MDawg finally banned from Vegas casinos for winning too much? Cheap internet headline.

[redietz]

Rob, i am going to ask you to stop repeatedly posting that I am envious of other players that win more than I do. Mickeycrimm, jbjb, Monet, MaxPen, Axelwolf and just about every AP that participates here or other forums win more than me. I have never questioned or challenged a single one of them. The difference is they are doing something mathematical that can back up and explain their advantage and winning. The only person that had math that could explain and back up their ability to win was Moses. With Moses, I challenged the amounts. A player can't do what he claimed in RENO. Has he made the same claims but said he was playing Las Vegas or traveling around to multiple locations, I wouldn't have questioned anything. It just can't be done in a small sweaty place like Reno (for more than very short bursts).

Now Mdawg and yourself, you have no math that can explain or back up your claims. your claims DEFY the math. You both have been given ample opportunity to make your case. You have come up with "special plays", stop limits and machines teleporting hot and cold cycles. Mdawg has come up with betting into streaks (similar to hot cycles). These are long disproven voodoo crap by both of you.

And then the playbook is that you both go on the attack. I suspect that it is he who copied your playbook on that, but either way, it is simply a deflection because you have no legitimate mathematical supported answers. Without some sort of math to back up your claims you and Mdawg and a few others are absolutely no different than Alan and his 18 y.o. in a row. If anything you are worse because I honestly don't believe Alan set out to intentionally deceive anyone. He is just mis-remembering and now that he has been shown the math too stubborn to admit he was wrong.

So I am going to say every, or 98% of advantage players playing for a living and I include some that may not be exclusively playing for a living but are playing seriously make more than me and I have never challenged a single one. Nor am I jealous of any. I measure myself against myself and my goals. I am not in competition with anyone else, nor jealous of anyone else. It is purely about the math for me. If you are going to claim long-term winning playing -EV games like you and Mdawg, you have got to have something, some math to back it up.

The fundamental problem with the bell curve claims is that the people making the claim that they have won simply by being at the far end of the bell curve, then report from that point forward that they are winning and winning and winning some more. Instead of saying, "Gee, I made this amount of money at a negative game, so it must be that I'm at the far end of distribution. I better stop," they continue to report winnings, slapping end of bell curve results onto end of bell curve results on and on. And there's always an implication if not an explication of some personal skills or attributes that enable them to do so. In Mdawg's case, it's an odd implied "reading of the cards" along with some implied advantage for being able to bang large sums into play over and over, as opposed to the proletariat, who can't muster the same sums. Rob.Singer goes with something he calls the "human factor," which reminds me of the Seinfeld "Human Fund." No definition is provided of the "human factor," of course, but ostensibly it does something.

Sports handicapping is a game of opinion, so there are no real math boundaries to it, but despite that, nobody wins more than 60% of their games lifetime. It just doesn't happen. Actual math-boundary casino games have much more predictable outcomes. The odds against MDawg doing what he originally claimed are so long that they can, from a practical standpoint, be dismissed out of hand.

Should posters protect "the public" from thinking they can do what MDawg claims he did? Yeah, I think so. If USA Today allowed sports services to post claims of 85% and 90% winners when it was first published, I think that suggests that Americans fall for a lot of stuff. And I can't say I think they've gotten any wiser over the years.

[Rob.Singer]

Rob, i am going to ask you to stop repeatedly posting that I am envious of other players that win more than I do. Mickeycrimm, jbjb, Monet, MaxPen, Axelwolf and just about every AP that participates here or other forums win more than me. I have never questioned or challenged a single one of them. The difference is they are doing something mathematical that can back up and explain their advantage and winning. The only person that had math that could explain and back up their ability to win was Moses. With Moses, I challenged the amounts. A player can't do what he claimed in RENO. Has he made the same claims but said he was playing Las Vegas or traveling around to multiple locations, I wouldn't have questioned anything. It just can't be done in a small sweaty place like Reno (for more than very short bursts).

Now Mdawg and yourself, you have no math that can explain or back up your claims. your claims DEFY the math. You both have been given ample opportunity to make your case. You have come up with "special plays", stop limits and machines teleporting hot and cold cycles. Mdawg has come up with betting into streaks (similar to hot cycles). These are long disproven voodoo crap by both of you.

And then the playbook is that you both go on the attack. I suspect that it is he who copied your playbook on that, but either way, it is simply a deflection because you have no legitimate mathematical supported answers. Without some sort of math to back up your claims you and Mdawg and a few others are absolutely no different than Alan and his 18 y.o. in a row. If anything you are worse because I honestly don't believe Alan set out to intentionally deceive anyone. He is just mis-remembering and now that he has been shown the math too stubborn to admit he was wrong.

So I am going to say every, or 98% of advantage players playing for a living and I include some that may not be exclusively playing for a living but are playing seriously make more than me and I have never challenged a single one. Nor am I jealous of any. I measure myself against myself and my goals. I am not in competition with anyone else, nor jealous of anyone else. It is purely about the math for me. If you are going to claim long-term winning playing -EV games like you and Mdawg, you have got to have something, some math to back it up.

There are lots of others who don't believe MDawg wins. They've let their beliefs be known multiple times over. But NONE of them have needed to fabricate false claims about knowing casino execs who had no problem showing and/or telling them private information on one of their big players. You just can't help yourself when your assertions about other players gets little to no traction.

Wise up.

[Rob.Singer]

Rob, i am going to ask you to stop repeatedly posting that I am envious of other players that win more than I do. Mickeycrimm, jbjb, Monet, MaxPen, Axelwolf and just about every AP that participates here or other forums win more than me. I have never questioned or challenged a single one of them. The difference is they are doing something mathematical that can back up and explain their advantage and winning. The only person that had math that could explain and back up their ability to win was Moses. With Moses, I challenged the amounts. A player can't do what he claimed in RENO. Has he made the same claims but said he was playing Las Vegas or traveling around to multiple locations, I wouldn't have questioned anything. It just can't be done in a small sweaty place like Reno (for more than very short bursts).

Now Mdawg and yourself, you have no math that can explain or back up your claims. your claims DEFY the math. You both have been given ample opportunity to make your case. You have come up with "special plays", stop limits and machines teleporting hot and cold cycles. Mdawg has come up with betting into streaks (similar to hot cycles). These are long disproven voodoo crap by both of you.

And then the playbook is that you both go on the attack. I suspect that it is he who copied your playbook on that, but either way, it is simply a deflection because you have no legitimate mathematical supported answers. Without some sort of math to back up your claims you and Mdawg and a few others are absolutely no different than Alan and his 18 y.o. in a row. If anything you are worse because I honestly don't believe Alan set out to intentionally deceive anyone. He is just mis-remembering and now that he has been shown the math too stubborn to admit he was wrong.

So I am going to say every, or 98% of advantage players playing for a living and I include some that may not be exclusively playing for a living but are playing seriously make more than me and I have never challenged a single one. Nor am I jealous of any. I measure myself against myself and my goals. I am not in competition with anyone else, nor jealous of anyone else. It is purely about the math for me. If you are going to claim long-term winning playing -EV games like you and Mdawg, you have got to have something, some math to back it up.

The fundamental problem with the bell curve claims is that the people making the claim that they have won simply by being at the far end of the bell curve, then report from that point forward that they are winning and winning and winning some more. Instead of saying, "Gee, I made this amount of money at a negative game, so it must be that I'm at the far end of distribution. I better stop," they continue to report winnings, slapping end of bell curve results onto end of bell curve results on and on. And there's always an implication if not an explication of some personal skills or attributes that enable them to do so. In Mdawg's case, it's an odd implied "reading of the cards" along with some implied advantage for being able to bang large sums into play over and over, as opposed to the proletariat, who can't muster the same sums. Rob.Singer goes with something he calls the "human factor," which reminds me of the Seinfeld "Human Fund." No definition is provided of the "human factor," of course, but ostensibly it does something.

Sports handicapping is a game of opinion, so there are no real math boundaries to it, but despite that, nobody wins more than 60% of their games lifetime. It just doesn't happen. Actual math-boundary casino games have much more predictable outcomes. The odds against MDawg doing what he originally claimed are so long that they can, from a practical standpoint, be dismissed out of hand.

Should posters protect "the public" from thinking they can do what MDawg claims he did? Yeah, I think so. If USA Today allowed sports services to post claims of 85% and 90% winners when it was first published, I think that suggests that Americans fall for a lot of stuff. And I can't say I think they've gotten any wiser over the years.

Weird. Just plain weird.

[kewlJ]

There are lots of others who don't believe MDawg wins. They've let their beliefs be known multiple times over. But NONE of them have needed to fabricate false claims about knowing casino execs who had no problem showing and/or telling them private information on one of their big players. You just can't help yourself when your assertions about other players gets little to no traction.

I don't think I ever used the term casino execs did I? I have a couple friends that work at one of the bigger strip casinos and may or may not have access to some player information. I don't know if their title or position qualifies them as a casino exec or not.

You have made claims of having a brother-in-law that works for the FBI and a nephew at the IRS (or maybe vice versa). Yet you think it some kind of stretch that I have a couple friends that work in the industry. I don't know what to tell you....that is the way life works. And I am no longer confirming or denying that anyone gave me any specific info. But that too is the way life works Ron, right or wrong.

[Rob.Singer]

There are lots of others who don't believe MDawg wins. They've let their beliefs be known multiple times over. But NONE of them have needed to fabricate false claims about knowing casino execs who had no problem showing and/or telling them private information on one of their big players. You just can't help yourself when your assertions about other players gets little to no traction.

I don't think I ever used the term casino execs did I? I have a couple friends that work at one of the bigger strip casinos and may or may not have access to some player information. I don't know if their title or position qualifies them as a casino exec or not.

You have made claims of having a brother-in-law that works for the FBI and a nephew at the IRS (or maybe vice versa). Yet you think it some kind of stretch that I have a couple friends that work in the industry. I don't know what to tell you....that is the way life works. And I am no longer confirming or denying that anyone gave me any specific info. But that too is the way life works Ron, right or wrong.

No kew. The "stretch" is that, after your silly envious meaningless-to-anyone-else disbief over MDawg's claims of winning which got little to no traction and certainly not enuf to make you feel at-ease, you suddenly just happened to "know" people at the casino you thought MDawg plays the most in (but of course you don't really know) who also just happened to have no problem whatsoever transferring info to you that would get them terminated if discovered.

That's what's called "concocting a false scenario in a last ditch attempt to try and talk yourself and others into forcibly believing something. In other words, you LIED ABOUT SOMETHING ONCE AGAIN.

Here's another flash to help your inexperience with real life: how many people who have access to a client's records work at Cosmo. The FBI has about 35,000 employees; and the IRS has over double that. You make up so much shit online, and this nonsense only exacerbates the low credibility everyone knows you're saddled with across internet forums. When you don't think others aren't buying your BS, lie by making something else up!

That's the way REAL life works in kew's world.

[Rob.Singer]

And I’m open to being proven wrong.

Post those photos you promised of the baccarat player that you hit on at the bar in Vegas, the guy you insisted was MDawg.

We can compare those photos to those of the attorney whose phone# you tagged your posts with (and you insisted was MDawg), and photos of Mitchell.

Here you go Coach. As far as I know this is MDawg. Can you prove me wrong?

My question is....why is this guy acting like he's God's gift to homos when he has a small dick?

[kewlJ]

Here's another flash to help your inexperience with real life: how many people who have access to a client's records work at Cosmo.

I didn't say anything about knowing anyone at Cosmo or that worked at Cosmo did I? I am not going any further with this discussion though. I think most people with a brain know what happened.

[kewlJ]

My question is....why is this guy acting like he's God's gift to homos when he has a small dick?

If this guy who went by the porn name Kyle Prescott is indeed the same scammer person Christopher Mitchel, and it certainly resembles the same person, just what 15-20 years difference. Anyway, the guy in the Boz pictures above does not have a small dick. It is at least average, probably a little better. Nothing special. Nice enough looking dick. And the dude was in pretty good shape back then. Not really my type, but kind of a muscle boy image that a lot of guys like.

So isn't he with a female or married or has a female side kick or something now? Assuming he is straight (and who really cares), he did gay porn for money. Gay for Pay they call it. That in itself....that "gay for pay thing", although common seems kind of scammy to me. Not surprised he followed that up with some other scammy internet thing which happens to be gambling related.

[Rob.Singer]

Here's another flash to help your inexperience with real life: how many people who have access to a client's records work at Cosmo.

I didn't say anything about knowing anyone at Cosmo or that worked at Cosmo did I? I am not going any further with this discussion though. I think most people with a brain know what happened.

Yes I agree. You lied and hope somebody somewhere believes you.

[Rob.Singer]

My question is....why is this guy acting like he's God's gift to homos when he has a small dick?

If this guy who went by the porn name Kyle Prescott is indeed the same scammer person Christopher Mitchel, and it certainly resembles the same person, just what 15-20 years difference. Anyway, the guy in the Boz pictures above does not have a small dick. It is at least average, probably a little better. Nothing special. Nice enough looking dick. And the dude was in pretty good shape back then. Not really my type, but kind of a muscle boy image that a lot of guys like.

So isn't he with a female or married or has a female side kick or something now? Assuming he is straight (and who really cares), he did gay porn for money. Gay for Pay they call it. That in itself....that "gay for pay thing", although common seems kind of scammy to me. Not surprised he followed that up with some other scammy internet thing which happens to be gambling related.

Only someone who doesn't believe he measures up would comment on that being an avg. dick. And if that's representative of what enters you from behind, no wonder you can still walk.

[jbjb]

My question is....why is this guy acting like he's God's gift to homos when he has a small dick?

If this guy who went by the porn name Kyle Prescott is indeed the same scammer person Christopher Mitchel, and it certainly resembles the same person, just what 15-20 years difference. Anyway, the guy in the Boz pictures above does not have a small dick. It is at least average, probably a little better. Nothing special. Nice enough looking dick. And the dude was in pretty good shape back then. Not really my type, but kind of a muscle boy image that a lot of guys like.

So isn't he with a female or married or has a female side kick or something now? Assuming he is straight (and who really cares), he did gay porn for money. Gay for Pay they call it. That in itself....that "gay for pay thing", although common seems kind of scammy to me. Not surprised he followed that up with some other scammy internet thing which happens to be gambling related.

It's the same person. They had the same arm tattoo.

[Ozzy]

Kew still playing ignorant, pretends like he knows very little about Chrissy Kyle Prescott Mitchell. You're not a very good liar. Are you still oblivious to PFA ? LMAO !

[kewlJ]

Kew still playing ignorant, pretends like he knows very little about Chrissy Kyle Prescott Mitchell. You're not a very good liar. Are you still oblivious to PFA. LMAO !

I have no idea what you are implying. I have visited PFA a couple times, I think once to read a few minutes about this Christopher Mitchel guy that Druff was going on about and once to send Druff a message because he hadn't visited here in about a month. If you are thinking something else, you are wrong as usual.

It's the same person. They had the same arm tattoo.

Yeah, I was wondering about that. That would do it. I am really not very familiar with this person. I thought his claims were baccarat related. Someone mentioned blackjack. That is more my style. where can I read his blackjack claims, like the short "cliff notes" version. I don't want to read through pages and pages of crap.

[Ozzy]

Kew still playing ignorant, pretends like he knows very little about Chrissy Kyle Prescott Mitchell. You're not a very good liar. Are you still oblivious to PFA. LMAO !

I have no idea what you are implying. I have visited PFA a couple times, I think once to read a few minutes about this Christopher Mitchel guy that Druff was going on about and once to send Druff a message because he hadn't visited here in about a month. If you are thinking something else, you are wrong as usual.

It's the same person. They had the same arm tattoo.

Yeah, I was wondering about that. That would do it. I am really not very familiar with this person. I thought his claims were baccarat related. Someone mentioned blackjack. That is more my style. where can I read his blackjack claims, like the short "cliff notes" version. I don't want to read through pages and pages of crap.

Kyle Prescott is by far the best thread in gambling forums history with an average of about 1100 views daily for the last 2 years. Im certain most regulars view that thread and half or so post over there. Of course UNKOOL1 does neither !....It can't be because of your inability to use you're VPN over at PFA is it ? You're a good boy over at Rusty's, displaying yourself to the DICKtators.

[kewlJ]

Kyle Prescott is by far the best thread in gambling forums history with an average of about 1100 views daily for the last 2 years. Im certain most regulars view that thread and half or so post over there. Of course UNKOOL1 does neither !....It can't be because of your inability to use you're VPN over at PFA is it ? You're a good boy over at Rusty's, displaying yourself to the DICKtators.

Gambling Forum now? No I don't read many thread there. I mostly read a thread with my name as the title and the misc forums thread where people were lying about me. I like to try to correct the record and lies, but you really can't with these trolls. Other than that, I long ago gave up treating GF as a serious gambling forum. It's not. I recently offered the owner a deal to try to be more gambling related topics but he didn't respond. All he wants is traffic and views. He doesn't care if it is on the topic of gambling or trolling.

So I just looked quickly. What subforum are you talking about. I don't want to spend 3 hours reading GF or PFA. I want to read about his blackjack claims for 5 minutes and then I might have something to say.

At WoV, what you refer to as Rusty's house, what do you care what I or anyone else does? So happens I am not going to participate there much either. As long as Mdawg is allowed and protected and enabled to post his ridiculous math defying claims, that no one is allowed to challenge, I can no longer consider WoV a serious gambling forum or Shackleford anything but part of this Mdawg whatever it is...scam. Just yesterday Mdawg said something about his betting up into steaks being the basics behind card counting which is complete bullshit. Card counting is identifying an advantage by cards played and cards remaining. It has nothing to do with streak and betting into streaks. But I, a guy who counts cards for a living for almost 20 years now, am not allowed to say anything. Ridiculous!

[MaxPen]

My question is....why is this guy acting like he's God's gift to homos when he has a small dick?

If this guy who went by the porn name Kyle Prescott is indeed the same scammer person Christopher Mitchel, and it certainly resembles the same person, just what 15-20 years difference. Anyway, the guy in the Boz pictures above does not have a small dick. It is at least average, probably a little better. Nothing special. Nice enough looking dick. And the dude was in pretty good shape back then. Not really my type, but kind of a muscle boy image that a lot of guys like.

So isn't he with a female or married or has a female side kick or something now? Assuming he is straight (and who really cares), he did gay porn for money. Gay for Pay they call it. That in itself....that "gay for pay thing", although common seems kind of scammy to me. Not surprised he followed that up with some other scammy internet thing which happens to be gambling related.

Only someone who doesn't believe he measures up would comment on that being an avg. dick. And if that's representative of what enters you from behind, no wonder you can still walk.

I understand KewlJ looking at the pics. But I would assume most scanned by that shit with a quickness.

Here we got Grandpa Newell studying that shit like homework.....RIP

[Rob.Singer]

Kyle Prescott is by far the best thread in gambling forums history with an average of about 1100 views daily for the last 2 years. Im certain most regulars view that thread and half or so post over there. Of course UNKOOL1 does neither !....It can't be because of your inability to use you're VPN over at PFA is it ? You're a good boy over at Rusty's, displaying yourself to the DICKtators.

Gambling Forum now? No I don't read many thread there. I mostly read a thread with my name as the title and the misc forums thread where people were lying about me. I like to try to correct the record and lies, but you really can't with these trolls. Other than that, I long ago gave up treating GF as a serious gambling forum. It's not. I recently offered the owner a deal to try to be more gambling related topics but he didn't respond. All he wants is traffic and views. He doesn't care if it is on the topic of gambling or trolling.

So I just looked quickly. What subforum are you talking about. I don't want to spend 3 hours reading GF or PFA. I want to read about his blackjack claims for 5 minutes and then I might have something to say.

At WoV, what you refer to as Rusty's house, what do you care what I or anyone else does? So happens I am not going to participate there much either. As long as Mdawg is allowed and protected and enabled to post his ridiculous math defying claims, that no one is allowed to challenge, I can no longer consider WoV a serious gambling forum or Shackleford anything but part of this Mdawg whatever it is...scam. Just yesterday Mdawg said something about his betting up into steaks being the basics behind card counting which is complete bullshit. Card counting is identifying an advantage by cards played and cards remaining. It has nothing to do with streak and betting into streaks. But I, a guy who counts cards for a living for almost 20 years now, am not allowed to say anything. Ridiculous!

Has it ever crossed your mind that the reason you are so dissed is because you are a proven liar? Wizard laughs at you, the GF administrator ripped you a new one just a bit ago, and Druff ignores you because you are an annoying little whiny-ass twit.

How thick are you anyway?

[Cerveza Fria]

Kyle Prescott is by far the best thread in gambling forums history with an average of about 1100 views daily for the last 2 years. Im certain most regulars view that thread and half or so post over there. Of course UNKOOL1 does neither !....It can't be because of your inability to use you're VPN over at PFA is it ? You're a good boy over at Rusty's, displaying yourself to the DICKtators.

Gambling Forum now? No I don't read many thread there. I mostly read a thread with my name as the title and the misc forums thread where people were lying about me. I like to try to correct the record and lies, but you really can't with these trolls. Other than that, I long ago gave up treating GF as a serious gambling forum. It's not. I recently offered the owner a deal to try to be more gambling related topics but he didn't respond. All he wants is traffic and views. He doesn't care if it is on the topic of gambling or trolling.

So I just looked quickly. What subforum are you talking about. I don't want to spend 3 hours reading GF or PFA. I want to read about his blackjack claims for 5 minutes and then I might have something to say.

At WoV, what you refer to as Rusty's house, what do you care what I or anyone else does? So happens I am not going to participate there much either. As long as Mdawg is allowed and protected and enabled to post his ridiculous math defying claims, that no one is allowed to challenge, I can no longer consider WoV a serious gambling forum or Shackleford anything but part of this Mdawg whatever it is...scam. Just yesterday Mdawg said something about his betting up into steaks being the basics behind card counting which is complete bullshit. Card counting is identifying an advantage by cards played and cards remaining. It has nothing to do with streak and betting into streaks. But I, a guy who counts cards for a living for almost 20 years now, am not allowed to say anything. Ridiculous!

Has it ever crossed your mind that the reason you are so dissed is because you are a proven liar? Wizard laughs at you, the GF administrator ripped you a new one just a bit ago, and Druff ignores you because you are an annoying little whiny-ass twit.

How thick are you anyway?

Pretty amazing that this particular Gringo, of all people, is calling someone else's veracity into question. LOL

[jdaewoo]

Pretty amazing that this particular Gringo, of all people, is calling someone else's veracity into question. LOL

He's a fake trolling cunt who's well aware that in real life he's a lifetime loser at gambling. The fact that a homosexual figured out how to make money gambling and he didn't eats at him daily, make no mistake.

[MisterV]

He's a fake trolling cunt who's well aware that in real life he's a lifetime loser at gambling. The fact that a homosexual figured out how to make money gambling and he didn't eats at him daily, make no mistake.

Add a dose of sadism, sprinkle in a bit of masochism, then bake half way.

Half baked or not, Rob is relentless and is a gifted writer creating some of the best prose on these boards.