Originally Posted by
AxelWolf
The fact that he found it(I can't even remember how he claims he figured it out at this point)
Axel, for me this is the most critical part of Rob’s story. How did he find the bug? It seems like you give him a pass on this point.
All the rest of Rob’s story makes total sense, and wouldn’t be that hard to pull off by anybody with just a little common sense. I mean it goes without saying if you go into a casino and win 8 jackpots on one slot machine totaling $30,000 in one evening (which is what Kane did), it’s going to raise a casino’s suspicions, and you aren’t going to last long.
Here’s how Rob said he found it. Rob claims he was actively looking for a “bug.” To me this is where Rob’s story falls apart. If you know anything about bugs in a computer program, you don’t actively look for them. You’re more likely to find them by random chance, like Kane and Nester did.
And remember two main - unrelated - things had to happen for someone to find this bug: 1) the double up had to be turned on and 2) the right sequence of buttons had to be pressed.
In hindsight it’s easy to see why nobody happened on this bug before Kane and Nester. As the article pointed out, the majority of casinos didn’t have the DU activated since most players didn’t like it. So if someone was looking for a bug without DU activated, they would have never found it. And there is no reason someone would think they’d have to tell the casino to activate the DU to start looking for bugs.
So without knowing the double up feature activitated this bug (which then took several complicated steps), it’s hard to see how someone would have figured this out if they were looking for “bugs”.
The article said the steps to activate this bug once the DU was on were very “complex”, quoting the article. It took the IGT computer engineer several days to figure it out and this was after he was armed with surveillance footage of Kane activating it.
As for me, I don’t care if Rob exploited the DU bug or not. I’ve been following this story because I find it fascinating. Everybody seems to question the part of Rob’s story that to me makes the most sense. Nobody seems to question my concern: How would somebody ever find a bug like this by actively searching for it? What if the bug didn’t exist? That means Rob would’ve been spending hours each evening pushing buttons randomly for no reason. At some point most reasonable people would quit looking for a bug.
This is why I think it is highly unlikely Rob found it or exploited it. It’s based on how he said he found it. His explanation just didn’t add up in my book. If it did in yours, I’m okay with that.
Again, once the bug is discovered, everything else made sense. I think most reasonable commonsense people could’ve easily exploited it for five years or longer and never got caught. The key is just don’t get greedy, even with how much you move up in denomination to win your jackpot. Someone could play it at one dollar and move it to two dollars and you would have a huge advantage, and still stay under the casino’s radar. Kane and Nester were moving it up from $1 to $10 and staying at a machine to claim multiple large jackpots in an evening. It’s easy to see why they didn’t last long.
Anyway, it’s a very interesting story and I still think the Kane and Nestor version could make it to the big screen someday. If it does, I’m going to try to be one of the principal screen writers. Lol