Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Tweet about losing money on bonus game (Magic of the Nile)

  1. #1
    Video of game can be found here:

    Tweet can be found here: https://mobile.twitter.com/APkid7/st...12159987793921

    Really dumb scavenger (this is my opinion based on reading his consistent stupid tweets but tableplay still remains dumbest scavenger in my book) WHINES the following:

    “$6.00 per spin. Started with 5 out of 9. Full of Dead spins. Consistent Poor results with features. $24.80 Expanding reels feature. How low can this one casino have it set? Only one casino, too many losses to be variance?”

    When the game came out I clocked one machine at a specific casino and the the milestone came out on average 1 in about the 11 spins with the longest dead zone at 41 spins [1]. The average prize was $9.75 for $0.75 wager REGARDLESS of which bonus was awarded. Keep in mind you can get one to three milestones per the special symbol.

    This guy APkid7 doesn’t have benchmarks to test when the game changed. So how would he know if his poor results were due to variance or a game change. The main point here is the lack of benchmarks.

    It’s an old game and I stated many times before, you want to be the first one to pull the ripcord when the bonus slot gets nerfed.

    [1] in inferential statistics, you have to collect enough data points to allow the law of large numbers to kick in. Most people study descriptive statistics so they are not familiar with inferential statistical techniques or how working with small sample sizes.

    Here’s the Logit model
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logistic_regression

    Moral: Many people know how to test whether or not the game changed based on few data points. Btw, it is no secret that Mickey (I make shit up) Crimm is not one of these people.

  2. #2
    Originally Posted by Ex-AP View Post
    Video of game can be found here:

    Tweet can be found here: https://mobile.twitter.com/APkid7/st...12159987793921

    Really dumb scavenger (this is my opinion based on reading his consistent stupid tweets but tableplay still remains dumbest scavenger in my book) WHINES the following:

    “$6.00 per spin. Started with 5 out of 9. Full of Dead spins. Consistent Poor results with features. $24.80 Expanding reels feature. How low can this one casino have it set? Only one casino, too many losses to be variance?”

    When the game came out I clocked one machine at a specific casino and the the milestone came out on average 1 in about the 11 spins with the longest dead zone at 41 spins [1]. The average prize was $9.75 for $0.75 wager REGARDLESS of which bonus was awarded. Keep in mind you can get one to three milestones per the special symbol.

    This guy APkid7 doesn’t have benchmarks to test when the game changed. So how would he know if his poor results were due to variance or a game change. The main point here is the lack of benchmarks.

    It’s an old game and I stated many times before, you want to be the first one to pull the ripcord when the bonus slot gets nerfed.

    [1] in inferential statistics, you have to collect enough data points to allow the law of large numbers to kick in. Most people study descriptive statistics so they are not familiar with inferential statistical techniques or how working with small sample sizes.

    Here’s the Logit model
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logistic_regression

    Moral: Many people know how to test whether or not the game changed based on few data points. Btw, it is no secret that Mickey (I make shit up) Crimm is not one of these people.
    A tard like yourself didn't even know that machine UTH deals a separate deck for each player, and calls it highjacking a thread when someone (JBJB in this case) points it out. I mean, holy fuck, you based the entire premise of your garbage thread on the assumption (shows how much you play the games you pontificate about) that a single deck is used as is done in the live game. On Big 5 Safari, you left out the fact, that, even if you know the frequency of a total "blackout" (all cells have the same animal) as you describe it, you would still need to know the average cycle that a total "blackout" awards the progressive for that animal since it will not do so every time there is a total "blackout".
    Mickey's forgotten more about slot hustling than you'll ever know dumbfuck. As usual, go fuck yourself windbag.
    Last edited by tableplay; 07-19-2020 at 02:42 AM.

  3. #3
    Originally Posted by Ex-AP View Post
    Video of game can be found here:

    Tweet can be found here: https://mobile.twitter.com/APkid7/st...12159987793921

    Really dumb scavenger (this is my opinion based on reading his consistent stupid tweets but tableplay still remains dumbest scavenger in my book) WHINES the following:

    “$6.00 per spin. Started with 5 out of 9. Full of Dead spins. Consistent Poor results with features. $24.80 Expanding reels feature. How low can this one casino have it set? Only one casino, too many losses to be variance?”

    When the game came out I clocked one machine at a specific casino and the the milestone came out on average 1 in about the 11 spins with the longest dead zone at 41 spins [1]. The average prize was $9.75 for $0.75 wager REGARDLESS of which bonus was awarded. Keep in mind you can get one to three milestones per the special symbol.

    This guy APkid7 doesn’t have benchmarks to test when the game changed. So how would he know if his poor results were due to variance or a game change. The main point here is the lack of benchmarks.

    It’s an old game and I stated many times before, you want to be the first one to pull the ripcord when the bonus slot gets nerfed.

    [1] in inferential statistics, you have to collect enough data points to allow the law of large numbers to kick in. Most people study descriptive statistics so they are not familiar with inferential statistical techniques or how working with small sample sizes.

    Here’s the Logit model
    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logistic_regression

    Moral: Many people know how to test whether or not the game changed based on few data points. Btw, it is no secret that Mickey (I make shit up) Crimm is not one of these people.
    I spend more on breakfast than you make in a week. And I made it all off machines. Since you simply want to be a punk bitch you will now be treated like one. You have to scout plays for others because you don't have the bankroll to spin them off. In other words, you're a bottomfeeding piece of shit. Now get out there and hustle those abandoned credits like you are used to doing.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  4. #4
    https://mobile.twitter.com/APkid7/st...84467160809472

    Guy wrote: “ One casino takes your money quickly even when you start with 5 of 9 the other casino 4 of 9 is usually good for a profit”

    The best play is 6 of 9 milestones completed because this way you have two shots.

    4 of 9 is misleading. Due to competition, it is 4 of 9 in many casinos I frequent but it’s 2 sets of 2 milestones vs 1 milestone, 1 milestone and 2 milestones.

  5. #5
    Originally Posted by tableplay View Post

    A tard like yourself didn't even know that machine UTH deals a separate deck for each player, and calls it highjacking a thread when someone (JBJB in this case) points it out. I mean, holy fuck, you based the entire premise of your garbage thread on the assumption (shows how much you play the games you pontificate about) that a single deck is used as is done in the live game. On Big 5 Safari, you left out the fact, that, even if you know the frequency of a total "blackout" (all cells have the same animal) as you describe it, you would still need to know the average cycle that a total "blackout" awards the progressive for that animal since it will not do so every time there is a total "blackout".
    Mickey's forgotten more about slot hustling than you'll ever know dumbfuck. As usual, go fuck yourself windbag.
    Idiot = dumb person

    Village Idiot like tableplay is dumbest person in village.

    I was describing a video UTHE that uses one deck and did not want jbjb to confuse readers with another Shufflemaster version that deals from different decks. This is another example of tableplay being a village idiot ... image Shufflemaster made different version of its games.

    And tableplay is TOO STUPID to know blackouts may use WILD symbols. So no, all CELLS DO NOT HAVE THE SAME ANIMAL ... as the definition supplied clearly states same symbol AND wild symbol.

    I don’t recall I described the entire process to map out B5S; I recalled I gave an example of mapping the game.

    Once again, tableplay proves she is the village idiot of VCT.

    Hey tableplay, how’s your transgender surgery coming along.

  6. #6
    Originally Posted by Ex-AP View Post
    Originally Posted by tableplay View Post

    A tard like yourself didn't even know that machine UTH deals a separate deck for each player, and calls it highjacking a thread when someone (JBJB in this case) points it out. I mean, holy fuck, you based the entire premise of your garbage thread on the assumption (shows how much you play the games you pontificate about) that a single deck is used as is done in the live game. On Big 5 Safari, you left out the fact, that, even if you know the frequency of a total "blackout" (all cells have the same animal) as you describe it, you would still need to know the average cycle that a total "blackout" awards the progressive for that animal since it will not do so every time there is a total "blackout".
    Mickey's forgotten more about slot hustling than you'll ever know dumbfuck. As usual, go fuck yourself windbag.
    Idiot = dumb person

    Village Idiot like tableplay is dumbest person in village.

    I was describing a video UTHE that uses one deck and did not want jbjb to confuse readers with another Shufflemaster version that deals from different decks. This is another example of tableplay being a village idiot ... image Shufflemaster made different version of its games.

    And tableplay is TOO STUPID to know blackouts may use WILD symbols. So no, all CELLS DO NOT HAVE THE SAME ANIMAL ... as the definition supplied clearly states same symbol AND wild symbol.

    I don’t recall I described the entire process to map out B5S; I recalled I gave an example of mapping the game.

    Once again, tableplay proves she is the village idiot of VCT.

    Hey tableplay, how’s your transgender surgery coming along.
    Sure you were cunt. You were caught red-handed with regard to the Shufflemaster. Proof was provided for one that uses a separate deck for each player. Prove there is one that doesn't. Never had transgender surgery cunt-troll, never will cunt-troll.
    Looks like the same animal to me cunt:
    Name:  allsame_animal.jpg
Views: 308
Size:  10.5 KB
    Name:  allsame_animal2.jpg
Views: 249
Size:  431.2 KB
    Last edited by tableplay; 07-20-2020 at 06:53 PM.

  7. #7
    Originally Posted by Ex-AP View Post
    Originally Posted by tableplay View Post

    A tard like yourself didn't even know that machine UTH deals a separate deck for each player, and calls it highjacking a thread when someone (JBJB in this case) points it out. I mean, holy fuck, you based the entire premise of your garbage thread on the assumption (shows how much you play the games you pontificate about) that a single deck is used as is done in the live game. On Big 5 Safari, you left out the fact, that, even if you know the frequency of a total "blackout" (all cells have the same animal) as you describe it, you would still need to know the average cycle that a total "blackout" awards the progressive for that animal since it will not do so every time there is a total "blackout".
    Mickey's forgotten more about slot hustling than you'll ever know dumbfuck. As usual, go fuck yourself windbag.
    Idiot = dumb person

    Village Idiot like tableplay is dumbest person in village.

    I was describing a video UTHE that uses one deck and did not want jbjb to confuse readers with another Shufflemaster version that deals from different decks. This is another example of tableplay being a village idiot ... image Shufflemaster made different version of its games.

    And tableplay is TOO STUPID to know blackouts may use WILD symbols. So no, all CELLS DO NOT HAVE THE SAME ANIMAL ... as the definition supplied clearly states same symbol AND wild symbol.

    I don’t recall I described the entire process to map out B5S; I recalled I gave an example of mapping the game.

    Once again, tableplay proves she is the village idiot of VCT.

    Hey tableplay, how’s your transgender surgery coming along.
    Ex-Ap, you got caught, idiot. Man up and admit it.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Tweet about high variance bonus slot
    By Ex-AP in forum Whatever's On Your Mind
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-13-2020, 06:41 AM
  2. Tweet on FarmVille — Did the game change?
    By Ex-AP in forum Whatever's On Your Mind
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-11-2020, 08:50 PM
  3. Tweet about Bonus Slot Prospecting
    By Ex-AP in forum Whatever's On Your Mind
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 06-09-2020, 04:37 PM
  4. IGT’s Hexbreaker 3 ... nice bonus game.
    By Ex-AP in forum Whatever's On Your Mind
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 03-14-2020, 01:08 AM
  5. Tweet about a $200 MH and lost money
    By Ex-AP in forum Whatever's On Your Mind
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 02-10-2020, 05:27 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •