Ok excellent, somebody at WoV posted a link to one of Rob's Gaming Today articles. Note the date of the article March 5, 2008. Read the article first and then the discussion.
https://www.gamingtoday.com/poker/ar...egy_that_works
So
this is Rob's progressive wagering strategy. The strategy that his original claim said he played from 2000 to 2009, winning over a million dollars. And the timing works perfectly with that original claim. The math doesn't work but the timing does. In 2008 Rob was "pushing" this strategy in weekly columns at Gaming Today and pushing his books of the same strategy. THAT was his scam at the time, his troll at the time.
Now according to his new claim of playing the double up bug from 2004-2009 to the tune of 2.8 million, the timing of this article would have been when he was actually playing the double up bug. So why the articles and books pushing the progressive strategy? Rob will tell you it was to throw people off his trail. That it was for "cover".
But guess what if you are trying to lay low, you do so by just being quiet. No books or columns drawing attention.
The fact is these columns and books in 2008 were promoting Rob's progressive system, because THAT WAS HIS SCAM AT THE TIME. He hadn't heard of Nester or Kane or the double up bug. He didn't learn about Nester, Kane and the double up bug until after the WIRED article came out years later. THAT is when Rob's whole story, scam and timeline changed. AND he had to go back and revise his earlier claims.
This idea of publishing books and writing a column week after week to throw someone off the trail is just complete baloney. Anyone falling for this and not seeing how he went back and changed the claim and timeline
way, way after the fact really is quite gullible. No wonder Rob has always refused to show any evidence. The evident clearly shows he is lying.