Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 70

Thread: MDawg's new LV MANSION

  1. #21
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    I seriously doubt it was you
    I haven't been out there, that was probably tewlj.

    I'd have stuck your head in the toilet.

  2. #22
    Originally Posted by blackhole View Post
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    And no, I won’t publicly name him because he obviously is a sue happy lawyer.
    Surprising how a few bucks could put the brakes on your whole forum personal demeanor you created of doing things just for and because of principle.
    have you blocked but I had see what you had to say. Call me curious but I believe you have credible stuff to post at times when you get past your anger….for whatever reason.

    Not sure why you would say it’s a few bucks. Why would I (or anyone) want to get sued by a guy who can represent himself and drag a lawsuit with or without merit on your years? Look at how the Wizard acts in fear of him.

    I have assets and don’t want the hassle. I clearly understand the person who I believe to be posting under the clearly anonymous name of MDawg Is very successful in life as an attorney. While I don’t believe his claims of winning at will, I do believe he is living a life few can understand. And for that I respect him. And I still will never understand why he is so concerned what we think about him.

  3. #23
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    And I still will never understand why he is so concerned what we think about him.
    Narcissism.

  4. #24
    Originally Posted by jbjb View Post
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    And I still will never understand why he is so concerned what we think about him.
    Narcissism.
    Simple and correct answer, but there has to be more.

    I don’t think he is selling anything. I’m thinking he never has been treated as such a punching bag in his life.

    In the history of gambling forums, Alan is probably at the top of punching bags. While there is a few that feel bad for him, even they laugh at him. Next in line is Tasha, but all know she is mentally retarted based on accepted IQ scales.

    That leaves some old guys from GG like Spike, guys from Patrick’s and MDawg. It has to bother him so much that he found someone who he thought was credible to verify him for $500.

    Just as big a question is how Michel sunk this low

  5. #25
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    Originally Posted by jbjb View Post
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    And I still will never understand why he is so concerned what we think about him.
    Narcissism.
    Simple and correct answer, but there has to be more.

    I don’t think he is selling anything. I’m thinking he never has been treated as such a punching bag in his life.

    In the history of gambling forums, Alan is probably at the top of punching bags. While there is a few that feel bad for him, even they laugh at him. Next in line is Tasha, but all know she is mentally retarted based on accepted IQ scales.

    That leaves some old guys from GG like Spike, guys from Patrick’s and MDawg. It has to bother him so much that he found someone who he thought was credible to verify him for $500.

    Just as big a question is how Michel sunk this low
    What is going on? Wizard getting sued?

  6. #26
    Originally Posted by MaxPen View Post
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    Originally Posted by jbjb View Post

    Narcissism.
    Simple and correct answer, but there has to be more.

    I don’t think he is selling anything. I’m thinking he never has been treated as such a punching bag in his life.

    In the history of gambling forums, Alan is probably at the top of punching bags. While there is a few that feel bad for him, even they laugh at him. Next in line is Tasha, but all know she is mentally retarted based on accepted IQ scales.

    That leaves some old guys from GG like Spike, guys from Patrick’s and MDawg. It has to bother him so much that he found someone who he thought was credible to verify him for $500.

    Just as big a question is how Michel sunk this low
    What is going on? Wizard getting sued?
    No the Wiz stated the other day he witnessed nothing with MDawg that was anything but luck.

    Amazingly he came back the next day, took 11 days off his suspension and stated he was redacting what he said about luck the previous day and mentioned his confidentiality agreement.

    We can all see exactly what happened.

  7. #27
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post
    Originally Posted by MaxPen View Post
    Originally Posted by The Boz View Post

    Simple and correct answer, but there has to be more.

    I don’t think he is selling anything. I’m thinking he never has been treated as such a punching bag in his life.

    In the history of gambling forums, Alan is probably at the top of punching bags. While there is a few that feel bad for him, even they laugh at him. Next in line is Tasha, but all know she is mentally retarted based on accepted IQ scales.

    That leaves some old guys from GG like Spike, guys from Patrick’s and MDawg. It has to bother him so much that he found someone who he thought was credible to verify him for $500.

    Just as big a question is how Michel sunk this low
    What is going on? Wizard getting sued?
    No the Wiz stated the other day he witnessed nothing with MDawg that was anything but luck.

    Amazingly he came back the next day, took 11 days off his suspension and stated he was redacting what he said about luck the previous day and mentioned his confidentiality agreement.

    We can all see exactly what happened.
    He, Wizard, did say in one post somewhere that he did indeed believe MD was using some sort of AP but wasn't at liberty to say. That post should be found.

  8. #28
    Originally Posted by jbjb View Post
    He, Wizard, did say in one post somewhere that he did indeed believe MD was using some sort of AP but wasn't at liberty to say. That post should be found.
    Since I have resigned from WoV, I can share insight from private conversation (not the conversations themselves) as to exactly what is going on.

    Wizard finally revealed the other day what his opinion based on witnessing Mdawgs play, which was what he was supposed to do at the time of the witnessing of the play. In no uncertain term wizard stated that while Mdawg won for the session witnessed, winning the bet with Dark Oz in the process, that Mdawgs play was not a strategy that would produce long-term winning (as claimed).

    Unfortunately because of this non disclosure agreement that Wizard had agreed to, he was immediately threatened and retracted the key part of that statement, plus other concessions. Why Mike agreed to that stipulation in the first place is beyond me. He was suppossed to be the expert witness sharing his expert opinion. And why Mdawg would make and enforce such an agreement should be plain to see for everyone. He did not want Mike saying exactly what Mike said this week. That essentiually ends the fairytale.

    Now in regards to what jbjb was referencing, it is a relatively minor point. During the witnessing of that one session, Mike became aware of a concession that the casino makes to Mdawg and probably most higher limit players. Most likely some sort of loss rebates. And while loss rebates can be substantial (as in the case of Don Johnson), it was immediately referenced that this loss rebate (whatever the terms) would not be enough to make for +EV play. In addition a loss rebate would not result in all the winning sessions claims. With a loss rebate, winning and losing sessions would be normal, it is just the losing sessions slightly reduced due to the rebate. So while this was referenced, it was also quickly pointed out that it was not significant or a game changer.

  9. #29
    What a joke. This Mdog character wins the internet.......lol

  10. #30
    Originally Posted by MaxPen View Post
    What a joke. This Mdog character wins the internet.......lol
    Yeah, this guy leaves Singer in the trolling dust. I guess Singer gets points for longevity, what was it 20+ years? But he eventually hung himself with the RV pictures. I still shake my head at the nerve. The guy went to an RV dealership and took pictures of himself in an RV, right there on the dealership showroom floor. My God!

    Any way this Mdawg, while a shorter time, although this isn't his first time around, he was a former member at WoV, but this guy because he is a high stakes (losing) player was able to produce real pictures and evidence to back up some of his claims. Not the winning, but the high stakes play part, that gave him some short lived credibility.

  11. #31
    So this "mansion" purchased in LV. Now with an identity, I suspect I could come up with this mansion, if it was really purchased. Purchased in a trust or not. Not that many property transactions at the price involved and even fewer involving a trust. I'll bet I could come up with the property involved (if there actually is one). But I have no interest. Who knows....maybe another day.

  12. #32
    Douchedawg would be a damned fool to sue the Wiz for violating a nondisclosure agreement.

    What damages could he possibly prove?

    His name is not known, so how could he show the disclosure hurt his reputation?

    A real person cannot show they've been damaged if the only name they're known by in the community is not their real name: does not compute.

    Also, once a suit is filed it is public record and when reported at WoV his name would be out there.
    What, Me Worry?

  13. #33
    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    Douchedawg would be a damned fool to sue the Wiz for violating a nondisclosure agreement.

    What damages could he possibly prove?

    His name is not known, so how could he show the disclosure hurt his reputation?

    A real person cannot show they've been damaged if the only name they're known by in the community is not their real name: does not compute.

    Also, once a suit is filed it is public record and when reported at WoV his name would be out there.
    You are the attorney. This is precisely why I haven't used or revealed the persons name.

    But let me ask: couldn't a non disclosure have been written in such a way to protect for that? Something like, this non disclosure agreement bewteen John Doe, who posts under the name Mdawg, and Micheal Shackleford, prevents Micheal Shackleford from revealing what he witnessed when he witnessed the gambling play of John Doe, posting as Mdawg?

  14. #34
    I am finding it hard to believe an actual physical non disclosure agreement was signed. This whole thing is more retarded than the phony Newell bill of sale......lol

  15. #35
    KJ: Your hypothetical only goes to the issue of disclosing what the Wiz might have seen.

    Assume he violated it and described what he saw, which would be a presumptive violation of a nondisclosure agreement.

    That doesn't mean douchedawg will run off immediately to the courthouse to file suit, at least not if he's rowing with all of his oars in the water.

    He'd only sue if he felt he had a good shot at getting a handsome financial reward, aka verdict, and if his real name was not known to WoV viewers when the Wiz blabbed about what he saw, then douchedawg cannot show his ACTUAL reputation was damaged because nobody knows his real name.

    It's like this: if someone posted at VCT that "KJ is a pedophile" I would not suggest you sue for defamation, as the character KJ is a fictitious non de plume, aka a ghost, and how can a ghost be harmed or even sue for that matter?

    That's just my opinion, not based on examination of any actual case law; for all I know I could be full of shit on this one, but I doubt it.
    What, Me Worry?

  16. #36
    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    KJ: Your hypothetical only goes to the issue of disclosing what the Wiz might have seen.

    Assume he violated it and described what he saw, which would be a presumptive violation of a nondisclosure agreement.

    That doesn't mean douchedawg will run off immediately to the courthouse to file suit, at least not if he's rowing with all of his oars in the water.

    He'd only sue if he felt he had a good shot at getting a handsome financial reward, aka verdict, and if his real name was not known to WoV viewers when the Wiz blabbed about what he saw, then douchedawg cannot show his ACTUAL reputation was damaged because nobody knows his real name.

    It's like this: if someone posted at VCT that "KJ is a pedophile" I would not suggest you sue for defamation, as the character KJ is a fictitious non de plume, aka a ghost, and how can a ghost be harmed or even sue for that matter?

    That's just my opinion, not based on examination of any actual case law; for all I know I could be full of shit on this one, but I doubt it.
    Thank you MisterV for your professional opinion.

    Now the only think I will say about the possibility of lawsuit being filed. Mdawg is one of those ambulance chaser type personal attorney type lawyers. Doesn't that group have a history of filing rather frivilous lawsuits, hoping that the other party will settle avoiding legal costs to fight?

  17. #37
    Originally Posted by MaxPen View Post
    I am finding it hard to believe an actual physical non disclosure agreement was signed. This whole thing is more retarded than the phony Newell bill of sale......lol
    I basically thought that too. Maybe some kind of oral agreement at best. But when Wizard disclosed what he disclosed this week, something sure spooked him as he withdrew parts of the statement immediately, released Mdawg from suspension and suspended himself. And Mike even announced that these actions (unsuspending Mdawg and suspending himself) where negotiated with Mdawg. It doesn't take much to see that their was some kind of legal thread involved.

    The guy is one of those ambulance chaser, personal attoney types. He probably did have Mike sign a document....how legal, I don't know.

  18. #38
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Originally Posted by MaxPen View Post
    I am finding it hard to believe an actual physical non disclosure agreement was signed. This whole thing is more retarded than the phony Newell bill of sale......lol
    I basically thought that too. Maybe some kind of oral agreement at best. But when Wizard disclosed what he disclosed this week, something sure spooked him as he withdrew parts of the statement immediately, released Mdawg from suspension and suspended himself. And Mike even announced that these actions (unsuspending Mdawg and suspending himself) where negotiated with Mdawg. It doesn't take much to see that their was some kind of legal thread involved.

    The guy is one of those ambulance chaser, personal attoney types. He probably did have Mike sign a document....how legal, I don't know.
    Just another reason for people to stay off that forum. Who wants to participate in a place that the rulers can't even control? Next Mdog will be demanding membership email lists and IP addresses for compensation for some unforeseen wrongdoing by the rulers......lol

    This really takes the cake for Cuckdom.

  19. #39
    For anyone needing an MDawg fix, there is some interesting stuff at GF.

    Admittedly I didn’t read it all but it appears he tried to threaten and bully the Admins there as he does. However unlike others, they stand up for their decisions. Most of us don’t agree with the garbage they allow there, but when they put their foot down, they don’t change their mind.

    Sounds like they put the old dog down!

  20. #40
    Quote from the GF admin:

    “ There is nothing further for us to add as we believe we have exhausted this matter and will not be changing our decision no matter how much you try to pressure or attack us. You know you acted in bad faith, we know you acted in bad faith, and now you know that we know that you acted in bad faith. You also know that you acted in bad faith to try to privately pressure us to acquiesce to your demands. We are not posting it here because we believe it would not reflect positively on you”

    The entire thing begs the question on why MDawg is so upset about not being able to promote the site he post his fantasy’s on that he doesn’t own?
    Last edited by The Boz; 08-31-2021 at 05:48 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The case against Mdawg
    By kewlJ in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 143
    Last Post: 06-07-2021, 10:03 PM
  2. A Question for Mr MDawg
    By AndrewG in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 04-24-2021, 12:23 AM
  3. Would You Allow an MDawg?
    By redietz in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 04-05-2021, 01:33 PM
  4. Congrats to MDawg
    By Wynnpleasure775 in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 42
    Last Post: 10-23-2020, 12:10 PM
  5. MDawg here. Greetings!
    By MDawg in forum Whatever's On Your Mind
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 02-29-2020, 04:30 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •