Originally Posted by
arcimede$
Alan, I got a good laugh out of your libel comment. Let's see, I can show where Singer's special plays fail to do what he claims, I can show that his claims that the pay tables are not important is pure nonsense, I can show that his system is worthless, I can show that he claims to teach people to play a mathematically inferior method of play even after he has been told it provides no advantage many, many times. Finally, I can show that he has lied continually in order to get people to try his system. Then, I can get dozens of math savvy folks to support what I am saying.
What can he do? I'd love to see him in a court trying to claim his method is common sense or some other nut-job claim. He would look like the dufus he really is. He would look like a complete fool, not that he doesn't do that on a regular basis.
Alan, you are an accessory. Why you would choose to be an accessory to an obvious con man is beyond me?