Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 92

Thread: A Note From Alan

  1. #61
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    The worst thing is you PMed me about this rigged machine downtown and blah blah and I actually thought you had credibility. I now regret repeating that story to others where I come across as "I have it on good authority" with what is likely a at best 50/50 story.
    I will respond to this, but I don't want to hijack Alan's thread, so if you feel the need to continue, please start a different thread or discussion.

    I did not PM you. YOU PMed me asking for the info. When I KNOW a casino is cheating, I will name them as I did with El Cortez. If I have not proven it to myself beyond any reasonable doubt I will not name a casino but still may share my experiences and concerns. This is what occurred with the 2 downtown casinos. You immediately PMed me asking for the names, which I provided. Again this was based on my experiences. I no longer have time, to investigate such incidents like I did with El Cortez, tracking some 200 shoes, to satisfy myself. beyond a reasonable doubt. Now if I feel a game isn't on the up and up, like I do with the 2 unnamed downtown properties (especially one), I just remove them from my rotation and move on. Plenty of fish in the sea. I am not here to investigate who is cheating. I just share my experiences.

    This is big difference. I did not PM you pushing some cheating conspiracy, YOU contacted me and I gave you what info I had (based on my experiences).

    If I am not mistaken you also PMed me another time, with questions about a specific count. I answered best I could. I am always happy to answer anything I can, but don't make it seem as though I PMed you pushing any idea.

  2. #62
    My friend at the NSA redirected a surveillance satellite to confirm that was kewlJ's residence.

  3. #63
    Are you guys serious? Are you not living in 2022? I am not very tech savy, but jeez, at least I know what exits, just not always how to use it.

    There is EXIF data encoded on every picture. That data will tell you the co-ordinates of where that picture was taken. But I don't believe that is what happened in this case. In this case there is also some technology, I am sorry I don't know the name that can take any picture taken of outdoor objects or scenery and reverse or spin that image to show where the picture originated, possibly using google maps or images. That is what was used in this instance, if I am not mistaken.

  4. #64
    Originally Posted by kewlJ View Post
    Are you guys serious? Are you not living in 2022? I am not very tech savy, but jeez, at least I know what exits, just not always how to use it.

    There is EXIF data encoded on every picture. That data will tell you the co-ordinates of where that picture was taken. But I don't believe that is what happened in this case. In this case there is also some technology, I am sorry I don't know the name that can take any picture taken of outdoor objects or scenery and reverse or spin that image to show where the picture originated, possibly using google maps or images. That is what was used in this instance, if I am not mistaken.
    FYI you are mistaken.

    You are literally suggesting data can just be poofed up out of thin air. Reverse an image to see where the picture originated? God could do that..... most likely.

    BTW ignore smurgerburger. Dude has unlikely redirected NSA satellites yet clearly very possible. Nothing would surprise me these days but never will there be such a tool as what you have suggested.

    Anyway, I bow out of Alan's thread like requested.
    It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"

  5. #65
    Please keep the conversation here. I think it's interesting and a diversion that I need.

    I think just using a good guess you can take any photo and come to a close approximation of where it was taken.

    When "live remote shots" are "beamed" to satellites and remote receiving towers our "live truck engineers" will frequently guess at where to point the transmitter signal. Then the receiving engineer will fine tune the sender's signal. This doesnt take spy equipment. It's done all the time.

    So yes, someone could easily have taken one of Kewlj's photos and backed it up to estimate where it was taken.

    I vividly remember doing a live shot from Miami Beach with the engineer shooting the signal thru the living room window of one apartment in a high rise building to hit the receiving tower in downtown Miami ten miles away. All it took was a good guess.

  6. #66
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    So yes, someone could easily have taken one of Kewlj's photos and backed it up to estimate where it was taken.
    Could have been. Someone suggested that there was technology that can do that. I don't know for sure. I am not that tech savy. Either way, the bigger point was there is no benefit to posting pictures for someone like me. As recent events have shown there are "those" looking for anything they can use to harm me.

  7. #67
    Common sense would eliminate 270-degrees of where a photo was taken from. That leaves 90 degrees and then just examine the angle on some point in the photo and you could narrow it down to 5 degrees. Then look around for possible locations for the camera. You can rule out thin air, the middle of freeways, chimneys, etc.

    It's not rocket science.

  8. #68
    I thought it over. Its simple geometry.

    Give me a magnifier to examine the photo then give me a laser pointer and some sort of lift or ladder and I'll tell you where the photo was taken.

    And you won't need the CSI crime lab.

    LOL

  9. #69
    Alan I feel we have gotten away what is important in life in these other threads about total nonsense.

    Are things going better? The same? I hope all is well.
    It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"

  10. #70
    It could take another 6 weeks before we know if the latest stem cell transplant worked. She had it about two weeks ago.

  11. #71
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    It could take another 6 weeks before we know if the latest stem cell transplant worked. She had it about two weeks ago.
    Wishing her the best, Alan. Is she currently hospitalized?

  12. #72
    No. She is back to being an outpatient but still needs blood transfusions and platelet infusions two to three times a week.

    If the stem cell transplant takes hold then she wouldn't need the blood products.

    They gave her an 8 week window.

    There are enuf stem cells for one more transplant.

    I dont know if I mentioned this but the transplant does not involve surgery. The stem cells are given during a transfusion and then the stem cells find their way into the bones to create blood.

    Right now she is not creating her own blood.

  13. #73
    Originally Posted by Alan Mendelson View Post
    No. She is back to being an outpatient but still needs blood transfusions and platelet infusions two to three times a week.

    If the stem cell transplant takes hold then she wouldn't need the blood products.

    They gave her an 8 week window.

    There are enuf stem cells for one more transplant.

    I dont know if I mentioned this but the transplant does not involve surgery. The stem cells are given during a transfusion and then the stem cells find their way into the bones to create blood.

    Right now she is not creating her own blood.

    Got it. This is a whole new treatment realm. It's great that it's done by transfusion. Does the infusion create any immediate discernible effects for her, or does it take weeks for any improvement to show?

  14. #74
    She has had partial success from two previous stem cell transplants but then they failed.

  15. #75
    It's like you have to hope the treatment fixes you before it kills you with all this pharma stuff.
    Has she tried any alternative medicine treatment along with traditional medicine?

  16. #76
    One week without blood transfusions and she'll die.

  17. #77
    Originally Posted by MaxPen View Post
    It's like you have to hope the treatment fixes you before it kills you with all this pharma stuff.
    Has she tried any alternative medicine treatment along with traditional medicine?
    Seconding MaxPen

    Alan, if you have nothing else to lose. Please try Ivermectin an alternative medicine treatment for Janet's condition.

    From the National Institute of Health PubMed system (yes, we pay taxpayer funds for this research. There is a lot of great information on there.)

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7505114/

    Per the article:


    2.4. Hematological cancer
    Leukemia is a type of malignant clonal disease caused by abnormal hematopoietic stem cells [52]. In an experiment designed to screen potential drugs for the treatment of leukemia, IVM preferentially killed leukemia cells at low concentrations without affecting normal hematopoietic cells [51]. The mechanism was related to the increase in the influx of chloride ions into the cell by IVM, resulting in hyperpolarization of the plasma membrane and induction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. It was also proven that IVM has a synergistic effect with cytarabine and daunorubicin on the treatment of leukemia. Wang's experiment found that IVM could selectively induce mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress, causing chronic myeloid leukemia K562 cells to undergo increased caspase-dependent apoptosis compared with normal bone marrow cells [53]. It was also confirmed that IVM inhibited tumor growth in a dose-dependent manner, and dasatinib had improved efficacy.

  18. #78
    Janet's Leukemia is controlled. The problem is her marrow hasn't recovered and she's not producing her own blood.

    In order to stop the leukemia she had heavy chemo. The chemo destroyed the cells that were infected with leukemia but now they're not recovering.

  19. #79
    What were the chances that the blood cells would recover after such drastic treatment?
    What, Me Worry?

  20. #80
    Originally Posted by MisterV View Post
    What were the chances that the blood cells would recover after such drastic treatment?
    The chances that she would survive two years after diagnosis were given as less than 40% and it's been now 18 months.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Note on American Horse racing
    By redietz in forum Sports & Sportsbetting
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-29-2021, 03:09 PM
  2. Masters Futures and Promo Note
    By redietz in forum Sports & Sportsbetting
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-06-2018, 07:40 PM
  3. Quick Note on Election Odds
    By redietz in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 11-09-2016, 05:53 PM
  4. Quick Note on Trump
    By redietz in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-24-2016, 02:46 PM
  5. Video Poker Note
    By redietz in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 266
    Last Post: 02-04-2016, 03:05 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •