Sorry--too old for a Lambo. It's more MDawg's style anyway.
Sorry--too old for a Lambo. It's more MDawg's style anyway.
Nice hit Rob!
Now for your favorite part of the story ...
How much did you tip?
No one believes for a second Rob plays $250 a spin video poker. We especially don't believe he had a pat royal on a multiplier.
It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"
I didn't even think about doing that because after a handpay like that I stop playing for the visit, and if they ask me to "play the hand off" I always refuse, then they must do it. These people didn't ask. Never got a royal on UX before but I think the multiplier is 4X for each royal on ddbp?
Well let's see Don. Since it's dealt we can just use one hand and extrapolate from there:
12x4000units=48000 units per hand. 48000 units x10 hands=480000 units. Now each unit is 5 dollars. 5*480000=$2.4 million. So you did it right. Thus the profit is $2,399,500. Now of course the chance of a person getting a dealt full house followed by a dealt royal flush is 1 in 450,756,396.3. This sequence requires some patience of course since you would need to wait for your full house hand pay. You might save a little time by telling the slot attendant(s) - "hey, hold on a sec I might get another hand pay on this next spin".
Cheers, TP.
.
Last edited by MaxPen; 04-11-2022 at 09:18 PM.
FraudJ's word is worth less than the prop cash in Singer's safe...RIP
I didn't say I play UX regularly, in fact, I don't. But I am very familiar with the smaller winning hand multipliers. This being my first royal(s) on one of these and the surprise of it doesn't leave a lot of need to worry about the next hand multipliers. And per kew, no one who plays a mathematically strategic game needs to "prove" anything.
As fully expected, this hit being one of mine is causing uneasiness for some here. Just like always. When I said I lost thousands on a $50 machine everyone had no problem with that. So tough love I guess. But my doomsday safe just got a little more cluttered. Take it or leave it.
You're insinuating that I made a trip to lurk in high limit rooms waiting for someone to hit something in 6-figures so I could ask them to step aside while I snapped a quick pic? How does that work? That's weirdo stuff.
It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"
That's idiotic and only proves how much you need this not to be mine. Kew will have the same issues because he's lied so much and so often that a few more won't matter.
If you knew anything about casinos, VP machines and trying to get a good clear picture on a slant top, you'd know you have to move around in order to get as much of the glare and flash out as you can.
Go cry me a river.
Sad. Even sadder than usual.
I prefer to add in a little bit of glare with my pictures to make them look a bit more authentic.
After that I crop out the machine and buttons.
It seems to have fooled everyone here for years now.
When I am really lazy but feel the urge to post up a picture, I just scour the internet and save some random big jackpot picture.
I do the same thing for vehicles, dogs and tents.
You can be sure these people have been scouring the internet all day trying to find this picture.
Kew will stay up all night. You can tell he's rattled by how the picture shocked him into being practically speechless. The only way these fools can cope is to pretend it didn't happen, you know, just like they did with the Newell.
I'll let the jealous losers whine as much as they like now. My next mention of jackpots will be when I hit my next one.
Think of me the next time you have to fill your tanks! Burn baby burn.
Slot attendants are probably slowly getting used to stick-arounds. For example on high-denom Golden Egypt, after a hand pay, one might ask the attendant(s) to stick around for the second spin on wilds across ("hey bro stick around, I got a lucky feeling about this next spin").
I found an IGT brochure for UX:
You know it's really my pic because it's directly overhead with spotlight glare.
IGT includes "top award" calculations -- presumably for operators to gauge their potential exposure. UX is "risky" for operators because of the multipliers up to 12x.
I'm trying to guess where the pic was taken. How common is it for casinos to offer $5 UX? I play mostly at hellholes that wouldn't consider venturing that high.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)