Since this is important...regarding the "we" in the sentence above, I have my doubts. The case is not nearly a slam dunk against Ivermectin, and not nearly a slam dunk for vaccine efficacy.
Ivermectin is NOT hydroxychloroquine. Just because anti-science Republicans are for something doesn't make it wrong.
Suggested reading:
https://www.newswars.com/now-is-the-...o-treat-covid/
The above sounds like a right wing hype job, but appearing on a right wing hype job website does not make the article itself a right wing hype job. This is a very important rule to remember.
And then we have this:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/med...?ocid=msedgntp
This was not a close contest. Having had the original Covid strain is much, much more effective against getting Delta than the vaccine.
I will tackle this in my blog in days ahead, not from the medical perspective because I am unqualified, but from an analysis of American media coverage (I was a journalism major originally, and have worked for small newspapers), and my degree is in Writing. I will absolutely eviscerate a piece CNN did regarding Ivermectin. And after you read what I have to say, you will agree with me.
So stay tuned.
KewlJ, I love you. You sound like my friends in academia, who are turning a blind eye to the fact that Republican-bad, Progressive-good is not really a way to evaluate sources.