MDawg's baccarat system/ method of play

[MisterV]

Here is how he plays baccarat ...

https://www.truepassage.com/forums/s...in-at-Baccarat

Basically follow the trend with a mini-martingale ("double up").

[coach belly]

Basically follow the trend with a mini-martingale ("double up").

Isn't the basis of martingale doubling up after losses?

Is that what MDawg explained that he does in that thread you linked?

[MDawg]

I press as I win. That's not a martingale. Sometimes I press as follows (using for example 100 as the unit):
100, 150, 250, etc.
I don't press exactly 1.5 for that sequence, but approximately.

other times
100, 300, 900, etc.
For this sequence I press exactly 3.


Just depends on the shoe and the circumstances.


There are times I have been down thirty grand, and gotten it back simply by betting average 500 for hours. No martingale. Martingale is stupid. I never got past my first year even of any kind of gambling, and I had just turned gambling age, before I abandoned any kind of martingale.


There is no mechanical progression or mechanical system to my winning. It just depends on the shoe and the circumstances.

[coach belly]

I press as I win. That's not a martingale.

After reading the post that V linked, how did he conclude that you played using martingale ?

[MisterV]

After reading the post that V linked, how did he conclude that you played using martingale ?

I said "mini-martingale (double up)."

To me pressing after a loss constitutes a mini-martingale; YMMV.

[MDawg]

As I explained.

There is no mechanical progression or mechanical system to my winning. It just depends on the shoe and the circumstances.

But, if whatever I have to say inspires an admirer to post 263 words about me, hey...there's no press like bad press.

[BoSox]

There is no mechanical progression or mechanical system to my winning. It just depends on the shoe and the circumstances.

To write something like the above quote and expect it to stand up for itself is astounding. You must literally love yourself. Talk about having a set of balls, buddy you set the record. That quote is worth repeating.

There is no mechanical progression or mechanical system to my winning. It just depends on the shoe and the circumstances.

Coach belly there is no defending that no matter whatever you say.

[Darkoz]

The only MCrap claim I ever believed was he received complimentary ketchup bottles

He was so overjoyed at those. They were just the right size for his thumb and his penis to fit. The ketchup made good lubrication for his only real action, masturbating to thoughts of beating (beating Baccarat while beating himself off, lol)

[Garnabby]

The only MCrap claim I ever believed was he received complimentary ketchup bottles

He was so overjoyed at those. They were just the right size for his thumb and his penis to fit. The ketchup made good lubrication for his only real action, masturbating to thoughts of beating (beating Baccarat while beating himself off, lol)

This reminds me about, in general, how "happy" gamblers are with the casino "gift" shoppe stuff. Cheap and gaudy as hell.

[Darkoz]

There is no mechanical progression or mechanical system to my winning. It just depends on the shoe and the circumstances.

To write something like the above quote and expect it to stand up for itself is astounding. You must literally love yourself. Talk about having a set of balls, buddy you set the record. That quote is worth repeating.

There is no mechanical progression or mechanical system to my winning. It just depends on the shoe and the circumstances.

Coach belly there is no defending that no matter whatever you say.

Yeah basically MCrap claims he has a system and it's comprised of getting lucky and knowing in advance when he is due to get lucky and taking advantage of his luck by raising his wagers.

Pure rubbish!

[MDawg]

The last trip, the very last day, the last shoe I played, I had a shoe where the bank NEVER went more than one. I mean, every time the bank hit, it went single only, and for that entire shoe, the next hand was player. It didn't take me long before I figured it out and I was rolling with laughter, chanting this mantra, BANK GOES ONE, NEXT HAND PLAYER! Just like that. The only reason I didn't empty the tray was...I kept thinking...there is NO WAY this is going to keep up. But it did. And, I bet it for a modest amount each time, 1800 for me, 100 on the side for the dealer on player each time the bank hit, and cleared about twenty grand on that shoe.

Then on another shoe, about a week earlier, I came in about fifteen hands into the shoe, and for the rest of the shoe, about sixty or so more hands, I missed...maybe 3 hands. Unfortunately, I was having such a good time I forget to bet...I bet a measly couple hundred the whole way through. So by the end, given that I didn't bet the ties and pushed on the tie hands, I had about ten five ($10,500.). Try to tell me that's just luck...winning 57/60 hands (minus ties).

But just as important as winning...is leaving...after a good shoe, which I'm excellent at that too. I try to always leave as soon as I'm sufficiently ahead. (Recall that both Teliot and the Wizard declared that about 97% of Vegas visitors are ahead at some point during their trips.)

On the other hand, there are sometimes shoes that follow no discernible pattern whatsoever. During this last trip I was playing a shoe, and not doing very well, and my friend (who plays with a half million line and is allowed to bet up to forty grand a hand), came over to look and declared that "It's impossible to win on that shoe!" - and, he was right, at least around that time. Later, that shoe settled into a discernible pattern and I started to win. But during the time when the shoe was unpredictable, I bet small.

Why do high rollers sometimes win millions on a single Baccarat shoe? Is it because they are lucky, or because there are in fact certain Baccarat shoes that allow any half way decent player to win, and other shoes where it will be very hard to win.

I'm just telling you, I am able to win at Baccarat very regularly, and very consistently, and it's not luck. Looking from the outside, there will always be non-believers, but so what - that leaves more deng (money), for me. And less crowded tables. I prefer it that way actually.

Same with stock trades. I just don't miss any longer. Now first off, I trade additional shares on top of my long term shares. I am not strictly a trader - I am mostly an investor, who also trades on occasion. Sometimes, I do get stuck, and then I just ride it out, and the stock always comes back. (For example today in the A.H. I sold some AMZN at 3384 that I had been holding at a loss, at 3328 for some time, on an intended day trade that turned into a position trade.) And I trade only very blue chip tech stocks for the most part, which is why the stocks I trade tend to make new ATHs (all time highs) eventually, such that it becomes impossible to lose trading them, so long as you are able to ride it out.

My luck or whatever you want to call it is good and I am determined to avoid contamination. Sometimes, contact with the lucky may change a man's run of bad luck, but generally it works out the other way. I prefer to play alone. I also stock trade alone. I don't waste time in groups when it comes to winning at stocks or gambling.

[MisterV]

I'm just telling you, I am able to win at Baccarat very regularly, and very consistently, and it's not luck. Same with stock trades. I just don't miss any longer.

If it's not luck, and it's not skill, it must be ...

*bows*

All hail the Messiah, truly he walks among us!

[AxelWolf]

The last trip, the very last day, the last shoe I played, I had a shoe where the bank NEVER went more than one. I mean, every time the bank hit, it went single only, and for that entire shoe, the next hand was player. It didn't take me long before I figured it out and I was rolling with laughter, chanting this mantra, BANK GOES ONE, NEXT HAND PLAYER! Just like that. The only reason I didn't empty the tray was...I kept thinking...there is NO WAY this is going to keep up. But it did. And, I bet it for a modest amount each time, 1800 for me, 100 on the side for the dealer on player each time the bank hit, and cleared about twenty grand on that shoe.

Then on another shoe, about a week earlier, I came in about fifteen hands into the shoe, and for the rest of the shoe, about sixty or so more hands, I missed...maybe 3 hands. Unfortunately, I was having such a good time I forget to bet...I bet a measly couple hundred the whole way through. So by the end, given that I didn't bet the ties and pushed on the tie hands, I had about ten five ($10,500.). Try to tell me that's just luck...winning 57/60 hands (minus ties).

Saved for easy viewing. This is going to be good.....

[Ozzy]

The last trip, the very last day, the last shoe I played, I had a shoe where the bank NEVER went more than one. I mean, every time the bank hit, it went single only, and for that entire shoe, the next hand was player. It didn't take me long before I figured it out and I was rolling with laughter, chanting this mantra, BANK GOES ONE, NEXT HAND PLAYER! Just like that. The only reason I didn't empty the tray was...I kept thinking...there is NO WAY this is going to keep up. But it did. And, I bet it for a modest amount each time, 1800 for me, 100 on the side for the dealer on player each time the bank hit, and cleared about twenty grand on that shoe.

Then on another shoe, about a week earlier, I came in about fifteen hands into the shoe, and for the rest of the shoe, about sixty or so more hands, I missed...maybe 3 hands. Unfortunately, I was having such a good time I forget to bet...I bet a measly couple hundred the whole way through. So by the end, given that I didn't bet the ties and pushed on the tie hands, I had about ten five ($10,500.). Try to tell me that's just luck...winning 57/60 hands (minus ties).

Saved for easy viewing. This is going to be good.....

That might be his best post ever HOF !

[kewlJ]

The last trip, the very last day, the last shoe I played, I had a shoe where the bank NEVER went more than one. I mean, every time the bank hit, it went single only, and for that entire shoe, the next hand was player. It didn't take me long before I figured it out and I was rolling with laughter, chanting this mantra, BANK GOES ONE, NEXT HAND PLAYER! Just like that. The only reason I didn't empty the tray was...I kept thinking...there is NO WAY this is going to keep up. But it did. And, I bet it for a modest amount each time, 1800 for me, 100 on the side for the dealer on player each time the bank hit, and cleared about twenty grand on that shoe.

Then on another shoe, about a week earlier, I came in about fifteen hands into the shoe, and for the rest of the shoe, about sixty or so more hands, I missed...maybe 3 hands. Unfortunately, I was having such a good time I forget to bet...I bet a measly couple hundred the whole way through. So by the end, given that I didn't bet the ties and pushed on the tie hands, I had about ten five ($10,500.). Try to tell me that's just luck...winning 57/60 hands (minus ties).

Saved for easy viewing. This is going to be good.....

That might be his best post ever HOF !

So despite blocking someone, you still "get" to read when they are quoted. Such joy.

The second paragraph from MDawg is quite possible and I find it quite believable. I had a similar experience in blackjack back in 2011 that I wrote about at WoV and a blackjack forum, which I called "the perfect shoe". In short, from the time the count got very positive (max bet territory), I won every single round except 1, which was a 20 to 20 push. I don't even know how many rounds somewhere between 30 and 40.

So this kind of thing is very possible. The problem with MDawg is this kind of thing is ALL he shares. We never hear about the losing periods. And for anyone really gambling, even playing with an advantage there is plenty of losing as well. As a real player I share my winning and losing, my good and bad. I sometimes refer to it as the good, the bad and the ugly, because that is what REAL life and gambling is. These guys telling you only of winning are either leaving out the losing, or making the whole thing up like a tale of fiction. Might as well call it The adventures of... Oh wait....he did.

[BoSox]

The last trip, the very last day, the last shoe I played, I had a shoe where the bank NEVER went more than one. I mean, every time the bank hit, it went single only, and for that entire shoe, the next hand was player. It didn't take me long before I figured it out and I was rolling with laughter, chanting this mantra, BANK GOES ONE, NEXT HAND PLAYER! Just like that. The only reason I didn't empty the tray was...I kept thinking...there is NO WAY this is going to keep up. But it did. And, I bet it for a modest amount each time, 1800 for me, 100 on the side for the dealer on player each time the bank hit, and cleared about twenty grand on that shoe.

The highlighted last sentence reaffirms to me that you are just some rich guy out to have fun, never an AP. Even though you were betting for the dealer 100 every other hand on the player, as the results were going back and forth 1 Bank / 1Player even discounting ties you still tipped about 3K and won for yourself nearly 20 K that comes out to about 15% tip of your winnings. Not to mention the upfront house advantage percentage. Of course, I am not taking into account that you win most every time.

[BoSox]

The last trip, the very last day, the last shoe I played, I had a shoe where the bank NEVER went more than one. I mean, every time the bank hit, it went single only, and for that entire shoe, the next hand was player. It didn't take me long before I figured it out and I was rolling with laughter, chanting this mantra, BANK GOES ONE, NEXT HAND PLAYER! Just like that. The only reason I didn't empty the tray was...I kept thinking...there is NO WAY this is going to keep up. But it did. And, I bet it for a modest amount each time, 1800 for me, 100 on the side for the dealer on player each time the bank hit, and cleared about twenty grand on that shoe.

The highlighted last sentence reaffirms to me that you are just some rich guy out to have fun, never an AP. Even though you were betting for the dealer 100 every other hand on the player, as the results were going back and forth 1 Bank / 1Player even discounting ties you still tipped about 3K and won for yourself nearly 20 K that comes out to about 15% tip of your winnings. Not to mention the upfront house advantage percentage. Of course, I am not taking into account that you win most every time.

Hold the horses, MDawg that 3k that you bet for the dealers won most of all those hands so it was not a 15% tip that you gave but closer to 30% as you won nearly 20 k for yourself and in reality tipped nearly 6k for the dealers. MDawg, your stories get worse and worse the more you talk about them.

[AxelWolf]

The last trip, the very last day, the last shoe I played, I had a shoe where the bank NEVER went more than one. I mean, every time the bank hit, it went single only, and for that entire shoe, the next hand was player. It didn't take me long before I figured it out and I was rolling with laughter, chanting this mantra, BANK GOES ONE, NEXT HAND PLAYER! Just like that. The only reason I didn't empty the tray was...I kept thinking...there is NO WAY this is going to keep up. But it did. And, I bet it for a modest amount each time, 1800 for me, 100 on the side for the dealer on player each time the bank hit, and cleared about twenty grand on that shoe.

The highlighted last sentence reaffirms to me that you are just some rich guy out to have fun, never an AP. Even though you were betting for the dealer 100 every other hand on the player, as the results were going back and forth 1 Bank / 1Player even discounting ties you still tipped about 3K and won for yourself nearly 20 K that comes out to about 15% tip of your winnings. Not to mention the upfront house advantage percentage. Of course, I am not taking into account that you win most every time.

Hold the horses, MDawg that 3k that you bet for the dealers won most of all those hands so it was not a 15% tip that you gave but closer to 30% as you won nearly 20 k for yourself and in reality tipped nearly 6k for the dealers. MDawg, your stories get worse and worse the more you talk about them.

I'm amazed it took people this long for everyone to figure out. Obviously there are one or two retards that haven't figured it out.

[coach belly]

Obviously there are one or two retards that haven't figured it out.

Obviously there are more than one retard (besides you) unaware that tipping 30% is common.

Maybe not common among elderly hillbillies, NYC deadbeats, and LV street cons,
but they're all clueless if unaware that plenty of folks tip 30%.

[coach belly]

MDawg, your stories get worse and worse the more you talk about them.

Why is tipping 30% worse? How is it worse? Worse than what?