Alan Mendelson Going For The Jugular

[redietz]

trying to make a case from whatever random details you can gather together

Random details?

You can't martian your way out of this, eddie's post was #468 & yours was #469, so the context is crystal clear.

I never said anything bad about Rob's wife

So what?...you called his daughter a whore.

Oh, I'm sorry, coach. You may have forgotten to post that part. Where is it? Help me out here, buddy. C'mon, man, you're detail-oriented.

[mickeycrimm]

I recall that incident, and I went back and took a look at the thread.

I think you're being too hard on Alan, he mostly supported you regarding the Wynn hit...

The $25 symbol is obviously an edit.

I had someone look at the photo who said the photo was NOT altered. It is legit.

The rest of the photo -- and I have the original, unaltered photo sent to me -- also looks legitimate.

Anyway, reading through the thread, I found an interesting exchange.

This should put an end to Mr redietz's endless crocodile tears shed over Rob's comments about his late wife.

This is when the gloves came off...apologies are in order...

we're staying nearby Lake Tahoe, we flew a back-and-forth to LV to visit our daughter who was on business there

"Visit" your daughter huh? Haven't you harmed her enough already? Oh no...don't tell me your years of emotional and sexual abuse drove her into a life of prostitution in Las Vegas...you are pure evil.

She probably works a double -- day shift in The Den of Pure Envy and nights at The Green Door.

This is why I have said that when it comes to trolling on this site KJ and redietz have been just as bad if not worse than Rob. And yes, I've been a bat out of hell troll on this site to. But Rob and I have both admitted our trolling ways. KJ and redietz are still in denial.

[Rob.Singer]

Hopefully, AndrewG is reading this and will go join Wizard of Vegas Forum to help his new found friend, Alan Mendelson, in this situation. LOL!!!

Ok, so I have a question about "AndrewG" that I have been wondering about for a couple weeks. Andrew seemed to be on top of the information about the Nevada unemployment situation, in a way that only someone who had filed and was attempting to get benefits would. Andrew told us he looked into it because his neighbors, laid off casino workers were effected.

So what I am wondering and couldn't ask because I wouldn't have gotten a straight answer....is Alan eligible for unemployment benefits? I mean not under the special rules applying to professional gamblers, but is he officially self employed? or still working or anything like that that anyone knows of?

He still did business part time. Not sure what % of his time though. Most of his texts to me were either jackpot pics (which I all believed without claiming photoshopping) or to post his opinions for him here.

[kewlJ]

So don't give us the "why should I". because I have an answer for that.

There's no point is asking questions here, we've been on that dizzying carousel for too long.

Best to send your questions/answers/strategies, etc directly to Shack to help him prepare for his inquisition.

Use Alan as your intermediary if Shack won't take your calls.

Imagine that...you and Alan on the same team.

First, I don't even know how, nor want to contact Alan. Nor do I want to be a part of said inquisition. I can already guess how it will end. Mike will find it inconclusive and probably leave it open based on introduction of new evidence....which will never come.

But since you have your "reasonable" shoes on today, posting more reasonable than usual, let me ask you. Do you not find it odd that Rob rushed to destroy any and all evidence that might have supported this claim, a claim so very unusual, it would be one of the most talked things about in the gambling community? I mean Rob has been making claims for decades that no one believed. Is it really believable that he didn't know he would be asked to provide something?

[mickeycrimm]

I recall that incident, and I went back and took a look at the thread.

I think you're being too hard on Alan, he mostly supported you regarding the Wynn hit...

I had someone look at the photo who said the photo was NOT altered. It is legit.

The rest of the photo -- and I have the original, unaltered photo sent to me -- also looks legitimate.

Anyway, reading through the thread, I found an interesting exchange.

This should put an end to Mr redietz's endless crocodile tears shed over Rob's comments about his late wife.

This is when the gloves came off...apologies are in order...

we're staying nearby Lake Tahoe, we flew a back-and-forth to LV to visit our daughter who was on business there

"Visit" your daughter huh? Haven't you harmed her enough already? Oh no...don't tell me your years of emotional and sexual abuse drove her into a life of prostitution in Las Vegas...you are pure evil.

She probably works a double -- day shift in The Den of Pure Envy and nights at The Green Door.

You realize, of course, that "The Den of Pure Envy" is a "Singer" phrase he had been employing at that time to characterize others, so I lifted it sarcastically?

Now, coach, with all of your gotchas, surely you knew that.

No, you didn't realize that? I accept your apology.

You know, you really should provide some context when you do all of this research. Otherwise some of the fine research is wasted.

And, in case anyone doesn't know it, The Green Door is not a brothel. It's a swinger's club location off Sahara.

So "The Den of Pure Envy" is where "Singer" had been saying various posters lived. And The Green Door" is a swinger's club off Sahara, which I have proudly toured. They do give tours, you know.

None of your facts here, redietz, takes away from the fact that you attacked Rob's daughter. But you get offended if anyone attacks yours. Troll on, dude.

[kewlJ]

None of your facts here, redietz, takes away from the fact that you attacked Rob's daughter. But you get offended if anyone attacks yours. Troll on, dude.

He said "probably"

That is a joke. I don't know when that conversation took place, probably before my time here, but Redietz comments were out of line. But I mean come on, 1 attack in poor taste doesn't equal hundreds or more.

[mickeycrimm]

In the spirit of RE-OPENING AMERICA, I've decided to accept wiz's offer. Not sure yet if he wants to do it in writing or in person as one of his audios or videos.

There will never be a higher rated interview.

I'd even move our road departure date out a little to accomodate whatever wizard requests. We're retired. Retired people do what they want.

Good for you Rob. I was just about to write that I think you should do it. You do realize he is going to ask for documentation or anything that can back up your claim(s). Do you have anything at all, that could be considered supporting documentation or supporting evidence?

Were I waiting out the statute of limitations there is no way I would keep any kind of documentation around me that could be used against me in a court of law.

[coach belly]

But since you have your "reasonable" shoes on today, posting more reasonable than usual, let me ask you.

Forward your questions to WOV, use Axel if Alan doesn't work for you.

I try to dispose of useless items promptly.

But I don't have any earthshaking claims, and I don't like clutter.

Try phrasing your questions without prefacing with back-handed compliments, it's insincere.

[mickeycrimm]

Alan asked me that too. I asked him what would exist as proof? He came back with the usual tax returns answer. I don't keep them and why should I? The law states 3 years and maybe 7 depending on other circumstances. I tossed each year's once it hit an age of 7.

I know Axel made a comment, I believe in the Rob Singer Redux thread at WoV, where Wizard first agreed to look into your claim. Axel said something like "He (meaning Singer) ought to be able to provide some sort of proof".

What about documentation from casinos? Look Rob, I am not trying to have a gottch ya moment here, but your answer really doesn't cut it. While the government doesn't require you to keep tax returns, you also are not required to throw them out. So don't give us the "why should I". because I have an answer for that.

You should have kept documentation for this claim, because if your story is how you say, you knew you were going to publicize this claim once the statute of limitations expired. And having been making claims for years, and decades that few believe, you knew it would come up. So you should have kept whatever necessary to prove your claim. Not doing so, just makes no sense, and really weakens your claim, when you could have proven it.

I've already said there is no way, if I were waiting out the statute of limitations, I would keep any kind of ducumentation that could be used against me.

[mickeycrimm]

Twice I asked Alan if he believed Rob's 4 year claim. He avoided answering.

After Alan's meeting with Rob? Did you ask him publicly on this forum? I ask, because that could show what Alan's real intent with all this is (which I think most of us know).

Go back and read the first 5 posts in this thread. It was in private messaging on twitter. Christ, KJ.

[Rob.Singer]

Alan asked me that too. I asked him what would exist as proof? He came back with the usual tax returns answer. I don't keep them and why should I? The law states 3 years and maybe 7 depending on other circumstances. I tossed each year's once it hit an age of 7.

I know Axel made a comment, I believe in the Rob Singer Redux thread at WoV, where Wizard first agreed to look into your claim. Axel said something like "He (meaning Singer) ought to be able to provide some sort of proof".

What about documentation from casinos? Look Rob, I am not trying to have a gottch ya moment here, but your answer really doesn't cut it. While the government doesn't require you to keep tax returns, you also are not required to throw them out. So don't give us the "why should I". because I have an answer for that.

You should have kept documentation for this claim, because if your story is how you say, you knew you were going to publicize this claim once the statute of limitations expired. And having been making claims for years, and decades that few believe, you knew it would come up. So you should have kept whatever necessary to prove your claim. Not doing so, just makes no sense, and really weakens your claim, when you could have proven it.

I've already said there is no way, if I were waiting out the statute of limitations, I would keep any kind of ducumentation that could be used against me.

You would expect that would be obvious but maybe to some it's not. The IRS doesn't keep it either.

[coach belly]

He said "probably" That is a joke.

That's not for you to say.

Wives are a social construct, children are blood...big difference, to us fathers anyway.

[mickeycrimm]

So don't give us the "why should I". because I have an answer for that.

There's no point is asking questions here, we've been on that dizzying carousel for too long.

Best to send your questions/answers/strategies, etc directly to Shack to help him prepare for his inquisition.

Use Alan as your intermediary if Shack won't take your calls.

Imagine that...you and Alan on the same team.

First, I don't even know how, nor want to contact Alan. Nor do I want to be a part of said inquisition. I can already guess how it will end. Mike will find it inconclusive and probably leave it open based on introduction of new evidence....which will never come.

But since you have your "reasonable" shoes on today, posting more reasonable than usual, let me ask you. Do you not find it odd that Rob rushed to destroy any and all evidence that might have supported this claim, a claim so very unusual, it would be one of the most talked things about in the gambling community? I mean Rob has been making claims for decades that no one believed. Is it really believable that he didn't know he would be asked to provide something?

You can go to Alan's website, Alanbestbuys and email him from there.

[mickeycrimm]

None of your facts here, redietz, takes away from the fact that you attacked Rob's daughter. But you get offended if anyone attacks yours. Troll on, dude.

He said "probably"

That is a joke. I don't know when that conversation took place, probably before my time here, but Redietz comments were out of line. But I mean come on, 1 attack in poor taste doesn't equal hundreds or more.

Excuses. Excuses.

[Deech]

Alan "Platinum Sombrero" Mendelson. Five strikeouts in one lifetime. The 1959 Peugeot is doing a drive by.

[kewlJ]

You can go to Alan's website, Alanbestbuys and email him from there.

What is going on here? I have no desire to influence Mike's investigation. I hope it all comes out well and we get to the bottom of these claims, something I have tried to do for a long time.

Hey look, if I wanted to sabotage the whole thing, all I would have to do is some how contact Mike and say I think him looking into this is a good thing. That would put an immediate end to it as he would immediately call it off.

[kewlJ]

Has Alan really been married 5 times? If so that IS incredible in a weird way.

[coach belly]

Alan "Platinum Sombrero" Mendelson. Five strikeouts in one lifetime. The 1959 Peugeot is doing a drive by.

Some of us have had intimate relationships with more than one woman...not just sexually intimate, but loving commitments without marriage.

Most don't consider their lost loves as strike-outs...it's quite the opposite in my experience.

[mickeycrimm]

KJ and redietz have both had barrels of fun trolling in this thread. And redietz has been having some fun trolling Rob in the Singer thread at WoV. But I have to take Mr. Dietz to task for some of the things he wrote in that thread. I'll use quotes for his remarks.

"Singer had glommed on to Alan to ramp up his notoriety."

This is red's opinion but he writes it like it is fact. It is just pure speculation on redietz's part.

"Singer decided to go with the double up bug story, which makes halfway sense in explaining some things. If he was involved in that he did not "discover it." He would have been an errand boy, a kind of video poker equivalent of a "runner" in sportsbetting terminology."

This is where redietz really goes off the deep end. I can understand having a runner in sportbetting where the professional is running high volume with not so big an edge and can afford to pay runners. But the double up bug is a play where if you got $100 in your pocket you are good to go. Sure there have been machine pros that have hired people. I have even been asked to go to work for them. I always turned that shit down because there were always low wager/low risk plays available to make money. And on this double up play were I offered a job when I got only $200 in my pocket my answer would have been:

"This play only takes a hundred dollar bill and you are good to go. WTF would I work for you. GTFO!" You have to give Rob some credit somewhere. He's to smart to accept being a runner on a play that just don't take any money to start it.

How would redietz know whether Rob discovered the play or not. Did he have any evidence to draw that conclusion? NO!!! But as we all know redietz likes to frame his opinions as facts.

[coach belly]

Has Alan really been married 5 times? If so that IS incredible in a weird way.

It's not that incredible or weird, it's just different.

Alan is/was in show business...maybe you didn't know...show people are different.

Have you ever been married to a woman? Or had a serious girlfriend?