge or question someone, he throws all objectively (and honesty and integrity) out the window. He becomes extremely biased and will stoop to any level. I have witnessed and been victim to this several times. And once he gets into this mode, there is no turning back. He will hold a grudge and be out to "get" you for a very long time. It is Rob who is currently in Alan's sights and that is playing out now.
    The big difference kew is, I can handle it.

    You keep saying I've used some aliases here and I never have. Why does your agenda at times have to be based on lies? It's really a toss-up over who's more insecure, unless and until they can make believe they're convincing others of how they want things to be perceived--you or Alan?

    What I agree with you about is what Dan knows and how he's giving Alan a pass. His choice of course, although it does differ from what was said about socks. But if you don't count the place Alan's LV girlfriend threw him out of, he's only lived in one other place and posted as Alan from there. I don't believe he bothers with VPN's etc.
    First Rob, you are still denying that Miss Friday (I believe was the name) was not you? How pathetic. And now you are accusing me of lying about it. News flash Rob! It was Dan Druff who identified and publicly stated that Miss Friday was Rob Singer. But....I guess Dan Druff was lying. Everyone else is always lying and everyone is always out to get you.

    And you know what it is that proves these things? Time. While it may not seem quite so crystal clear at the time, as time passes and you see that a "miss Friday", claiming to be a relator, only showed up to back up things you said about me getting a mortgage...things that were demonstratively incorrect, so you needed to invent a pretend person to back you up. Did you have pretend friends when you were a child back in 1910?

    When a person (or sock) only shows to weigh in on a specific issue like this, and then disappears, it becomes more than obvious as to what is going on. Time is the great revealer. Kind of similarly to the QFIT thing at WoV. Time has revealed what his real intention was.

    As for Alan, and GF's, I have no knowledge of any of that, other than what he posted and I don't remember him posting about a GF throwing him out. So if you know something like this for sure, it is you using info from private discussions to again, twist the knife a little further. Why do you have the need to do that? And why would that make you feel better? Rob, THIS is the sign of a very insecure person.

    One just can't help but wonder....IF you have this successful life before your gambling claims, and a significant retirement income and then add in millions of dollars in gambling claims on top, why would a 70 year old man be so insure that he takes pleasure in something like this. Most revealing Rob.
    Last edited by kewlJ; 04-26-2020 at 11:25 AM.

  3. #23
    Someone just get Jerry Logan in this thread. We need some comic relief!

  4. #24
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    THIS is the sign of a very insecure person.
    Kj, just so I’m clear on your use of words. When you call someone “insecure” is that the same as when you call them “small”? You’ve called a lot of people “small” on this forum too. Is that because you think they are midgets or because they’re insecure? Thanks for the clarification.

  5. #25
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    I am not trying to be mean to Alan. Alan can be a good contributor, when he sets aside any biases that he may have and participates objectively. I also enjoy some of his gambling experiences that he shares, as I do with most people, AP or recreational gambler.

    But Alan also has a darker side and I am not referring to any kind of gambling problem. Once he decides to challenge or question someone, he throws all objectively (and honesty and integrity) out the window. He becomes extremely biased and will stoop to any level. I have witnessed and been victim to this several times. And once he gets into this mode, there is no turning back. He will hold a grudge and be out to "get" you for a very long time. It is Rob who is currently in Alan's sights and that is playing out now.
    The big difference kew is, I can handle it.

    You keep saying I've used some aliases here and I never have. Why does your agenda at times have to be based on lies? It's really a toss-up over who's more insecure, unless and until they can make believe they're convincing others of how they want things to be perceived--you or Alan?

    What I agree with you about is what Dan knows and how he's giving Alan a pass. His choice of course, although it does differ from what was said about socks. But if you don't count the place Alan's LV girlfriend threw him out of, he's only lived in one other place and posted as Alan from there. I don't believe he bothers with VPN's etc.
    First Rob, you are still denying that Miss Friday (I believe was the name) was not you? How pathetic. And now you are accusing me of lying about it. News flash Rob! It was Dan Druff who identified and publicly stated that Miss Friday was Rob Singer. But....I guess Dan Druff was lying. Everyone else is always lying and everyone is always out to get you.

    And you know what it is that proves these things? Time. While it may not seem quite so crystal clear at the time, as time passes and you see that a "miss Friday", claiming to be a relator, only showed up to back up things you said about me getting a mortgage...things that were demonstratively incorrect, so you needed to invent a pretend person to back you up. Did you have pretend friends when you were a child back in 1910?

    When a person (or sock) only shows to weigh in on a specific issue like this, and then disappears, it becomes more than obvious as to what is going on. Time is the great revealer. Kind of similarly to the QFIT thing at WoV. Time has revealed what his real intention was.

    As for Alan, and GF's, I have no knowledge of any of that, other than what he posted and I don't remember him posting about a GF throwing him out. So if you know something like this for sure, it is you using info from private discussions to again, twist the knife a little further. Why do you have the need to do that? And why would that make you feel better? Rob, THIS is the sign of a very insecure person.

    One just can't help but wonder....IF you have this successful life before your gambling claims, and a significant retirement income and then add in millions of dollars in gambling claims on top, why would a 70 year old man be so insure that he takes pleasure in something like this. Most revealing Rob.

    Because some of us are BORED during this “crisis” and at others times. Successful people are used to working and having a purpose in life. Retirement changes that and some like me have no clue what to do. Money isn’t a lot of use right now if you can’t spend it.

    As for taking pleasure at someone else’s misery as you say, I don’t see it as that. We have no clue if Alan is miserable or not, unless you read between the lines or get incite from people who know him. Or when a son comes on a site and complains about issues.

    I don’t blame Rob on bIt on hitting back at Alan. As you said, you have been a target of Alan. It’s natural to defend yourself when someone comes after you. Alan is a big boy, even if he is too much of a pussy to admit he is Andrew. Hell he even said he was done here but keeps coming back.

    How is it any different than all the times you say you were done here, but keep coming back? You know you are going to take shit every time, but every time you keep coming back. As a wise man once said, you are a Drama Queen and enjoy it.

    As for Singer, I’ve called him plenty of shit for his claims on his “system”. But you will never find any statement from me on the Double Up because I have no educated clue on it. I know the math didn’t work on his system but on this I trust the people he talked to on it and if they believe it’s possible he did it, that’s good enough for me.

    I always knew the guy had money, people without it don’t talk about retirement accounts, pensions and the other stuff he is very educated one. People may not like it, but the guy isn’t poor.

    And we have all called each other shit we may want to take back over the years, but if you continue to come here, you are opening yourself up to the abuse. But we all don’t have “Kick Me” signs on our back like Alan. But in this case, he put it there himself.

    Or as another wise man once said....Fun is best had at the expense of others less fortunate than yourself.

    Perhaps he had Alan in mind when he wrote it.

  6. #26
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    I am not trying to be mean to Alan. Alan can be a good contributor, when he sets aside any biases that he may have and participates objectively. I also enjoy some of his gambling experiences that he shares, as I do with most people, AP or recreational gambler.

    But Alan also has a darker side and I am not referring to any kind of gambling problem. Once he decides to challenge or question someone, he throws all objectively (and honesty and integrity) out the window. He becomes extremely biased and will stoop to any level. I have witnessed and been victim to this several times. And once he gets into this mode, there is no turning back. He will hold a grudge and be out to "get" you for a very long time. It is Rob who is currently in Alan's sights and that is playing out now.
    The big difference kew is, I can handle it.

    You keep saying I've used some aliases here and I never have. Why does your agenda at times have to be based on lies? It's really a toss-up over who's more insecure, unless and until they can make believe they're convincing others of how they want things to be perceived--you or Alan?

    What I agree with you about is what Dan knows and how he's giving Alan a pass. His choice of course, although it does differ from what was said about socks. But if you don't count the place Alan's LV girlfriend threw him out of, he's only lived in one other place and posted as Alan from there. I don't believe he bothers with VPN's etc.
    First Rob, you are still denying that Miss Friday (I believe was the name) was not you? How pathetic. And now you are accusing me of lying about it. News flash Rob! It was Dan Druff who identified and publicly stated that Miss Friday was Rob Singer. But....I guess Dan Druff was lying. Everyone else is always lying and everyone is always out to get you.

    And you know what it is that proves these things? Time. While it may not seem quite so crystal clear at the time, as time passes and you see that a "miss Friday", claiming to be a relator, only showed up to back up things you said about me getting a mortgage...things that were demonstratively incorrect, so you needed to invent a pretend person to back you up. Did you have pretend friends when you were a child back in 1910?

    When a person (or sock) only shows to weigh in on a specific issue like this, and then disappears, it becomes more than obvious as to what is going on. Time is the great revealer. Kind of similarly to the QFIT thing at WoV. Time has revealed what his real intention was.

    As for Alan, and GF's, I have no knowledge of any of that, other than what he posted and I don't remember him posting about a GF throwing him out. So if you know something like this for sure, it is you using info from private discussions to again, twist the knife a little further. Why do you have the need to do that? And why would that make you feel better? Rob, THIS is the sign of a very insecure person.

    One just can't help but wonder....IF you have this successful life before your gambling claims, and a significant retirement income and then add in millions of dollars in gambling claims on top, why would a 70 year old man be so insure that he takes pleasure in something like this. Most revealing Rob.
    There's that insecure gene of yours showing up once again.

    Dan never said he had evidence of Miss Friday? being me because she or he wasn't me. You lie about that because you just don't like that she caught you in a lie about yourself. The reason you seem to have all the details of that episode at your fingertips? Because it bothers the hell out of you that you were exposed in yet another lie about your concocted life. Caught in your own trap, in a matter of speaking.

    More blind bs. Do you know why Alan's GF threw him out (he went to casinos and lost too much) and do you know why it's well known? BECAUSE JUST LIKE WHAT YOU AND OTHER WEAK & INSECURE PEOPLE ALWAYS DO, HE POSTED ABOUT IT EINSTEIN.

    I take pleasure in wiping the floor with weak twits. Bad boy.

  7. #27
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by LMR View Post

    Honestly, I don't think that Alan is either promoting himself, or being scores of his own people to agree with.
    You are correct. Alan's use of a sock puppet is not the traditional use of making it seem like there are more people agreeing with or supporting one side of an argument or discussion, as Rob and other banned members of this forum have done in the past. But the fact is the rule is no sock puppets. And although it usually takes a little nudging of Dan Druff, he has been pretty consistent in enforcing the rule. Now because it is Alan, Dan is just going to look the other way and say "I don't know if it is or isn't".

    Is it too much to ask for a little consistency? I mean you allow this from Alan, then how do you say no when the next guy creates a sockpuppet, pretending to be a female realtor in Arizona (Rob), or a female girlfriend praising a member (moses)? You look the other way on this, then don't you have to allow a 100 different Tasha sockpuppets?
    It’s funny you would make this post to LMR who is a sock of bill yung....who was a sock of one hit wonder who got banned.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  8. #28
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post

    The big difference kew is, I can handle it.

    You keep saying I've used some aliases here and I never have. Why does your agenda at times have to be based on lies? It's really a toss-up over who's more insecure, unless and until they can make believe they're convincing others of how they want things to be perceived--you or Alan?

    What I agree with you about is what Dan knows and how he's giving Alan a pass. His choice of course, although it does differ from what was said about socks. But if you don't count the place Alan's LV girlfriend threw him out of, he's only lived in one other place and posted as Alan from there. I don't believe he bothers with VPN's etc.
    First Rob, you are still denying that Miss Friday (I believe was the name) was not you? How pathetic. And now you are accusing me of lying about it. News flash Rob! It was Dan Druff who identified and publicly stated that Miss Friday was Rob Singer. But....I guess Dan Druff was lying. Everyone else is always lying and everyone is always out to get you.

    And you know what it is that proves these things? Time. While it may not seem quite so crystal clear at the time, as time passes and you see that a "miss Friday", claiming to be a relator, only showed up to back up things you said about me getting a mortgage...things that were demonstratively incorrect, so you needed to invent a pretend person to back you up. Did you have pretend friends when you were a child back in 1910?

    When a person (or sock) only shows to weigh in on a specific issue like this, and then disappears, it becomes more than obvious as to what is going on. Time is the great revealer. Kind of similarly to the QFIT thing at WoV. Time has revealed what his real intention was.

    As for Alan, and GF's, I have no knowledge of any of that, other than what he posted and I don't remember him posting about a GF throwing him out. So if you know something like this for sure, it is you using info from private discussions to again, twist the knife a little further. Why do you have the need to do that? And why would that make you feel better? Rob, THIS is the sign of a very insecure person.

    One just can't help but wonder....IF you have this successful life before your gambling claims, and a significant retirement income and then add in millions of dollars in gambling claims on top, why would a 70 year old man be so insure that he takes pleasure in something like this. Most revealing Rob.

    Because some of us are BORED during this “crisis” and at others times. Successful people are used to working and having a purpose in life. Retirement changes that and some like me have no clue what to do. Money isn’t a lot of use right now if you can’t spend it.

    As for taking pleasure at someone else’s misery as you say, I don’t see it as that. We have no clue if Alan is miserable or not, unless you read between the lines or get incite from people who know him. Or when a son comes on a site and complains about issues.

    I don’t blame Rob on bIt on hitting back at Alan. As you said, you have been a target of Alan. It’s natural to defend yourself when someone comes after you. Alan is a big boy, even if he is too much of a pussy to admit he is Andrew. Hell he even said he was done here but keeps coming back.

    How is it any different than all the times you say you were done here, but keep coming back? You know you are going to take shit every time, but every time you keep coming back. As a wise man once said, you are a Drama Queen and enjoy it.

    As for Singer, I’ve called him plenty of shit for his claims on his “system”. But you will never find any statement from me on the Double Up because I have no educated clue on it. I know the math didn’t work on his system but on this I trust the people he talked to on it and if they believe it’s possible he did it, that’s good enough for me.

    I always knew the guy had money, people without it don’t talk about retirement accounts, pensions and the other stuff he is very educated one. People may not like it, but the guy isn’t poor.

    And we have all called each other shit we may want to take back over the years, but if you continue to come here, you are opening yourself up to the abuse. But we all don’t have “Kick Me” signs on our back like Alan. But in this case, he put it there himself.

    Or as another wise man once said....Fun is best had at the expense of others less fortunate than yourself.

    Perhaps he had Alan in mind when he wrote it.
    You make some good points that I agree with Boz and naturally some I don't.

    Let's start with me, because it is always about me. Yes, I sometimes, make that frequently, get fed up and either ask myself or sometimes more publicly, why I put myself through this crap....why any of us do? Sometimes I stop posting and obviously return for whatever reason. I am guessing on some level all of us have an unhealthy relationship with the forums.

    You say Rob has knowledge of retirement accounts and pensions. He also has extensive knowledge of the snap food stamp program sharing things over the years I had no idea about. Of course he exposed this "knowledge" as he was trying to put others down, saying they were on the program, usually mickeycrimm, but in doing so he exposed extensive knowledge of the program that you, nor I or any reasonably successful person would have. That doesn't mean that Rob does or doesn't have good retirement accounts and/or pension and or made millions from the casinos in one way or another, but it is a curious piece that doesn't fit. You can even say the same thing about his eviction and legal judgement for not paying rent. Rob will tell you that was in the late 1990's, before he made millions from the casinos, but according to his life claim, he had a high paying government job at the time. Is an eviction consistent with that? Why is this important, because it goes to credibility and this person has a long history of lying about everything big and small.

    So while I don't know if his double up bug claim is true, partially true or stolen when it became public knowledge with Rob being able to fill in some gaps, I personally start with skepticism based on 20 years of untruthfulness about almost everything out of his mouth.

    Now speaking of retirement, I find your retirement comments troubling. I mean we all work hard in life. You worked hard, successfully built and ran a business for many years from what I understand. And now you get to retirement that you have been chasing and working for and you are bored and the only thing you can find to fill the void is trolling entertainment on internet forums? Again, we all have an unhealthy association with this but come on Boz, those comments scare me, not only for you, but I am hoping like hell that isn't what I have to look forward to. Life doesn't stop when you retire...it should start!

  9. #29
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by AndrewG View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    If Alan was any type of investigative reporter who knew his stuff, he'd have completely reviewed what I wrote on this forum about having been contacted by IGT months ago. He might also be able to deduce why things are as they are now. Andrew/Alan will keep the nonsense going, and the majority of his posts will continue to be about me for a while. He's been wounded, and that's what these people do. Don't doubt for a minute Dan doesn't really know what's what. Everybody else knows also. You're a bad spoofer Alan.
    Mr Singer you have an answer for every question. But just end the questions by showing some proof.
    Name the form of proof that would be acceptable to you.
    Mickey, for the record, when I say "broke," I mean somebody worth half a million or less. That's a little bit of a snobby definition, but I'm in that neighborhood, and I consider myself "broke."

    It's true that I have a helluva library, about a ton and a half, but very few books are worth anything.

  10. #30
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post

    First Rob, you are still denying that Miss Friday (I believe was the name) was not you? How pathetic. And now you are accusing me of lying about it. News flash Rob! It was Dan Druff who identified and publicly stated that Miss Friday was Rob Singer. But....I guess Dan Druff was lying. Everyone else is always lying and everyone is always out to get you.

    And you know what it is that proves these things? Time. While it may not seem quite so crystal clear at the time, as time passes and you see that a "miss Friday", claiming to be a relator, only showed up to back up things you said about me getting a mortgage...things that were demonstratively incorrect, so you needed to invent a pretend person to back you up. Did you have pretend friends when you were a child back in 1910?

    When a person (or sock) only shows to weigh in on a specific issue like this, and then disappears, it becomes more than obvious as to what is going on. Time is the great revealer. Kind of similarly to the QFIT thing at WoV. Time has revealed what his real intention was.

    As for Alan, and GF's, I have no knowledge of any of that, other than what he posted and I don't remember him posting about a GF throwing him out. So if you know something like this for sure, it is you using info from private discussions to again, twist the knife a little further. Why do you have the need to do that? And why would that make you feel better? Rob, THIS is the sign of a very insecure person.

    One just can't help but wonder....IF you have this successful life before your gambling claims, and a significant retirement income and then add in millions of dollars in gambling claims on top, why would a 70 year old man be so insure that he takes pleasure in something like this. Most revealing Rob.

    Because some of us are BORED during this “crisis” and at others times. Successful people are used to working and having a purpose in life. Retirement changes that and some like me have no clue what to do. Money isn’t a lot of use right now if you can’t spend it.

    As for taking pleasure at someone else’s misery as you say, I don’t see it as that. We have no clue if Alan is miserable or not, unless you read between the lines or get incite from people who know him. Or when a son comes on a site and complains about issues.

    I don’t blame Rob on bIt on hitting back at Alan. As you said, you have been a target of Alan. It’s natural to defend yourself when someone comes after you. Alan is a big boy, even if he is too much of a pussy to admit he is Andrew. Hell he even said he was done here but keeps coming back.

    How is it any different than all the times you say you were done here, but keep coming back? You know you are going to take shit every time, but every time you keep coming back. As a wise man once said, you are a Drama Queen and enjoy it.

    As for Singer, I’ve called him plenty of shit for his claims on his “system”. But you will never find any statement from me on the Double Up because I have no educated clue on it. I know the math didn’t work on his system but on this I trust the people he talked to on it and if they believe it’s possible he did it, that’s good enough for me.

    I always knew the guy had money, people without it don’t talk about retirement accounts, pensions and the other stuff he is very educated one. People may not like it, but the guy isn’t poor.

    And we have all called each other shit we may want to take back over the years, but if you continue to come here, you are opening yourself up to the abuse. But we all don’t have “Kick Me” signs on our back like Alan. But in this case, he put it there himself.

    Or as another wise man once said....Fun is best had at the expense of others less fortunate than yourself.

    Perhaps he had Alan in mind when he wrote it.
    You make some good points that I agree with Boz and naturally some I don't.

    Let's start with me, because it is always about me. Yes, I sometimes, make that frequently, get fed up and either ask myself or sometimes more publicly, why I put myself through this crap....why any of us do? Sometimes I stop posting and obviously return for whatever reason. I am guessing on some level all of us have an unhealthy relationship with the forums.

    You say Rob has knowledge of retirement accounts and pensions. He also has extensive knowledge of the snap food stamp program sharing things over the years I had no idea about. Of course he exposed this "knowledge" as he was trying to put others down, saying they were on the program, usually mickeycrimm, but in doing so he exposed extensive knowledge of the program that you, nor I or any reasonably successful person would have. That doesn't mean that Rob does or doesn't have good retirement accounts and/or pension and or made millions from the casinos in one way or another, but it is a curious piece that doesn't fit. You can even say the same thing about his eviction and legal judgement for not paying rent. Rob will tell you that was in the late 1990's, before he made millions from the casinos, but according to his life claim, he had a high paying government job at the time. Is an eviction consistent with that? Why is this important, because it goes to credibility and this person has a long history of lying about everything big and small.

    So while I don't know if his double up bug claim is true, partially true or stolen when it became public knowledge with Rob being able to fill in some gaps, I personally start with skepticism based on 20 years of untruthfulness about almost everything out of his mouth.

    Now speaking of retirement, I find your retirement comments troubling. I mean we all work hard in life. You worked hard, successfully built and ran a business for many years from what I understand. And now you get to retirement that you have been chasing and working for and you are bored and the only thing you can find to fill the void is trolling entertainment on internet forums? Again, we all have an unhealthy association with this but come on Boz, those comments scare me, not only for you, but I am hoping like hell that isn't what I have to look forward to. Life doesn't stop when you retire...it should start!
    Good stuff and not much to argue with.

    As for the boredom I should have added it’s mostly due to the current CV situation. I had a lot of plans cancelled. I planned on being in Florida for all of Spring Training and came home early once everything got cancelled. I would have been in Tahoe much of this month and was planning on helping a friend at his business when home to get out.

    I’m flying back to Florida shortly for a quick trip to handle a few things I left open when I left on short notice. Flights are cheap and I have no fear. I saved hundreds of thousands of miles from using Cards for business over the years and will use them. Also the airlines reduced the miles needed for elite status this year and extended current status until January 2022, so it’s a win/win situation to visit the country.

    No one is ready to be stuck in the house 23 hours a day. That’s not retirement, that’s punishment.

  11. #31
    Another long and winding ramble of concocted lies in an attempt to make yourself feel good.

    You and Alan also have one major thing in common: you both like to argue endlessly about the lies you present, and neither of you will ever become comfortable unless and until you do some converting.

    It is the classic sign of weak, insecure people who crave continuing attention and relevance. And if they can't convert, they bring the same lies up over and over again.

    Must have something to do with tossing and turning ....

  12. #32
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by LMR View Post

    Honestly, I don't think that Alan is either promoting himself, or being scores of his own people to agree with.
    You are correct. Alan's use of a sock puppet is not the traditional use of making it seem like there are more people agreeing with or supporting one side of an argument or discussion, as Rob and other banned members of this forum have done in the past. But the fact is the rule is no sock puppets. And although it usually takes a little nudging of Dan Druff, he has been pretty consistent in enforcing the rule. Now because it is Alan, Dan is just going to look the other way and say "I don't know if it is or isn't".

    Is it too much to ask for a little consistency? I mean you allow this from Alan, then how do you say no when the next guy creates a sockpuppet, pretending to be a female realtor in Arizona (Rob), or a female girlfriend praising a member (moses)? You look the other way on this, then don't you have to allow a 100 different Tasha sockpuppets?
    LOL. Forgot about the female realtor stint by "Singer." Wonder if he wore pantyhose. I remember those old Joe Namath commercials. Very sexy.

  13. #33
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by LMR View Post

    Honestly, I don't think that Alan is either promoting himself, or being scores of his own people to agree with.
    You are correct. Alan's use of a sock puppet is not the traditional use of making it seem like there are more people agreeing with or supporting one side of an argument or discussion, as Rob and other banned members of this forum have done in the past. But the fact is the rule is no sock puppets. And although it usually takes a little nudging of Dan Druff, he has been pretty consistent in enforcing the rule. Now because it is Alan, Dan is just going to look the other way and say "I don't know if it is or isn't".

    Is it too much to ask for a little consistency? I mean you allow this from Alan, then how do you say no when the next guy creates a sockpuppet, pretending to be a female realtor in Arizona (Rob), or a female girlfriend praising a member (moses)? You look the other way on this, then don't you have to allow a 100 different Tasha sockpuppets?
    LOL. Forgot about the female realtor stint by "Singer." Wonder if he wore pantyhose. I remember those old Joe Namath commercials. Very sexy.
    I heard she was a liberal and didn't wear any because she couldn't afford them.

  14. #34
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post

    The big difference kew is, I can handle it.

    You keep saying I've used some aliases here and I never have. Why does your agenda at times have to be based on lies? It's really a toss-up over who's more insecure, unless and until they can make believe they're convincing others of how they want things to be perceived--you or Alan?

    What I agree with you about is what Dan knows and how he's giving Alan a pass. His choice of course, although it does differ from what was said about socks. But if you don't count the place Alan's LV girlfriend threw him out of, he's only lived in one other place and posted as Alan from there. I don't believe he bothers with VPN's etc.
    First Rob, you are still denying that Miss Friday (I believe was the name) was not you? How pathetic. And now you are accusing me of lying about it. News flash Rob! It was Dan Druff who identified and publicly stated that Miss Friday was Rob Singer. But....I guess Dan Druff was lying. Everyone else is always lying and everyone is always out to get you.

    And you know what it is that proves these things? Time. While it may not seem quite so crystal clear at the time, as time passes and you see that a "miss Friday", claiming to be a relator, only showed up to back up things you said about me getting a mortgage...things that were demonstratively incorrect, so you needed to invent a pretend person to back you up. Did you have pretend friends when you were a child back in 1910?

    When a person (or sock) only shows to weigh in on a specific issue like this, and then disappears, it becomes more than obvious as to what is going on. Time is the great revealer. Kind of similarly to the QFIT thing at WoV. Time has revealed what his real intention was.

    As for Alan, and GF's, I have no knowledge of any of that, other than what he posted and I don't remember him posting about a GF throwing him out. So if you know something like this for sure, it is you using info from private discussions to again, twist the knife a little further. Why do you have the need to do that? And why would that make you feel better? Rob, THIS is the sign of a very insecure person.

    One just can't help but wonder....IF you have this successful life before your gambling claims, and a significant retirement income and then add in millions of dollars in gambling claims on top, why would a 70 year old man be so insure that he takes pleasure in something like this. Most revealing Rob.
    How is it any different than all the times you say you were done here, but keep coming back? You know you are going to take shit every time, but every time you keep coming back. As a wise man once said, you are a Drama Queen and enjoy it.
    The latest time KJ anounced that he was leaving the board was this week on Thursday 04/23/2020 in a reply to mickey when he wrote the following:

    Originally Posted by kewlJ

    "So I haven't posted because I just wasn't up to dealing with this forum and the bi-partisan nonsense. And now that I am feeling better, I think this is a good time for me to step away. No hard feeling towards anyone or anything....this forum just has nothing to do with gambling or any kind of talk of gambling, Las Vegas or anything related. Just none. It used to have some, but now every single thread is either about or hijacked into partisan politics. And that really does nothing for me. So you guys can just go at it and do your thing."

    KJ, you made it one full day without posting, good job! That is considered satisfactory.

  15. #35
    Kew is and has always been the poster boy for "Hearing it thru the Grapevine". It's impossible for him to do what he says he's gonna do. He can't take not being relevant. He panics when things don't include him. But he chokes when it comes to serving up the truthful facts.

    Weak...ineffective...insecure. Yes, THE poster boy.

  16. #36
    Originally Posted by BoSox View Post
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post

    First Rob, you are still denying that Miss Friday (I believe was the name) was not you? How pathetic. And now you are accusing me of lying about it. News flash Rob! It was Dan Druff who identified and publicly stated that Miss Friday was Rob Singer. But....I guess Dan Druff was lying. Everyone else is always lying and everyone is always out to get you.

    And you know what it is that proves these things? Time. While it may not seem quite so crystal clear at the time, as time passes and you see that a "miss Friday", claiming to be a relator, only showed up to back up things you said about me getting a mortgage...things that were demonstratively incorrect, so you needed to invent a pretend person to back you up. Did you have pretend friends when you were a child back in 1910?

    When a person (or sock) only shows to weigh in on a specific issue like this, and then disappears, it becomes more than obvious as to what is going on. Time is the great revealer. Kind of similarly to the QFIT thing at WoV. Time has revealed what his real intention was.

    As for Alan, and GF's, I have no knowledge of any of that, other than what he posted and I don't remember him posting about a GF throwing him out. So if you know something like this for sure, it is you using info from private discussions to again, twist the knife a little further. Why do you have the need to do that? And why would that make you feel better? Rob, THIS is the sign of a very insecure person.

    One just can't help but wonder....IF you have this successful life before your gambling claims, and a significant retirement income and then add in millions of dollars in gambling claims on top, why would a 70 year old man be so insure that he takes pleasure in something like this. Most revealing Rob.
    How is it any different than all the times you say you were done here, but keep coming back? You know you are going to take shit every time, but every time you keep coming back. As a wise man once said, you are a Drama Queen and enjoy it.
    The latest time KJ anounced that he was leaving the board was this week on Thursday 04/23/2020 in a reply to mickey when he wrote the following:

    Originally Posted by kewlJ

    "So I haven't posted because I just wasn't up to dealing with this forum and the bi-partisan nonsense. And now that I am feeling better, I think this is a good time for me to step away. No hard feeling towards anyone or anything....this forum just has nothing to do with gambling or any kind of talk of gambling, Las Vegas or anything related. Just none. It used to have some, but now every single thread is either about or hijacked into partisan politics. And that really does nothing for me. So you guys can just go at it and do your thing."

    KJ, you made it one full day without posting, good job! That is considered satisfactory.
    Hey look my old friend BoSox is finally learning how to use the quote feature. And they say you can't teach an old dog new tricks.

    Nope BoSox, I never said that. You are quoting it? Doesn't matter....never said it. very similarly to how the guy you worship, claims he didn't say something even when confronted with video that he did. FAKE NEWS BoSox! what you are claiming I said is FAKE NEWS!

    That is comedic relief, but on a more serious note, this guy that you worship does frequently change his mind about all sorts of things. (sometimes from one sentence to the next ) Why am I not afforded that same option to change my mind if I wish.

  17. #37
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Kew is and has always been the poster boy for "Hearing it thru the Grapevine". It's impossible for him to do what he says he's gonna do. He can't take not being relevant. He panics when things don't include him. But he chokes when it comes to serving up the truthful facts.

    Weak...ineffective...insecure. Yes, THE poster boy.
    https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...m531MtxwOcwR27

  18. #38
    Originally Posted by BoSox View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Kew is and has always been the poster boy for "Hearing it thru the Grapevine". It's impossible for him to do what he says he's gonna do. He can't take not being relevant. He panics when things don't include him. But he chokes when it comes to serving up the truthful facts.

    Weak...ineffective...insecure. Yes, THE poster boy.
    https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...m531MtxwOcwR27
    OK I see kew in that burly brutal bunch, but which one's baby bro? And which one is the gay right's mouthpiece, redietz??

  19. #39
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by BoSox View Post
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post

    How is it any different than all the times you say you were done here, but keep coming back? You know you are going to take shit every time, but every time you keep coming back. As a wise man once said, you are a Drama Queen and enjoy it.
    The latest time KJ anounced that he was leaving the board was this week on Thursday 04/23/2020 in a reply to mickey when he wrote the following:

    Originally Posted by kewlJ

    "So I haven't posted because I just wasn't up to dealing with this forum and the bi-partisan nonsense. And now that I am feeling better, I think this is a good time for me to step away. No hard feeling towards anyone or anything....this forum just has nothing to do with gambling or any kind of talk of gambling, Las Vegas or anything related. Just none. It used to have some, but now every single thread is either about or hijacked into partisan politics. And that really does nothing for me. So you guys can just go at it and do your thing."

    KJ, you made it one full day without posting, good job! That is considered satisfactory.
    Hey look my old friend BoSox is finally learning how to use the quote feature. And they say you can't teach an old dog new tricks.

    Nope BoSox, I never said that. You are quoting it? Doesn't matter....never said it. very similarly to how the guy you worship, claims he didn't say something even when confronted with video that he did. FAKE NEWS BoSox! what you are claiming I said is FAKE NEWS!

    That is comedic relief, but on a more serious note, this guy that you worship does frequently change his mind about all sorts of things. (sometimes from one sentence to the next ) Why am I not afforded that same option to change my mind if I wish.
    The post is # 4100 in the WOV thread.

  20. #40
    Originally Posted by jbjb View Post
    Someone just get Jerry Logan in this thread. We need some comic relief!
    First choice would be Jerry Logan he was hilarious!! next best would be Ibeatyouraces.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-30-2019, 10:37 PM
  2. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-08-2014, 08:59 AM
  3. A tax question for Rob Singer
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 06-07-2014, 07:41 PM
  4. Replies: 9
    Last Post: 06-09-2013, 11:07 AM
  5. Question for Rob Singer
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 84
    Last Post: 07-17-2012, 01:39 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •