Originally Posted by
AxelWolf
Rob, I Tried quoting you but I think I timed out because I got a phone call.
You can probably figure out what post I was quoting, I'm too lazy to go look it up at this point.
You describe how it worked on all the various different types of machines. The one you mostly describe was the one that said "don't ask me again"
What If it's proven that it wasn't even possible on anything but one chipset/type of machine what would you say to that? Again, if it's only available on one chipset if I would have to come to the conclusion but you're not telling the truth. There's no reason to talk about the other double up's on machines that it doesn't pertain to. And again, if it was available on those other machines/ chipsets that you described, I would have to say that greatly adds credibility to your story.
Whatever the case, I voiced my Strong opinion and said it was a terrible idea for Mike do this interview, especially without more investigation on his part and not knowing exactly how it works. How could he possibly challenge you on anything? He didn't even bring up the whole Alan Mendelson thing. The only thing that this accomplished as far as the double up bug goes was start more debate after the interview(just kind of f***** up anyways, since you can't even post on that forum.) I don't like that, because everything is now tainted. Going forward you now you have the ability to think about everything and come up with an answer from behind the computer. Truthful or not, I don't like that because it always leaves room for people to believe you had time to think about your answer and concoct something or do further research before you answer. The interview went nowhere and it was thoroughly disappointing on most aspects, but a few. Mike brought up a few things that he needed to push more and challenge your answers.
The one thing I did find very interesting is the fact that you admitted that had you kept playing your VP betting system, you probably would have lost. I think that's the most substantial thing we got out of the interview. You should certainly feel bad if anybody did lose money trying to use your system and if they can prove that, you should repay them their money. I don't know how one could prove that. I'm wondering if someone could successfully sue you over that? How many people did purchase your books?
If we find out the double up bug feature was only available on one Chip set I would have to conclude that you're not telling the truth. Someone I know that works in the industry, they said to their knowledge it was only available on one chipset. Whenever someone says "to their knowledge" it ends up leaving doubt. However, someone knows the answer to this. I'm sure there are plenty of people that have those machines at their house that were purchased prior to the update. There's someone on Wizard of Vegas that claims to have one of these machines. I asked him to send me a video of the double which process. I can't remember exactly what he said I just know it was a let-down that seems like it was more interested I'm trying to hit a royal * shrug shoulders.
Hey, how come we never got a goddamn tour of that RV?
I certainly hope that isn't your computer room, it looks thoroughly depressing.
I'm a bit annoyed that at the how this was all fast tracked without any real perpetration.
axel, just come out and say it--you're going to keep on trying to find something until you even in the slightest think you have, which you will then be able to proclaim "he's been lying!" It's the same thing kew does with his obsession over my personal life.
Someone "in the business" is hardly qualified to have been tuned into all the numerous software updates to new and old equipment alike, unless they have the internal spec sheets and memos to support the assertion. Nobody, even folks like your friend, knows the things I know about this play, which is why mickey, when skeptical, put out a reward to anybody who told me anything about how this play works.
Further, the two low limit machines I found that were still infected at Az. Indian casinos 3-1/2 years ago both had the double up button at the bottom along with the "don't ask again" question. So that would be my response.
It sounds like you don't want a follow-up interview? Either way is fine. I'll do it because I said I would, but if you don't see the point in it then that's OK too.
Edit: my family just informed me that since I finished what I had to do, I'm to get the rig ready for a departure date tomorrow. That'll give several of you plenty of time to make more things up about me for at least 3 weeks until we get up around Tahoe. And I may not even bother visiting back at that time. I had my say. Believe it....or not.
Axel, let me know via pm if and when you'd like the next interview to occur. Bring your guy who's in the business. I assume he's a tech? We'll talk software, hardware, etc.
Reply With Quote
