Originally Posted by
jbjb
Another 2 table debate???
Not really much of a debate, as I am sure you know jbjb. You have a handful of people who have absolutely zero blackjack experience or knowledge, Rob and Alan among them, that want to insist that a person can't track more than one table simultaneously, when numerous successful players have done so, including the basis for an entire team approach, the "call-in" implemented by many successful players and teams.
To counter that, opponents want to draw a distinction between back-counting multiple table and playing one while tracking a second, when there is no distinction. Are there not people, both players with their backs to the spotters as well as people walking through the casino that may cause a back-counting spotter to missed card or two? Absolutely. It all comes down to "partial" counts, which can still identify an advantage and the key phrase "when able to".
Much less a debate than an attempt to troll.
Originally Posted by
Ozzy
Damn J, BlackjackDegen.
Why would you use the term "degen". I guess an attempt to degrade me, as you always do. A degenerate in gambling terms is someone who can't control their gambling, plays a losing game....
loses, usually effecting their life financially (unable to pay bills, relationship deteriorate ect).
I am a professional blackjack player, in my 19th year of supporting myself from blackjack advantage play and a bit of non-blackjack advantage play (but mostly blackjack related), who has earned more than 1.6 million dollars doing so. Show me how that fits into
any definition of degenerate in terms of gambling?
Now if you want to use some terminology saying I am obsessed with blackjack card counting advantage play....
fine. It has been my life, for 19 years, nearly all of my adult life.