Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 21 to 26 of 26

Thread: Employing Stop Wins and Loss Goals

  1. #21
    Originally Posted by Rob.Singer View Post
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    Originally Posted by redietz View Post
    Man, I hope coach has better gotchas than this. I thought biggest bullshitter had something to do with personal history and personal claims to have done this, that or the other. Gambling claims. Claims of personal history details. Things like MDawg winning 50 of 52 sessions at a negative game or Singer with his systems and double up claims. Or me claiming to have won the Heritage Race to the Super Bowl or having the Rams at 300-1 and the Titans at 35-1 to win the SB the year they met in the SB. Or having documented records against the spread, or winning 17 consecutive spread games, or things like that.

    This other stuff -- I'll get things wrong all the time. Everybody does. Like I thought Michael Osterholm's pandemic death estimates were high, and they turned out to be slightly low. Or I thought the CDC/FDA/government interface would be more honest under Biden than Trump, and I was wrong. I get things wrong all the time. I have Patrick Reed at 35-1 to win a golf tournament this weekend. I'll get that wrong, in all likelihood. I thought bullshitting was personal aggrandizing and all that. Gilding the personal historic lilly. I didn't know bullshitting was a list of things you get wrong. Hell, I just learned, during the pandemic, that prunes should be refrigerated after you open them. I got that wrong, I'll tell you. I was eating from a package of unrefrigerated prunes for six months!

    LOL. I just looked up the urban dictionary definition of bullshitting. "A writing technique in which the user bases an entire piece of writing, often an essay, around a single and often small, irrelevant and/or useless piece of information."

    My God, man, that sounds like a definition of coach. He's the very definition of bullshitter! Don't take my word for it. Look it up in the urban dictionary. Congrats, coach, If you send them your pic, they might put it right in there next to the definition.
    He is a total clown who is not worth interacting with.

    He literally thinks words are equivalent because the synonym section exists in online dictionaries.

    Going off his dumfukin logic, most words mean the same thing. 6 degrees of separation or whatever.

    At least Rob Singer is amusing with his daily spazztarding on here.

    Coachbelly isn't worth trying understand with his particular mental dysfunction. He's a total no one outside of being a gambling forum troll. Not funny. Not likeable. No one defends him on any level.

    Total fucking resource thief. Not worth the electricity or drive-space required to host his messages.

    I'd say air-thief but it is possible he's done something useful in life..... who the fuck knows

    pathetic
    More and more, it appears coach easily achieves his intended results every time he spots what certain bs-prone posters believe are their hidden inconsistencies. The only negative I see here is in how he elicits so many long-winded weird and rambling replies from redietz, as he struggles so valiantly to regain his honor. And then, of course, we get treated to the usual pat on the back of the back from the perpetual entertainment-seeking AQ, who never does seem to get it right.
    Entertainment I do seek, but what I said about Coach is true. The guy is an idiot. He based his whole argument of words being equivalent because they're listed as synonyms in a dictionary.

    It is true that he could be more wrong, yes.
    It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"

  2. #22
    The fact that the judge used a WLS proferred by the claimant to impeach the claimant's other evidence does not mean the WLS can be used as uncorroborated evidence to prove that it is accurate.
    What, Me Worry?

  3. #23
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    He based his whole argument of words being equivalent because they're listed as synonyms in a dictionary.
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    This is like 'quitting' vs 'pausing'. They're not the same either.
    You're obviously hung up on the notion that quitting and pausing cannot be equivalent.

    Of course they can be equivalent, in context, that's why they are listed as synonyms.

    Quitting time, quit for the day, quit while ahead...none of these phrases denotes or requires permanence.

    Wise up....and quit your bitching, cunt.

  4. #24
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    He based his whole argument of words being equivalent because they're listed as synonyms in a dictionary.
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    This is like 'quitting' vs 'pausing'. They're not the same either.
    You're obviously hung up on the notion that quitting and pausing cannot be equivalent.

    Of course they can be equivalent, in context, that's why they are listed as synonyms.

    Quitting time, quit for the day, quit while ahead...none of these phrases denotes or requires permanence.

    Wise up....and quit your bitching, cunt.
    Hung up? I'm not arguing with the imbecile. I'm telling people to ignore him. I've seen many others express this opinion but never paid much attention to him until recently.
    It is official. Redietz will never be on Dan Druff's podcast. "too much integrity"

  5. #25
    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    Originally Posted by coach belly View Post

    Originally Posted by accountinquestion View Post
    This is like 'quitting' vs 'pausing'. They're not the same either.
    You're obviously hung up on the notion that quitting and pausing cannot be equivalent.

    Of course they can be equivalent, in context, that's why they are listed as synonyms.

    Quitting time, quit for the day, quit while ahead...none of these phrases denotes or requires permanence.

    Wise up....and quit your bitching, cunt.
    Hung up? I'm not arguing with the imbecile. I'm telling people to ignore him. I've seen many others express this opinion but never paid much attention to him until recently.
    LOL...are you punch-drunk?...you don't even know where you are.

  6. #26
    I fear that if any casino execs browse through the recent threads here that the jig may be up.

    They will tell their surveillance departments to be on look out for people who quit while ahead through stop wins and people who quit while behind through stop losses.

    By only looking at the people who quit while ahead and the people who quit while behind, they will be able to rapidly isolate anyone using this strategy.

    A possible counter measure to this is that instead of quitting when you are ahead or behind, just set your watch forward one day and reset your stop loss or stop win back to zero. Lock in the previous profit or loss as if it happened yesterday and play a brand new session.

    This will make you much tougher to spot.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 50
    Last Post: 09-05-2016, 08:05 PM
  2. Replies: 63
    Last Post: 01-26-2016, 07:20 AM
  3. Use of Win Goals and Stop Losses
    By Alan Mendelson in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 98
    Last Post: 05-18-2015, 06:21 PM
  4. Win Goals/Stop Losses: Basic Facts
    By redietz in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 58
    Last Post: 04-16-2013, 08:18 PM
  5. What about loss goals?
    By slingshot in forum Las Vegas
    Replies: 100
    Last Post: 05-08-2012, 09:30 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •