“So its clear to me the people making 200k or more a year from machines is less then 6. Based on the jokes I’m reading from people like MaxPen, and that Buffalo Diamond Loser. So there’s no value in sharing information. No point it would be a one way street. We all lose“

Source: https://mobile.twitter.com/freeplayA...10324633370626

I got asked about this comment so I will explain. Let’s assume the $200K is a straight up number, e.g. no points to free slot play, mailers, bounce backs, gifts you would resell on eBay et al, etc. And **NO TEAM PLAY**.

Suppose the person worked 50 weeks out of the year (2 weeks off for a vacation).

Suppose we use theory of CE that a bird in hand is worth 2 in the bush or $1 profit is worth roughly $2 in EV.

Source: “ As has been pointed out by MathProf, the CE profit is approximately half of the expected profit.”
https://bj21.com/category/advantage-...valentanalysis

Now, we could put things into perspective:
1) $200K / 50 is $4K a week
2) $4K a week is roughly the equivalent of finding $8K in EV per week.

Now you see the problem.

Most people can’t calculate the correct EV, much less find $8K of EV each week for 50 weeks. Mickey Crimm tried to calculate the EV of a massive progressive Sequential RF and failed (miserably as expected as in a Crimmtard can do AP level math). Calculating EV for Bonus Slots is hard. However, Slotloser has an advantage because he has access to Par Sheets.

Second, scavengers run into the issue of Bonus Slots being nerfed, e.g. they are not as profitable as before.

I am not agreeing with Slotloser’s opinion, but you need to put that $200K into the proper context.