Caesars Palace hahhahahaha not again. Not again u son of btiches

[BoSox]

How does one open or shut their mouth on an internet message board??

Never mind that how is the sheetrock patchwork coming along?

[monet]

Never mind that how is the sheetrock patchwork coming along?

Very Slow.
Not Fun at all.
One of my dogs fell sick for the last 2 days.
Hope she pulls through.
I'm real close to taking her to the Vet.
She was throwing up for almost 3 days straight and feces didn't look so good.
She hasn't regurgitated anything up in the last 22 hours so that seems like a good sign.
I blew off work for the day to watch her while I sit here and play chess and poker.
Interwebthingy Machine said to feed her activated charcoal which I mixed with some congee and she got it down.
Fucking Alpo!
So far, so good.
Thanks for asking.
I still can't figure out how to open or shut my mouth on this web page thingamajig... emphasis on JIG.

[BoSox]

Never mind that how is the sheetrock patchwork coming along?

Very Slow.
Not Fun at all.
One of my dogs fell sick for the last 2 days.
Hope she pulls through.
I'm real close to taking her to the Vet.
She was throwing up for almost 3 days straight and feces didn't look so good.
She hasn't regurgitated anything up in the last 22 hours so that seems like a good sign.
I blew off work for the day to watch her while I sit here and play chess and poker.
Interwebthingy Machine said to feed her activated charcoal which I mixed with some congee and she got it down.
Fucking Alpo!
So far, so good.
Thanks for asking.
I still can't figure out how to open or shut my mouth on this web page thingamajig... emphasis on JIG.

Sorry about the current situation. Sounds like "at times, people's writing habits do often feel like talking to others" you bit off more than you can chew. Speaking of which, don't worry if things turn for the worse at least you may very well end up eating a nice unexpected stew. And don't get angry at the wife if you do as she would be only following old ancestral customs. I know, I know, but, even people from Hong Kong have a history.

[Mission146]

Bump. This thread is being bumped until I get someone with verifiable proof that is up on the main floor shoe games with a decent sample size at Caesars Palace LV/AC, Planet Hollywood, Mandalay Bay, San Manuel, Harrah's PA or any Harrah's in general, and all of Southern California shoe games. SHOE games only. I will bump this every fucking day until I get verifiable proof

Are you seriously expecting (Let's be real: I know the answer is no) that one of the...what...three Blackjack players here (?) have not only counted at one of these specific properties, but can also provide, "Verifiable proof," that they were profitable there? Even if someone kept session logs of each place, which they may or may not have, would you even accept those as, "Proof!?"

Don't bump this thread again....hahahahahahahaha....not again you son of a bitch!

If the Super Troll thread gets popped again, I'm adding you to my list.

[coach belly]

Even if someone kept session logs of each place, which they may or may not have, would you even accept those as, "Proof!?"

tewlj is assuming that he would not, and he's clinging to that assumption as an excuse not to corroborate the claims that he has made about yearly winnings.

It seems that you are also doubtful that ZK would accept playing records, tax records, bank records, etc....but he clearly states what he would accept as verified proof here...

When I ask for verifiable proof I mean detailed records of your play, which no one ever has. You can take all of my records and offset it by all of my expenses since May 2017 with the bankroll I came here with and then take my overall win and then show you cash on hand and bank statements to verify it all works out and my bankroll equals what I say it does.

If you (Mission) claimed to make X for your writings, and you then posted a photo of your 1099s as proof of earnings, people would believe you....as long as your documents matched your claims.

Your real identity is known, but even if it was not known, redacting personal identifying information from the documents, would preserve your anonymity.

So tewlj's excuse of risking anonymity is bogus.

[Mission146]

tewlj is assuming that he would not, and he's clinging to that assumption as an excuse not to corroborate the claims that he has made about yearly winnings.

It seems that you are also doubtful that ZK would accept playing records, tax records, bank records, etc....but he clearly states what he would accept as verified proof here...

Who the hell is talking about KewlJ on this one? I didn't see anything where ZK said it had to be KewlJ specifically.

Listen, ZK is suggesting that someone provide, "Verifiable Proof," that another person is winning card counting Blackjack in one of a specific handful of casinos under one specific condition. Would he accept tax records? How would tax records even prove that you were winning at one specific place?

Would he accept handwritten records? In what way are handwritten records, "Verifiable Proof?" I can write something down right now and it wouldn't prove anything.

Even if someone kept meticulous financial records...you'd still have to be willing to believe them. Hell, the IRS has to be willing to believe them...how would they even investigate and prove if you were lying or underreporting? Quite frankly, I imagine that the IRS is just pleased as punch that people are filing at all on gambling income (profits). But, my original point...even if someone kept meticulous records, do you think they would automatically differentiate between shoe/hand dealt games?

Anyway, when you talk about, "Proof," the IRS doesn't even get, "Proof." Because the IRS doesn't get, "Proof," then tax documents would fail to suffice as proof.

If you (Mission) claimed to make X for your writings, and you then posted a photo of your 1099s as proof of earnings, people would believe you....as long as your documents matched your claims.

Your real identity is known, but even if it was not known, redacting personal identifying information from the documents, would preserve your anonymity.

So tewlj's excuse of risking anonymity is bogus.

First of all, I wouldn't publicly disclose what I make because it's not anyone's goddamn business. Secondly, it's not like it's some huge and impressive number...not that I would be inclined to brag if it was, because I still wouldn't.

The next thing is that I'm not going to post anything having to do with tax documents, because those are similarly nobody's fucking business.

You internet gangsta's have some nuts, I'll tell you that. Internet nuts, anyway. If I were having a casual in-person conversation and mentioned being a paid writer, then the other guy demanded to see my tax returns, I can't say that I wouldn't reflexively just crack him one in the jaw...of course, nobody would ever behave like that in an in-person setting, which is the difference between nuts and internet nuts.

Anyway, this is where I back up KewlJ's very sensible point and get accused of being a KewlJ cultist, even though I'm not the one obsessed with bringing KewlJ into every Blackjack related conversation.

If KewlJ's claims are true, he makes more money than I do from gambling AND his particular form of AP is one of the most highly scrutinized. In short, his anonymity means more to him than mine does to me...as far as the casinos themselves are concerned. Originally, I wrote under my actual name and was quite surprised when that bit me in the ass with both a physical and an online casino...although, the online thing really shouldn't have surprised me as much as it did.

But, beyond that, it's not the same level of scrutiny. Maybe multi-carding could be a concern, but I don't think a casino is just going to automatically kick me out if they see me playing a slot machine or video poker...even using a card. I think most casinos tend to be, "Live and let live," with small-time machine guys like me who are mostly taking two and three figure sums out of there on any one visit.

[Mission146]

Also, my post shouldn't be taken as a shot at ZK...other than the impossibility of anything rising to the level of, "Verifiable proof." Mostly, I got a great laugh at his thread title.

[coach belly]

Who the hell is talking about KewlJ on this one?

Here's what ZK was looking for...

All I fucking need to know is who is a lifetime winner at Caesars Palace LV and Caesars Palace Atlantic City on their SHOE games. Also Planet Hollywood, Mandalay Bay, San Manuel, and the rest of that rigged SoCal state.

And here's who answered him...

I am a lifetime winner at Caesars LV, Planet H and Mandy Bay.

That's how KJ became the subject.

ZK is suggesting that someone provide, "Verifiable Proof," that another person is winning card counting Blackjack in one of a specific handful of casinos under one specific condition. Would he accept tax records? How would tax records even prove that you were winning at one specific place?
Would he accept handwritten records?

Apparently, yes he would, and he stated that here...

When I ask for verifiable proof I mean detailed records of your play, which no one ever has. You can take all of my records and offset it by all of my expenses since May 2017 with the bankroll I came here with and then take my overall win and then show you cash on hand and bank statements to verify it all works out and my bankroll equals what I say it does..

First of all, I wouldn't publicly disclose what I make because it's not anyone's goddamn business.
The next thing is that I'm not going to post anything having to do with tax documents, because those are similarly nobody's fucking business.

It's a hypothetical scenario, I used you as an example since I was replying to you. But the same level of scrutiny would apply to anyone who was interested in supplying ZK with the verified results he seeks. It applies specifically to tewlj, since he has publicly disclosed what he made, and that's he's a lifetime winner at the properties that ZK named.

You internet gangsta's have some nuts, I'll tell you that. Internet nuts, anyway. If I were having a casual in-person conversation and mentioned being a paid writer, then the other guy demanded to see my tax returns, I can't say that I wouldn't reflexively just crack him one in the jaw.

This is not a casual in-person conversation. ZK asked for verifiable proof that anyone was a lifetime winner at those properties. tewlj replied that he is a lifetime winner, but refuses to prove it to ZK's satisfaction.

Why bother making the claim, when he knew that verification was required? Why not just verify the claim and be done with it? Especially since it it would be easy and risk-free to do so.[/QUOTE]

[Mission146]

This quote in Quote is too much of a pain. All quotes are of Belly:

That's how KJ became the subject.

Yeah, but the thread bumps apply to anyone and what you said doesn't have anything to do with, "Verifiable proof." Would you agree with me that there is a difference between, 'Proof,' and, 'Evidence?'

Even if that's what ZK wants, then even one of the (as I mentioned, what, three(?)) Blackjack players here would have had to have kept not only their logs, but their logs would have to separate the different types of games in the first place. If the written records constitute, 'Proof,' to ZK's standard, then who am I to argue? I only see them as evidence...fairly weak, at that.

It's a hypothetical scenario, I used you as an example since I was replying to you. But the same level of scrutiny would apply to anyone who was interested in supplying ZK with the verified results he seeks. It applies specifically to tewlj, since he has publicly disclosed what he made, and that's he's a lifetime winner at the properties that ZK named.

Well, again, I don't see how the tax documents prove anything about a specific type of game at those specific properties. As mentioned, the IRS would just have to accept whatever records as, 'Proof,' but that doesn't make them proof...that just means that's what you told the IRS.

This is not a casual in-person conversation. ZK asked for verifiable proof that anyone was a lifetime winner at those properties. tewlj replied that he is a lifetime winner, but refuses to prove it to ZK's satisfaction.

Why bother making the claim, when he knew that verification was required? Why not just verify the claim and be done with it? Especially since it it would be easy and risk-free to do so.

What do you want? That he posts a picture of a handwritten piece of paper or computer printout? The standard of proof demands must be slipping. I can post that...wouldn't be true, but I could post it.

[jbjb]

Never counter cards in Caesars Palace. Much better things to do there.

[coach belly]

Well, again, I don't see how the tax documents prove anything about a specific type of game at those specific properties. As mentioned, the IRS would just have to accept whatever records as, 'Proof,' but that doesn't make them proof...that just means that's what you told the IRS.

ZK is looking for verified proof that anyone is a lifetime winner at those properties he listed.

tewlj replied that he is a lifetime winner at those properties, but he won't submit any evidence to verify that claim...nothing.

His excuse for not submitting anything is that ZK won't accept anything he submits.

But we know what ZK will accept, so that excuse is bogus.

We can also stipulate that ZK's standards and the IRS's standards of proof are not the same.

But that doesn't matter, since the IRS is not involved in this examination.

[Mission146]

Well, again, I don't see how the tax documents prove anything about a specific type of game at those specific properties. As mentioned, the IRS would just have to accept whatever records as, 'Proof,' but that doesn't make them proof...that just means that's what you told the IRS.

ZK is looking for verified proof that anyone is a lifetime winner at those properties he listed.

tewlj replied that he is a lifetime winner at those properties, but he won't submit any evidence to verify that claim...nothing.

His excuse for not submitting anything is that ZK won't accept anything he submits.

But we know what ZK will accept, so that excuse is bogus.

We can also stipulate that ZK's standards and the IRS's standards of proof are not the same.

But that doesn't matter, since the IRS is not involved in this examination.

On shoe games specifically. With the sample being of the posters here, because really, who else is going to see this request?

Okay, if KewlJ indeed keeps such specific records and ZK would accept them as, 'Proof,' then there's really nothing further for us to discuss. Will ZK openly state that such, 'Evidence,' constitutes, 'Verified Proof,' in his mind if KewlJ stipulates that he even has such specific documentation to begin with?

Well, you brought up tax records, bank records and 1099's in your comment---not me.

And, again, I mostly just got a kick out of the thread title and wanted to repeat it.

[ZenKinG]

Bump

[Mission146]

Not again you son of a bitch!!!!

[MisterV]

Bump

Nobody will help you, you are a pariah, a dead, stinking albatross tied figuratively around the neck of this forum.

[jbjb]

Seriously, I hope he's being cheated and he goes broke! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

[Tasha]

Zenking, do you EVER post anything that is actually 100 percent POSITIVE? Basically of your posts seem to be 100 percent NEGATIVE. I think you've written just ONE positive thing, something about ACTUALLY being ahead at a certain Casino.

[The Boz]

Zenking, do you EVER post anything that is actually 100 percent POSITIVE? Basically of your posts seem to be 100 percent NEGATIVE. I think you've written just ONE positive thing, something about ACTUALLY being ahead at a certain Casino.

Fuck you “Tasha”, only reason you are alive is someone saw you as a government entitlement.

[ZenKinG]

Still waiting... For someone to come out of the woodwork and tell me they're up on the main floor shoe games at Caesars Palace LV or AC, San Manuel, any SoCal shoe game, Mandalay Bay, Planet Hollywood, and Harrah's PA

[The Boz]

Still waiting... For someone to come out of the woodwork and tell me they're up on the main floor shoe games at Caesars Palace LV or AC, San Manuel, any SoCal shoe game, Mandalay Bay, Planet Hollywood, and Harrah's PA

I’m up at Caesars Palace LV on the shoe game lifetime.

I also am up at PH and Harrahs Chester.

I also won the FIFA video game Championship. I beat a loser who was shaking the entire time because he was just happy to be there.

I wonder how that stupid fucks life turned out?