I tend to think no money, no meeting. At a minimum, I doubt it would have happened as quickly. Beyond that, money was introduced twice and not by either of the parties. You're worried about a pine and an elm, but it's an oak you're looking for.
I assume you have proof of that. Let me ask it a different way: Suppose that I couldn't prove what you just said and I was an Admin there, what would you expect me to be doing?
The claims are so outrageous and math defying that numerous legitimate AP's felt the need to speak up. Mike on the other hand allowed it because it created traffic. Finally after 2 plus year of constant winning (claims), Mike decided it was time to do something....and then was talked out of it by Mdawg. Don't believe me? ask Mike.
I'll take your word for it. I still think you get the most mileage out of just ignoring him, if that's your stance.
Mdawg, having lost all credibility started creating sockpuppets to support him. And this issue, sockpuppets which has always been front and center at WoV, is suddenly ignored. Look the other way. "VPN's oh gee what can we do". Every other forum manages to deal with VPNs.
Proof? Also, which ones? MarcusClark? Could be, I guess. Again, if I were an Admin and I couldn't prove it, what would you think I should do?
Some sort of proof had always been required when I was an Admin. I had a mountain of circumstantial on Nathan and didn't consider it good enough. I also didn't want to ban Nathan because too many people were hassling me to do it.
Come on Mission, don't play dumb. And people need to stop with this
"anything is possible" bullshit. We are dealing with math and gambling reality, not this 1 in a million
"so you are telling me there is a chance" (dumb and dumber) bullshit.
Math and reality! That was supposed to be the difference with WoV. Sadly those days are gone and WoV is just another troll forum.
I guess every single person to ever hit the Powerball was fictional.
Again, you either accept the math, or you don't. I don't think math should only be accepted if you like what it has to say, but I guess you can take that stance.