Alan Mendelson Going For The Jugular

[mickeycrimm]

the correct sequence of operating the bug HAS been released....by ME! And GUESS WHO reported that the sequence as reported by Wired was wrong? Yes, ME!!

Yeppers. That sums it up.

Is the wifey giving up on the trip? And when is the interview?

Andrew, so far we haven't gotten a response from you about joining WoV and making a post in the Singer thread. Alan told me he was going to talk to you about it. Did you two have the talk? Why are you ignoring the issue?

[mickeycrimm]

KJ, A couple of days ago while doing research on betting systems Shack pointed out the the systems videos on youtube get 6 and 7 figure views. From your numerous posts here against the Singer System it is obvious to anyone that you are anti-systems.

So I was wondering, since you are so deadset against these people and....you can post comments about these videos on youtube....how many times have you posted on youtube condemning the systems?

With that many views we are talking millions and millions of people being duped. The Rob Singer story is nothing compared to that. If you haven't posted there yet perhaps you should consider it.

Looking forward to you debunking those charlatons.

[kewlJ]

I'd also like to say something about maxpen....and I want to be clear: he can say whatever he wants about me and I'm always gonna be OK with that. We throw insults back and forth. That's the game on forums. I'm a real person and he's anonymous, which is something that's also fine with me. I even believe he saw something about food stamps and welfare about me on some snoop site or else he wouldn't have said it. But it had to be an error of some sort. Our SS income alone disqualifies us from any of that. Either way, he never "begged me" for anything. I've noticed he can say about 3 paragraphs in 27 words. People tell me he knows what he's doing. I think I agree with that.

Isn't this sweet. I have said for a couple years that I saw the foodstamp penalty info on Singers report. And for a couple years Singer has called me a liar. MaxPen has also stated it was there for about the same length of time, several years now. And Singer pretty much called him a liar (among other names). So now Axelwolf says "If MaxPen says he saw it, then he saw it". Now Rob's tone changes. All of the sudden Rob believes MaxPen saw it (while still calling me a liar). Rob says "it must have been a mistake".

I wonder why the sudden change? Could it be that Rob needs mickey and Axelwolf on his side. He needs legit players to say his claim is possible. Now I am not saying Axelwolf is on Rob's side or fully supporting him. But Rob doesn't want to say anything to piss him off, so when Axelwolf vouches for MaxPen, Rob's tone changes dramatically. "I believe MaxPen saw something or he wouldn't have said it". Can Rob be any less obvious of trying to kiss Axelwolf's ass?

Of course MaxPen saw it, because it was there! And it was no mistake. These sites don't make that kind of mistake. They put that kind of thing on there by mistake and they get their ass sued off. It was on there, you can be sure of that. It was on there because it happened. Now the circumstances of it being removed, I have no idea. I mean something like that, is probably only on there until the penalty time has expired. It probably isn't something permanent. But I really don't know. If I had to guess, I would guess Rob gave a nudge. Probably wrote them to remove it because the time period was up. But maybe it falls of automatically. But either way, it was on there and it was no mistake.

It is just all part of this ongoing troll that is Rob Singer.

[kewlJ]

It really isn't just the food stamp item that brings this little fantasy story down. Like I said anyone that wants to look can find a number of different things that don't fit the pieces of this fairytale. It is just so telling that so many don't want to look. Don't want to see.

But it is fitting that something involving foodstamps is one of the key pieces, only because for years, decades, one of Rob's big attacks on people has been to say they are on food stamps and welfare. How many times did he untruthfully say this about Mickeycrimm? The funny thing is Rob seemed to know all about these programs, the ins-and-outs. How everything worked. That all makes sense now doesn't it?

[Rob.Singer]

Kew I do believe you're jealous of how I said I believe max. While everything to Alan is Breaking News, everything to you is a soap opera. You could create a drama out of two pieces of rebar sitting side by side on the kitchen floor.

Concoct all the bs and lies you need to. It's simply glorious how my upcoming interview with Mike is gonna both burn your ass and break your poor defective little heart at the same wonderful time.

[kewlJ]

Kew I do believe you're jealous of how I said I believe max. While everything to Alan is Breaking News, everything to you is a soap opera. You could create a drama out of two pieces of rebar sitting side by side on the kitchen floor.

Concoct all the bs and lies you need to. It's simply glorious how my upcoming interview with Mike is gonna both burn your ass and break your defective heart at the same wonderful time.

Rob, you think I am jealous of everything. I am not. Proves you have no idea what I am about. Almost everyone that I encounter on these forums is "better off" than me. Most of the people who had careers make more than I do and most of the AP's play with a bigger advantage, or play higher stakes and ultimately make more than me. I am sincerely happy for and rooting for anyone that can and does beat the casinos and I don't measure myself against anyone else and what they do, I only compete against myself and my goals. So there would be no reason for me to be jealous of anyone and that includes you.

Your other claims are complete bullshit so there is no reason to even talk about them, but if I sincerely though you had found and played the double-up, as you claim, I would be happy for you. I really would. But I just don't believe you based on your long history of lying and now the pieces of your information just don't fit.

The fact that you keep insisting that me and others frankly are jealous of you, is pretty revealing that this is what you want. You want everyone to admire and be envious of you and that is what these tall tales are all about. I don't know what it is that would cause a 71 year old man to crave this kind of attention, but something is wrong or missing or very unsatisfying from your life, that much is crystal clear.

[The Boz]

Kew I do believe you're jealous of how I said I believe max. While everything to Alan is Breaking News, everything to you is a soap opera. You could create a drama out of two pieces of rebar sitting side by side on the kitchen floor.

Concoct all the bs and lies you need to. It's simply glorious how my upcoming interview with Mike is gonna both burn your ass and break your defective heart at the same wonderful time.

Rob, you think I am jealous of everything. I am not. Proves you have no idea what I am about. Almost everyone that I encounter on these forums is "better off" than me. Most of the people who had careers make more than I do and most of the AP's play with a bigger advantage, or play higher stakes and ultimately make more than me. I am sincerely happy for and rooting for anyone that can and does beat the casinos and I don't measure myself against anyone else and what they do, I only compete against myself and my goals. So there would be no reason for me to be jealous of anyone and that includes you.

Your other claims are complete bullshit so there is no reason to even talk about them, but if I sincerely though you had found and played the double-up, as you claim, I would be happy for you. I really would. But I just don't believe you based on your long history of lying and now the pieces of your information just don't fit.

The fact that you keep insisting that me and others frankly are jealous of you, is pretty revealing that this is what you want. You want everyone to admire and be envious of you and that is what these tall tales are all about. I don't know what it is that would cause a 71 year old man to crave this kind of attention, but something is wrong or missing or very unsatisfying from your life, that much is crystal clear.

I would be proud if Rob was my Uncle. If you were my Uncle I would probably have been scarred for life and still in treatment.

[Rob.Singer]

Kew I do believe you're jealous of how I said I believe max. While everything to Alan is Breaking News, everything to you is a soap opera. You could create a drama out of two pieces of rebar sitting side by side on the kitchen floor.

Concoct all the bs and lies you need to. It's simply glorious how my upcoming interview with Mike is gonna both burn your ass and break your defective heart at the same wonderful time.

Rob, you think I am jealous of everything. I am not. Proves you have no idea what I am about. Almost everyone that I encounter on these forums is "better off" than me. Most of the people who had careers make more than I do and most of the AP's play with a bigger advantage, or play higher stakes and ultimately make more than me. I am sincerely happy for and rooting for anyone that can and does beat the casinos and I don't measure myself against anyone else and what they do, I only compete against myself and my goals. So there would be no reason for me to be jealous of anyone and that includes you.

Your other claims are complete bullshit so there is no reason to even talk about them, but if I sincerely though you had found and played the double-up, as you claim, I would be happy for you. I really would. But I just don't believe you based on your long history of lying and now the pieces of your information just don't fit.

The fact that you keep insisting that me and others frankly are jealous of you, is pretty revealing that this is what you want. You want everyone to admire and be envious of you and that is what these tall tales are all about. I don't know what it is that would cause a 71 year old man to crave this kind of attention, but something is wrong or missing or very unsatisfying from your life, that much is crystal clear.

Denial of the facts. The second most glaring problem of serial liars. And there is no greater envious liar, than you.

Your next biggest issue is you never get it. max is tough, nasty, and he gets it done in 50 words or less. I appreciate a person like that. With or against me, it shows strength. You're weak, stupid, unsure what to say or how to say it, and it takes you 7000 words in multiple long-winded posts to get your twitty little thoughts out--and it's all because you have trouble conveying things you're really not sure of.

[mickeycrimm]

I'd also like to say something about maxpen....and I want to be clear: he can say whatever he wants about me and I'm always gonna be OK with that. We throw insults back and forth. That's the game on forums. I'm a real person and he's anonymous, which is something that's also fine with me. I even believe he saw something about food stamps and welfare about me on some snoop site or else he wouldn't have said it. But it had to be an error of some sort. Our SS income alone disqualifies us from any of that. Either way, he never "begged me" for anything. I've noticed he can say about 3 paragraphs in 27 words. People tell me he knows what he's doing. I think I agree with that.

Isn't this sweet. I have said for a couple years that I saw the foodstamp penalty info on Singers report. And for a couple years Singer has called me a liar. MaxPen has also stated it was there for about the same length of time, several years now. And Singer pretty much called him a liar (among other names). So now Axelwolf says "If MaxPen says he saw it, then he saw it". Now Rob's tone changes. All of the sudden Rob believes MaxPen saw it (while still calling me a liar). Rob says "it must have been a mistake".

I wonder why the sudden change? Could it be that Rob needs mickey and Axelwolf on his side. He needs legit players to say his claim is possible. Now I am not saying Axelwolf is on Rob's side or fully supporting him. But Rob doesn't want to say anything to piss him off, so when Axelwolf vouches for MaxPen, Rob's tone changes dramatically. "I believe MaxPen saw something or he wouldn't have said it". Can Rob be any less obvious of trying to kiss Axelwolf's ass?

Of course MaxPen saw it, because it was there! And it was no mistake. These sites don't make that kind of mistake. They put that kind of thing on there by mistake and they get their ass sued off. It was on there, you can be sure of that. It was on there because it happened. Now the circumstances of it being removed, I have no idea. I mean something like that, is probably only on there until the penalty time has expired. It probably isn't something permanent. But I really don't know. If I had to guess, I would guess Rob gave a nudge. Probably wrote them to remove it because the time period was up. But maybe it falls of automatically. But either way, it was on there and it was no mistake.

It is just all part of this ongoing troll that is Rob Singer.

Ummm, KJ, axel didn't name Maxpen as the person he was talking about.

[kewlJ]

I'd also like to say something about maxpen....and I want to be clear: he can say whatever he wants about me and I'm always gonna be OK with that. We throw insults back and forth. That's the game on forums. I'm a real person and he's anonymous, which is something that's also fine with me. I even believe he saw something about food stamps and welfare about me on some snoop site or else he wouldn't have said it. But it had to be an error of some sort. Our SS income alone disqualifies us from any of that. Either way, he never "begged me" for anything. I've noticed he can say about 3 paragraphs in 27 words. People tell me he knows what he's doing. I think I agree with that.

Isn't this sweet. I have said for a couple years that I saw the foodstamp penalty info on Singers report. And for a couple years Singer has called me a liar. MaxPen has also stated it was there for about the same length of time, several years now. And Singer pretty much called him a liar (among other names). So now Axelwolf says "If MaxPen says he saw it, then he saw it". Now Rob's tone changes. All of the sudden Rob believes MaxPen saw it (while still calling me a liar). Rob says "it must have been a mistake".

I wonder why the sudden change? Could it be that Rob needs mickey and Axelwolf on his side. He needs legit players to say his claim is possible. Now I am not saying Axelwolf is on Rob's side or fully supporting him. But Rob doesn't want to say anything to piss him off, so when Axelwolf vouches for MaxPen, Rob's tone changes dramatically. "I believe MaxPen saw something or he wouldn't have said it". Can Rob be any less obvious of trying to kiss Axelwolf's ass?

Of course MaxPen saw it, because it was there! And it was no mistake. These sites don't make that kind of mistake. They put that kind of thing on there by mistake and they get their ass sued off. It was on there, you can be sure of that. It was on there because it happened. Now the circumstances of it being removed, I have no idea. I mean something like that, is probably only on there until the penalty time has expired. It probably isn't something permanent. But I really don't know. If I had to guess, I would guess Rob gave a nudge. Probably wrote them to remove it because the time period was up. But maybe it falls of automatically. But either way, it was on there and it was no mistake.

It is just all part of this ongoing troll that is Rob Singer.

Ummm, KJ, axel didn't name Maxpen as the person he was talking about.

Yep, you are right mickey. Alex didn't name MaxPen. My bad. Apologizes to Axel if it is someone else. Most of us assumed he was speaking about MaxPen. Certainly Singer did as Singer immediately changed his tune about MaxPen so as not to offend Axel.

If it is not MaxPen that Axel was speaking of that's fine, too. That means there was yet another person who saw and can verify the food stamp item on Singers records. Even better.

[mickeycrimm]

Isn't this sweet. I have said for a couple years that I saw the foodstamp penalty info on Singers report. And for a couple years Singer has called me a liar. MaxPen has also stated it was there for about the same length of time, several years now. And Singer pretty much called him a liar (among other names). So now Axelwolf says "If MaxPen says he saw it, then he saw it". Now Rob's tone changes. All of the sudden Rob believes MaxPen saw it (while still calling me a liar). Rob says "it must have been a mistake".

I wonder why the sudden change? Could it be that Rob needs mickey and Axelwolf on his side. He needs legit players to say his claim is possible. Now I am not saying Axelwolf is on Rob's side or fully supporting him. But Rob doesn't want to say anything to piss him off, so when Axelwolf vouches for MaxPen, Rob's tone changes dramatically. "I believe MaxPen saw something or he wouldn't have said it". Can Rob be any less obvious of trying to kiss Axelwolf's ass?

Of course MaxPen saw it, because it was there! And it was no mistake. These sites don't make that kind of mistake. They put that kind of thing on there by mistake and they get their ass sued off. It was on there, you can be sure of that. It was on there because it happened. Now the circumstances of it being removed, I have no idea. I mean something like that, is probably only on there until the penalty time has expired. It probably isn't something permanent. But I really don't know. If I had to guess, I would guess Rob gave a nudge. Probably wrote them to remove it because the time period was up. But maybe it falls of automatically. But either way, it was on there and it was no mistake.

It is just all part of this ongoing troll that is Rob Singer.

Ummm, KJ, axel didn't name Maxpen as the person he was talking about.

Yep, you are right mickey. Alex didn't name MaxPen. My bad. Apologizes to Axel if it is someone else. Most of us assumed he was speaking about MaxPen. Certainly Singer did as Singer immediately changed his tune about MaxPen so as not to offend Axel.

If it is not MaxPen that Axel was speaking of that's fine, too. That means there was yet another person who saw and can verify the food stamp item on Singers records. Even better.

Nothing is better than actual proof we can all see. Use the way back machine.

[Ozzy]

Kew I do believe you're jealous of how I said I believe max. While everything to Alan is Breaking News, everything to you is a soap opera. You could create a drama out of two pieces of rebar sitting side by side on the kitchen floor.

Concoct all the bs and lies you need to. It's simply glorious how my upcoming interview with Mike is gonna both burn your ass and break your defective heart at the same wonderful time.

Rob, you think I am jealous of everything. I am not. Proves you have no idea what I am about. Almost everyone that I encounter on these forums is "better off" than me. Most of the people who had careers make more than I do and most of the AP's play with a bigger advantage, or play higher stakes and ultimately make more than me. I am sincerely happy for and rooting for anyone that can and does beat the casinos and I don't measure myself against anyone else and what they do, I only compete against myself and my goals. So there would be no reason for me to be jealous of anyone and that includes you.

Your other claims are complete bullshit so there is no reason to even talk about them, but if I sincerely though you had found and played the double-up, as you claim, I would be happy for you. I really would. But I just don't believe you based on your long history of lying and now the pieces of your information just don't fit.

The fact that you keep insisting that me and others frankly are jealous of you, is pretty revealing that this is what you want. You want everyone to admire and be envious of you and that is what these tall tales are all about. I don't know what it is that would cause a 71 year old man to crave this kind of attention, but something is wrong or missing or very unsatisfying from your life, that much is crystal clear.

I would be proud if Rob was my Uncle. If you were my Uncle I would probably have been scarred for life and still in treatment.

I don't think a mid 30s Kew can be your uncle Boz. Singer very possible.

[The Boz]

Rob, you think I am jealous of everything. I am not. Proves you have no idea what I am about. Almost everyone that I encounter on these forums is "better off" than me. Most of the people who had careers make more than I do and most of the AP's play with a bigger advantage, or play higher stakes and ultimately make more than me. I am sincerely happy for and rooting for anyone that can and does beat the casinos and I don't measure myself against anyone else and what they do, I only compete against myself and my goals. So there would be no reason for me to be jealous of anyone and that includes you.

Your other claims are complete bullshit so there is no reason to even talk about them, but if I sincerely though you had found and played the double-up, as you claim, I would be happy for you. I really would. But I just don't believe you based on your long history of lying and now the pieces of your information just don't fit.

The fact that you keep insisting that me and others frankly are jealous of you, is pretty revealing that this is what you want. You want everyone to admire and be envious of you and that is what these tall tales are all about. I don't know what it is that would cause a 71 year old man to crave this kind of attention, but something is wrong or missing or very unsatisfying from your life, that much is crystal clear.

I would be proud if Rob was my Uncle. If you were my Uncle I would probably have been scarred for life and still in treatment.

I don't think a mid 30s Kew can be your uncle Boz. Singer very possible.

Either way I would never be concerned Uncle Rob would ever try to diddle me.

[kewlJ]

Nothing is better than actual proof we can all see. Use the way back machine.

That isn't the issue mickey and you damn well know it. 3 different issue.

It is illegal for me to post that information. It would have Rob's real name and open me up to liability.

The agreement signed with the reporting company prohibits me from doing so. Break that agreement and they can take legal action.

Third and less concerning legally, it is against the rules of this forum.

You know all this and are just trying to get me to do something illegal that could put me in jeopardy.


Now, to this very topic. I have been contacted by a member of this forum, via PM twice now. This is a member that both you mickey and me have had many issues with. A real ass "hole" of a guy. So this idiot all of the sudden wants to help me out. Says he has the resources to get reports with much deeper dirt on Singer. All I have to do is provide Singers real name, SS# and date of birth.

Of course this is a set up as well. As soon as I provide that, even privately, THAT is against the law. I have no idea if Singer is working with this guy or you are working with this guy or what? Maybe he is working alone, but it is a set up and these things are illegal and open me up to liability.

The bottom line is anyone wanting to see the info, can find it for themselves and see many pieces don't fit. The people questioning me don't want to do that. They don't want to see what is there. I suspect they already have seen or already know. So it is all just games at this point, as it always is with this forum.

[Rob.Singer]

Ummm, KJ, axel didn't name Maxpen as the person he was talking about.

Yep, you are right mickey. Alex didn't name MaxPen. My bad. Apologizes to Axel if it is someone else. Most of us assumed he was speaking about MaxPen. Certainly Singer did as Singer immediately changed his tune about MaxPen so as not to offend Axel.

If it is not MaxPen that Axel was speaking of that's fine, too. That means there was yet another person who saw and can verify the food stamp item on Singers records. Even better.

Nothing is better than actual proof we can all see. Use the way back machine.

I see kew as the Adam Schiff of this forum. He says he's seen evidence, yet he can't produce it or even explain anything about it. Both are serial liars.

Seems to me, there has to be at least ONE background check report out there that has info on this kew-assertion if in fact it is real. Why is he content to just keep lying about it when he could/should search multiple sites to provide some evidence. Answer: he's a twit. Same as Schiff.

I just did a quick review and any kind of welfare is controlled via state programs. I've had an Az. DL until Nov. 2011, when I got a Nv. license because we were at the RV park learning full-time RVing in Pahrump. So that should be great info for a background checker. You probably want to check both states' records. I'll have a big laugh about it when you do.

[kewlJ]

Yep, you are right mickey. Alex didn't name MaxPen. My bad. Apologizes to Axel if it is someone else. Most of us assumed he was speaking about MaxPen. Certainly Singer did as Singer immediately changed his tune about MaxPen so as not to offend Axel.

If it is not MaxPen that Axel was speaking of that's fine, too. That means there was yet another person who saw and can verify the food stamp item on Singers records. Even better.

Nothing is better than actual proof we can all see. Use the way back machine.

I see kew as the Adam Schiff of this forum. He says he's seen evidence, yet he can't produce it or even explain anything about it. Both are serial liars.

Seems to me, there has to be at least ONE background check report out there that has info on this kew-assertion if in fact it is real. Why is he content to just keep lying about it when he could/should search multiple sites to provide some evidence. Answer: he's a twit. Same as Schiff.

I just did a quick review and any kind of welfare is controlled via state programs. I've had an Az. DL until Nov. 2011, when I got a Nv. license because we were at the RV park learning full-time RVing in Pahrump. So that should be great info for a background checker. You probably want to check both states' records. I'll have a big laugh about it when you do.

Funny thing. I saw it and say so and I am lying. Someone else saw it and says so and you say "you believe he saw it" but it must have been a mistake. These things contradicted each other Rob. You know it was there, because you know it was true. Why it isn't any longer, that I have no idea about or how it works. But I'll bet you do Rob.

[Rob.Singer]

Nothing is better than actual proof we can all see. Use the way back machine.

I see kew as the Adam Schiff of this forum. He says he's seen evidence, yet he can't produce it or even explain anything about it. Both are serial liars.

Seems to me, there has to be at least ONE background check report out there that has info on this kew-assertion if in fact it is real. Why is he content to just keep lying about it when he could/should search multiple sites to provide some evidence. Answer: he's a twit. Same as Schiff.

I just did a quick review and any kind of welfare is controlled via state programs. I've had an Az. DL until Nov. 2011, when I got a Nv. license because we were at the RV park learning full-time RVing in Pahrump. So that should be great info for a background checker. You probably want to check both states' records. I'll have a big laugh about it when you do.

Funny thing. I saw it and say so and I am lying. Someone else saw it and says so and you say "you believe he saw it" but it must have been a mistake. These things contradicted each other Rob. You know it was there, because you know it was true. Why it isn't any longer, that I have no idea about or how it works. But I'll bet you do Rob.

Don't be a chicken kew. Look it up on a half dozen sites and produce the evidence. Send it to me and I'll post it myself. Better yet....you claim to play by the math. Look up the poverty income level required to get welfare, post that, then for just $500 of your money up front I will prove our social security alone (either one of us actually) would disqualify us from any of that nonsense. And that doesn't even count our pensions, which in total is slightly more than our ss income. C'mon Kew Schiff--let's see EVIDENCE!

Oh that's right, I'm a photoshop expert....

[kewlJ]

I see kew as the Adam Schiff of this forum. He says he's seen evidence, yet he can't produce it or even explain anything about it. Both are serial liars.

Seems to me, there has to be at least ONE background check report out there that has info on this kew-assertion if in fact it is real. Why is he content to just keep lying about it when he could/should search multiple sites to provide some evidence. Answer: he's a twit. Same as Schiff.

I just did a quick review and any kind of welfare is controlled via state programs. I've had an Az. DL until Nov. 2011, when I got a Nv. license because we were at the RV park learning full-time RVing in Pahrump. So that should be great info for a background checker. You probably want to check both states' records. I'll have a big laugh about it when you do.

Funny thing. I saw it and say so and I am lying. Someone else saw it and says so and you say "you believe he saw it" but it must have been a mistake. These things contradicted each other Rob. You know it was there, because you know it was true. Why it isn't any longer, that I have no idea about or how it works. But I'll bet you do Rob.

Don't be a chicken kew. Look it up on a half dozen sites and produce the evidence. Send it to me and I'll post it myself. Better yet....you claim to play by the math. Look up the poverty income level required to get welfare, post that, then for just $500 of your money up front I will prove our social security alone (either one of us actually) would disqualify us from any of that nonsense. And that doesn't even count our pensions, which in total is slightly more than our ss income. C'mon Kew Schiff--let's see EVIDENCE!

Oh that's right, I'm a photoshop expert....

I don't believe you are going to try to play stupid with this. You are saying the foodstamp charge couldn't have been on there because you wouldn't have qualified for foodstamps. That is exactly what the charge is. That is what fraud is! Exactly the reason you were kicked off and penalized.

Funny, you think you are the smartest guy on the forum, except when you play dumb. You are just not fooling anyone Rob.

And btw, the person that thinks and claims he is the smartest person in the room, never is. He is almost always closer to the other end.

[Rob.Singer]

Too many of those little faces kew. That means, as usual, you're unsure of yourself and worry about how dumb you look. A rare combination of incapable, incompetent, and insecure.... Kew Schiff!

[mcap]

Honestly scrolling from bottom up I thought Tasha was back after seeing that many emoji faces is such a short span.