KewlJ, Are You Going to Share How You Did for 2021 With the Forum

[Midwest Player]

I know you have shared for other years. I hope you do it again. If I remember correctly, I thought you posted somewhere that this year started off great! I hope it continued for the entire year. I think I read you also always take off the week right after Christmas till New Years.

Anyway, I had my best year ever. At least I hope so as its not over yet, but I would have to lose more than $10,000 for it to not be my best year and that is doubtful in the next 5 days.

PS. Hope a few others also share how their year went. I enjoy reading about the good, the bad and even the ugly.

[kewlJ]

Congrats on your good year Midwest Player. I like to hear how others have done, especially in these trying times.

I had a real nice year. I was ahead of expectation, not a lot but some, all year long, which is a nice way to play and also very welcome after being way below expectation last year. Towards the end of the year, I had an unusual play (for me) that bumped me up significantly above expectation. I am not going to go into further details and numbers as I have in the past as that seems to really bother some fellow AP's. So I will leave it at that. Thanks for your interest and best wishes for a safe, healthy and profitable 2022.

[The Boz]

Better question. I can show over 15 casinos I will have a positive statement from. Mickey could probably show double or triple that.

They are worthless for so many reasons most here understand. Otherwise it’s on the reader to believe what the poster states they “won”. Most will accept what known AP’s like KJ post. But also most known AP’s won’t post anything and honestly why would they?

Or you can get laughed at like a clown like MDawg who claims to win hundreds of thousands and find a foil (the Wiz) to play along until called out. And then you can say after further examination you are “about even”.

In any case, nothing anyone posts here is the entire truth.

[redietz]

KewlJ, if you get a chance, ship me a pic of MDawg or an Instagram link or something.

I was reading the latest MDawg posts. So WoV is allowing him to keep the fantasy narrative going just as before? That's terrible. I actually think it's gotten worse, because he writes as if assuming his paranormal abilities are generally accepted.

I don't get the chameleon abilities of some people based on context. It's VCT, so Mission will intellectually debate mickey regarding the Civil War and call him out on every historical error. It's WoV, so Mission will politely inquire regarding MDawg's casino perks without calling him out on anything.

I just can't operate like that. It's schizophrenic and demeaning to self because you're subordinating yourself when you don't have to.

[MisterV]

Nah, just put douche dawg on "IGNORE."

Silence is golden ...

Nothwithstanding that asshole and his few fans there is still some juice to be squeezed from the WoV lemon.

[kewlJ]

Otherwise it’s on the reader to believe what the poster states they “won”. Most will accept what known AP’s like KJ post. But also most known AP’s won’t post anything and honestly why would they?

The reason most people will accept what known AP's say is because it just isn't hard to figure out who knows what they are talking about and credible. Even with all the trolling and name calling on a forum like this, if you look beyond that and just look at what someone has to say about what they do or claim to do, it is pretty easy to figure out what makes sense and what doesn't or as I like to say "who knows what they are talking about and who is just talking". Most of that trolling and name calling is just deflection to cover lack of knowing what they are talking about anyway.

KewlJ, if you get a chance, ship me a pic of MDawg or an Instagram link or something.

I don't have a picture of Mdawg to send you redietz and wouldn't do so if I did. That would be no better than the doxxing of myself that has taken place by Mdawg, Moses or a combination of the two. I happen to think there IS a difference, in that doxxing an AP, a player that makes a living off the casinos, a player fighting the battle with the casino industry to remain anonymous and be able to play and earn a living is a little different than naming an attorney or non AP, making claims that are fantasy.

If I name Mdawg for example by name, it doesn't affect his ability to earn a living as an attorney. Nor doesn't affect his recreational play at casinos since he plays rated. He wants the casinos to know who he is on every single bet that he makes, because he wants credit and comps for those wagers. So I am not outing him as far as his ability to earn a living or his play with casinos. The only place I am outing him is on the forums where he wants to be anonymous but for the wrong reason. So that people can't look into him and discover everything he claims is BS.

Despite that difference, I am still not going to send a picture. But I may send you info on where you can look into it and find a picture of him yourself. I don't know. Will have to think about it. Probably nothing good can come from doing so and best to let this die at least as far as I am involved. I really am very satisfied at where things stand right now. His nonsense has been debunked to my satisfaction.

[MaxPen]

KewlJ, if you get a chance, ship me a pic of MDawg or an Instagram link or something.

I was reading the latest MDawg posts. So WoV is allowing him to keep the fantasy narrative going just as before? That's terrible. I actually think it's gotten worse, because he writes as if assuming his paranormal abilities are generally accepted.

I don't get the chameleon abilities of some people based on context. It's VCT, so Mission will intellectually debate mickey regarding the Civil War and call him out on every historical error. It's WoV, so Mission will politely inquire regarding MDawg's casino perks without calling him out on anything.

I just can't operate like that. It's schizophrenic and demeaning to self because you're subordinating yourself when you don't have to.

It's called being a cuck. If you participate at WoV you are what you are......RIP

[jbjb]

Better question. I can show over 15 casinos I will have a positive statement from. Mickey could probably show double or triple that.

They are worthless for so many reasons most here understand. Otherwise it’s on the reader to believe what the poster states they “won”. Most will accept what known AP’s like KJ post. But also most known AP’s won’t post anything and honestly why would they?

Or you can get laughed at like a clown like MDawg who claims to win hundreds of thousands and find a foil (the Wiz) to play along until called out. And then you can say after further examination you are “about even”.

In any case, nothing anyone posts here is the entire truth.

The real expert part is having those statements show a loss but in reality you had a win.

[mickeycrimm]

KewlJ, if you get a chance, ship me a pic of MDawg or an Instagram link or something.

I was reading the latest MDawg posts. So WoV is allowing him to keep the fantasy narrative going just as before? That's terrible. I actually think it's gotten worse, because he writes as if assuming his paranormal abilities are generally accepted.

I don't get the chameleon abilities of some people based on context. It's VCT, so Mission will intellectually debate mickey regarding the Civil War and call him out on every historical error. It's WoV, so Mission will politely inquire regarding MDawg's casino perks without calling him out on anything.

I just can't operate like that. It's schizophrenic and demeaning to self because you're subordinating yourself when you don't have to.

Wrong thread to pull that bullshit, comrade redietz. You've succeeded in hijacking this thread.

I'm a southerner. There is the northern perspective and the southern perspective on the Civil War. I've corrected some of mission's historical errors but haven't had the time to correct all of them.

I won't let those who are not from the south get away with false narratives about us. Why don't you put your false narratives up and I will be glad to correct them for you.

I had ancestors in the war. Many of them died. I've done a lot of research on them. Most all of them were conscripts. Only a few were fighting so rich men could own slaves. The vast majority fought to protect their families, land and rights from northern aggressors. They were yeoman farmers working small tracts of land for a living, had little money, and didn't own slaves. They absolutely were not fighting for a rich man's slave. Those of you pushing the narrative that they were fighting to preserve slavery are wrong (historical error).

[Mission146]

Wrong thread to pull that bullshit, comrade redietz. You've succeeded in hijacking this thread.

I'm a southerner. There is the northern perspective and the southern perspective on the Civil War. I've corrected some of mission's historical errors but haven't had the time to correct all of them.

I won't let those who are not from the south get away with false narratives about us. Why don't you put your false narratives up and I will be glad to correct them for you.

I had ancestors in the war. Many of them died. I've done a lot of research on them. Most all of them were conscripts. Only a few were fighting so rich men could own slaves. The vast majority fought to protect their families, land and rights from northern aggressors. They were yeoman farmers working small tracts of land for a living, had little money, and didn't own slaves. They absolutely were not fighting for a rich man's slave. Those of you pushing the narrative that they were fighting to preserve slavery are wrong (historical error).

Corrected Mission's what?

I don't deny anything you said in your last paragraph; I simply don't care. Damn near every war that has ever been fought has seen the poor fighting the war on behalf of the social, economic, political and/or religious elites, but you expect the people who fought in the Civil War to somehow have history have a different take on them because you happen to be from there? I've already acknowledged that they probably didn't fight for the reason that the elites wanted the war, but again, that's any war. I don't know what bullshit line they were handed, but you can be sure that it was bullshit...until the last year of the war...when they really were fighting to protect their families and property!

I mean, I'm guessing that the guys who flew into the World Trade Center were not the Taliban's #1 operatives. I doubt that every single person in our Armed Forces actually believed that Saddam had WMD's...other than the remnants of the ones that we ourselves sold him, of course.

Just because you come from Bible-humping Mississippi with family ties to South Lyncholina doesn't mean that what the men on the ground may have personally felt about the war suddenly matters, when it wouldn't matter in any other war or context. I'm not claiming that every single Southern soldier was fighting to preserve the institution of slavery, most weren't...but it is the official line on what the South (as an entity) was fighting for...or as at least one of the officially stated reasons.

[The Boz]

Better question. I can show over 15 casinos I will have a positive statement from. Mickey could probably show double or triple that.

They are worthless for so many reasons most here understand. Otherwise it’s on the reader to believe what the poster states they “won”. Most will accept what known AP’s like KJ post. But also most known AP’s won’t post anything and honestly why would they?

Or you can get laughed at like a clown like MDawg who claims to win hundreds of thousands and find a foil (the Wiz) to play along until called out. And then you can say after further examination you are “about even”.

In any case, nothing anyone posts here is the entire truth.

The real expert part is having those statements show a loss but in reality you had a win.

Hard to argue with that.

[jbjb]

Better question. I can show over 15 casinos I will have a positive statement from. Mickey could probably show double or triple that.

They are worthless for so many reasons most here understand. Otherwise it’s on the reader to believe what the poster states they “won”. Most will accept what known AP’s like KJ post. But also most known AP’s won’t post anything and honestly why would they?

Or you can get laughed at like a clown like MDawg who claims to win hundreds of thousands and find a foil (the Wiz) to play along until called out. And then you can say after further examination you are “about even”.

In any case, nothing anyone posts here is the entire truth.

The real expert part is having those statements show a loss but in reality you had a win.

Hard to argue with that.

Yep. Think card counters rat-holing chips.

[kewlJ]

Yep. Think card counters rat-holing chips.

Why only card counters? Don't hole carders rat hole? Shouldn't all table game AP's rathole a bit to make their perceived win disappear or appear smaller?

[jbjb]

Yep. Think card counters rat-holing chips.

Why only card counters? Don't hole carders rat hole? Shouldn't all table game AP's rathole a bit to make their perceived win disappear or appear smaller?

I didn't want a 2000 word post that other people would have to read.

[redietz]

Better question. I can show over 15 casinos I will have a positive statement from. Mickey could probably show double or triple that.

They are worthless for so many reasons most here understand. Otherwise it’s on the reader to believe what the poster states they “won”. Most will accept what known AP’s like KJ post. But also most known AP’s won’t post anything and honestly why would they?

Or you can get laughed at like a clown like MDawg who claims to win hundreds of thousands and find a foil (the Wiz) to play along until called out. And then you can say after further examination you are “about even”.

In any case, nothing anyone posts here is the entire truth.

The real expert part is having those statements show a loss but in reality you had a win.

Hard to argue with that.

My late cousin, E.R. Dietz was so unlucky in this regard. Whenever we had a big hit, somehow the tickets were in E.R.'s name.

[mickeycrimm]

Wrong thread to pull that bullshit, comrade redietz. You've succeeded in hijacking this thread.

I'm a southerner. There is the northern perspective and the southern perspective on the Civil War. I've corrected some of mission's historical errors but haven't had the time to correct all of them.

I won't let those who are not from the south get away with false narratives about us. Why don't you put your false narratives up and I will be glad to correct them for you.

I had ancestors in the war. Many of them died. I've done a lot of research on them. Most all of them were conscripts. Only a few were fighting so rich men could own slaves. The vast majority fought to protect their families, land and rights from northern aggressors. They were yeoman farmers working small tracts of land for a living, had little money, and didn't own slaves. They absolutely were not fighting for a rich man's slave. Those of you pushing the narrative that they were fighting to preserve slavery are wrong (historical error).

Corrected Mission's what?

I don't deny anything you said in your last paragraph; I simply don't care. Damn near every war that has ever been fought has seen the poor fighting the war on behalf of the social, economic, political and/or religious elites, but you expect the people who fought in the Civil War to somehow have history have a different take on them because you happen to be from there? I've already acknowledged that they probably didn't fight for the reason that the elites wanted the war, but again, that's any war. I don't know what bullshit line they were handed, but you can be sure that it was bullshit...until the last year of the war...when they really were fighting to protect their families and property!

I mean, I'm guessing that the guys who flew into the World Trade Center were not the Taliban's #1 operatives. I doubt that every single person in our Armed Forces actually believed that Saddam had WMD's...other than the remnants of the ones that we ourselves sold him, of course.

Just because you come from Bible-humping Mississippi with family ties to South Lyncholina doesn't mean that what the men on the ground may have personally felt about the war suddenly matters, when it wouldn't matter in any other war or context. I'm not claiming that every single Southern soldier was fighting to preserve the institution of slavery, most weren't...but it is the official line on what the South (as an entity) was fighting for...or as at least one of the officially stated reasons.

Mish, would you point me to the 1861 speech or edict that Lincoln made telling the nation they were going to war to end slavery? I can't seem to find it. Maybe redietz knows an academic that knows where its at.

[MisterV]

"The Civil War began in 1861 as a struggle over whether states had the right to leave the Union. President Abraham Lincoln firmly believed that a state did not have that right. And he declared war on the southern states that tried to leave...Lincoln decided to recognize that slavery was, in fact, a major issue in the war. On September 22, 1862, he announced a new policy on slavery in the rebel southern states. His announcement became known as the Emancipation Proclamation."

https://learningenglish.voanews.com/...n/2509418.html

[mickeycrimm]

"The Civil War began in 1861 as a struggle over whether states had the right to leave the Union. President Abraham Lincoln firmly believed that a state did not have that right. And he declared war on the southern states that tried to leave...Lincoln decided to recognize that slavery was, in fact, a major issue in the war. On September 22, 1862, he announced a new policy on slavery in the rebel southern states. His announcement became known as the Emancipation Proclamation."

Yes, and the north had began a war with the south by invading a year earlier than his Proclamation announcement. And notice the crafty language he used

"....on the 1st day of January 1863, all persons held as slaves WITHIN ANY STATE THEN IN REBELLION against the United States, shall then become and be forever free."

https://learningenglish.voanews.com/...n/2509418.html

Yes, and the North invaded the south well over a year before Antietam. Lincoln did not lead the nation into war in 1861 claiming it was to end slavery. Notice the crafty language Lincoln used in the announcement. It was meant to send a message to Tennessee and Missouri, two slave states that didn't leave the Union, that those states were not included in the Proclamation. That they could keep their slaves. It also meant that any state returning to the Union could keep their slaves. If all 13 states had returned to the fold the "war to end slavery," would have been over and slavery still intact.

This line here:

"....on the 1st day of January, 1863 all person held as slaves within any state still in rebellion against the United States shall then become and be free forever."

[MisterV]

"The Civil War started because of uncompromising differences between the free and slave states over the power of the national government to prohibit slavery in the territories that had not yet become states. When Abraham Lincoln won election in 1860 as the first Republican president on a platform pledging to keep slavery out of the territories, seven slave states in the deep South seceded and formed a new nation, the Confederate States of America. The incoming Lincoln administration and most of the Northern people refused to recognize the legitimacy of secession. They feared that it would discredit democracy and create a fatal precedent that would eventually fragment the no-longer United States into several small, squabbling countries...The event that triggered war came at Fort Sumter in Charleston Bay on April 12, 1861. Claiming this United States fort as their own, the Confederate army on that day opened fire on the federal garrison and forced it to lower the American flag in surrender. Lincoln called out the militia to suppress this "insurrection."

https://www.battlefields.org/learn/a...ican-civil-war

[MaxPen]