For Coach and Rob

[redietz]

Had a few moments to see whose memory was failing, mine or Rob's. And to help coach out, of course.

Thus, from 12/07 at 9:37 AM in post #8230, Rob.Singer wrote,

"Wait long enuf--the truth does come out. The concocted internet life of kew has truly been exposed. Just asked the undeniable expert on him: Tater."


And then on 12/11 at 8:44 AM, in post #2 of my "Singer/tater" thread, Rob.Singer asks,

"Who is tater? Is this another 'close associate' of yours...or one of your seemingly many obscure relatives, whom you appear to prop up as having 'something to do with' or 'some expert knowledge about' things, every time someone posts a story that gets some interest?"

Now how can it be that Rob proclaimed that he just asked Tater about kewlJ and four days later he doesn't recall who Tater is? Yeah, that is a problem. As I said, Rob evidently has some memory issues. Understandable at his age. I would take much of what he says with a grain of salt, because if you post something as dramatically as Rob did about Tater and then four days later, you are stuck to remember that you did it, that's really not good at all.

I did take Alzheimer's classes, and I actually have some experience with this stuff. If you think about it, Rob's writing displays a lot of red flags. He doesn't remember what he posted when, and a lot of it is a repetitive loop type of writing.

I suggest everybody lay off him and let him cope as best he can. Seriously. That's the best thing at this point.

Coach, probably a good thing you wanted me to look this up. I didn't realize it was just four days between Rob's posts.

[kewlJ]

You are missing the other possibility Red. And that is that Rob just lies and says whatever will help him in THAT moment. If he needs to change that story or lie in a few days or next week or next month....so be it. And if anyone calls him on it, he will attack that person, their family and friends in any manner he can think of to deflect and change the subject. He is an internet troll.

The disturbing part is that so many others embrace him and find his trolling funny, entertaining and acceptable.

[mickeycrimm]

Amazing. redietz and KJ hang on every word Rob writes. How many times do you guys check your computers every day to see if Rob has posted? And your conclusions about what he posts are the parts where you guys got tired of thinking.

[redietz]

Amazing. redietz and KJ hang on every word Rob writes. How many times do you guys check your computers every day to see if Rob has posted? And your conclusions about what he posts are the parts where you guys got tired of thinking.

You've lost all objectivity, mickey. Some posters have figured you lost objectivity a while ago, but I was on the fence until now.

Rob directly asked me to tell him who Tater was four days after Rob said Tater was an undeniable expert on kewlJ.

Can you imagine coach's reaction if this had been me asking who Tater was four days after saying Tater was a whack job? I'd be a (pick one) idiot, liar, scammer, not to be trusted on anything.

Can you imagine YOUR reaction if I quoted Tater as saying Rob was nuts, and four days later I asked YOU who Tater was. What would YOU say?

So this was mickey's response. A deflection having nothing to do with what Rob wrote.

Rob says Tater is a kewlJ expert. Mickey says nothing. I'm not sure how Tater is a kewlJ expert, but mickey says nothing.

Four days later, Rob asks me who Tater is, and says Tater must be one of my family or something. Mickey says nothing.

Then I point out in a separate thread that Rob must have memory issues and has forgotten he said Tater is an expert. Coach challenges me to find where Rob said that. Mickey says nothing.

Coach comes back and says that I failed to look up the post where Rob says he knew Tater. Now I had said I'd do it after the football weekend, which includes Monday Night Football, by the way. Mickey says nothing.

After Monday Night Football, I look up the posts. I find that I was correct. Rob either lied or completely forgot what he had posted. I start this thread.

Mickey finally, at this point, decides to comment, not about who was right or wrong, not about Rob being confused or lying, but about me catching Rob being either confused or lying. He forgives Rob his trespasses, but I'm wrong for pointing out that Rob was either confused or lying.

So much for mickey's alleged objectivity.

Mickey figured to be the first response, as coach and Rob will sit this one out as long as possible.

[mickeycrimm]

Amazing. redietz and KJ hang on every word Rob writes. How many times do you guys check your computers every day to see if Rob has posted? And your conclusions about what he posts are the parts where you guys got tired of thinking.

You've lost all objectivity, mickey. Some posters have figured you lost objectivity a while ago, but I was on the fence until now.

Rob directly asked me to tell him who Tater was four days after Rob said Tater was an undeniable expert on kewlJ.

Can you imagine coach's reaction if this had been me asking who Tater was four days after saying Tater was a whack job? I'd be a (pick one) idiot, liar, scammer, not to be trusted on anything.

Can you imagine YOUR reaction if I quoted Tater as saying Rob was nuts, and four days later I asked YOU who Tater was. What would YOU say?

So this was mickey's response. A deflection having nothing to do with what Rob wrote.

Rob says Tater is a kewlJ expert. Mickey says nothing. I'm not sure how Tater is a kewlJ expert, but mickey says nothing.

Four days later, Rob asks me who Tater is, and says Tater must be one of my family or something. Mickey says nothing.

Then I point out in a separate thread that Rob must have memory issues and has forgotten he said Tater is an expert. Coach challenges me to find where Rob said that. Mickey says nothing.

Coach comes back and says that I failed to look up the post where Rob says he knew Tater. Now I had said I'd do it after the football weekend, which includes Monday Night Football, by the way. Mickey says nothing.

After Monday Night Football, I look up the posts. I find that I was correct. Rob either lied or completely forgot what he had posted. I start this thread.

Mickey finally, at this point, decides to comment, not about who was right or wrong, not about Rob being confused or lying, but about me catching Rob being either confused or lying. He forgives Rob his trespasses, but I'm wrong for pointing out that Rob was either confused or lying.

So much for mickey's alleged objectivity.

Mickey figured to be the first response, as coach and Rob will sit this one out as long as possible.

Yes, you are right. I've lost all objectivity. I lost it when maxpunk started smearing me over a benign opinion I gave on the DUB....and YOU said nothing. He smeared me over and over again and YOU said nothing.

KJ attacked me because of a benign opinion I gave on the DUB and YOU said nothing. He attacked me over and over again and YOU said nothing.

So who gives a fuck about objectivity when dealing with you assclowns?

Cheerio! Take care. Have a nice day. And.......blow me.

[redietz]

I think mickey's responses sum things up.

Rob gets the green light when he either lies or is confused. No comments from mickey.

But mickey will criticize others when they point out that Rob is either lying or confused.

[coach belly]

Now how can it be that Rob proclaimed that he just asked Tater about kewlJ and four days later he doesn't recall who Tater is?

Rob either lied or completely forgot what he had posted.

I don't see a lie, forgetfulness, confusion, or any conflict in what Rob wrote about Tater.

Singer wrote that he had taken a look at GF, where he obviously saw many posts by Tater about tewlj,
and based on that site he commented that Tater was an undeniable expert on tewlj.

That doesn't mean Rob knows who Tater is.

You've read posts by Tater at GF...do you know who Tater is?

Then, in one of your typically weird posts, you asked Rob to recruit Tater for something silly.

So Rob asked you "who is Tater, Is this another 'close associate' of yours...?",
because he doesn't know who Tater is....who does?

Seems like a reasonable question, considering your request.

Wise up, ditz.

[MaxPen]

Yes, you are right. I've lost all objectivity. I lost it when maxpunk started smearing me over a benign opinion I gave on the DUB....and YOU said nothing. He smeared me over and over again and YOU said nothing.

KJ attacked me because of a benign opinion I gave on the DUB and YOU said nothing. He attacked me over and over again and YOU said nothing.

So who gives a fuck about objectivity when dealing with you assclowns?

Cheerio! Take care. Have a nice day. And.......blow me.

This post from Mickey "Man Servant" O.1x brought a smile to my face. What a punk bitch.....lol

[coach belly]

This post from Mickey "Man Servant" O.1x brought a smile to my face.

You trying to pass off that hotel bathroom as being in your home was pretty funny too.

All that's missing is the squeegee.

[MaxPen]

This post from Mickey "Man Servant" O.1x brought a smile to my face.

You trying to pass off that hotel bathroom as being in your home was pretty funny too.

All that's missing is the squeegee.

Another example proving you're a DOPE.......RIP

[monet]

This post from Mickey "Man Servant" O.1x brought a smile to my face.

You trying to pass off that hotel bathroom as being in your home was pretty funny too.

All that's missing is the squeegee.

Another example proving you're a DOPE.......RIP

I haven't commented on the bathroom yet but I wanted to say that I wish I could of completed my project as you did.
Very Nice Job MaxPen!
I, on the other hand, decided to go with a solid surface (Onyx) in both of my bathrooms converting them from tubs to showers.
I've been on the schedule for a few months now.
Project supposed to be completed by Mid February.
12 thousand smackers up front.
Another 12 grand when project is completed.
I did get all the pipes in the house converted over to Uponor Pex A though and got all 25 odd holes patched up with new drywall and painted.
I'll take some pictures of my hotel bathrooms when completed.
After everything is completed and wasting some of money on DIY I'm at about 40k spent.
Having to have the entire house re-piped cost about 6k and having a professional patch all the holes cost another 4k.
Ouchie!

[coach belly]

Another example......

I love it. Very casinoey.

Yes it is.

Crapgame and his hotel crapper...RIP.

[jbjb]

This post from Mickey "Man Servant" O.1x brought a smile to my face.

You trying to pass off that hotel bathroom as being in your home was pretty funny too.

All that's missing is the squeegee.

Another example proving you're a DOPE.......RIP

Coach most likely has little boys locked up in his bathroom.

[mickeycrimm]

I think mickey's responses sum things up.

Rob gets the green light when he either lies or is confused. No comments from mickey.

But mickey will criticize others when they point out that Rob is either lying or confused.

KJ's invented a gillion "facts" and YOU stood by and said nothing. maxpunk did the same and YOU stood by and said nothing. Assclown.

There was nothing incongruous in Rob's statements....but you already knew that. You're just throwing shit against the wall hoping something sticks.

[accountinquestion]

This forum is the best.

No kids living in their parent's basement except myself.

All grizzled old assholes who would have a hard time having a real job, yet are all somewhat sharp.

Pretty much all self-made men who haven't had to kiss ass in any meaningful way.

Yet here we are on this forum and it is like everyone just woke up in 8th grade ready to battle to death.

Fucking awesome !

[kewlJ]

KJ's invented a gillion "facts" and YOU stood by and said nothing. maxpunk did the same and YOU stood by and said nothing. Assclown.

There was nothing incongruous in Rob's statements....but you already knew that. You're just throwing shit against the wall hoping something sticks.

Mickeycrimm, you attack me and redietz and Maxpen because we bothered to look in to Singer and state some of his many lies.

I recently re-posted some statements from Dan Druff, saying basically the same thing. I noticed there wasn't a peep out of you. No attack of Dan Druff.

And although Dan didn't mention it, he is a guy that often spends a little time looking into someone that he finds to be misleading (Christopher Mitchell comes to mind), so I wouldn't be surprised at all if he spent a few minutes looking into Singer just to confirm his suspicions. And a few minutes is all it takes. Maybe Dan will admit that. Maybe he will deny that. Maybe he would rather not say. He just seems like a guy that likes to do some homework before he states things like he stated about Rob.

Either way, it is "funny" you have had no criticism of Dan Druff who said the same things as the rest of us.

Shackleford has interviewed Rob as to these claims a couple times now. Alan met, interviewed Rob numerous times, including providing a platform (videos) for Rob's claims until Alan realized he was being lied to and played.

Mickey it isn't that everyone else is wrong including the mickeycrimm prior to this new arrangement with Rob. You can join the long running troll or play your games or whatever it is you think you are doing, but you are wrong. Everyone knows it. YOU know it. And frankly, I suspect I am not alone in losing respect for you.

[kewlJ]

And by the way, I am quite sure there are other members here that have looked into Singer and know his claims are BS. it could be they are people who don't really get involved in calling someone out publicly. It could also be a few don't want to say so and have Singer and you attack them. That is one of the aspects of the bullying that Singer and now you do. It makes people not want to say anything or get involved.

[redietz]

Now how can it be that Rob proclaimed that he just asked Tater about kewlJ and four days later he doesn't recall who Tater is?

Rob either lied or completely forgot what he had posted.

I don't see a lie, forgetfulness, confusion, or any conflict in what Rob wrote about Tater.

Singer wrote that he had taken a look at GF, where he obviously saw many posts by Tater about tewlj,
and based on that site he commented that Tater was an undeniable expert on tewlj.

That doesn't mean Rob knows who Tater is.

You've read posts by Tater at GF...do you know who Tater is?

Then, in one of your typically weird posts, you asked Rob to recruit Tater for something silly.

So Rob asked you "who is Tater, Is this another 'close associate' of yours...?",
because he doesn't know who Tater is....who does?

Seems like a reasonable question, considering your request.

Wise up, ditz.

So coach's interpretation of Rob writing "Just asked the undeniable expert on him: Tater." is (according to coach) meant to convey that Rob never asked Tater anything. And that Rob has no idea who Tater is.

Makes perfect sense, coach. Carry on.

[coach belly]

Rob writing "Just asked the undeniable expert on him: Tater." .

You're quoting a typo, you dumb hillbilly.

You wanna know who lied to you?... whoever it was in Chamberpot, PA who said you were smart...they were lying.

[redietz]

Rob writing "Just asked the undeniable expert on him: Tater." .

You're quoting a typo, you dumb hillbilly.

You wanna know who lied to you?... whoever it was in Chamberpot, PA who said you were smart...they were lying.

So now coach is Rob's editor. A psychic editor, to boot. He knows what Rob intended to write.

Tater has made about a thousand anti-kewlJ posts on various forums. Rob asks, four days after saying tater was the undeniable kewlj expert, if tater is a relative of mine. Because, according to coach, Rob remembered that tater is the undeniable kewlJ expert and therefore must be a relative of mine?

Makes perfect sense. Carry on, coach.