No I'm not paying you to give you what you've been asking for.Originally Posted by MisterV
Meeting up and getting what you've been asking for is not absurd.
I understand why you choose to remain a sniper...it's because you're a coward.
20 years a coward, according to Alan. Wow, that's a heavy cross to bear.
Carry on.
Originally Posted by kewlJYa know something else. I even gave Mr Po-Tater-head my surefire winning NFL game pick last Thursday night. The Eagles +6.5 against Tampa Bay. Not because it was the Eagles, but whenever a game looks too good to be true...bet the other way. It took a backdoor cover that should have never happened and an inexplicable 2 point conversion, making it a 6 point game instead of 7. But in the end, what looked to be the sure thing Tampa - 6.5 didn't cover (28-22). The games that look like a sure thing never are.Originally Posted by jbjb
My thanks from Potater boy. He made fun of the Eagles losing. I didn't lose. I won. And I gave it to him before the game. At his level of betting he could have won himself a "kewl" 10 bucks and sprung for a happy meal, which would have been a nice chance from the soup kitchen.
You know, kewlJ, some folks think that two-point conversion was entirely explicable. I actually called it right after the TD. I'm psychic like that.
Brace yourself Comrade, your buddy Flash Gordon888 is in the house. Prepare for battle !Originally Posted by redietzOriginally Posted by kewlJYa know something else. I even gave Mr Po-Tater-head my surefire winning NFL game pick last Thursday night. The Eagles +6.5 against Tampa Bay. Not because it was the Eagles, but whenever a game looks too good to be true...bet the other way. It took a backdoor cover that should have never happened and an inexplicable 2 point conversion, making it a 6 point game instead of 7. But in the end, what looked to be the sure thing Tampa - 6.5 didn't cover (28-22). The games that look like a sure thing never are.Originally Posted by jbjb
My thanks from Potater boy. He made fun of the Eagles losing. I didn't lose. I won. And I gave it to him before the game. At his level of betting he could have won himself a "kewl" 10 bucks and sprung for a happy meal, which would have been a nice chance from the soup kitchen.
You know, kewlJ, some folks think that two-point conversion was entirely explicable. I actually called it right after the TD. I'm psychic like that.
All I'm asking for is twenty grand.Originally Posted by coach belly
Of course, if you can't afford it or don't want to pay it then go fuck yourself.
"Sniper?"Originally Posted by coach belly
"Coward?"
And you say that you heard this from Mr. "18 yo's in a row," alan?
Shocking, just shocking.
What, Me Worry?
No I'm not paying you to give you what you've been asking for.
Stop being a coward after 20 years...stop being a sniper and face those who you've been hiding from.
Last edited by coach belly; 10-19-2021 at 08:13 PM.
Going by V's( BetCheckBet look alike) meet up photo from a few years ago. He appears to be in decent shape for a guy in his mid/upper 60s. Better shape then slightly older Robbie.
I've seen that photo too. He better get his weight up if he wants to deal with me.Originally Posted by Ozzy
Sumo?Originally Posted by coach belly
Is that where you got that "coach belly" moniker?
What, Me Worry?
I'll tell you what...I'll pay you $20K to show up, if we bet $40K on who wins.Originally Posted by MisterV
So I'm giving you 3-1 odds...your $20K against my $60K.
Any combat sport is acceptable...you won't last 2 minutes until you start begging me to stop hurting you.
I'm a big boy, no doubt.Originally Posted by MisterV
Come on smart ass, find out for yourself what belly means.
Kew, your obsession with posting repetitious piles of BS just keeps your tit getting caught in the same old wringer.Originally Posted by kewlJYou are just a complete imbecile....and troll. Has anyone every mentioned you were a troll? Oh yeah just about every forum owner on every forum that you are on has taken that unusual step.Originally Posted by coach bellyThe latest reports continue to confirm that MDawg's Blackjack playing strategy is much more lucrative than yours.Originally Posted by kewlJ
He's won more from his #4 side hussle in the last 8 weeks than you have in 20 years...ouch that's gotta hurt.
You should ask him show you, in person, how things work in Las Vegas.
If you have doubts, feelings of unfairness, and the conviction of your certainty, then you have the following opportunity to redress your grievances...
I'm willing to present a side Challenge. If anyone doubts that any one, just any one of the Session reports I present during this trip is not entirely accurate, throw down a red flag! Put up a mere ten grand in cash, let's work out how to verify the Session to your satisfaction using the Wizard as the judge, and winner takes the twenty thousand.
I'll contribute five hundred from my end for the Wizard's time if the Challenger will do the same, so that's $19,000. to the winner of this side Challenge.
This Side Challenge remains good for the duration of this particular Vegas trip.
If you want to challenge MDawg, and you're a little short (cash-wise, not height-wise like AW), then I'll spot you the entry fee and you can pay me back when variance is kinder to you than it was in Reno.
Mdawg's blackjack playing strategy is NOT more lucrative than mine, because his accounts are not real. It is a work of fiction.
Furthermore, if Mdawgs accounts were real, it wouldn't "hurt" me at all. I would sincerely be happy for him just as I am almost every other AP that earns more than me. I am competing with no one, but myself. I am very happy and proud of the money I have made during my career. I play limits of my choosing to insure longevity, as much as possible, because I can afford to play much higher. The real world of Las Vegas won't allow it. Not a player that plays regularly. So as usual....you just have no clue of anything you are saying.
The problems for me with Mdawgs challenge is his play can't be verified to my satisfaction. Can't be done. He phonies up documents much the way Someone else did, and has even claimed that the casino will phony up documents for him because he is a high end (losing) player.
And Michael Shackleford as the Judge. No thanks. That ship has sailed. Shackleford had a chance to be objective in these discussions and near as I can tell took a payment and signed an agreement not to.
I lost 11 grand in Reno. Am still significantly above expectation for the year and stilling having a very nice year. I am trying not to share that info as much because it seems to rub some of my fellow AP's the wrong way, but trolls like you want to make things up, I am within my right to correct the record.
On the one hand here, you claim "to be happy for" all the AP's who say they make more than you. Then in the very next breath it's "you could play higher limits (of course, everyone was impressed by that) bbbbbut LV doesn't ALLOW it!!"
Are you ready to admit that you are an avid reader of blackjack books and forums who wastes tons of time making posts that rely on other people's expertise, but you are no professional?
Stupidest thing you have ever written Rob. And I know I say that often, but it seems every few days you come up with something dumber than the last time. Your mental decline is pretty obvious I am afraid.Originally Posted by Rob.SingerKew, your obsession with posting repetitious piles of BS just keeps your tit getting caught in the same old wringer.
On the one hand here, you claim "to be happy for" all the AP's who say they make more than you. Then in the very next breath it's "you could play higher limits (of course, everyone was impressed by that) bbbbbut LV doesn't ALLOW it!!"
Are you ready to admit that you are an avid reader of blackjack books and forums who wastes tons of time making posts that rely on other people's expertise, but you are no professional?
Of course I am an avid readers of blackjack books and forums! Almost every card counter playing today learned the mechanics, the math of card counting from the group of books published in the 80's and 90's. For me it was World's Greatest Blackjack Book, Stanford Wong's Professional Blackjack, and the third which I got to a little later, but turned out to be the best Don Schlesinger's Blackjack Attack 3. Other players probably first learned by Authors like Snyder or some others, but at the risk of offending any of these authors, they all taught that basic mechanics, the mathematics of how card counting worked. I will single out Blackjack Attack 3 again as that is much more comprehensive than the others teaching more than just the basic mechanics of card counting. And the only reason I left Norm's Modern Blackjack off the list is because it didn't come along until much later, but I put that right up there pretty close to BJA3 for someone playing today. Again, all these books, now outdated as far as bet spreads and ramps needed to overcome the larger house edges of today, taught the basics and everyone playing today probably learned those basics from one of those 80's books.
But the forums are where I really learned HOW to win. Players sharing different techniques or nuances. What a player can get away with and what he can't. The things not taught in books. And I have been fortunate enough to have some really top players, really successful players share and teach me some things that I have incorporated into my game. It is no coincidence that my career really took off several years in, after I joined a blackjack forum and other players started sharing their knowledge and experiences with me. And that continues today. Less so on open forums as most serious players have been driven underground or to private forums, but those connections I made, I still network with many privately. I have tried to play that part forward but it is a different world today. These forums are filled with trolls and bitter dudes, and few serious players looking to learn anything. But I have still tried.
So yeah, I am an avid reader of blackjack books and forums. Stupidest thing you have said, until probably tomorrow when you come up with something even stupider.
Last edited by kewlJ; 10-19-2021 at 09:37 PM.
Just the statement that you are getting a 1 unit to 100 unit betting spread is a crock. It's amazing how the casinos throw out all the card counting counter measures for MDawg. While others can't even get a 1 to 10 betting spread the casinos allow MDawg, a player who is supposedly beating them everyday, to do 1 to 100?
This story is more than far-fetched. It's pure out delusions of grandeur. A fantasy.
No casino is going to allow someone who is beating them everyday such a betting spread. If there is such a casino would someone give us the name. Even I can beat a game with a 1 to 100 betting spread.
"More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ
Exactly mickeycrimm!Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Did you see he has claimed to win $151,000 the last two days playing double deck blackjack with this monster spread? Anyone that knows anything about Las Vegas blackjack and particularly double deck, which has earned the nickname "card counter trap" knows what bullshit this is.
And I saved the best for last. The name of this magical, mystical casino in Las Vegas is Cosmopolitan, which in reality (which this isn't) is one of the sweatiest casino's in Las Vegas and most dangerous because they are a big contributor to the databases.
To anyone that knows, there is not a single thing among any of this guys claims that rings anything close to true. It is all make believe.
Originally Posted by kewlJExactly mickeycrimm!Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Did you see he has claimed to win $151,000 the last two days playing double deck blackjack with this monster spread? Anyone that knows anything about Las Vegas blackjack and particularly double deck, which has earned the nickname "card counter trap" knows what bullshit this is.
And I saved the best for last. The name of this magical, mystical casino in Las Vegas is Cosmopolitan, which in reality (which this isn't) is one of the sweatiest casino's in Las Vegas and most dangerous because they are a big contributor to the databases.
To anyone that knows, there is not a single thing among any of this guys claims that rings anything close to true. It is all make believe.
Since I know nothing about blackjack, here are a couple questions:
1) Do you think MDawg is reporting a 1 to 100 spread in the hopes of luring counters to Cosmo?
2) Do you think MDawg switched from baccarat to blackjack on the advice of certain wizards, so as to boost possibility if not credibility, and to provide a better rationale for his fantasy tales being allowed?
3) Any chance the switch to blackjack would be required if there were a further goal in mind, like a book or screenplay or whatever? The baccarat stuff was too farfetched and unfamiliar to the general public, while every civilian knows the various blackjack movies and stories of winning.
It's a shame MDawg hasn't conquered sports betting. That would be fun.
Hint: MDawg, I don't even know hockey rules in their entirety, so you could probably start there.
I do think that's why MDawg switched to BJ. I think your imagination has got the better of you in thinking The Wizard had anything to do with it.Originally Posted by redietz
My first thought was even ZenKing wouldn’t complain if he could play this way…..maybeOriginally Posted by kewlJExactly mickeycrimm!Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Did you see he has claimed to win $151,000 the last two days playing double deck blackjack with this monster spread? Anyone that knows anything about Las Vegas blackjack and particularly double deck, which has earned the nickname "card counter trap" knows what bullshit this is.
And I saved the best for last. The name of this magical, mystical casino in Las Vegas is Cosmopolitan, which in reality (which this isn't) is one of the sweatiest casino's in Las Vegas and most dangerous because they are a big contributor to the databases.
To anyone that knows, there is not a single thing among any of this guys claims that rings anything close to true. It is all make believe.
But seriously KJ or other BJ players, have you considered the math on what an experienced counters edge would be under these spreads, if tolerated?
What it appears MD is doing her is now saying he is working with an advantage based on the game he claims to be playing. Obviously it’s a game that isn’t available to anyone else in Vegas, or elsewhere. But he doesn’t have to nuisance of trying to explain he is winning at a -EV game like he did with Baccarat.
It’s actually a smart move on his part to fuck with everyone because in his mind the only way to prove him wrong is to go out and get yourself put in a database.
A fair Wizard would comment on the possibility of any casino letting a player spread like this at these (or any) limits and calculate the players edge.
Has anyone asked the Wizard about this?Originally Posted by The BozMy first thought was even ZenKing wouldn’t complain if he could play this way…..maybeOriginally Posted by kewlJExactly mickeycrimm!Originally Posted by mickeycrimm
Did you see he has claimed to win $151,000 the last two days playing double deck blackjack with this monster spread? Anyone that knows anything about Las Vegas blackjack and particularly double deck, which has earned the nickname "card counter trap" knows what bullshit this is.
And I saved the best for last. The name of this magical, mystical casino in Las Vegas is Cosmopolitan, which in reality (which this isn't) is one of the sweatiest casino's in Las Vegas and most dangerous because they are a big contributor to the databases.
To anyone that knows, there is not a single thing among any of this guys claims that rings anything close to true. It is all make believe.
But seriously KJ or other BJ players, have you considered the math on what an experienced counters edge would be under these spreads, if tolerated?
What it appears MD is doing her is now saying he is working with an advantage based on the game he claims to be playing. Obviously it’s a game that isn’t available to anyone else in Vegas, or elsewhere. But he doesn’t have to nuisance of trying to explain he is winning at a -EV game like he did with Baccarat.
It’s actually a smart move on his part to fuck with everyone because in his mind the only way to prove him wrong is to go out and get yourself put in a database.
A fair Wizard would comment on the possibility of any casino letting a player spread like this at these (or any) limits and calculate the players edge.
Originally Posted by AxelWolfI do think that's why MDawg switched to BJ. I think your imagination has got the better of you in thinking The Wizard had anything to do with it.Originally Posted by redietz
LOL. I think your imagination has gotten the better of you if (A) you think Shackleford signed an NDA that isn't part of a contract and (B) signing that NDA has nothing to do with anything.
Signing that NDA makes Shackleford core to the entire problem.
I mean, really, Axelwolf, wake up and dump some scalding coffee on your noggin.
Why would anyone do that? Easier just to make up whatever narrative best suits them.Originally Posted by AxelWolfHas anyone asked the Wizard about this?Originally Posted by The BozMy first thought was even ZenKing wouldn’t complain if he could play this way…..maybeOriginally Posted by kewlJ
But seriously KJ or other BJ players, have you considered the math on what an experienced counters edge would be under these spreads, if tolerated?
What it appears MD is doing her is now saying he is working with an advantage based on the game he claims to be playing. Obviously it’s a game that isn’t available to anyone else in Vegas, or elsewhere. But he doesn’t have to nuisance of trying to explain he is winning at a -EV game like he did with Baccarat.
It’s actually a smart move on his part to fuck with everyone because in his mind the only way to prove him wrong is to go out and get yourself put in a database.
A fair Wizard would comment on the possibility of any casino letting a player spread like this at these (or any) limits and calculate the players edge.
My best guess is Wizard gives not one shit what MDawg plays or how he plays it.
There are currently 7 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 7 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
