Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 50

Thread: Scammer Chrissy Mitchell 8% HA BJ strategy

  1. #1


    Dan and the crew over on Dan’s other forum do a great job exposing this idiot but I thought I would post this here for those who don’t visit that forum.

    This scammer is now pushing such a bad BJ strategy that would make anyone laugh. Except it shows from the comments how many idiots are out there. While he is behind some of the comments, most are from people who fall for this garbage.

    This would be a good pastime for KJ if he is not playing right now to help expose this guy.

    Check out the thread at Dan’s if interested.

    https://pokerfraudalert.com/forum/sh...nal-Gambler%94
    Last edited by The Boz; 10-24-2020 at 08:01 AM.

  2. #2
    Guys like him just prove how stupid and gullible gamblers are.

  3. #3
    Rob needs his own YouTube channel. That would be great entertainment.

  4. #4
    Who could argue with this strategy. Add a Marty in and you can’t lose!

    Name:  F74E2DFD-A6EB-4C6B-8C0D-DD502EE92F6E.jpg
Views: 1332
Size:  53.8 KB

  5. #5
    Joel Osteen is no different. Only he uses religion to scam millions of stupid suckers.

  6. #6
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post

    This would be a good pastime for KJ if he is not playing right now to help expose this guy.
    There is like a zillion of these kinds of guys now isn't there? They don't make their money from whatever nonsensical system or strategy they promote. They make their money from viewership on the you tube channel. I don't even know how that crap works.

    Before we even get into his ridiculous rules and strategy, I did a quick search just to get a little background. Free search.....I didn't even pay the $3.

    A couple of interesting things. Real estate records show Mr. Mitchell purchased a new home in the Aliante Section of Las Vegas in December 2019 in a gated community purchase price $400k. That certainly was unexpected. So he has some money. BUT, just glancing at his blackjack rules and strategy which looks to be a progressive system....that is why there is no splitting or doubling, any money this gentleman has didn't come from blackjack advantage play....at least not what he is describing.

    Second interesting thing is he is listed as an owner or co owners of C and H automotive. I am guessing he is the "C" of C & H. But I don't see a C &H automotive listed in Las Vegas (there is one in North Carolina). My guess is maybe some sort of side business without a permanent business address. I am thinking some sort of buying and re-selling vehicles. Sort of a flipping cars version of "flipping houses". Just a guess.

    Still doesn't explain where the money for the recent real estate purchase came from, but, it sure as hell wasn't from blackjack play. Maybe he makes that kind of money from these youtube channel and videos. Like I said, I don't know how that works.

    One final thing I found interesting and that is that Dan Druff discovered and posted that this person used to be in male Porn back in 2010. No, Boz, that doesn't interest me. But it is interesting that Druff knew that.

    add on: oh yeah, one more thing. This guy is flashing 10, count em, 10 Benjamin's. That is suppose to be impressive? Gotta love these guys.

  7. #7
    Ok, Boz, I watched a few minutes of the video. FUCK YOU BOZ, for making me do that. Somebody owes me those minutes back.

    So I don't have to guess that it is a progressive (martingale system). Half way through he tells you that it is. You bet $25, then $50, then $100, then $200, then $400.

    That is why he only plays double deck. Double deck has 6, 7 rounds before the shuffle depending on number of players and Christopher has decided that he can't lose 6 or 7 rounds in a row. Anybody that thinks that hasn't played much blackjack, because it happens all the time.

    Nothing much more to say, these guys continue to want to rewrite history AND MATH, thinking that a "marty" or any progressive wagering can overcome -EV. Ridiculous! And blackjack is actually about the worst application of a marty, because a player doesn't win anywhere close to 50% of hands. A good player playing a good basic strategy wins 42%. And if you start doing the crap Christopher says, standing on 14 and above, no doubling, no splitting, that percentage is likely down in the 30's. Blackjack is just a horrible game for a marty.

    Anyway, continue on with you politics, and general sewer discussions.

  8. #8
    Predictable. Boz asks for an opinion about the guy's goofy BJ strategy because kew tries so hard to be the forum poster boy expert on the game, and we instead get just another jealous rant about someone who is far more successful in life than him who actually made/makes money from something called a JOB.

    Must be from the all the stress of having to wait for another stimulus check.

  9. #9
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Predictable. Boz asks for an opinion about the guy's goofy BJ strategy because kew tries so hard to be the forum poster boy expert on the game, and we instead get just another jealous rant about someone who is far more successful in life than him who actually made/makes money from something called a JOB.

    Must be from the all the stress of having to wait for another stimulus check.
    As usual Rob Chiming in when he hasn't a clue what he is talking about.

    If there is another stimulus check right now, I wouldn't qualify. I did receive a check earlier this year back in March because that was based on my 2018 income, which was a bit below my average and allowed me to qualify. A second check now would be based on 2019, which was significantly better for me and I wouldn't qualify. Now if the second check gets pushed back past the first of the year or there is a third check next spring based on 2020 taxes, I will qualify and will be sure to do my taxes early so I do qualify. And I don't feel the slightest bit guilty about it.

    Now as for Christopher Mitchell having a JOB. Nowhere does it say that. Since you seem to want to support him, when you know nothing of this situation, please tell us all what his job is? He lists himself as an entrepreneur and a "principal" in a company that doesn't seem to legally exist. What we do know is that he makes money from his youtube videos and previously made money from gay porn. Are these the JOBS and income sources you are rushing to endorse?

    The youtube thing, as I have stated, I have no idea how that works. I don't begrudge anyone making money legally. I am not thrilled if they are pushing disinformation or mis-information that may harm others to do so, which appears to be the case here, but I am not going to make it a crusade.

    I am not a expert at blackjack....never claimed to be. Believe it or not I like to think I am still a student and learning the game. Not how to play the game, but how to successfully win at the game. I learn from new experiences each and every year, including this very "trying" year.

    But let me leave you with 2 thoughts.

    1.) progressive wagering cannot turn a losing (-EV) game into a winning (+EV).....period!!! Can't do it in blackjack as Christopher is proposing. Can't do it with your claims in video poker! It is a mathematical impossibility.

    and 2.) Blackjack is about the worst game to even try a Martingale or any progression system because the player does not win anywhere close to 50% of outcomes. It is 42% for a player playing an optimal, but still losing basic strategy. And what Christopher Mitchell is describing is far from optimal. As he describes it, he is probably playing at a 10% or more disadvantage. Progressive wagering can't overcome a 1/2 percent disadvantage (blackjack basic strategy or common video poker payouts), it sure as hell can't overcome 10% disadvantage. Christopher's "special plays", just like your "special plays" don't change the math.....Progressive wagering cannot overcome -EV! Math Rob....MATH!

    jbjb said you should have a youtube channel. He is right, you would fit right in with these guys. What you do is exactly the same thing. Might as well get paid for your ridiculous and impossible claims. Go for it Rob.

  10. #10
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Predictable. Boz asks for an opinion about the guy's goofy BJ strategy because kew tries so hard to be the forum poster boy expert on the game, and we instead get just another jealous rant about someone who is far more successful in life than him who actually made/makes money from something called a JOB.

    Must be from the all the stress of having to wait for another stimulus check.
    As usual Rob Chiming in when he hasn't a clue what he is talking about.

    If there is another stimulus check right now, I wouldn't qualify. I did receive a check earlier this year back in March because that was based on my 2018 income, which was a bit below my average and allowed me to qualify. A second check now would be based on 2019, which was significantly better for me and I wouldn't qualify. Now if the second check gets pushed back past the first of the year or there is a third check next spring based on 2020 taxes, I will qualify and will be sure to do my taxes early so I do qualify. And I don't feel the slightest bit guilty about it.

    Now as for Christopher Mitchell having a JOB. Nowhere does it say that. Since you seem to want to support him, when you know nothing of this situation, please tell us all what his job is? He lists himself as an entrepreneur and a "principal" in a company that doesn't seem to legally exist. What we do know is that he makes money from his youtube videos and previously made money from gay porn. Are these the JOBS and income sources you are rushing to endorse?

    The youtube thing, as I have stated, I have no idea how that works. I don't begrudge anyone making money legally. I am not thrilled if they are pushing disinformation or mis-information that may harm others to do so, which appears to be the case here, but I am not going to make it a crusade.

    I am not a expert at blackjack....never claimed to be. Believe it or not I like to think I am still a student and learning the game. Not how to play the game, but how to successfully win at the game. I learn from new experiences each and every year, including this very "trying" year.

    But let me leave you with 2 thoughts.

    1.) progressive wagering cannot turn a losing (-EV) game into a winning (+EV).....period!!! Can't do it in blackjack as Christopher is proposing. Can't do it with your claims in video poker! It is a mathematical impossibility.

    and 2.) Blackjack is about the worst game to even try a Martingale or any progression system because the player does not win anywhere close to 50% of outcomes. It is 42% for a player playing an optimal, but still losing basic strategy. And what Christopher Mitchell is describing is far from optimal. As he describes it, he is probably playing at a 10% or more disadvantage. Progressive wagering can't overcome a 1/2 percent disadvantage (blackjack basic strategy or common video poker payouts), it sure as hell can't overcome 10% disadvantage. Christopher's "special plays", just like your "special plays" don't change the math.....Progressive wagering cannot overcome -EV! Math Rob....MATH!

    jbjb said you should have a youtube channel. He is right, you would fit right in with these guys. What you do is exactly the same thing. Might as well get paid for your ridiculous and impossible claims. Go for it Rob.
    Kew, you're no different than any of the other anonymous cowards on forums who claim to "win every year because they're AP's" or "live in 'gated' communities"' or "have it made in the shade". You people claim anything you want while you know your constant denials and anonymity will protect you from anyone getting at least some information on any of you. But I HAVE info on you. Remember you threatened me and I had my nephew in the FBI do a background check on you and your slug family? THAT'S why you despise me so, even though you know I'm prohibited from publicly exposing any of your embarrassing details--details that were NOT obtained from unverifiable two-bit online snoop sites that some loser like you would count on as being gospel.

    And therein lies why you are so addicted to forums, and why you get so unnerved whenever anybody calls you for your bullshit. In any virtual existence, fools who crave attention and desperately need relevance have no choice but to continue their ruse. Even when clowns like your useless family having to leave your sugar daddy's home and seek low income housing elsewhere.

    As is ALWAYS the case with you clowns, it'll all come around and bite you in the ass, eventually. And don't come crying to me when it does.

    BTW, thank you for allowing me to force you into talking about the guy's supposed winning system.

  11. #11
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post

    Kew, you're no different than any of the other anonymous cowards on forums who claim to "win every year because they're AP's" or "live in 'gated' communities"' or "have it made in the shade". You people claim anything you want while you know your constant denials and anonymity will protect you from anyone getting at least some information on any of you. But I HAVE info on you. Remember you threatened me and I had my nephew in the FBI do a background check on you and your slug family? THAT'S why you despise me so, even though you know I'm prohibited from publicly exposing any of your embarrassing details--details that were NOT obtained from unverifiable two-bit online snoop sites that some loser like you would count on as being gospel.

    And therein lies why you are so addicted to forums, and why you get so unnerved whenever anybody calls you for your bullshit. In any virtual existence, fools who crave attention and desperately need relevance have no choice but to continue their ruse. Even when events like your useless family having to leave your sugar daddy's home and seek low income housing elsewhere.

    As is ALWAYS the case with you clowns, it'll all come around and bite you in the ass, eventually. And don't come crying to me when it does.
    More lies from the king of liars. You have been claiming this for years. Rob you have nothing on me I can assure you. But you have my full permission to publicly disclose anything you think you have. More than permission...I encourage you to do so.

    I mean I gotta tell ya, since you made this claim years ago, saying something about you know where I work, I have been kind of anxious to find out what kind of work I do for a living.

  12. #12
    Kew rest assued Rob uses his writings as pure foreplay in trying to get his little dick hard so he can jack it off and get some kind of climax while he writes.

    There's no other reason and no other ultimate advantage to himself.

    Once a loser always a loser he's your perfect example. ROMAFL.

    He believes he knows everything all the members do and he doesn't even know where they live or what their real names are or any pertinent information. Pure fallacy fueling his fantasies.

  13. #13
    I'd be more interested in the fact if he's actually committing any federal crimes running these scams over the internet.

  14. #14
    Originally Posted by jbjb View Post
    I'd be more interested in the fact if he's actually committing any federal crimes running these scams over the internet.
    The problem is these fools keep sending him money. The only issue I see is if he is not reporting all the money.

    It’s really no different than any handicapper selling sports picks. Of course it is a scam, but is it illegal?

    That said, you bring up a good question. And is YouTube complacent in allowing these scammers to use their site to facilitate the scans.
    Last edited by The Boz; 10-25-2020 at 02:38 PM.

  15. #15
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post

    Kew, you're no different than any of the other anonymous cowards on forums who claim to "win every year because they're AP's" or "live in 'gated' communities"' or "have it made in the shade". You people claim anything you want while you know your constant denials and anonymity will protect you from anyone getting at least some information on any of you. But I HAVE info on you. Remember you threatened me and I had my nephew in the FBI do a background check on you and your slug family? THAT'S why you despise me so, even though you know I'm prohibited from publicly exposing any of your embarrassing details--details that were NOT obtained from unverifiable two-bit online snoop sites that some loser like you would count on as being gospel.

    And therein lies why you are so addicted to forums, and why you get so unnerved whenever anybody calls you for your bullshit. In any virtual existence, fools who crave attention and desperately need relevance have no choice but to continue their ruse. Even when events like your useless family having to leave your sugar daddy's home and seek low income housing elsewhere.

    As is ALWAYS the case with you clowns, it'll all come around and bite you in the ass, eventually. And don't come crying to me when it does.
    More lies from the king of liars. You have been claiming this for years. Rob you have nothing on me I can assure you. But you have my full permission to publicly disclose anything you think you have. More than permission...I encourage you to do so.

    I mean I gotta tell ya, since you made this claim years ago, saying something about you know where I work, I have been kind of anxious to find out what kind of work I do for a living.
    I like how he went from working at the IRS to working at the FBI. Next he'll be driving a Newell.

  16. #16
    Speaking of Newell, Nov is around the corner, when is the big day in Gilbert Rob ?

  17. #17
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    Originally Posted by jbjb View Post
    I'd be more interested in the fact if he's actually committing any federal crimes running these scams over the internet.
    The problem is these fools keep sending him money. The only issue I see is if he is not reporting all the money.

    It’s really no different than any handicapper selling sports picks. Of course it is a scam, but is it illegal?

    That said, you bring up a good question. And is YouTube complacent in allowing these scammers to use their site to facilitate the scans.
    Search "Christopher Mitchell Author" and see all of the other stuff he's been involved with. He seems to be a jack of all trades Tony Robbins type.

  18. #18
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    Originally Posted by jbjb View Post
    I'd be more interested in the fact if he's actually committing any federal crimes running these scams over the internet.
    The problem is these fools keep sending him money. The only issue I see is if he is not reporting all the money.

    It’s really no different than any handicapper selling sports picks. Of course it is a scam, but is it illegal?

    That said, you bring up a good question. And is YouTube complacent in allowing these scammers to use their site to facilitate the scans.
    Unfortunately, what Youtube is complacent about and what it isn't is quite the moving target as you know.

  19. #19
    Originally Posted by tableplay View Post
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    Originally Posted by jbjb View Post
    I'd be more interested in the fact if he's actually committing any federal crimes running these scams over the internet.
    The problem is these fools keep sending him money. The only issue I see is if he is not reporting all the money.

    It’s really no different than any handicapper selling sports picks. Of course it is a scam, but is it illegal?

    That said, you bring up a good question. And is YouTube complacent in allowing these scammers to use their site to facilitate the scans.
    Unfortunately, what Youtube is complacent about and what it isn't is quite the moving target as you know.
    Reminds me of when Logan Paul filmed a dead body in a Suicide Forest. And LAUGHED.... Youtube DIDN'T pull that disturbing video themselves... Logan was forced to pull tuat disturbing video himself after his Viewers really sunk their claws into him very hard and dragged and ragged on him... Honestly, YouTube should have pulled that disturbing video down themselves... Logan later apologized for disturbing video xlaimed he LAUGHED because he was scared and nervous because he had never seen a suicide before but it seemed to me that he was just trying to appease his viewers who were mad at him for that disturbing video.
    https://photos.app.goo.gl/Zk2WAFzDcrJ7pjNB7

    Take comfort in the fact that no one is actually backing up his wishes to have you permanantly banned.


    Smart is knowing a Tomato is a fruit.

    Wise is knowing a Tomato doesn't belong in a fruit salad.



    I am glad to get my full posting rights back! Thank you Dan!

  20. #20
    Originally Posted by Tasha View Post
    Originally Posted by tableplay View Post
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post

    The problem is these fools keep sending him money. The only issue I see is if he is not reporting all the money.

    It’s really no different than any handicapper selling sports picks. Of course it is a scam, but is it illegal?

    That said, you bring up a good question. And is YouTube complacent in allowing these scammers to use their site to facilitate the scans.
    Unfortunately, what Youtube is complacent about and what it isn't is quite the moving target as you know.
    Reminds me of when Logan Paul filmed a dead body in a Suicide Forest. And LAUGHED.... Youtube DIDN'T pull that disturbing video themselves... Logan was forced to pull tuat disturbing video himself after his Viewers really sunk their claws into him very hard and dragged and ragged on him... Honestly, YouTube should have pulled that disturbing video down themselves... Logan later apologized for disturbing video xlaimed he LAUGHED because he was scared and nervous because he had never seen a suicide before but it seemed to me that he was just trying to appease his viewers who were mad at him for that disturbing video.
    Good example. There are countless examples which show their negative bias towards non-liberals. Bitchute and Brandnewtube are thankfully much more tolerant and uploaded videos to these two sites seem to be welcome from liberals and non-liberals alike.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 41
    Last Post: 02-05-2022, 08:31 PM
  2. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-16-2018, 09:57 PM
  3. VP Strategy
    By rymetymeuk in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 78
    Last Post: 10-07-2014, 04:20 AM
  4. Vp Strategy
    By Vpnewbie in forum California/Western US Casinos
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-16-2014, 07:30 PM
  5. What is your craps strategy?
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-11-2012, 08:23 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •