Guinea pigs are a “staple food” in Peru. Fucking savages.
# dropping knowledge
Guinea pigs are a “staple food” in Peru. Fucking savages.
# dropping knowledge
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Alan's gambling opinions here were far more dangerous than Singer's. I pointed this out a long time ago. Long before any truce. Alan was a B-celebrity pushing irrational gambling logic. He had a far bigger audience than Singer. Alan's gambling analysis' were totally outrageous.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Saying his retirement date is not proof....is not proof he lied.
Saying that identifying machines is not proof...does not prove he didn't put down the play.
Saying that providing details does not prove anything....also doesn't disprove anything.
With time being what it is I put the probability that Rob's retirement date was just coincidence somewhere between slim and none. But you can always say it's possible....just like 18 yo's in a row is possible.
There is another piece of evidence I forgot to include. Rob told us the published sequence was wrong. KJochio, looking for evidence to shoot down Rob's story, contacted the author of the article and asked him about the sequence. The author told him he intentionally used a wrong sequence.
How could Rob have possibly known the published sequence was wrong if he had never worked the play? Of course, KJochio's assertion was some phantom person taught the sequence to Rob after the fact. Here's the problem with that assertion. Where did KJochio get that idea? HE FABRICATED IT to back his narrative.
Rob is a huge target in the gambling world. Why have these phantom people never come forward to tell us Rob is a fraud? I'll tell you why. PHANTOM'S ARE TOTALLY LACKING IN COMMUNICATION SKILLS. THEY CAN'T SEE, HEAR OR SPEAK.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Papua New Guinea is the world's 2nd largest island. It's located of the northern coast of Australia.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Good evening, everyone.
I'm basically just appearing to back up MC's statement about the published sequence being wrong. Please note that I am not currently offering an opinion about whether or not Rob Singer did the DUB and have almost zero interest in the subject of whether or not he did it. I WOULD be interested in interviewing him if he could prove (to my satisfaction) that he did it, but I don't think he would care to participate in such an interview anyway.
Anyway, I've spoken to one of the individuals KNOWN to have done the DUB and can confirm that he believes something is inaccurate with the step-by-step in the WIRED article. I'm hoping to conduct a full-length interview with this individual one day, but he's not sure whether or not he can actually do it for reasons that I will not disclose here. The only thing that I can add is that this individual did not specifically say that the mistake (in the article) was intentional, but that doesn't mean it wasn't.
Mission, I would suggest you contact the author of the article if you haven't already. He will confirm that they knew the sequence published was not accurate and that it was intentionally so. Doesn't take much to guess why.
The fact that Singer knew the sequence was wrong is not as definitive as some people think as many people seemed to have this knowledge. There are many ways and people one could learn that from....AFTER THE FACT.
I don't disbelieve you, so I have no need to contact that author. The individual that I spoke to (who definitely participated in the DUB) might just not remember that the article had the mistake intentionally...he recalls that there IS an inaccuracy, so that's what is relevant. After all, the WIRED article was published in 2014, so that's a pretty specific thing whether the inaccuracy is intentional or not.
Not to hijack the thread, but I wonder how difficult it would be for a really, really sharp coder to get hired on by a slot machine company like IGT and install a secret program that only he or someone who knows about it can take advantage of?
Sort of like Ronald Dale Harris, except instead of working for the Nevada Gaming Commission he'd work for the mfr.:see -- https://www.gamblingsites.com/info/f...s-reid-mcneal/
I wonder what IGT and other mfr's do to prevent employees from doing such a thing?
I mean, you can't watch a guy ALL the time...
What, Me Worry?
Oh boy, Christmas comes early. Assume the position Mission “graced” us with his presence.
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)