Originally Posted by
BoSox
KewlJ, I am finding a contradiction in your full support of Dan Druff why are backing him? When you quote the following words by Dan:
What kind of credibility or consistency does Dan show by being openly opinionated regarding Singer while giving MDawg the full run of the place? You just wrote the following words regarding blackhole:
Originally Posted by
kewlJ
ok, I have been tolerant with you for years, but it is time for you to join, coach belly, and Mdawg on my ignore list. Happy trails.
When I recently criticized Dan for the same behavior you chimed in with somewhat of an agreement. So I find it strange that you quoting Dan as if his word actually means something, which could not be further from the truth. The man is simply biased and that is true and you know it. Now the logical argument that you may say is that we are talking about two completely different subjects and my response to this is that is complete
bullshit. First Singers thread coverage is in reality minuscule compared to MDawgs. Plus the big mystery about the ownership or not of a Newel will never hurt any independent reader period. On the other hand regarding the Mdawg escapades, the complete silence of Dan Druff speaks volumes to me on credibility standards.
Come on BoSox, my friend, no one and I mean no one has been more critical of Dan Druff and his forum moderation or lack of than me.
In regards to Singer vs MDawg, while MDawg has been more dominate recently, Singer and his claims date 20 years, I don't know how many on this forum, but far longer than you and I have been here. So I don't know how to judge who is worse. They are running neck and neck for
WORST!
You know my position Bosox. I don't like claims that just can't be. That defy math, logic and reality. Even if no one is "selling" anything (at least openly, who knows behind the scenes), People including many who don't openly participate come to these forums, to read about the truth in gambling and gambling math. They read this sh*t and say, hell, let me give that a try.
I think it is the AP's and math guys
responsibility to call out voodoo claims and nonsense. Unfortunately we can't do it without some help from the forum administrator. If they are going to protect these guys and their fantasy claims and provide them a platform, as Norm did with T3, Shackleford has done With Mdawg, and Dan Druff has done with both Singer and Mdawg, what we AP's say doesn't matter one iota. And being that they guys are gambling math guys, all of them they have an obligation to weigh in on what they think. Not doing so is almost an endorsement. So yeah, I embrace Dan's recent comments and conclusions about Singer. I think it is way too late, but better late than never. and yes, I wish he would do the same with Mdawg. Come on Dan, Last weekends project was opining about Singer, this Sunday how about Mdawg.
Problem Bosox always comes back to one conflict with these owners/administrators. Forum traffic. I absolutely hate that they sell out their math beliefs, for which they are known and respected, in the name of forum traffic. So on the occasion that they step forward, I am going to applaud.