Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 21 to 40 of 53

Thread: MGM execs intend to release player records to internet blogger?

  1. #21
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post



    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    What facts are not in evidence?
    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    there were no consequences to the employees who leaked the info
    Huh?

    The "facts in evidence" would be the details and documents leaked by sources to the reporter, not whether the sources were punished for leaking.

    Obviously someone spoke and showed documents to the reporter.
    What, Me Worry?

  2. #22
    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    The "facts in evidence" would be the details and documents leaked by sources to the reporter, not whether the sources were punished for leaking.
    Your question was as follows...

    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    why were there were no consequences to the employees who leaked the info?
    The question assumes facts not in evidence...that there were no consequences to the employees who leaked the info.

    You also apparently assume facts not in evidence here...

    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    you'd think the casinos named would have investigated, discovered and punished those who leaked.
    Are you assuming that they did not investigate, discover and punish those who leaked?

  3. #23
    MisterV heading down the rabbit hole with coach belly. Don't do it V. You know the old saying.

    Never wrestle with a pig. You just get dirty and the pig enjoys it.
    Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".

  4. #24
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    So one of the 74,500 MGM employees or an even larger number of people that are consultants, or contracted workers, leaks some information about a gambler and you think MGM is going to go bonkers?
    Future unethical or illegal or acts by MGM employees are subject to whatever remedies the company chooses to pursue.

    Your defamatory statements have already been made, your actions are on record.

    It would be prudent for MGM to investigate claims that their executives intend to release individual player records for publication on popular internet gambling sites.

    Mitigating disinformation wouldn't be considered "going bonkers", nor would measures to sanction bloggers and their confederates who propagate damaging rumors .
    You are somewhere beneath Tasha and ahead of Singer. Would you please just STFU. It would be in your interest to maintain this generous ranking.

    Hosts are now "executives". Sanction bloggers ! lmao. Coach retard.
    It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"

  5. #25
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    So one of the 74,500 MGM employees or an even larger number of people that are consultants, or contracted workers, leaks some information about a gambler and you think MGM is going to go bonkers?
    Future unethical or illegal or acts by MGM employees are subject to whatever remedies the company chooses to pursue.

    Your defamatory statements have already been made, your actions are on record.

    It would be prudent for MGM to investigate claims that their executives intend to release individual player records for publication on popular internet gambling sites.

    Mitigating disinformation wouldn't be considered "going bonkers", nor would measures to sanction bloggers and their confederates who propagate damaging rumors .
    You are somewhere beneath Tasha and ahead of Singer. Would you please just STFU. It would be in your interest to maintain this generous ranking.

    Hosts are now "executives". Sanction bloggers ! lmao. Coach retard.
    Funny stuff.

    I wasn't going to say anything but just look at the title of this thread. Totally unrepresentative of what was said. Nowhere did I say anything about MGM or casino executive, in their official capacity doing anything.

    The stinky belly guy is just a nut.
    Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".

  6. #26
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Nowhere did I say anything about MGM or casino executive, in their official capacity doing anything.
    The title of the the thread does not assert anyone acting in their official capacity.

    Your mental illness has rendered you incapable of posting honestly.

    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    I have friends in high places at MGM who will then have access to his information and they tell me likely prior to the actual close of the sale.

    What that means is I will then know everything about his bullshit claims.

    I will have no problem revealing everything, right down to his Tax ID number (substitute for SS #) and DoB.

  7. #27
    I defer to MisterV if he speaks to the contrary as he is an attorney and I am not---but I believe that MGM would have difficulty (even IF there was, in theory, an otherwise legally actionable position) demonstrating that they incurred damages as a result of KewlJ's posting. KewlJ also made his post on a non-profit (no advertising) website that he doesn't own anyway, so MGM cannot prove that KewlJ benefitted in any way (financially) from making his post.

    Anyway, please don't see this post as taking sides. I care just as much about the whole MDawg thing now as I did three months ago-which is very close to zero. I am neither richer nor poorer for any of this. It's entertaining reading, on rare occasion.

  8. #28
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    Hosts are now "executives". lmao.
    tewlj didn't specify "hosts"...he claimed "friends in high places at MGM".

    But hosts are considered executives, don't cha know...

    PLAYER DEVELOPMENT EXECUTIVE
    Seminole Gaming

    Job Description
    The Player Development Executive focuses on new business to Seminole Hard Rock Tampa. Candidate MUST bring established book of new customers to market; maintains close ties with targeted customers through personal contact by phone and in person in order to generate designated incremental gaming revenues.

  9. #29
    Originally Posted by Mission146 View Post
    I believe that MGM would have difficulty (even IF there was, in theory, an otherwise legally actionable position) demonstrating that they incurred damages as a result of KewlJ's posting. KewlJ also made his post on a non-profit (no advertising) website that he doesn't own anyway, so MGM cannot prove that KewlJ benefitted in any way (financially) from making his post.
    We'll see about all that in discovery.

  10. #30
    Originally Posted by Mission146 View Post
    I believe that MGM would have difficulty (even IF there was, in theory, an otherwise legally actionable position) demonstrating that they incurred damages as a result of KewlJ's posting. KewlJ also made his post on a non-profit (no advertising) website that he doesn't own anyway, so MGM cannot prove that KewlJ benefitted in any way (financially) from making his post.
    I'm certainly not an expert in this area, but were KJ to publish documents and confidential info received from casino employees about douchedawg then the following might happen:

    The casino could seek an injunction / restraining order against KJ from posting further info, and as part of the process I suspect they could take his deposition and ask him the name of his casino sources so they could be fired / disciplined; I'm unclear as to whether damages would be awarded.

    The problem would be the dawg himself suing KJ; what cause of action could he plead?

    It isn't defamatory, at least not that I see: probably the tort of outrage would be a legal theory; he might also sue the casinos for releasing the info, claiming perhaps breach of contract.

    Regardless, can you imagine the glee he'd have in suing KJ?

    He would subpoena Dan Druff and / or his forum hosting service to make them cough up KJ's identifying info so that a lawsuit could then be personally served on him.

    Not a pleasant prospect, one which due to the dawg's act of contrition will never transpire.
    What, Me Worry?

  11. #31
    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    The problem would be the dawg himself suing KJ; what cause of action could he plead?
    Exactly! what damages would this fool have? He tells this "story" that he has now admitted was a lie on multiple forums and he claims to play rated, meaning he isn't hiding who he is from casinos.

    The only damages I can see is his inability to continue to tell his lie of a fairytale.

    Now if you want to talk damages, someone doxxed me on that forum that he posts at today, a supposedly new member, posted my name and an address. It has since been removed, but as a player who plays anonymously, this could have REAL damages in loss of income.

    I think we all know who was behind this. I spoke to Bob N about it this morning. He said we could go after the website in question, force them to disclose if it was who we think and then pursue that person, who happens to have deep pockets for potential loss of income. Still considering what to do.

    What says you to that, smelly belly, esquire.
    Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".

  12. #32
    And by the way, the publishing documents is quite different than revealing what is in them. This is exactly why I never posted or published the documents of the information I had on Singer.
    Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".

  13. #33
    All you legal beagles are a bunch of idiots......lol

    Do you really think there is a record of access to player accounts? Coach is the biggest tard the internet has ever known.
    FraudJ's word is worth less than the prop cash in Singer's safe...RIP

  14. #34
    KJ:

    Yes, attorney Bob N most certainly can file suit against "John Doe," subpoena Dan's hosting service and thus learn the identity of the doxxer.

    Not saying you shouldn't go down that road, KJ, but as they say: "Know your adversary."

    If in fact the doxxer was the dawg, remember he is an attorney who seems to hate you and could probably tie you up in expensive litigation; there's lots of tricks lawyers can pull to make litigation very expensive.

    Of greater concern might be the issue of damages.

    Yes, you are an AP flying under the radar, but since you don't use a card I question how the casinos would learn your identity, unless a photo is posted / provided to them.

    I suspect that a casino might somehow be able to acquire your photo via investigation, but would they want to spend the time and money?

    A viable plan of action might be to wait and see if the doxxing causes you any difficulties plying your trade: if so, then yeah, lawyer up, but go into it with your eyes (and wallet, unless Bob will take it on a contingent fee basis, which I doubt) wide open.
    What, Me Worry?

  15. #35
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    potential loss of income. Still considering what to do.

    What says you to that, esquire.
    I think MGM should consider pursuing a damages action against you for potential loss of income.

    I would suspect that the forum owner would be a plaintiff in that action as well, since he permitted your defamatory statements to be repeatedly posted on his website.

  16. #36
    MisterV, casinos have photos and info on players regardless of playing rated or unrated. There is a whole database industry supplying that information to the casino industry. I am surprised you aren't aware of that.

    I don't want to litigate my case or options here, but if I find out definitively that the person I believe is behind it, what I want to do is pursue it through the California bar association and try to get his license suspended. Cost him income, as he attempted to do to me.
    Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".

  17. #37
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    potential loss of income. Still considering what to do.

    What says you to that, esquire.
    I think MGM should consider pursuing a damages action against you for potential loss of income.

    I would suspect that the forum owner would be a plaintiff in that action as well, since he permitted your defamatory statements to be repeatedly posted on his website.
    Get real dude. Have you not followed recent congressional hearing concerning facebook and other social media? These platforms are not responsible for what is posted, unless it is something obviously illegal and they took no action to remove it.

    Seriously you are just making shit up. Barking at the vacuum cleaner.
    Dan Druff: "there's no question that MDawg has been an obnoxious braggart, and has rubbed a ton of people the wrong way. There's something missing from his stories. Either they're fabricated, grossly exaggerated, or largely incomplete".

  18. #38
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    MisterV, casinos have photos and info on players regardless of playing rated or unrated. There is a whole database industry supplying that information to the casino industry. I am surprised you aren't aware of that.

    I don't want to litigate my case or options here, but if I find out definitively that the person I believe is behind it, what I want to do is pursue it through the California bar association and try to get his license suspended. Cost him income, as he attempted to do to me.
    Not sure he would care as he doesn’t seem to be using his license since he is in Las Vegas full time.

  19. #39
    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    I question how the casinos would learn your identity
    Are casinos required to demonstrate that they know a player's identity in order to regulate their play...flat-bet, banning, or whatever other deterrents they use?

  20. #40
    Oh look, V decided to play internet lawyer today, that’s cute...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Too little freedom on the internet
    By theywontpayontuesday in forum Whatever's On Your Mind
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-29-2021, 02:18 PM
  2. My internet fails! :D
    By Tasha in forum Whatever's On Your Mind
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 09-07-2019, 02:48 PM
  3. Finally, the new $100 bills get a release date.
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 10-11-2013, 12:00 AM
  4. Replies: 54
    Last Post: 08-07-2012, 05:37 PM
  5. Execs getting bonuses for cutting costs and cutting jobs.
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Whatever's On Your Mind
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-31-2011, 07:44 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •