Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 27

Thread: A Question for Mr MDawg

  1. #1
    Why do you bother to post on this forum and other forums including WOV?

    Clearly few appreciate your posts.
    Most forum members challenge your credibility.
    What do you gain by posting?

    These are not innocent questions. I don't know if anyone has posted this but someone could suspect you've been laying the groundwork for an investment scam. You may have posted about your successes with the idea of getting money from players who want "casino money management."

    To your credit you've never hinted about playing with other people's money, to the best of my knowledge.

    But despite all the attacks and criticism and lack of appreciation you continue to post.

    Why?

    You don't even use your own name so ego can't be a reason to continue.

    I doubt you're really Mr Shackleford or Mr Druff so you can't be trying to generate traffic on their behalf? Or could you? Did you strike a deal to be paid to keep the views and responses coming?

    Is this your true line of work, being paid a fee to promote traffic on websites?

    I just can't imagine how someone who claims to be a highly paid attorney, who spends so much time in a casino winning so much money, would have any legitimate reason to keep posting in these environments? Something is not right and that's the understatement of my life.

  2. #2
    Actually it makes perfect sense. Things build on themselves, and once someone has posted something and is challenged it is only natural to follow the matter to its conclusion of proving any doubter wrong.
    I tell you it’s wonderful to be here, man. I don’t give a damn who wins or loses. It’s just wonderful to be here with you people.

    MDawg Adventures carry on at: https://www.truepassage.com/forums/f.../46-IPlayVegas

  3. #3
    AndrewG, the simple answer is this: fucknutsDawg is a narcissistic bull shit artist who revels in attention, especially negative attention.

    He certainly is not what he claims to be: that fact should be clear by now.

    Mods / forum owners tolerate him because he tiptoes around the rules and is good clickbait, but we who have read some of his nonsense know that he's just another internet attention whore.
    What, Me Worry?

  4. #4
    Originally Posted by AndrewG View Post
    Why do you bother to post on this forum and other forums including WOV?

    Clearly few appreciate your posts.
    Most forum members challenge your credibility.
    What do you gain by posting?

    These are not innocent questions. I don't know if anyone has posted this but someone could suspect you've been laying the groundwork for an investment scam. You may have posted about your successes with the idea of getting money from players who want "casino money management."

    To your credit you've never hinted about playing with other people's money, to the best of my knowledge.

    But despite all the attacks and criticism and lack of appreciation you continue to post.

    Why?

    You don't even use your own name so ego can't be a reason to continue.

    I doubt you're really Mr Shackleford or Mr Druff so you can't be trying to generate traffic on their behalf? Or could you? Did you strike a deal to be paid to keep the views and responses coming?

    Is this your true line of work, being paid a fee to promote traffic on websites?

    I just can't imagine how someone who claims to be a highly paid attorney, who spends so much time in a casino winning so much money, would have any legitimate reason to keep posting in these environments? Something is not right and that's the understatement of my life.

    Of course the first thing that comes to mind when you see the Dawg's WoV posting with 50 out of 51 baccarat winning sessions and the sister "MDawg Investments" thread where the Dawg rarely loses, is a recruitment scam.

    I mean, if I had the cajones (or idiocy) to post that I won every week but one last year betting sports, and had an accompanying "REDietz Investment" thread, I would think the obvious conclusion should be that I was trying to recruit investors.

    With records like that, the Dawg (and me) wouldn't even have to contact anyone. We'd just wait for them to contact us.

    Then you throw in that the site allowing the Dawg to do it is owned by Serbs, and the site manager has, with his own posting, hinted at some financial pressures recently, and the obvious conclusions get darker still.

    Then we have a MarcusClark cheerleader/sock/wingman-for-Dawg post at WoV that anyone wanting to join the Dawg fan club should PM their email, and the obvious conclusions get even scammier. Marcus was suspended for a week for that, but the damage, as they say, was done.

    Not sure, AndrewG, if you caught that post by MarcusClark or not, but it does imply a Dawg/Marcus connection of sorts, eh?

    I mean, the whole thing screams investment scam, right? And then DarkOz has gone over to the dark side, so to speak. It's almost textbook.

    What do you think? You have experience with this sort of thing.

  5. #5
    MDawg = GOAT




  6. #6
    Originally Posted by redietz
    Of course the first thing that comes to mind when you see the Dawg's WoV posting with 50 out of 51 baccarat winning sessions and the sister "MDawg Investments" thread where the Dawg rarely loses, is a recruitment scam.

    Now that's an interesting thought.

    You might want to PM him, ask to join his Mickey Mouse Club, and ply him for the secrets of winning your own set of mouse ears from the casino.
    What, Me Worry?

  7. #7
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Originally Posted by AndrewG View Post
    Why do you bother to post on this forum and other forums including WOV?

    Clearly few appreciate your posts.
    Most forum members challenge your credibility.
    What do you gain by posting?

    These are not innocent questions. I don't know if anyone has posted this but someone could suspect you've been laying the groundwork for an investment scam. You may have posted about your successes with the idea of getting money from players who want "casino money management."

    To your credit you've never hinted about playing with other people's money, to the best of my knowledge.

    But despite all the attacks and criticism and lack of appreciation you continue to post.

    Why?

    You don't even use your own name so ego can't be a reason to continue.

    I doubt you're really Mr Shackleford or Mr Druff so you can't be trying to generate traffic on their behalf? Or could you? Did you strike a deal to be paid to keep the views and responses coming?

    Is this your true line of work, being paid a fee to promote traffic on websites?

    I just can't imagine how someone who claims to be a highly paid attorney, who spends so much time in a casino winning so much money, would have any legitimate reason to keep posting in these environments? Something is not right and that's the understatement of my life.

    Of course the first thing that comes to mind when you see the Dawg's WoV posting with 50 out of 51 baccarat winning sessions and the sister "MDawg Investments" thread where the Dawg rarely loses, is a recruitment scam.

    I mean, if I had the cajones (or idiocy) to post that I won every week but one last year betting sports, and had an accompanying "REDietz Investment" thread, I would think the obvious conclusion should be that I was trying to recruit investors.

    With records like that, the Dawg (and me) wouldn't even have to contact anyone. We'd just wait for them to contact us.

    Then you throw in that the site allowing the Dawg to do it is owned by Serbs, and the site manager has, with his own posting, hinted at some financial pressures recently, and the obvious conclusions get darker still.

    Then we have a MarcusClark cheerleader/sock/wingman-for-Dawg post at WoV that anyone wanting to join the Dawg fan club should PM their email, and the obvious conclusions get even scammier. Marcus was suspended for a week for that, but the damage, as they say, was done.

    Not sure, AndrewG, if you caught that post by MarcusClark or not, but it does imply a Dawg/Marcus connection of sorts, eh?

    I mean, the whole thing screams investment scam, right? And then DarkOz has gone over to the dark side, so to speak. It's almost textbook.

    What do you think? You have experience with this sort of thing.
    Age old scam. Makes as much sense as anything else.

    Pick the hottest growth stocks (Amazon, Tesla, etc) with good volatility and claim you make money daily no matter if they are up or down. Always after the fact of course, like 14-1 on Monday nights. Present a glamorous lifestyle backstory, rinse and repeat.

    It’s what Christopher Mitchell does if you watch any of his videos, before they disappeared. And of course he didn’t hide who he was, but makes unbelievable claims daily while professing to live a high roller lifestyle. You can add Vegas Dave and other hustlers to the list.

    And they always have a few “testimonials” from fanboys shilling all the claims how they are the greatest. Even find a “public” figure down on their luck to try and give you credibility. Again, age old playbook.

    Mike Laskey had an old Johnny Unitas
    Jeff D’Ambrosia had Dan Pastorini
    Some Medicare scam has Joe Namath
    Chris Bernan pushes some Car warranty bullshit
    Hell I even remember some desperate computer company in Parade magazine using “Jeff Conway from Taxi” in the early 2000’s

    Kid, if you are still in contact with your bosses client, maybe get him on the case. He was a bulldog when he wanted to prove something.

  8. #8
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    Kid, if you are still in contact with your bosses client, maybe get him on the case. He was a bulldog when he wanted to prove something.
    Until he ran into Rob Singer that is.

  9. #9
    Originally Posted by monet View Post
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    Kid, if you are still in contact with your bosses client, maybe get him on the case. He was a bulldog when he wanted to prove something.
    Until he ran into Rob Singer that is.
    He let friendship affect his objectivity.

    It happens ... like with the Wiz at WoV.
    What, Me Worry?

  10. #10
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Originally Posted by AndrewG View Post
    Why do you bother to post on this forum and other forums including WOV?

    Clearly few appreciate your posts.
    Most forum members challenge your credibility.
    What do you gain by posting?

    These are not innocent questions. I don't know if anyone has posted this but someone could suspect you've been laying the groundwork for an investment scam. You may have posted about your successes with the idea of getting money from players who want "casino money management."

    To your credit you've never hinted about playing with other people's money, to the best of my knowledge.

    But despite all the attacks and criticism and lack of appreciation you continue to post.

    Why?

    You don't even use your own name so ego can't be a reason to continue.

    I doubt you're really Mr Shackleford or Mr Druff so you can't be trying to generate traffic on their behalf? Or could you? Did you strike a deal to be paid to keep the views and responses coming?

    Is this your true line of work, being paid a fee to promote traffic on websites?

    I just can't imagine how someone who claims to be a highly paid attorney, who spends so much time in a casino winning so much money, would have any legitimate reason to keep posting in these environments? Something is not right and that's the understatement of my life.

    Of course the first thing that comes to mind when you see the Dawg's WoV posting with 50 out of 51 baccarat winning sessions and the sister "MDawg Investments" thread where the Dawg rarely loses, is a recruitment scam.

    I mean, if I had the cajones (or idiocy) to post that I won every week but one last year betting sports, and had an accompanying "REDietz Investment" thread, I would think the obvious conclusion should be that I was trying to recruit investors.

    With records like that, the Dawg (and me) wouldn't even have to contact anyone. We'd just wait for them to contact us.

    Then you throw in that the site allowing the Dawg to do it is owned by Serbs, and the site manager has, with his own posting, hinted at some financial pressures recently, and the obvious conclusions get darker still.

    Then we have a MarcusClark cheerleader/sock/wingman-for-Dawg post at WoV that anyone wanting to join the Dawg fan club should PM their email, and the obvious conclusions get even scammier. Marcus was suspended for a week for that, but the damage, as they say, was done.

    Not sure, AndrewG, if you caught that post by MarcusClark or not, but it does imply a Dawg/Marcus connection of sorts, eh?

    I mean, the whole thing screams investment scam, right? And then DarkOz has gone over to the dark side, so to speak. It's almost textbook.

    What do you think? You have experience with this sort of thing.
    Age old scam. Makes as much sense as anything else.

    Pick the hottest growth stocks (Amazon, Tesla, etc) with good volatility and claim you make money daily no matter if they are up or down. Always after the fact of course, like 14-1 on Monday nights. Present a glamorous lifestyle backstory, rinse and repeat.

    It’s what Christopher Mitchell does if you watch any of his videos, before they disappeared. And of course he didn’t hide who he was, but makes unbelievable claims daily while professing to live a high roller lifestyle. You can add Vegas Dave and other hustlers to the list.

    And they always have a few “testimonials” from fanboys shilling all the claims how they are the greatest. Even find a “public” figure down on their luck to try and give you credibility. Again, age old playbook.

    Mike Laskey had an old Johnny Unitas
    Jeff D’Ambrosia had Dan Pastorini
    Some Medicare scam has Joe Namath
    Chris Bernan pushes some Car warranty bullshit
    Hell I even remember some desperate computer company in Parade magazine using “Jeff Conway from Taxi” in the early 2000’s

    Boz, you forgot all about the guy who started this thread, and his Best Buy gig.

  11. #11
    Originally Posted by monet View Post
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    Kid, if you are still in contact with your bosses client, maybe get him on the case. He was a bulldog when he wanted to prove something.
    Until he ran into Rob Singer that is.
    He was a bulldog, trying to prove Rob’s claimed systems worked. I didn’t say he was always right, but he was persistent when he thought he was right.

  12. #12
    Its hard to beat the AllStar duo of Alan- Singer from 2010- to around 2014 when those two jokers were the ones responsible for the majority of the lulz !! They were the life support of this place, until Druff and other knowledgeable characters came afterwards.

  13. #13
    Originally Posted by MDawg View Post
    Actually it makes perfect sense. Things build on themselves, and once someone has posted something and is challenged it is only natural to follow the matter to its conclusion of proving any doubter wrong.
    Mr Mdawg even if you are innocent of all charges including that you were creating an investor scam, you should give up. You won't convince anyone on these forums. Their sole purpose is to ride you or any of their targets till death. Look at the posts in this thread. They are still hounding someone in this thread who hasn't posted here in three years, and they still hound others in other threads who haven't posted here for as long or longer (from what I can see).

    Give it up. It's a waste of time.

  14. #14
    The only thing doucheDawg is "innocent" of is killing Jimmy Hoffa.

    And some even have doubts about that ...
    What, Me Worry?

  15. #15
    Originally Posted by AndrewG View Post
    They are still hounding someone in this thread who hasn't posted here in three years
    Wait. You're still pretending you're not Alan?

    You really are butthurt that you got called out on your retarded 18 yo claim.

  16. #16
    Enough.

    I could easily post my driver's license (with certain info redacted) but it is not in my best interests to be linked to a gambling forum. Which is why I think most of you also do not use your true names.

    Mr M has used his real name. You can Google him. His personal email and even his cell phone number are public. You can contact him directly.

  17. #17
    Originally Posted by AndrewG View Post
    Enough.

    I could easily post my driver's license (with certain info redacted) but it is not in my best interests to be linked to a gambling forum. Which is why I think most of you also do not use your true names.

    Mr M has used his real name. You can Google him. His personal email and even his cell phone number are public. You can contact him directly.
    Sorry Andrew I deleted the post.

  18. #18
    You see, jdaewoo?

    The guy is denser than osmium.

    Here, let's toy with him a little ...

    Hey "AndrewG," you say your "boss" is alan's attorney: can you tell us WHY alan needs an attorney?

    Criminal?

    Domestic Violence?

    Bankruptcy?

    Thank you and keep slaving away, some day you might make something of yourself.
    What, Me Worry?

  19. #19
    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    You see, jdaewoo?

    The guy is denser than osmium.

    Here, let's toy with him a little ...

    Hey "AndrewG," you say your "boss" is alan's attorney: can you tell us WHY alan needs an attorney?

    Criminal?

    Domestic Violence?

    Bankruptcy?

    Thank you and keep slaving away, some day you might make something of yourself.
    Very clever of you, listing negative reasons for having an attorney. I'll list some other reasons:

    Because he set up a trust.
    Because he was injured in an auto accident.
    Because he needed a prenup.
    Because he's a business owner.
    Because he was libeled.

    Of course your goal is to link negative reasons to his identity and you do it using a fictitious name for yourself.

    Yes, very clever.

  20. #20
    Nobody has used the word libeled more then Alan. He ate that word for breakfast.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Would You Allow an MDawg?
    By redietz in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 04-05-2021, 01:33 PM
  2. Congrats to MDawg
    By Wynnpleasure775 in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 10-23-2020, 12:10 PM
  3. MDawg and WynnPleasure775
    By Dan Druff in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 64
    Last Post: 09-10-2020, 06:51 PM
  4. MDawg Poll
    By kewlJ in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 95
    Last Post: 04-13-2020, 06:34 AM
  5. MDawg here. Greetings!
    By MDawg in forum Whatever's On Your Mind
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-29-2020, 04:30 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •