Results 1 to 20 of 180

Thread: My Strategy For Cashman Bingo

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    the likelihood of squares getting filled is absolutely not equal. the same squares that already have coins in them keep getting hit, even when the bingo card is almost totally filled and there are lots of squares resulting in bingo.

  2. #2
    Originally Posted by pepe View Post
    the likelihood of squares getting filled is absolutely not equal. the same squares that already have coins in them keep getting hit, even when the bingo card is almost totally filled and there are lots of squares resulting in bingo.
    Yes, thats true. Thats the reason I play for the amount of money on board, not the number of squares filled in.

    Squares that have had balls land in them will keep getting balls landing in them and the money keeps building in those squares. The probability is a square already filled in has a much better chance to catch a ball than one that doesn't. But the ball that bingo's the card is going to come out.

    It appears to me that the unfilled squares all have an equal chance of being hit. I base my strategy on that.

    I don't win on every play but I'm well ahead on this game playing for the maxi and major meters. I've yet to see the grand on the board.
    Last edited by mickeycrimm; 02-01-2022 at 02:45 PM.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  3. #3
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    The probability is a square already filled in has a much better chance to catch a ball than one that doesn't.
    Stupid question incoming, do you understand how the game accomplishes the uneven probabilities?

    Visually it looks like only one reel strip for each of the 5 columns, but it seems to behave more like a 24 reel game with a strip for each position on the grid.

  4. #4
    Originally Posted by Don Perignom View Post
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    The probability is a square already filled in has a much better chance to catch a ball than one that doesn't.
    Stupid question incoming, do you understand how the game accomplishes the uneven probabilities?

    Visually it looks like only one reel strip for each of the 5 columns, but it seems to behave more like a 24 reel game with a strip for each position on the grid.
    We know the game is designed for balls to come out on squares that have already been filled. And they always have an amount of money in them. This allows the money to build in each bingo pattern. Exactly how it is accomplished I don't know. There is some kind of conditional probability there.
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

  5. #5
    Originally Posted by mickeycrimm View Post
    We know the game is designed for balls to come out on squares that have already been filled. And they always have an amount of money in them. This allows the money to build in each bingo pattern. Exactly how it is accomplished I don't know. There is some kind of conditional probability there.
    A further design obfuscation is the "Cashman Antics." Randomly the cartoon character will award or increment a prize.

    From design perspective, I guess it's all about disguising that the machines are essentially fancy vacuum cleaners. It doesn't work for me because the game feels rigged and the Cashman character flashes me back to the annoying paperclip from Microsoft Word. Of course I'll play anyway if I think I have an advantage.

  6. #6
    This is my biggest success so far. It was $1.50 bet level. I jumped on this play because the major meter was at $530 and it was on the board. While playing there was another $309 dumped into that particular square by balls continually landing on that square. There was one ball that dumped $300 into the square. So there was about $840 in that square.

    When I bingo'd there was more than one unfilled square that filled in and it created five bingo's. It paid 692 units. I was in maybe 50 units when it hit.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    "More importantly, mickey thought 8-4 was two games over .500. Argued about it. C'mon, man. Nothing can top that for math expertise. If GWAE ever has you on again, you can be sure I'll be calling in with that gem.'Nuff said." REDIETZ

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. VP Strategy
    By rymetymeuk in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 78
    Last Post: 10-07-2014, 04:20 AM
  2. Vp Strategy
    By Vpnewbie in forum California/Western US Casinos
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-16-2014, 07:30 PM
  3. San Manuel Indian Bingo & Casino in Highland
    By Alan Mendelson in forum California/Western US Casinos
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 07-22-2013, 06:58 AM
  4. Bingo makes a return at Pechanga, and to Las Vegas
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-04-2012, 06:43 AM
  5. Super bingo at the Plaza
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-29-2012, 08:16 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •