Page 7 of 18 FirstFirst ... 3456789101117 ... LastLast
Results 121 to 140 of 358

Thread: Kewlj's Fantasy Facts or Bullshit

  1. #121
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    But if you call anyone a liar, that's against the rules.
    You seem to be caught in your own cart & horse problem.

    You are allowed to question claims in an effort to show that the member is lying, but no need to call them a liar first.

    Once you demonstrate that someone is lying, then perhaps it's permitted to call them a liar.

    We'll find out about that if you ever prove that another member is lying.

    But you can't prove someone is lying with name-calling, silly poems, or repeatedly proclaiming "that's just not the way casinos work".

    If you are so hot and bothered about MDawg lying, then stop clowning around, take him up in his challenge, prove that he is lying, and then go right ahead and call him a liar.

    Your stubborn attitude is what's keeping you off that site.

    Really, coach? You have more brains than that. Don't play dumb blond. Don't be a hypocrite.

    What would your response be if I said I could show you sports book won/loss statements for a year that "proved" I won x amount? You'd cut the argument that those statements "prove I win" to shreds in 10 seconds.

    Shackleford made a call. He could have somebody like MDawg on the site, or he could have somebody who has called out gambling nonsense for 40 years. He made his decision.

    I did tell you years ago what to expect when you decided to post over there.

    Michel runs that place with an iron fist over everyone except the Serbs. Everyone else is just living in Michel’s fantasy world. Don’t let a few suspensions fool you. It’s his world and we are just lucky to be able to live in it.

    Just saying.

  2. #122
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    when he heard something that may have been past tense (as in weeks ago) or was some pit boss yanking his chain (I can see that), he reported it as "inside info" from his pals in the high limit room.
    Perhaps, but that doesn't mean he was lying or even bullshitting, he just reported what he was told.

    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    There was zero chance a table full of Canadiens were playing over the weekend in Las Vegas.
    Nobody claimed that "a table full of Canadiens were playing over the weekend in Las Vegas".

    That's something you made up.

    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    MDawg's a fine bullshitter.
    As are you.
    Last edited by coach belly; 07-18-2021 at 03:51 PM.

  3. #123
    Anyway, I apologize, Coach Belly.

    I’m a prick with very little patience when I’m not in the mood for the game you like. I should just ignore you when I don’t feel like playing rather than take it out on you. I sometimes enjoy trying to frame a position in such a fashion that even the most nitty holes can’t be poked in it.

  4. #124
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post

    You seem to be caught in your own cart & horse problem.

    You are allowed to question claims in an effort to show that the member is lying, but no need to call them a liar first.

    Once you demonstrate that someone is lying, then perhaps it's permitted to call them a liar.

    We'll find out about that if you ever prove that another member is lying.

    But you can't prove someone is lying with name-calling, silly poems, or repeatedly proclaiming "that's just not the way casinos work".

    If you are so hot and bothered about MDawg lying, then stop clowning around, take him up in his challenge, prove that he is lying, and then go right ahead and call him a liar.

    Your stubborn attitude is what's keeping you off that site.

    Really, coach? You have more brains than that. Don't play dumb blond. Don't be a hypocrite.

    What would your response be if I said I could show you sports book won/loss statements for a year that "proved" I won x amount? You'd cut the argument that those statements "prove I win" to shreds in 10 seconds.

    Shackleford made a call. He could have somebody like MDawg on the site, or he could have somebody who has called out gambling nonsense for 40 years. He made his decision.

    I did tell you years ago what to expect when you decided to post over there.

    Michel runs that place with an iron fist over everyone except the Serbs. Everyone else is just living in Michel’s fantasy world. Don’t let a few suspensions fool you. It’s his world and we are just lucky to be able to live in it.

    Just saying.

    Well, what I asked myself was how I would have responded if MDawg had been bullshitting about sports betting the way he bullshits about baccarat. If he had done that, I realized I would have gone full scale nuclear on Shackleford as an enabler. Probably right off the bat. But because it's baccarat and I'm no table games guru, I had been letting the enabler angle slide.

    But, as kewlj predicted, MDawg kept escalating the stories. Right now, he's used the WoV rules, which are all subjective, really, to put together a continual scamdicapper tour de force complete with cheerleaders. Nobody with an ounce of integrity (or who's owned something called Integrity Sports for 40 years) should really stand by and allow that. So I have not.

    But yeah, Boz, you were correct. The bottom line is that if you allow scamming, you're a scammer.

  5. #125
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by Mission146 View Post
    You may find the post which contained all of my sources, including charters and private planes.
    What do you mean sources?...some anonymous forum?

    But you don't know what the employees meant anyway...how many players, which players, scratched players, retired players, or simply a fan club that are called Montreal Canadians.

    You didn't follow up with MDawg, but keep at it if it's so important to you.

    You may be an educated man, but I'm afraid you can't speak intelligently about the travel habits of every person associated with the Montreal Canadiens. What you do know is that MDawg reported that someone associated with the team was gambling in the back room at Wynn that night.
    Exactly, coach. The employee was talking about the hookers who travel with the team and call themselves Canadi-Annes. They flew in for the weekend, and it was those hookers wearing jerseys with players' names on them that enabled the casino employees to honestly report, "A table full of Canadi-Annes were playing in a private room."

    And, to be precise here coach, by "playing" the employees may have meant "banging the hell out of."

    So MDawg was completely correct, as were the employees. They weren't lying at all. Or bullshitting.

    One can only imagine what coach means when he says he "gambles" occasionally. Or that he gets "free play." LOL.
    I'm going to bump the above for coach's benefit.

  6. #126
    Originally Posted by Mission146 View Post
    Almost as sad as feeling the need to take the time to do it. (Explaining it to BH)

    Wise up.

    Don’t you get it?

    In these last days, Blackhole can only find joy in bringing annoyance and irritation to others. It’s really all he has. I don’t need to know his situation to come to this conclusion as his posting tone alone makes it obvious.

    You should pity Blackhole, as I do. I feel sorry for him. That you feel the need to defend yourself against any except the absolute most vile or baseless accusations is borderline incomprehensible to me. He called you a liar, so what?

    Why should you care what his opinion is? It would be like me worrying about what a blind dog that’s going to die of old age any day thinks of me. A mean blind dog, at that. You try to feed him or scratch him and he tries to take your hand off.

    Whatever happened to lead you to this state, Blackhole, I’m truly sorry.

    Poor son of a bitch.
    Really Mission? Coming from a person who monitored and writes gambling essays for Serbians or whoever they are owned forums and web sites preying on dumb Americans to gamble and transfer money illegally to third world countries, says a lot about your real mission on these forums.

    The more Houdini winning gamblers that post fantasies, the better chance of you getting more subscribers that buy into it, give it go, and become third world casino customers to line their pockets and help make payroll for you. Of course, you’ll back up any one who comes on these forums and alleges there successful AP’s whether you know them or not.

    Your forum background and your attempts to trash me with your post should pretty much explain why your opinions could never be bias. (joke)

    What is truly sad is you don’t even realize you’re the pathetic one here. Then again you do need to protect your job.

  7. #127
    What the hell are any of you talking about? Buried. Someone deliver a eulogy because the thread is effectively dead.

  8. #128
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    Originally Posted by Mission146 View Post
    Almost as sad as feeling the need to take the time to do it. (Explaining it to BH)

    Wise up.

    Don’t you get it?

    In these last days, Blackhole can only find joy in bringing annoyance and irritation to others. It’s really all he has. I don’t need to know his situation to come to this conclusion as his posting tone alone makes it obvious.

    You should pity Blackhole, as I do. I feel sorry for him. That you feel the need to defend yourself against any except the absolute most vile or baseless accusations is borderline incomprehensible to me. He called you a liar, so what?

    Why should you care what his opinion is? It would be like me worrying about what a blind dog that’s going to die of old age any day thinks of me. A mean blind dog, at that. You try to feed him or scratch him and he tries to take your hand off.

    Whatever happened to lead you to this state, Blackhole, I’m truly sorry.

    Poor son of a bitch.
    Really Mission? Coming from a person who monitored and writes gambling essays for Serbians or whoever they are owned forums and web sites preying on dumb Americans to gamble and transfer money illegally to third world countries, says a lot about your real mission on these forums.

    The more Houdini winning gamblers that post fantasies, the better chance of you getting more subscribers that buy into it, give it go, and become third world casino customers to line their pockets and help make payroll for you. Of course, you’ll back up any one who comes on these forums and alleges there successful AP’s whether you know them or not.

    Your forum background and your attempts to trash me with your post should pretty much explain why your opinions could never be bias. (joke)

    What is truly sad is you don’t even realize you’re the pathetic one here. Then again you do need to protect your job.
    Yes, coming from me.

    Assume everything you said is 100% accurate and without spin, and yet, I PITY YOU. Isn’t that sad?

  9. #129
    My general gambling advice can be summed up: “Don’t gamble…but if you are going to gamble…”

    You’d think the first two words wouldn’t be great for job security. It would seem that the owners of the site, who you seem to loathe, don’t have a problem with academic honesty.

    Also, nicest guys you’d ever want to meet.

  10. #130
    Originally Posted by Mission146 View Post
    My general gambling advice can be summed up: “Don’t gamble…but if you are going to gamble…”

    You’d think the first two words wouldn’t be great for job security. It would seem that the owners of the site, who you seem to loathe, don’t have a problem with academic honesty.

    Also, nicest guys you’d ever want to meet.
    I heard the same thing about the Taliban.

    More than likely you didn't take your first two words advice.

    Your job is to pity me.

  11. #131
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    I'm going to bump the above for coach's benefit.
    What are you bumping?

    I don't have a ditz-to-English dictionary.

  12. #132
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    Originally Posted by Mission146 View Post
    My general gambling advice can be summed up: “Don’t gamble…but if you are going to gamble…”

    You’d think the first two words wouldn’t be great for job security. It would seem that the owners of the site, who you seem to loathe, don’t have a problem with academic honesty.

    Also, nicest guys you’d ever want to meet.
    I heard the same thing about the Taliban.

    More than likely you didn't take your first two words advice.

    Your job is to pity me.
    It won’t be the first or last time I’ve gone against my own advice. I guess that makes me a hypocrite. Oh well, almost everyone is, at times.

    I mainly gamble at a positive expectation, not that I expect you to believe me, or care if you do. If you care to be objective, then I have sprinkled easily repeatable plays here and there that you could try for yourself, if you were so inclined.

    But, you don’t have to. Above all else, know this: If you don’t gamble, then you can’t possibly lose.

    It sounds like you also didn’t take my first two words of advice.

  13. #133
    lol... I didn't read much of this thread but it's impressive that you got Boz and Mission146 involved and you have other members writing 400 word responses lol lol lol.
    Obviously, MISSION ACCOMPLISHED for blackhole!
    Last edited by monet; 07-18-2021 at 04:26 PM.

  14. #134
    It’s been fun, but it’s time to start winding her down for the night. Bedtime in about two hours. I hope everyone sleeps well and I’ll probably see you sons of bitches tomorrow.

  15. #135
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    But I also participate on a serious blackjack forum, with serious blackjack players of all levels. No it's not Norms site where I had a very high helpful rating, but blackjackinfo with much less traffic these days.
    I took your lead and went over to that forum. Clicked on your posts and went down like the first 10 that popped up.

    Looks like the same shit taking place here. 9 out of 10 posts were having arguments with other members.

    Get some help Kewlj.

  16. #136
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    I decided to create a thread showing some of the bullshit Kewlj claims here. Sadly, we could only go back to January 2018 of saved posts losing 2 early years of bullshit. So as I view the past I'll slowly post what I find here.

    So far his claim of making bets to stay hidden under the card-counting radar that scans casinos for these types of players is not adding up. He talks about a losing day of $8,800, a $20,000 swing in one shoe, considers losing 10K or winning 12K in one day is normal for mid-level limits, losing 8K in seven days and 4 of those days losing 10K, winning drawings of 100k cash, a CAR, 1 year free mortgage payments.

    So far he mentioned his BJ career was in its 14th then 15th year and I'm still reading posts only in 01/2018. I had to post this one here because the numbers are hilarious.

    Remember he shows no comp cards, or proven ID's. The pit and surveillance teams in Las Vegas are dropping the ball big time. I think these numbers would have plenty of red flags flying.

    Quote from Kewlj Jan. 15 2018 :

    "I am sure this will fall on deaf ears (or I guess blind eyes) as far as Alan. He sees and acknowledges what he wants to. But, I have spent the last hour or so, looking over my records for 2017.

    I had 7 days that I lost $8000 or more (4 of $10k).

    Alan proposes a stop limit of $2000. I had 58 days that I was down $2000 or more after one or two sessions. 19 of those days I finished the day in the black. 6 of those days down $2000 early, I finished up $5000 or more!

    The total win from those 19 winning days (after being down $2000 or more) was $62,637.50.

    Let me say that again. I won $62,637.50 on those days that I was down $2000 or more and continued playing and turned into winning days. Had I stopped playing at some sort of artificial "stop limit" of $2000, those 19 days would have generated a loss of $38,000.

    That is exactly a $100,000 swing. ($100,637.50 to be exact)

    Now in addition to those 19 days that I was down $2000 and turned into winning days, I had 22 days that I was down $2000 and ended up losing for the day, but losing less than $2000. (Losses of somewhere between $1 and $1999). Those losses on these 22 days that were less than $2000 represent a win of $23,175.

    So lets add that to the total. That is winnings of $123,812.50 after being down $2000 or more early in the day.

    Now for the negative. 17 days that I was initially down $2000 or more, ended up with a total loss of more than $2000. The total losses greater than $2000 are $85,425.

    Subtracting $85,425 (additional losses) from $123,812.50 winning....that is a grand total of a profit of $38,387.50 I profited $38,387.50 because I didn't employ a stop limit and kept playing..

    Any questions Alan? I don't know how I can make it any clearer that when you are playing with and advantage (advantage player), you do not stop playing because of some short term losses. The more you play...the more you will win in the long term.

    I expect you will come back with some sort of "voodoo" money management strategy that is either of your own or Singer's but you are Flat out wrong. When you are playing at an advantage, you want to get in as much play as you can. Stop limits are only beneficial for negative expectation play (losing players). Period! End of conversation."


    I didn't even get started yet.
    Oh so KJ isn't a professional gambler? Fake news. Maybe you should send a letter as a concerned stock holder to be on the look out for a BJ player with semen dripping from his butt hole.

  17. #137
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    You point out a bunch of different scenarios of about 33% of the time you were in casinos over a one year period where for 7 days you had swings from -8K to -10K to profit days. In another combined different 19-day period you won over 62K with over a 100K swing. Winning 123K before deducting your losses.
    Blackhole, you need to read and re-read and re-read until you understand what is being said before you speak. Please show where I ever said I had swings from -8k or -10k to profitable days? I may have had one of these over the years, but I don't recall it. One of the reasons this is unlikely is because I only come out with a fixed amount of funds for a days play. If I were to lose 8k to 10k, my playing BR will have been depleted to the point that for me to continue, I would have to replenish funds from the bank or go back home. I rarely do that. One of the few times I did was the 20k losing day I mentioned. If I recall correctly, I started the daay with a big loss, $7500 or 8k. Since i had only made one stop and played 45 minutes, I decided to replenish that day. After replenishing I recorded anoth losing session in the 3k, 4k range. 3rd session was either break even or a very small win. After a lunch break I played my 4th session and lost another 10k at which point I quit for the day. Very, very rare that I replenish like that, so almost impossible for me to lose 8k-10k and then win for the day.

    For me to lose this kind of money I will have HAD to replenish at some point, and think I have only done so 3 or 4 times in my career. Sometimes I will replenish a few thousand from an ATM just to be sure I have proper BR to start another session, but to lose all or most of my funds for that day and then go to the bank or home and replenish with another substanitial amount, very, very rare.

    These kind of swings 8k, 10k are not common for me at my level. They happen but only a handful of times a year. So for me to be down 8k, 10k and then win for the day, not only would I have had to replenish as just stated, but I would have had to have had two of these rare swings (one in each direction) in the same day. I don't recall that happening....it may have but I don't recall, so again, please link to where I said I was down 8k, 10k and won for the day. And if it did occur and I don't recall, it was ONCE. This is not a common occurance. None of these things you are focusing on are common occurances. You are cherry-picking the most extreme things and trying to portary them as routine.

    As for my playing unrated, I have shared some of the things I do to do so. It all starts with short sessions and betting levels that are well tolerated. That way you aren't going to score as many really big wins that draw attention and pit wants to know who you are and/or has to answer for you.
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post


    This is GREAT! These two idiots, Singer and Blackhole have climbed aboard the Moses bandwagon in an effort to discredit me.

    I don't want to reopen a feud with Moses but he plays blackjack in Reno, playing the single deck game and how he claims to play is very different than I or any other professional lackjck player plays. He gets a round or two in at his max bet at a time before shuffle. He can't possible understand what it is like to get to your max bet early in a 6 deck shoe and play 30-40 max bet rounds in a row before the shoe ends and either win the majority or lose the majority of those max bets for a big winning or losing shoe. He can't possible understand what it is like to get to your max bet early in a 6 deck shoe and play 30-40 max bet rounds in a row before the shoe ends and either win the majority or lose the majority of those max bets for a big winning or losing shoe. Moses just never has understood the variance associated with 6 or 8 deck blackjack play.

    Now that said moses is speculating all kinds of goofy shit. For instance he keeps referring to 8 deck game, when I was playing 6 deck the day I had the 20k win. He keeps referring to a $450 max bet when my max bet is normally $400, but on that day because the count got so high and I knew my cover was blown, I went to what I call my supermax bet above the normal max bet. This may seem contradictory as per staying under the radaar, but at the point you aren't under the radar, so you win as much as you can before being backed off.

    None of this is new. This was all talked about 10 years ago in posts at both WoV and blackjackinfo describing this incident. Try searching "perfect shoe" at either forum.

    Moses is also mixing up a $20k winning shoe with a $20k losing shoe as he is talking about needing to lose almost every hand for a $20k losing shoe. I never had a 20k losing shoe, so I have no idea. I had a 20k losing day ONCE, but it was over 4 different casinos and I don't even know how many shoes.


    So it is just funny as hell that these two nitwits who obviosly know nothing of blackjack advantage play, have latched onto a single deck player from Reno, who similarly knows nothing of 6 and 8 deck blackjack play as their savior in discrediting me. In short these two nitwits, floundering in the water, have climbed into a rowboat with a hole in the bottom to feel safe. Have fun boys.

    KewlJ, you just stated that your normal max bet is $400 okay so let's go with that amount even though you often state that your max bet is $500. In this thread, you have stated that your "starting the day"with your playing bank is between $8K and $10K and that you very rarely if ever have the need to replenish session funds. I am finding these statements of yours extremely difficult to believe as well as to comprehend considering the above statements you made. In reference to Moses you just stated which is worth repeating again.

    "He can't possible understand what it is like to get to your max bet early in a 6 deck shoe and play 30-40 max bet rounds in a row before the shoe ends and either win the majority or lose the majority of those max bets for a big winning or losing shoe. Moses just never has understood the variance associated with 6 or 8 deck blackjack play."

    Evidently, it is you who does not understand the variance associated with shoe play! Without a doubt, it is impossible to guarantee that in heads up play "obvious that it is heads up play you reference to get between 30 and 40 max bets in a row" that you are properly funded to finish the shoe considering your playing bank and betting levels. You often ridicule these board members left and right while openly calling yourself a professional player, which I find astounding. Making just one max bet can lead up to eight times the money bet with splits and doubles and you are betting at just over 200% what is considered optimal and practical betting levels "by your playing bank" by two of the best math guys in the business Don Schlesinger and Norm Wattenberger. One thing you never want to face is having to leave a positive EV situation because of a lack of funds at hand to which I have never had to do.

    On a side note, my lack of posting is due to myself playing many more hours at the tables over the last two months. I am on a real nice positive variance run "meaningless" from returning to play after receiving my covid shots.
    Last edited by BoSox; 07-19-2021 at 06:30 AM.

  18. #138
    Originally Posted by Mission146 View Post
    My general gambling advice can be summed up: “Don’t gamble…but if you are going to gamble…”



    this is from the linked report from N.I.H. - one of the most highly respected medical organizations in the world:




    "Based on its analysis of the U.S. prevalence studies that had been conducted in the past 10 years, the committee estimates that approximately 0.9 percent of the adults in the United States meet the SOGS criteria as pathological gamblers on the basis of their gambling activities in the past year."




    so, it's only reasonable to conclude that for the vast majority of gamblers - gambling is not really a bad thing

    a wife might tear into a husband or vice versa for losing $7K in a year gambling

    but most probably that $7K is not critical to their finances

    people have to do something with their free time - is a guy who loves camping out and spends $7K a year on gear and travel and other stuff so superior to the gambler who loses $7K........?

    I don't think so - especially since I have no interest in camping out

    those posting on these and other forums are not representative of the gambling public - the vast majority don't go to a gambling forum to discuss strategies

    they're going to do what they're going to do regardless of who calls them a ploppy or what anybody else thinks - they could care less


    .


    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK230631/





    .
    Last edited by Half Smoke; 07-19-2021 at 07:39 AM.
    please don't feed the trolls

  19. #139
    Originally Posted by BoSox View Post

    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post


    This is GREAT! These two idiots, Singer and Blackhole have climbed aboard the Moses bandwagon in an effort to discredit me.

    I don't want to reopen a feud with Moses but he plays blackjack in Reno, playing the single deck game and how he claims to play is very different than I or any other professional lackjck player plays. He gets a round or two in at his max bet at a time before shuffle. He can't possible understand what it is like to get to your max bet early in a 6 deck shoe and play 30-40 max bet rounds in a row before the shoe ends and either win the majority or lose the majority of those max bets for a big winning or losing shoe. He can't possible understand what it is like to get to your max bet early in a 6 deck shoe and play 30-40 max bet rounds in a row before the shoe ends and either win the majority or lose the majority of those max bets for a big winning or losing shoe. Moses just never has understood the variance associated with 6 or 8 deck blackjack play.

    Now that said moses is speculating all kinds of goofy shit. For instance he keeps referring to 8 deck game, when I was playing 6 deck the day I had the 20k win. He keeps referring to a $450 max bet when my max bet is normally $400, but on that day because the count got so high and I knew my cover was blown, I went to what I call my supermax bet above the normal max bet. This may seem contradictory as per staying under the radaar, but at the point you aren't under the radar, so you win as much as you can before being backed off.

    None of this is new. This was all talked about 10 years ago in posts at both WoV and blackjackinfo describing this incident. Try searching "perfect shoe" at either forum.

    Moses is also mixing up a $20k winning shoe with a $20k losing shoe as he is talking about needing to lose almost every hand for a $20k losing shoe. I never had a 20k losing shoe, so I have no idea. I had a 20k losing day ONCE, but it was over 4 different casinos and I don't even know how many shoes.


    So it is just funny as hell that these two nitwits who obviosly know nothing of blackjack advantage play, have latched onto a single deck player from Reno, who similarly knows nothing of 6 and 8 deck blackjack play as their savior in discrediting me. In short these two nitwits, floundering in the water, have climbed into a rowboat with a hole in the bottom to feel safe. Have fun boys.

    KewlJ, you just stated that your normal max bet is $400 okay so let's go with that amount even though you often state that your max bet is $500. In this thread, you have stated that your "starting the day"with your playing bank is between $8K and $10K and that you very rarely if ever have the need to replenish session funds. I am finding these statements of yours extremely difficult to believe as well as to comprehend considering the above statements you made. In reference to Moses you just stated which is worth repeating again.

    "He can't possible understand what it is like to get to your max bet early in a 6 deck shoe and play 30-40 max bet rounds in a row before the shoe ends and either win the majority or lose the majority of those max bets for a big winning or losing shoe. Moses just never has understood the variance associated with 6 or 8 deck blackjack play."

    Evidently, it is you who does not understand the variance associated with shoe play! Without a doubt, it is impossible to guarantee that in heads up play "obvious that it is heads up play you reference to get between 30 and 40 max bets in a row" that you are properly funded to finish the shoe considering your playing bank and betting levels. You often ridicule these board members left and right while openly calling yourself a professional player, which I find astounding. Making just one max bet can lead up to eight times the money bet with splits and doubles and you are betting at just over 200% what is considered optimal and practical betting levels "by your playing bank" by two of the best math guys in the business Don Schlesinger and Norm Wattenberger. One thing you never want to face is having to leave a positive EV situation because of a lack of funds at hand to which I have never had to do.

    On a side note, my lack of posting is due to myself playing many more hours at the tables over the last two months. I am on a real nice positive variance run "meaningless" from returning to play after receiving my covid shots.
    I don't quite see it that way, Bosox. KJ's playing bankroll is much larger than what he is bringing in. The chance that he would run out of money in a plus EV situation is small. And it's not the end of the world if he walks in a plus EV situation. I do it all the time when I'm tired of working. Plus EV can always be found again.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  20. #140
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    Originally Posted by BoSox View Post

    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post


    This is GREAT! These two idiots, Singer and Blackhole have climbed aboard the Moses bandwagon in an effort to discredit me.

    I don't want to reopen a feud with Moses but he plays blackjack in Reno, playing the single deck game and how he claims to play is very different than I or any other professional lackjck player plays. He gets a round or two in at his max bet at a time before shuffle. He can't possible understand what it is like to get to your max bet early in a 6 deck shoe and play 30-40 max bet rounds in a row before the shoe ends and either win the majority or lose the majority of those max bets for a big winning or losing shoe. He can't possible understand what it is like to get to your max bet early in a 6 deck shoe and play 30-40 max bet rounds in a row before the shoe ends and either win the majority or lose the majority of those max bets for a big winning or losing shoe. Moses just never has understood the variance associated with 6 or 8 deck blackjack play.

    Now that said moses is speculating all kinds of goofy shit. For instance he keeps referring to 8 deck game, when I was playing 6 deck the day I had the 20k win. He keeps referring to a $450 max bet when my max bet is normally $400, but on that day because the count got so high and I knew my cover was blown, I went to what I call my supermax bet above the normal max bet. This may seem contradictory as per staying under the radaar, but at the point you aren't under the radar, so you win as much as you can before being backed off.

    None of this is new. This was all talked about 10 years ago in posts at both WoV and blackjackinfo describing this incident. Try searching "perfect shoe" at either forum.

    Moses is also mixing up a $20k winning shoe with a $20k losing shoe as he is talking about needing to lose almost every hand for a $20k losing shoe. I never had a 20k losing shoe, so I have no idea. I had a 20k losing day ONCE, but it was over 4 different casinos and I don't even know how many shoes.


    So it is just funny as hell that these two nitwits who obviosly know nothing of blackjack advantage play, have latched onto a single deck player from Reno, who similarly knows nothing of 6 and 8 deck blackjack play as their savior in discrediting me. In short these two nitwits, floundering in the water, have climbed into a rowboat with a hole in the bottom to feel safe. Have fun boys.

    KewlJ, you just stated that your normal max bet is $400 okay so let's go with that amount even though you often state that your max bet is $500. In this thread, you have stated that your "starting the day"with your playing bank is between $8K and $10K and that you very rarely if ever have the need to replenish session funds. I am finding these statements of yours extremely difficult to believe as well as to comprehend considering the above statements you made. In reference to Moses you just stated which is worth repeating again.

    "He can't possible understand what it is like to get to your max bet early in a 6 deck shoe and play 30-40 max bet rounds in a row before the shoe ends and either win the majority or lose the majority of those max bets for a big winning or losing shoe. Moses just never has understood the variance associated with 6 or 8 deck blackjack play."

    Evidently, it is you who does not understand the variance associated with shoe play! Without a doubt, it is impossible to guarantee that in heads up play "obvious that it is heads up play you reference to get between 30 and 40 max bets in a row" that you are properly funded to finish the shoe considering your playing bank and betting levels. You often ridicule these board members left and right while openly calling yourself a professional player, which I find astounding. Making just one max bet can lead up to eight times the money bet with splits and doubles and you are betting at just over 200% what is considered optimal and practical betting levels "by your playing bank" by two of the best math guys in the business Don Schlesinger and Norm Wattenberger. One thing you never want to face is having to leave a positive EV situation because of a lack of funds at hand to which I have never had to do.

    On a side note, my lack of posting is due to myself playing many more hours at the tables over the last two months. I am on a real nice positive variance run "meaningless" from returning to play after receiving my covid shots.
    I don't quite see it that way, Bosox. KJ's playing bankroll is much larger than what he is bringing in. The chance that he would run out of money in a plus EV situation is small. And it's not the end of the world if he walks in a plus EV situation. I do it all the time when I'm tired of working. Plus EV can always be found again.

    Mickey, having to leave a positive position in blackjack because of lack of playing funds is considered a Cardinal Sin in the blackjack world of knowledgeable players. However, I strongly suspect that KJ is smartly fibbing about the amount of money that he brings to the casino for fear of assault and robbery.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Pre-Season Fantasy
    By redietz in forum Sports & Sportsbetting
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-12-2017, 12:28 PM
  2. Fun Facts About Pottsville (PA)
    By redietz in forum Whatever's On Your Mind
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-27-2017, 06:36 PM
  3. Fantasy Football and the NFL
    By redietz in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 06-12-2015, 02:10 PM
  4. What is your casino fantasy?
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-22-2013, 09:24 AM
  5. Facts about Las Vegas they don't want you to know.
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-16-2011, 04:03 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •