Page 3 of 33 FirstFirst 123456713 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 60 of 654

Thread: Objective proof?

  1. #41
    Sorry--too old for a Lambo. It's more MDawg's style anyway.

  2. #42
    Gold Don Perignom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Location
    Google Archipelago
    Posts
    433
    Nice hit Rob!

    Now for your favorite part of the story ...

    How much did you tip?

  3. #43
    No one believes for a second Rob plays $250 a spin video poker. We especially don't believe he had a pat royal on a multiplier.
    It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"

  4. #44
    Originally Posted by Don Perignom View Post
    Nice hit Rob!

    Now for your favorite part of the story ...

    How much did you tip?
    I took the handpay entirely in cash and I gave a tip to no one. I had two smaller handpays before this one, left no tips, and it didn't affect anything on any of the handpays.

  5. #45
    Gold Don Perignom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Location
    Google Archipelago
    Posts
    433
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    I took the handpay entirely in cash and I gave a tip to no one.
    All cash, well played! Did they break down the last hundred into 20s?

  6. #46
    Originally Posted by Don Perignom View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    I took the handpay entirely in cash and I gave a tip to no one.
    All cash, well played! Did they break down the last hundred into 20s?
    No, not on the smaller pays either.

    I just saw where a sore AQ doesn't want me to have the scratch to be able to play this machine. So how can I afford to tip??

  7. #47
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    The first thing that crossed my mind after absorbing the magnitude of this hit was, how much PAIN I'd dole out when I posted a picture of it. Responses such as "you're a cunt" and "fake photo" and others only added to the satisfaction of it all. I'll bet jbjb isn't the only downtrodden gambling loser trying desperately to find a way where it just isn't real! In fact, when they find they can't do that, you can be sure chants of "big deal--he probably lost it all and more afterwards" will be the battle cry of the lost.
    Congratulations Ron - awesome hit. Did you play off your multipliers after your hand pay ?

  8. #48
    Gold Don Perignom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Location
    Google Archipelago
    Posts
    433
    Originally Posted by tableplay View Post
    Did you play off your multipliers after your hand pay ?
    Had it been 10-play, he would have earned 4x next hand multipliers instead of 2x. But it may not have been enabled on the menu. For 10-play, max potential payoff would be $2.4 million on a dealt royal following a dealt full house. Did I do that right?

  9. #49
    Originally Posted by tableplay View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    The first thing that crossed my mind after absorbing the magnitude of this hit was, how much PAIN I'd dole out when I posted a picture of it. Responses such as "you're a cunt" and "fake photo" and others only added to the satisfaction of it all. I'll bet jbjb isn't the only downtrodden gambling loser trying desperately to find a way where it just isn't real! In fact, when they find they can't do that, you can be sure chants of "big deal--he probably lost it all and more afterwards" will be the battle cry of the lost.
    Congratulations Ron - awesome hit. Did you play off your multipliers after your hand pay ?
    I didn't even think about doing that because after a handpay like that I stop playing for the visit, and if they ask me to "play the hand off" I always refuse, then they must do it. These people didn't ask. Never got a royal on UX before but I think the multiplier is 4X for each royal on ddbp?

  10. #50
    Originally Posted by Don Perignom View Post
    Originally Posted by tableplay View Post
    Did you play off your multipliers after your hand pay ?
    Had it been 10-play, he would have earned 4x next hand multipliers instead of 2x. But it may not have been enabled on the menu. For 10-play, max potential payoff would be $2.4 million on a dealt royal following a dealt full house. Did I do that right?
    Well let's see Don. Since it's dealt we can just use one hand and extrapolate from there:
    12x4000units=48000 units per hand. 48000 units x10 hands=480000 units. Now each unit is 5 dollars. 5*480000=$2.4 million. So you did it right. Thus the profit is $2,399,500. Now of course the chance of a person getting a dealt full house followed by a dealt royal flush is 1 in 450,756,396.3. This sequence requires some patience of course since you would need to wait for your full house hand pay. You might save a little time by telling the slot attendant(s) - "hey, hold on a sec I might get another hand pay on this next spin".
    Cheers, TP.
    .

  11. #51
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by tableplay View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    The first thing that crossed my mind after absorbing the magnitude of this hit was, how much PAIN I'd dole out when I posted a picture of it. Responses such as "you're a cunt" and "fake photo" and others only added to the satisfaction of it all. I'll bet jbjb isn't the only downtrodden gambling loser trying desperately to find a way where it just isn't real! In fact, when they find they can't do that, you can be sure chants of "big deal--he probably lost it all and more afterwards" will be the battle cry of the lost.
    Congratulations Ron - awesome hit. Did you play off your multipliers after your hand pay ?
    I didn't even think about doing that because after a handpay like that I stop playing for the visit, and if they ask me to "play the hand off" I always refuse, then they must do it. These people didn't ask. Never got a royal on UX before but I think the multiplier is 4X for each royal on ddbp?
    Well as Don pointed out, for ten play it is 4x and of course for five play it is 2x as observed for your massive hit. Please PM me here at VCT next time so I can play off your multipliers with a five coin bet ;-).

  12. #52
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by tableplay View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    The first thing that crossed my mind after absorbing the magnitude of this hit was, how much PAIN I'd dole out when I posted a picture of it. Responses such as "you're a cunt" and "fake photo" and others only added to the satisfaction of it all. I'll bet jbjb isn't the only downtrodden gambling loser trying desperately to find a way where it just isn't real! In fact, when they find they can't do that, you can be sure chants of "big deal--he probably lost it all and more afterwards" will be the battle cry of the lost.
    Congratulations Ron - awesome hit. Did you play off your multipliers after your hand pay ?
    I didn't even think about doing that because after a handpay like that I stop playing for the visit, and if they ask me to "play the hand off" I always refuse, then they must do it. These people didn't ask. Never got a royal on UX before but I think the multiplier is 4X for each royal on ddbp?
    The pic even shows 2x. No way someone who plays that regularly does not know that.

    I am not going to doubt that Rob was present in the casino for the hit. But I would need something more substantial than a from the side pic.
    Last edited by MaxPen; 04-11-2022 at 09:18 PM.
    FraudJ's word is worth less than the prop cash in Singer's safe...RIP

  13. #53
    Originally Posted by MaxPen View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by tableplay View Post
    Congratulations Ron - awesome hit. Did you play off your multipliers after your hand pay ?
    I didn't even think about doing that because after a handpay like that I stop playing for the visit, and if they ask me to "play the hand off" I always refuse, then they must do it. These people didn't ask. Never got a royal on UX before but I think the multiplier is 4X for each royal on ddbp?
    The pic even shows 2x. No way someone who plays that regularly does not know that.

    I am not going to doubt that Rob was present in the casino for the hit. But I would need something more substantial than a from the side pic.
    I didn't say I play UX regularly, in fact, I don't. But I am very familiar with the smaller winning hand multipliers. This being my first royal(s) on one of these and the surprise of it doesn't leave a lot of need to worry about the next hand multipliers. And per kew, no one who plays a mathematically strategic game needs to "prove" anything.

    As fully expected, this hit being one of mine is causing uneasiness for some here. Just like always. When I said I lost thousands on a $50 machine everyone had no problem with that. So tough love I guess. But my doomsday safe just got a little more cluttered. Take it or leave it.

    You're insinuating that I made a trip to lurk in high limit rooms waiting for someone to hit something in 6-figures so I could ask them to step aside while I snapped a quick pic? How does that work? That's weirdo stuff.

  14. #54
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by MaxPen View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post

    I didn't even think about doing that because after a handpay like that I stop playing for the visit, and if they ask me to "play the hand off" I always refuse, then they must do it. These people didn't ask. Never got a royal on UX before but I think the multiplier is 4X for each royal on ddbp?
    The pic even shows 2x. No way someone who plays that regularly does not know that.

    I am not going to doubt that Rob was present in the casino for the hit. But I would need something more substantial than a from the side pic.
    I didn't say I play UX regularly, in fact, I don't. But I am very familiar with the smaller winning hand multipliers. This being my first royal(s) on one of these and the surprise of it doesn't leave a lot of need to worry about the next hand multipliers. And per kew, no one who plays a mathematically strategic game needs to "prove" anything.

    As fully expected, this hit being one of mine is causing uneasiness for some here. Just like always. When I said I lost thousands on a $50 machine everyone had no problem with that. So tough love I guess. But my doomsday safe just got a little more cluttered. Take it or leave it.

    You're insinuating that I made a trip to lurk in high limit rooms waiting for someone to hit something in 6-figures so I could ask them to step aside while I snapped a quick pic? How does that work? That's weirdo stuff.
    Maxpen had a sharp observation.

    So why the picture from the side? Never seen someone take a picture of their own jackpot and not be directly in front of it. lol.

    quality nonsense rob, quality nonsense.
    It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"

  15. #55
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by MaxPen View Post

    The pic even shows 2x. No way someone who plays that regularly does not know that.

    I am not going to doubt that Rob was present in the casino for the hit. But I would need something more substantial than a from the side pic.
    I didn't say I play UX regularly, in fact, I don't. But I am very familiar with the smaller winning hand multipliers. This being my first royal(s) on one of these and the surprise of it doesn't leave a lot of need to worry about the next hand multipliers. And per kew, no one who plays a mathematically strategic game needs to "prove" anything.

    As fully expected, this hit being one of mine is causing uneasiness for some here. Just like always. When I said I lost thousands on a $50 machine everyone had no problem with that. So tough love I guess. But my doomsday safe just got a little more cluttered. Take it or leave it.

    You're insinuating that I made a trip to lurk in high limit rooms waiting for someone to hit something in 6-figures so I could ask them to step aside while I snapped a quick pic? How does that work? That's weirdo stuff.
    Maxpen had a sharp observation.

    So why the picture from the side? Never seen someone take a picture of their own jackpot and not be directly in front of it. lol.

    quality nonsense rob, quality nonsense.
    That's idiotic and only proves how much you need this not to be mine. Kew will have the same issues because he's lied so much and so often that a few more won't matter.

    If you knew anything about casinos, VP machines and trying to get a good clear picture on a slant top, you'd know you have to move around in order to get as much of the glare and flash out as you can.

    Go cry me a river.

  16. #56
    Sad. Even sadder than usual.

  17. #57
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    That's idiotic and only proves how much you need this not to be mine. Kew will have the same issues because he's lied so much and so often that a few more won't matter.

    If you knew anything about casinos, VP machines and trying to get a good clear picture on a slant top, you'd know you have to move around in order to get as much of the glare and flash out as you can.

    Go cry me a river.
    I prefer to add in a little bit of glare with my pictures to make them look a bit more authentic.
    After that I crop out the machine and buttons.
    It seems to have fooled everyone here for years now.
    When I am really lazy but feel the urge to post up a picture, I just scour the internet and save some random big jackpot picture.
    I do the same thing for vehicles, dogs and tents.

  18. #58
    Originally Posted by monet View Post
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    That's idiotic and only proves how much you need this not to be mine. Kew will have the same issues because he's lied so much and so often that a few more won't matter.

    If you knew anything about casinos, VP machines and trying to get a good clear picture on a slant top, you'd know you have to move around in order to get as much of the glare and flash out as you can.

    Go cry me a river.
    I prefer to add in a little bit of glare with my pictures to make them look a bit more authentic.
    After that I crop out the machine and buttons.
    It seems to have fooled everyone here for years now.
    When I am really lazy but feel the urge to post up a picture, I just scour the internet and save some random big jackpot picture.
    I do the same thing for vehicles, dogs and tents.
    You can be sure these people have been scouring the internet all day trying to find this picture.
    Kew will stay up all night. You can tell he's rattled by how the picture shocked him into being practically speechless. The only way these fools can cope is to pretend it didn't happen, you know, just like they did with the Newell.

    I'll let the jealous losers whine as much as they like now. My next mention of jackpots will be when I hit my next one.

    Think of me the next time you have to fill your tanks! Burn baby burn.

  19. #59
    Slot attendants are probably slowly getting used to stick-arounds. For example on high-denom Golden Egypt, after a hand pay, one might ask the attendant(s) to stick around for the second spin on wilds across ("hey bro stick around, I got a lucky feeling about this next spin").

  20. #60
    Gold Don Perignom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2022
    Location
    Google Archipelago
    Posts
    433
    Originally Posted by monet View Post
    I prefer to add in a little bit of glare with my pictures to make them look a bit more authentic.
    I found an IGT brochure for UX:

    Name:  igt ux.png
Views: 862
Size:  75.0 KB

    You know it's really my pic because it's directly overhead with spotlight glare.

    IGT includes "top award" calculations -- presumably for operators to gauge their potential exposure. UX is "risky" for operators because of the multipliers up to 12x.

    I'm trying to guess where the pic was taken. How common is it for casinos to offer $5 UX? I play mostly at hellholes that wouldn't consider venturing that high.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 67
    Last Post: 05-27-2021, 08:49 AM
  2. The Pandemic Proof is in the Predictive Pudding
    By redietz in forum Coronavirus
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 09-13-2020, 07:42 PM
  3. Attention Conspiracy Theorists -- I found proof
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-09-2017, 08:55 AM
  4. Since you guys like proof..
    By LoneStarHorse in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 01-08-2016, 01:03 PM
  5. Proof Casino's 'rig' machines
    By OceanCityMD in forum Whatever's On Your Mind
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-03-2012, 12:08 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •