Since Singer is on record saying he lost from 1994 to 2000 and also on record saying he won 90K in 2000 maybe he could clarify this for us. There had to have been a point when he started using the progressive system. Exactly when was it? Was it early in 2000 or late in 2000? But, clearly, the year 2000 could not have been both a losing year and a winning year for him. Only Singer can explain.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"
See this post right here, exemplifies your problem mickey. I am absolutely thrilled that you live in a state that has more cows than people, so you were able to get your socialized vaccine earlier than some of the rest of us. I really am. I was worried that you might be a little pig-headed about it and am glad you weren't.
Ever since you "surrendered" to Rob you have been trying to pick a fight with me and others. I don't read other forums that you are on, but it sounds like that is all you do. I guess you need and want that negative attention. But with me, you are trying to fight with a guy that isn't fighting you back. I have no need to. You are an AP that I respect his AP abilities that seems to enjoy being a jerk online. That is your call.
So good for you for getting your socialized vaccine and being back making money. I am happy for you. A little jealous, but happy.
Accountinquestion wrote:
"Being a blatant and repeated liar does not make one an "underdog" in any world I have been in.
Nap it out for the rest of us. Please."
When Rob S told the story about the double-up bug almost everyone did not believe him and called him as you say a
blatant liar without proof frankly even right up to today no one has proven him a liar on that issue. The story about the Newel ownership wasn't even told yet. When everyone is against you I consider it an underdog position. I am not supporting him but will admit I was hoping that he in fact figured out the glitch. After the way Rob was treated with the double-up bug story, I think he then gave the mob what they really wanted, and asked for, a lie with the Newel story, and guess what he won people went bonkers while he sat back and laughed at them.
Last edited by BoSox; 03-04-2021 at 10:29 PM.
At this point, Rob can't prove he played it, and no one can prove he didn't. There are a few things one could do to find out what is significantly more likely. I had some interest but it would have taken some effort. Mike's premature interview kind of spoiled it as far as I was concerned. His interview really didn't get to the bottom of anything. I begged Mike to wait, but he went forward with it unprepared. I don't think Mike cared to prove or disprove it, he was just doing it to get Rob side of the story and let people make their own judgment. If any concrete evidence comes out that it wasn't true, Rob can always just claim it was all part of some big troll. So here we are.
BoSox, why do you think the "mob" as you called us didn't believe Rob's double up bug? Do you think the fact that he has lied about all these other claims, half of which I can't even remember and changed stories and timelines for 2 decades had anything to do with people's first reaction to not believe him? Hell I can even find posts where Rob first stated he bought a Newell for 900k. Then it was 1.1 million, 1.5 million and finally 1.6 million. Almost every single thing he said and claimed, some of them pretty minor, turns out to be not true or the truth severely stretched. That is what credibility is. You lie and lie and lie and expect people to believe your next fantastic claim?
Bosox let me ask you this...did you read what Rob wrote back, I don't even know what year it was, but when the Kane/Nester story broke and was being discussed right on this very forum? Rob wrote what they did was illegal and they should go to jail. He now says that was to deflect people. Who? who on this forum was thinking Rob could have possibly stumbled onto that play that he needed to "deflect'? Absurd.
If he really had been involved with that play, when the Kane/Nestor story broke and was being talked about here, Rob would have said nothing....not a word.
I mean just imagine if Rob's claim was true....it isn't so that is a lot of imagining, but try hard to imagine it was. They were busted in 2009. The story didn't really break until the Wired articled a couple years later as they were going through the legal process. A year or two later is still well within the statute of limitations that Rob told us he was so worried about. So he makes his comments here and is arrested afterwards. He will have admitted that he knew it was a crime and thinks he should have gone to jail.
But the fact is Rob made that up after the story broke. And he had to change his primary long running claim, of 10 years playing the Singer progression to accommodate this new claim. I mean come on there has to be a point that a guy who keeps lying, making up nearly impossible claim, after nearly impossible claim has zero credibility. Rob was way past that point.
I disagree.
It was because of THAT interview that Rob himself tied the double up bug to the Newell. He did that. No one put that on him. He did that which made it fair for people to look into the Newell. And Rob became so desperate he did that stunt at the RV dealership, the phony bill of sales, and the phony ad and sale, which for anybody being even a little objective proved the RV and subsequently the double up was a hoax.
And what I posted today, the timeline that again Rob himself said, proves that he was a losing player for the 6 years prior to the time he wrote the book claiming to be a "winning professional player".
So that interview really exposed 2 of Rob's biggest claims in the last 20 years as made up. And in both cases it was he himself that exposed himself (no comments please BoSox). How does the saying go? Given enough rope a liar will always hang himself. I don't think it was any great skill on Wizard's part, but he did provide the rope and Rob hung himself......twice it turns out.
Hey Axel, I see you chimed in recently. Could you give your opinion on your COWARD friend posting misleading phony details about a member from this site?
You always seemed to be the fair level headed type.
Are you talking about MaxPen and him having some damning information about Rob singer? "misleading phony details about a member from this site?" Perhaps I missed something, because, from what I understand is that Max said he was going to post something at some point but has yet to do so.
I have no clue what evidence he has, I haven't even ask him and I have seen or talked to him a number of times since he posted that. It is rare that I think about the going on's of the forums once I'm not directly looking at them. If Max says he has something, then I have no doubt he does. At that point, it might all come down to one's own opinion, you might laugh at the information he has, where someone else might think it's jaw dropping put a nail in the coffin type of info. Should he or shouldn't he post it? I guess it depends on what it is. Let's say it's some seriously damning personal information. I don't think Singer has ever done anything to MaxPen that would rise to the level of hurting or shaming Rob in any serious way. Assuming he has something serious, but it's not really related to disproving the Newell, if he played the double up bug, or his gambling claims. I don't think he should. If he does, I wouldn't change my opinion about Max, you might think he's an ass, but calling him a coward is pretty far off base.
I would also like to say, People have the right to change their minds after giving something more thought.
Furthermore, if I felt a friend or somebody I liked was doing something that I felt was strongly distasteful, I would discuss it in private.
Last edited by AxelWolf; 03-05-2021 at 02:15 AM.
MaxPen, are the games completed as far as you are concerned? Or are you just warming up?
Could you explain about the following:
Copies of the foregoing
.. mailed or delivered to:
Robert H. Argentino
11126Wainwright
Werrington Peterborough 14 England PE45AH
Axel, don't take it personal, but my personal opinion about your last post, confirms to me you might be as big a bullshitting con artist as MaxPrick.
You spend your life on these forums, saw Max several times after his threat, and didn't even ask about what he has with the hottest thread presently on this site?
Your loyalty to the AP club is second to none.
BULLSHIT
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)